vault backup: 2026-09-22 17:42:28
This commit is contained in:
parent
38d5eec140
commit
5b12b43bb6
130 changed files with 821 additions and 367 deletions
|
|
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ The American International Association for Economic and Social Development (AIA)
|
|||
|
||||
The American International Association for Economic and Social Development was established by Nelson Rockefeller in 1946, alongside his for-profit IBEC (International Basic Economy Corporation). The two entities were designed to work in tandem: IBEC pursued commercial ventures while AIA conducted philanthropic and technical-assistance programs that would improve conditions for IBEC's market operations. Both were based at Rockefeller's [[Room 5600]] offices at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in New York.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
AIA's early programs focused on [[Brazil]] and [[Venezuela]], the two countries where the Rockefeller family had the deepest oil and investment interests. In Venezuela, AIA worked alongside state governments and the oil companies, including Rockefeller's [[Creole Petroleum]], on agricultural credit and rural development. By the early 1950s, Venezuelan state governments and the oil companies began withdrawing from AIA programs as the [[Marcos Perez Jimenez]] dictatorship deteriorated political conditions.
|
||||
AIA's early programs focused on [[Brazil]] and [[Venezuela]], the two countries where the [[Rockefeller family]] had the deepest oil and investment interests. In Venezuela, AIA worked alongside state governments and the oil companies, including Rockefeller's [[Creole Petroleum]], on agricultural credit and rural development. By the early 1950s, Venezuelan state governments and the oil companies began withdrawing from AIA programs as the [[Marcos Perez Jimenez]] dictatorship deteriorated political conditions.
|
||||
|
||||
### Brazil Operations
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
aliases:
|
||||
- American Institute for Free Labor Development
|
||||
category: "Private Organization"
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Organization
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ updated: 2026-09-22
|
|||
|
||||
Accumenics, Inc., a maker of litigation-support software, was acquired by [[Hadron]], the company controlled by [[Earl Brian]], together with SIMCON Inc., a police-software firm. In the telephone call of April 1983 that [[Bill Hamilton]] attributed to Hadron's chairman [[Dominic Laiti]], the purchases were explained as part of a strategy "to become the leading vendor in the United States of software for law enforcement and courts," the ambition behind Laiti's offer to buy [[INSLAW]] and its [[PROMIS]] software.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
Hamilton's affidavit in the INSLAW litigation alleged that [[James L. Byrnes]], a deputy assistant attorney general with "close ties to [[Edwin Meese|Meese]]," "spearheaded the award by DOJ in October 1987 to a Hadron subsidiary of a 40 million dollar computer services contract for litigation support" in the Land and Natural Resources Division. Byrnes told the investigators of the special counsel [[Nicholas J. Bua]] that he had transferred to that division in November 1987, a month after the alleged award, that he was unaware of any such contract and did not know whether one had ever been made, that he had no knowledge of or contact with Hadron, [[Simeon]] or Accumenics, and that his relationship with Meese was the ordinary one of a [[Department of Justice]] official. Bua's report treats the dollar figure and date as unconfirmed and the Byrnes connection as unsupported. The contract is distinct from Project Eagle, the department's litigation-automation program whose 30-million-dollar systems contract went to Tisoft, Inc., in January 1986, and which INSLAW separately theorized had been intended for Hadron.[^1]
|
||||
Hamilton's affidavit in the INSLAW litigation alleged that [[James L. Byrnes]], a deputy assistant attorney general with "close ties to [[Edwin Meese|Meese]]," "spearheaded the award by DOJ in October 1987 to a Hadron subsidiary of a 40 million dollar computer services contract for litigation support" in the Land and Natural Resources Division. Byrnes told the investigators of the special counsel [[Nicholas J. Bua]] that he had transferred to that division in November 1987, a month after the alleged award, that he was unaware of any such contract and did not know whether one had ever been made, that he had no knowledge of or contact with Hadron, [[Simeon]] or Accumenics, and that his relationship with Meese was the ordinary one of a [[Department of Justice]] official. Bua's report treats the dollar figure and date as unconfirmed and the Byrnes connection as unsupported. The contract is distinct from [[Project Eagle]], the department's litigation-automation program whose 30-million-dollar systems contract went to Tisoft, Inc., in January 1986, and which INSLAW separately theorized had been intended for Hadron.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
### Footnotes
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ end: 1976-12-31
|
|||
location: "Washington, DC"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Air America was a CIA proprietary airline that provided covert transportation services during the Vietnam War, trafficking heroin out of the Golden Triangle region. Its personnel and aviation infrastructure later reappeared in the Contra supply chain during the 1980s, illustrating the continuity of CIA covert aviation from Southeast Asia to Central America.[^1][^2]
|
||||
Air America was a CIA proprietary airline that provided covert transportation services during the [[Vietnam War]], trafficking heroin out of the Golden Triangle region. Its personnel and aviation infrastructure later reappeared in the Contra supply chain during the 1980s, illustrating the continuity of CIA covert aviation from Southeast Asia to Central America.[^1][^2]
|
||||
|
||||
### The Finders Connection
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ updated: 2026-09-22
|
|||
|
||||
Allen and Company is the [[New York City]] investment bank of the Allen family. In September 1983 [[Dominic Laiti]], chairman of [[Hadron]], the company controlled by [[Earl Brian]], and [[Paul Wormeli]], vice president of its public-safety software subsidiary [[Simeon]], went to New York to raise capital for Simeon and met at the bank's offices with the executive [[Mark Kesselman]] and "a young man whose last name was Allen." Kesselman later visited Simeon's Northern Virginia offices; he told the investigators of the special counsel [[Nicholas J. Bua]] that he had been asked by [[Charles Allen]] to assist Allen's nephew [[Nathaniel Kramer]] in the analysis, and that he left the firm in February 1984. [[Bill Hamilton]] of [[INSLAW]] held that the trip's purpose was the acquisition of INSLAW and its [[PROMIS]] software; Bua's investigators concluded the thesis was "incorrect."[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
About 1985 or 1986 the bank bought 7.8 percent of the stock of [[SCT|Systems and Computer Technology]] on behalf of an unnamed third party. INSLAW cited the purchase, in its rebuttal to Bua's report, as evidence that Brian was secretly behind SCT's attempted hostile purchase of INSLAW in 1986. The Justice Department's 1994 review rejected the inference as unsupported and noted that on INSLAW's own theory Brian by then already controlled the enhanced PROMIS and was selling it abroad, leaving him no motive to buy the company. Neither the Bua report nor the House Judiciary Committee's report connects the bank to the financing of Brian's later Infotechnology, Financial News Network and United Press International ventures, which collapsed in 1991.[^1][^2]
|
||||
About 1985 or 1986 the bank bought 7.8 percent of the stock of [[SCT|Systems and Computer Technology]] on behalf of an unnamed third party. INSLAW cited the purchase, in its rebuttal to Bua's report, as evidence that Brian was secretly behind SCT's attempted hostile purchase of INSLAW in 1986. The Justice Department's 1994 review rejected the inference as unsupported and noted that on INSLAW's own theory Brian by then already controlled the enhanced PROMIS and was selling it abroad, leaving him no motive to buy the company. Neither the Bua report nor the House Judiciary Committee's report connects the bank to the financing of Brian's later Infotechnology, [[Financial News Network]] and [[United Press International]] ventures, which collapsed in 1991.[^1][^2]
|
||||
|
||||
### Footnotes
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ created: 2026-06-05
|
|||
updated: 2026-06-05
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Chase Manhattan Bank was the principal financial vehicle through which the Rockefeller family exercised economic leverage in [[Latin America]] during the Cold War. Under [[David Rockefeller]], who joined the bank in 1946, served as president from 1961, and chaired it from 1969 to 1981, Chase became the dominant US commercial bank in the hemisphere, holding major loans to Brazilian industry, financing trade across the region, and using its credit policies as an instrument of political pressure during the destabilization of nationalist governments.
|
||||
Chase Manhattan Bank was the principal financial vehicle through which the [[Rockefeller family]] exercised economic leverage in [[Latin America]] during the Cold War. Under [[David Rockefeller]], who joined the bank in 1946, served as president from 1961, and chaired it from 1969 to 1981, Chase became the dominant US commercial bank in the hemisphere, holding major loans to Brazilian industry, financing trade across the region, and using its credit policies as an instrument of political pressure during the destabilization of nationalist governments.
|
||||
|
||||
### Formation and Rockefeller Control
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,13 +26,13 @@ Hamilton alleged that [[James L. Byrnes]], a Deputy Assistant Attorney General w
|
|||
|
||||
INSLAW alleged a connection between [[Peter Videnieks]], DOJ's PROMIS contracting officer, and Hadron, claiming Videnieks had administered Customs Service contracts with Hadron. While a witness suggested a possible meeting between Videnieks and Laiti, Videnieks denied being the contracting officer for any Hadron contract or meeting Hadron management. The Special Counsel found no evidence of a conspiracy, concluding any connection was "tenuous and insignificant."[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
Hamilton alleged that Systems and Computer Technology, Inc. (SCT)'s 1986 attempt to purchase INSLAW was encouraged by DOJ officials and indirectly linked to Brian. The Special Counsel found no evidence supporting these claims, noting that SCT's contacts with DOJ were for due diligence purposes only.[^2]
|
||||
Hamilton alleged that [[SCT|Systems and Computer Technology, Inc.]] (SCT)'s 1986 attempt to purchase INSLAW was encouraged by DOJ officials and indirectly linked to Brian. The Special Counsel found no evidence supporting these claims, noting that SCT's contacts with DOJ were for due diligence purposes only.[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
[[Lois Battistoni]] claimed an unnamed DOJ employee told her that Hadron was connected to a top DOJ official and had been chosen to take over INSLAW's business. The Special Counsel found Battistoni's account unreliable and without corroboration.[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
### Congressional and Official Findings
|
||||
|
||||
The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations found "no proof of any connection between [[Earl Brian]] or Hadron and the Department with regard to the INSLAW contract" in its September 1989 report.[^3] The House Judiciary Committee's September 1992 report described Brian's alleged role in connection with Hadron as "intriguing...but without the requisite degree of causation," raising circumstantial concerns while stopping short of a direct finding.[^1] The Special Counsel's report concluded that the evidence overwhelmingly showed no connection between Hadron and anything related to INSLAW or PROMIS, and that individuals claiming direct knowledge were "unworthy of belief" and contradicted by credible evidence.[^2]
|
||||
The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations found "no proof of any connection between Earl Brian or Hadron and the Department with regard to the INSLAW contract" in its September 1989 report.[^3] The House Judiciary Committee's September 1992 report described Brian's alleged role in connection with Hadron as "intriguing...but without the requisite degree of causation," raising circumstantial concerns while stopping short of a direct finding.[^1] The Special Counsel's report concluded that the evidence overwhelmingly showed no connection between Hadron and anything related to INSLAW or PROMIS, and that individuals claiming direct knowledge were "unworthy of belief" and contradicted by credible evidence.[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
### Footnotes
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ created: 2026-06-05
|
|||
updated: 2026-06-05
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
The International Basic Economy Corporation (IBEC) was a private corporation founded by [[Nelson Rockefeller]] in 1947, the year after he was fired from the State Department, as the commercial successor to his wartime [[CIAA]] operations. IBEC combined Rockefeller family investment objectives with a development philosophy that made profitable enterprises out of the agricultural, food processing, and basic goods sectors of Latin American economies, sectors that the CIAA had prepared during the war years. IBEC operated in Venezuela, Brazil, Peru, Colombia, and elsewhere, and was paired with its sister nonprofit, the [[AIA]] (American International Association for Economic and Social Development), in a structure that blended private profit with public development legitimacy.[^1]
|
||||
The International Basic Economy Corporation (IBEC) was a private corporation founded by [[Nelson Rockefeller]] in 1947, the year after he was fired from the State Department, as the commercial successor to his wartime [[CIAA]] operations. IBEC combined [[Rockefeller family]] investment objectives with a development philosophy that made profitable enterprises out of the agricultural, food processing, and basic goods sectors of Latin American economies, sectors that the CIAA had prepared during the war years. IBEC operated in Venezuela, Brazil, Peru, Colombia, and elsewhere, and was paired with its sister nonprofit, the [[AIA]] (American International Association for Economic and Social Development), in a structure that blended private profit with public development legitimacy.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
### Origins and Philosophy
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -48,13 +48,13 @@ Senior District Judge [[William Bryant, Jr.|William Bryant]] of the district cou
|
|||
|
||||
The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) issued a report in September 1989 finding "no proof" that [[Lowell Jensen]] and [[Edwin Meese]] had conspired to ruin INSLAW or steal its software. The Senate report nonetheless found that DOJ official Thomas Stanton had improperly sought special handling for INSLAW's bankruptcy and criticized the Department for placing Brewer in charge of the implementation contract given his prior employment by INSLAW.[^3]
|
||||
|
||||
The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Representative [[Jack Brooks]], conducted a three-year investigation from 1989 to 1992. Its September 1992 report (House Report 102-857) found "strong evidence...that the Department of Justice 'acted willfully and fraudulently,' and 'took, converted and stole,' Inslaw's Enhanced PROMIS by 'trickery fraud and deceit.'" A key basis for this conclusion was testimony from Deputy Attorney General [[Arnold Burns]], who had told DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility in 1986 that INSLAW's proprietary rights claim was "legitimate" and that the government "would probably lose the case in court on this issue," yet DOJ continued litigating against INSLAW for another decade.[^1]
|
||||
The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Representative [[Jack Brooks]], conducted a three-year investigation from 1989 to 1992. Its September 1992 report (House Report 102-857) found "strong evidence...that the Department of Justice 'acted willfully and fraudulently,' and 'took, converted and stole,' Inslaw's Enhanced PROMIS by 'trickery fraud and deceit.'" A key basis for this conclusion was testimony from Deputy Attorney General Arnold Burns, who had told DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility in 1986 that INSLAW's proprietary rights claim was "legitimate" and that the government "would probably lose the case in court on this issue," yet DOJ continued litigating against INSLAW for another decade.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
Special Counsel [[Nicholas J. Bua]] issued a 267-page report in March 1993 finding no credible evidence that any DOJ official had committed criminal wrongdoing in connection with the INSLAW matter. The Senate subsequently referred INSLAW's remaining claims to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in May 1995. Judge [[Christine Odell Cook Miller|Christine Miller]] ruled on July 31, 1997, that all versions of PROMIS were in the public domain and that the government had always been entitled to use the software as it wished. A three-judge Review Panel upheld that ruling in August 1998. INSLAW received no compensation from the federal government.[^2][^6]
|
||||
Special Counsel Nicholas J. Bua issued a 267-page report in March 1993 finding no credible evidence that any DOJ official had committed criminal wrongdoing in connection with the INSLAW matter. The Senate subsequently referred INSLAW's remaining claims to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in May 1995. Judge [[Christine Odell Cook Miller|Christine Miller]] ruled on July 31, 1997, that all versions of PROMIS were in the public domain and that the government had always been entitled to use the software as it wished. A three-judge Review Panel upheld that ruling in August 1998. INSLAW received no compensation from the federal government.[^2][^6]
|
||||
|
||||
### FBI Systems Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
In mid-1979, the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] sought congressional approval for acquisition of a new front-end processor, a communications controller device that manages data flows into and out of a central computer. To evaluate the request, the Senate Judiciary Committee commissioned independent technical analyses from both the [[OTA|Office of Technology Assessment]] and INSLAW. INSLAW's involvement in this evaluation demonstrated the organization's recognized expertise in criminal justice information systems during the period preceding the DOJ contract dispute.[^7]
|
||||
In mid-1979, the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] sought congressional approval for acquisition of a new front-end processor, a communications controller device that manages data flows into and out of a central computer. To evaluate the request, the [[Senate Judiciary Committee]] commissioned independent technical analyses from both the [[OTA|Office of Technology Assessment]] and INSLAW. INSLAW's involvement in this evaluation demonstrated the organization's recognized expertise in criminal justice information systems during the period preceding the DOJ contract dispute.[^7]
|
||||
|
||||
### Later Operations
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -16,8 +16,9 @@ created: 2026-09-22
|
|||
updated: 2026-09-22
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Patricof and Company, formally Allen Patricof and Associates and known in the special counsel's report as APA, was a New York venture capital firm that managed several funds, among them [[53rd Street Ventures]], formed about 1976. [[Jonathan Ben Cnaan]], a native of [[Israel]] employed at the firm from 1981 to 1987, managed the funds and about 1982 made the firm's first investment in [[INSLAW]], 100,000 dollars through 53rd Street Ventures, describing himself to the investigators of [[Nicholas J. Bua]] as a "follower" investor with no active role in the negotiations. [[Patricia Cloherty]] worked at the firm from about 1970 to 1977, left for the Small Business Administration under [[Jimmy Carter]], ran [[Tessler & Cloherty|Tessler and Cloherty]] with her husband [[Daniel Tessler]] through the 1980s, during which that firm took over the 53rd Street fund in 1984, and returned to Patricof and Company in February 1988. Neither the House Judiciary Committee nor Bua found any wrongdoing by the firm, which entered the [[PROMIS Software Scandal|INSLAW affair]] only through its stake in the company and the handoff of the fund to the Tesslers, whose dealings with [[Bill Hamilton]] in December 1984 became the subject of his affidavit.[^1]
|
||||
Patricof and Company, formally Allen Patricof and Associates and known in the special counsel's report as APA, was a New York venture capital firm founded in 1969 as Patricof & Co. Ventures by [[Alan Patricof]], later renamed Apax Partners.[^2] It managed several funds, among them [[53rd Street Ventures]], formed about 1976. [[Jonathan Ben Cnaan]], a native of [[Israel]] employed at the firm from 1981 to 1987, managed the funds and about 1982 made the firm's first investment in [[INSLAW]], 100,000 dollars through 53rd Street Ventures, describing himself to the investigators of [[Nicholas J. Bua]] as a "follower" investor with no active role in the negotiations. [[Patricia Cloherty]] worked at the firm from about 1970 to 1977, left for the Small Business Administration under [[Jimmy Carter]], ran [[Tessler & Cloherty|Tessler and Cloherty]] with her husband [[Daniel Tessler]] through the 1980s, during which that firm took over the 53rd Street fund in 1984, and returned to Patricof and Company in February 1988. Neither the House Judiciary Committee nor Bua found any wrongdoing by the firm, which entered the [[PROMIS Software Scandal|INSLAW affair]] only through its stake in the company and the handoff of the fund to the Tesslers, whose dealings with [[Bill Hamilton]] in December 1984 became the subject of his affidavit.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
### Footnotes
|
||||
|
||||
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice. *Report of Special Counsel Nicholas J. Bua to the Attorney General of the United States Regarding the Allegations of Inslaw, Inc.,* March 1993, interviews of Jonathan Ben Cnaan, Daniel Tessler and Patricia Cloherty. https://archive.org/details/InslawPROMISBuaReport The identity of the firm's founder with the venture capitalist Alan J. Patricof is inferred from the firm's name and was not separately verified.
|
||||
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice. *Report of Special Counsel Nicholas J. Bua to the Attorney General of the United States Regarding the Allegations of Inslaw, Inc.,* March 1993, interviews of Jonathan Ben Cnaan, Daniel Tessler and Patricia Cloherty. https://archive.org/details/InslawPROMISBuaReport
|
||||
[^2]: Boston Properties, Inc. Definitive proxy statement (Schedule 14A), filed March 29, 2002, director biography of Alan J. Patricof. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1037540/000092701602001770/ddef14a.txt
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ The panels produced a series of influential reports between 1958 and 1961, colle
|
|||
|
||||
### Panel IV: National Security (Kissinger)
|
||||
|
||||
Panel IV on national security was chaired by Henry Kissinger, then a Harvard faculty member who had worked on earlier Rockefeller-sponsored studies. The panel's work on nuclear strategy and limited war doctrine reflected the Rockefeller family's long-standing interest in "flexible response" military capabilities as an alternative to massive nuclear retaliation.
|
||||
Panel IV on national security was chaired by Henry Kissinger, then a Harvard faculty member who had worked on earlier Rockefeller-sponsored studies. The panel's work on nuclear strategy and limited war doctrine reflected the [[Rockefeller family]]'s long-standing interest in "flexible response" military capabilities as an alternative to massive nuclear retaliation.
|
||||
|
||||
Kissinger's panel work through the RBF gave him the intellectual platform and Rockefeller family connections that launched his career as a foreign policy adviser. After the Special Studies Project, Kissinger continued to serve as Nelson Rockefeller's foreign policy consultant through the 1960s.[^3]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
aliases:
|
||||
- Systems and Computer Technology
|
||||
- Systems and Computer Technology, Inc.
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- Organization
|
||||
category: "Private Organization"
|
||||
summary: "Systems and Computer Technology, Inc. ('SCT') was a company involved in an alleged attempt to purchase Inslaw Corporation in early 1986."
|
||||
---
|
||||
Systems and Computer Technology, Inc. ("SCT") was a company involved in an alleged attempt to purchase [[INSLAW|Inslaw]] in early 1986. [[Bill Hamilton]]'s affidavit described this as a "hostile" effort, alleging that in "late 1985" [[Department of Justice|DOJ]] officials met with SCT representatives to "encourage" the SCT takeover of [[INSLAW]]. Hamilton also suggested an indirect link between [[Earl Brian]] and SCT, claiming that the investment firm [[Allen and Company]] bought 7.8% of SCT stock on behalf of an unnamed third party, and that one of the law firms that worked for Earl Brian also worked for SCT.[^1]
|
||||
Systems and Computer Technology, Inc. ("SCT") was a company involved in an alleged attempt to purchase [[INSLAW|Inslaw]] in early 1986. [[Bill Hamilton]]'s affidavit described this as a "hostile" effort, alleging that in "late 1985" [[Department of Justice|DOJ]] officials met with SCT representatives to "encourage" the SCT takeover of INSLAW. Hamilton also suggested an indirect link between [[Earl Brian]] and SCT, claiming that the investment firm [[Allen and Company]] bought 7.8% of SCT stock on behalf of an unnamed third party, and that one of the law firms that worked for Earl Brian also worked for SCT.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
The Special Counsel's investigation found little evidence to support these allegations. It noted that by late 1985, Inslaw's implementation contract with the DOJ was terminated, and the DOJ was beginning to self-install [[PROMIS]]. Furthermore, Inslaw claimed that by 1985, Earl Brian had already obtained enhanced PROMIS and was selling it globally, which would negate any apparent reason for Brian or Hadron to attempt to control Inslaw through SCT in 1986. The investigation interviewed SCT officers and employees involved in the effort to purchase Inslaw, who stated that they approached Hamilton about a possible purchase, and he was initially receptive but later rejected the offer. They also confirmed that their only contacts with DOJ officials occurred during their due diligence, to understand Inslaw's disputes with the DOJ and the possibility of Inslaw obtaining additional contract work if SCT purchased Inslaw. None of the SCT employees had any knowledge of a DOJ effort to encourage the purchase or any connection between Earl Brian and SCT. The Special Counsel concluded that none of the evidence supported the allegation that the DOJ encouraged SCT to buy Inslaw, or that Earl Brian had any connection to the SCT effort.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ SRI's role in the early network extended past the first connection. From 1972 th
|
|||
|
||||
### The 1970 Separation and Later Work
|
||||
|
||||
During the Vietnam War, student activists at Stanford protested the university's ties to SRI, whose contracts included classified military and counterinsurgency research, arguing that the relationship made the university part of the military-industrial complex. After demonstrations in the spring of 1969, including a sit-in at the SRI building and tear-gassing of protesters near the site in May 1969, the Stanford trustees voted to sever the institute, and SRI became a fully independent nonprofit in 1970, taking the name SRI International in 1977.[^1][^2] Its Artificial Intelligence Center, founded in 1966, built Shakey, the first mobile robot able to reason about its own actions, between 1966 and 1972; decades later the center's DARPA-funded CALO project spun off the company Siri in 2007, which Apple acquired in 2010.[^2]
|
||||
During the [[Vietnam War]], student activists at Stanford protested the university's ties to SRI, whose contracts included classified military and counterinsurgency research, arguing that the relationship made the university part of the military-industrial complex. After demonstrations in the spring of 1969, including a sit-in at the SRI building and tear-gassing of protesters near the site in May 1969, the Stanford trustees voted to sever the institute, and SRI became a fully independent nonprofit in 1970, taking the name SRI International in 1977.[^1][^2] Its Artificial Intelligence Center, founded in 1966, built Shakey, the first mobile robot able to reason about its own actions, between 1966 and 1972; decades later the center's DARPA-funded CALO project spun off the company Siri in 2007, which Apple acquired in 2010.[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
### The Remote-Viewing Program
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ end: 1986-11-01
|
|||
location: "United States"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
The Enterprise was the informal name given by [[Oliver North]] and other participants to the private covert operations network that conducted the two interlocking elements of the [[Iran-Contra Affair]]: the sale of American weapons to [[Iran]] and the resupply of the Nicaraguan [[Contras]] during the period when Congressional [[Boland Amendment]] prohibitions barred U.S. government agencies from providing the Contras with military assistance. The Enterprise was organized by [[Richard Secord]], a retired Air Force major general, and [[Albert Hakim]], an Iranian-born American arms dealer, through a network of corporate entities that held accounts, purchased weapons, and managed logistics outside official U.S. government channels. [[Oliver North]], serving on the [[National Security Council]] staff, provided the [[White House]] political authorization and operational direction.[^1]
|
||||
The Enterprise was the informal name given by [[Oliver North]] and other participants to the private covert operations network that conducted the two interlocking elements of the [[Iran-Contra Affair]]: the sale of American weapons to [[Iran]] and the resupply of the Nicaraguan [[Contras]] during the period when Congressional [[Boland Amendment]] prohibitions barred U.S. government agencies from providing the Contras with military assistance. The Enterprise was organized by [[Richard Secord]], a retired Air Force major general, and [[Albert Hakim]], an Iranian-born American arms dealer, through a network of corporate entities that held accounts, purchased weapons, and managed logistics outside official U.S. government channels. Oliver North, serving on the [[National Security Council]] staff, provided the [[White House]] political authorization and operational direction.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
### Structure and Legal Entities
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ North maintained a private communications channel with Secord using KL-43 encryp
|
|||
|
||||
The arms-for-hostages dimension of the Enterprise began in August 1985, when Israel shipped 96 [[TOW Missile|TOW anti-tank missiles]] to Iran as the first transfer in the arrangement. The United States replenished Israel's stocks. [[Adnan Khashoggi]] provided bridge loans to finance the early transactions; [[Manucher Ghorbanifar]], an Iranian arms dealer and former [[SAVAK]] officer, served as the Iranian intermediary.
|
||||
|
||||
Subsequent transfers included 408 more TOW missiles in September 1985, a failed HAWK missile shipment in November 1985 that became an operational embarrassment requiring CIA aircraft for the logistics, and multiple TOW shipments in 1986. Approximately 2,000 TOW missiles and other weapons were transferred to Iran in total. The Enterprise generated the profits from the markup between its acquisition costs and the prices charged to Iran.[^1]
|
||||
Subsequent transfers included 408 more TOW missiles in September 1985, a failed [[HAWK missile]] shipment in November 1985 that became an operational embarrassment requiring CIA aircraft for the logistics, and multiple TOW shipments in 1986. Approximately 2,000 TOW missiles and other weapons were transferred to Iran in total. The Enterprise generated the profits from the markup between its acquisition costs and the prices charged to Iran.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
In October 1986, [[Albert Hakim]] conducted unauthorized negotiations in Geneva with a representative of Iranian speaker [[Hashemi Rafsanjani]] (identified in documents as "the Relative") that produced a Nine-Point Plan expanding U.S. commitments to Iran far beyond what North, Poindexter, or Reagan had authorized. The Geneva negotiations, when discovered, alarmed NSC officials who felt Hakim had made policy commitments without authorization.[^2]
|
||||
In October 1986, Albert Hakim conducted unauthorized negotiations in Geneva with a representative of Iranian speaker [[Hashemi Rafsanjani]] (identified in documents as "the Relative") that produced a Nine-Point Plan expanding U.S. commitments to Iran far beyond what North, Poindexter, or Reagan had authorized. The Geneva negotiations, when discovered, alarmed NSC officials who felt Hakim had made policy commitments without authorization.[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
### Contra Side
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ The Contra resupply network used multiple aircraft and crews. [[Eugene Hasenfus]
|
|||
|
||||
### Finances and the Diversion
|
||||
|
||||
Walsh's investigation documented that the Enterprise generated approximately $48 million in revenues from the Iran weapons sales. Of this amount, only approximately $3.8 million was delivered to Contra supply operations. The remainder was retained in Enterprise accounts, disbursed to Secord and Hakim, used for operational expenses, and in part used to pay [[Oliver North]] a salary supplement - the basis for one of the criminal charges against Hakim.
|
||||
Walsh's investigation documented that the Enterprise generated approximately $48 million in revenues from the Iran weapons sales. Of this amount, only approximately $3.8 million was delivered to Contra supply operations. The remainder was retained in Enterprise accounts, disbursed to Secord and Hakim, used for operational expenses, and in part used to pay Oliver North a salary supplement - the basis for one of the criminal charges against Hakim.
|
||||
|
||||
The large gap between revenues and Contra deliveries was a finding of significant consequence: it indicated that the Enterprise was operating substantially as a profit-making private venture rather than purely as a mechanism for funding the Contras, as its participants had represented to congressional investigators.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ The Finders was a Washington D.C.-based communal group led by former [[U.S. Air
|
|||
|
||||
### Origins and Structure
|
||||
|
||||
The Finders coalesced in the late 1960s around [[Marion Pettie]], who had been hosting open-house gatherings at his Washington D.C. residence since at least the 1940s. The formal communal structure took shape around 1971 at Pettie's home in the Glover Park neighborhood.[^5] Pettie described no formal membership requirements: "Nobody signs anything."[^5] Members pooled finances into what [[Robert Garder Terrell]] called the "Invisible Bank," with some members contributing life savings to the communal fund.[^5]
|
||||
The Finders coalesced in the late 1960s around Marion Pettie, who had been hosting open-house gatherings at his Washington D.C. residence since at least the 1940s. The formal communal structure took shape around 1971 at Pettie's home in the Glover Park neighborhood.[^5] Pettie described no formal membership requirements: "Nobody signs anything."[^5] Members pooled finances into what [[Robert Garder Terrell]] called the "Invisible Bank," with some members contributing life savings to the communal fund.[^5]
|
||||
|
||||
The group blended Taoist philosophy with New Age and Human Potential Movement concepts. Members were typically well-educated professionals who rejected conventional employment as an obstacle to what Pettie called spontaneity. Pettie functioned as the "Game Caller," a title the children in the group also used for him, directing members on assignments called "projects" that could range from mundane tasks to international travel, and exercising final authority over communal life.[^5][^6] His stated life philosophy, offered to journalist Eddie Dean in 1996, was "to know everything and do nothing."[^5]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ Beginning around 1980, children were raised communally rather than by biological
|
|||
The group maintained several interconnected properties:
|
||||
|
||||
- 3918-3920 W Street NW, Glover Park, Washington D.C.: Two attached red brick buildings containing approximately eight apartments, renting rooms at five dollars per night. Women and children lived here. A duplex portion contained a satellite communications setup.[^5][^2]
|
||||
- 1307 Fourth Street NE, Washington D.C.: A 10,000-square-foot warehouse owned of record by [[Robert Garder Terrell]]. Men lived here. The space contained a large library, two kitchens, a sauna, a hot tub, a video production room, extensive computer equipment, and satellite dish antennas on the roof.[^2][^3]
|
||||
- 1307 Fourth Street NE, Washington D.C.: A 10,000-square-foot warehouse owned of record by Robert Garder Terrell. Men lived here. The space contained a large library, two kitchens, a sauna, a hot tub, a video production room, extensive computer equipment, and satellite dish antennas on the roof.[^2][^3]
|
||||
- The Farm, Nethers, Madison County, Virginia: Approximately 90 acres near Shenandoah National Park and Old Rag Mountain. Neighbors reported vans arriving at night with children who were sometimes heard crying.[^5][^7]
|
||||
|
||||
### Membership
|
||||
|
||||
The active membership roster circulated during the 1987 investigations listed: [[Ronald L. Alleman]]; [[Mary Grogan]]; [[Christian Herbst]]; [[Kristin Knauth]]; [[Theodore G. Reiss]]; [[Allen Schoen]]; [[Stuart Miles Silverstone]] (operating under the alias Steve Learner); [[Randolph Winn]]; and [[Steve Usdin]]. Former members included [[Patricia H. Livingston]], [[Carolyn Said]], and others who maintained contact with the group.[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
[[Robert Garder Terrell]], a former [[Internal Revenue Service|IRS]] appeals officer and certified public accountant, served as the group's principal spokesman and financial manager. He was associated with [[Future Enterprises]], a computer training company that conducted business with the CIA.[^2][^3]
|
||||
Robert Garder Terrell, a former [[Internal Revenue Service|IRS]] appeals officer and certified public accountant, served as the group's principal spokesman and financial manager. He was associated with [[Future Enterprises]], a computer training company that conducted business with the CIA.[^2][^3]
|
||||
|
||||
### John J. Cox and General Scientific
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -50,9 +50,9 @@ A separate and partially contradicting account appears in MPD Intelligence docum
|
|||
|
||||
### Marion Pettie's Background and Intelligence Connections
|
||||
|
||||
[[Marion Pettie]] was born in 1920 and grew up in Culpeper, Virginia, where his family had lived for ten generations. He dropped out of school after ninth grade. He served as a Master Sergeant in the U.S. Air Force and retired in 1956.[^5] His wife, [[Isabelle Pettie]], was a CIA employee; FBI Vault documents confirm her employment, though the precise dates cited across sources vary, with estimates ranging from approximately 1952 to 1961, and the Stitcher MPD report citing 1950 to 1971.[^3] She was listed as a staff stenographer but was issued passports to North Korea, North Vietnam, and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, travel that would not ordinarily be approved for an employee in that category.[^3] Pettie confirmed in a 1993 interview with U.S. News & World Report that his wife "once worked for the Central Intelligence Agency."[^4]
|
||||
Marion Pettie was born in 1920 and grew up in Culpeper, Virginia, where his family had lived for ten generations. He dropped out of school after ninth grade. He served as a Master Sergeant in the U.S. Air Force and retired in 1956.[^5] His wife, [[Isabelle Pettie]], was a CIA employee; FBI Vault documents confirm her employment, though the precise dates cited across sources vary, with estimates ranging from approximately 1952 to 1961, and the Stitcher MPD report citing 1950 to 1971.[^3] She was listed as a staff stenographer but was issued passports to North Korea, North Vietnam, and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, travel that would not ordinarily be approved for an employee in that category.[^3] Pettie confirmed in a 1993 interview with U.S. News & World Report that his wife "once worked for the Central Intelligence Agency."[^4]
|
||||
|
||||
Pettie's son [[George Pettie]] worked for [[Air America]], the CIA proprietary airline that operated in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War and was documented to have transported narcotics from the [[Golden Triangle]].[^4] George Pettie had broken contact with his father by 1985 and was operating a home inspection business in Northern Virginia at the time of the 1987 investigations. In a 1987 interview he described the circa-1971 Glover Park gatherings as "the beginning of a new life" for his father and followers.[^5]
|
||||
Pettie's son [[George Pettie]] worked for [[Air America]], the CIA proprietary airline that operated in Southeast Asia during the [[Vietnam War]] and was documented to have transported narcotics from the [[Golden Triangle]].[^4] George Pettie had broken contact with his father by 1985 and was operating a home inspection business in Northern Virginia at the time of the 1987 investigations. In a 1987 interview he described the circa-1971 Glover Park gatherings as "the beginning of a new life" for his father and followers.[^5]
|
||||
|
||||
Marion Pettie consistently denied CIA employment in public interviews, stating: "The reason the CIA wouldn't hire me is that they wouldn't have the control factor over me."[^5] He acknowledged studying intelligence agencies since the 1930s and described himself as Taoist by inclination. His open houses in Washington from the 1930s onward drew intelligence figures, diplomats, and journalists, though Pettie described these gatherings as self-financed social events rather than operational meetings.[^5]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ The six children ranged in age from approximately two to seven years. They were
|
|||
|
||||
Florida HRS physician Dr. Moorer found physical evidence consistent with possible sexual abuse in two of the six children. A subsequent psychiatric examination by Dr. Nahman Greenberg found "no signs of recent sexual or physical abuse."[^8] Items found in the van included a TRS-80 computer, twenty floppy computer disks, a telephone connection device, and a Chinese-English dictionary.[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
[[Douglas Ammerman]] and [[James Michael Holwell]] were charged with misdemeanor child abuse; Holwell faced an additional count of resisting arrest without violence. Bond was initially set at $100,000 each, reduced to $20,000 on February 19. Five women identifying as the children's mothers arrived in Tallahassee from Washington around February 12: [[Kristin Knauth]], [[Judy Evans]], [[Paula Arico]], [[Carolyn Said]], and [[Patricia H. Livingston]].[^8]
|
||||
Douglas Ammerman and James Michael Holwell were charged with misdemeanor child abuse; Holwell faced an additional count of resisting arrest without violence. Bond was initially set at $100,000 each, reduced to $20,000 on February 19. Five women identifying as the children's mothers arrived in Tallahassee from Washington around February 12: Kristin Knauth, [[Judy Evans]], [[Paula Arico]], Carolyn Said, and Patricia H. Livingston.[^8]
|
||||
|
||||
### Custody Proceedings and Outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Martinez's April 13, 1987 report documented information provided by an MPD offic
|
|||
|
||||
### Glover Park and Stuart Miles Silverstone
|
||||
|
||||
At the Glover Park duplex, investigators found [[Stuart Miles Silverstone]] inside a room equipped with multiple computers, printers, and satellite communications equipment. Large bags of color slides and photographic contact sheets containing images of children were also seized.[^2]
|
||||
At the Glover Park duplex, investigators found Stuart Miles Silverstone inside a room equipped with multiple computers, printers, and satellite communications equipment. Large bags of color slides and photographic contact sheets containing images of children were also seized.[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
### Virginia Farm
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ Virginia State Police found at the Madison County farm what they described as ev
|
|||
|
||||
### CIA Involvement and Investigation Suppression
|
||||
|
||||
On February 6, 1987, the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] took over the investigation and took possession of computers and floppy disks seized from Finders properties. The FBI's Foreign Counterintelligence Division directed the Metropolitan Police Department to classify all MPD reports related to The Finders as Secret, and further directed MPD not to advise the FBI's own Washington Field Office of what had occurred.[^2][^3]
|
||||
On February 6, 1987, the FBI took over the investigation and took possession of computers and floppy disks seized from Finders properties. The FBI's Foreign Counterintelligence Division directed the Metropolitan Police Department to classify all MPD reports related to The Finders as Secret, and further directed MPD not to advise the FBI's own Washington Field Office of what had occurred.[^2][^3]
|
||||
|
||||
MPD Sgt. [[John H. Stitcher Jr.]] filed a report on February 19, 1987, titled "Re: Finders involvement with the CIA," marked Confidential and Do Not Disseminate. The report documented a conversation with a CIA special agent (name redacted in released versions) that included several significant admissions. When Stitcher asked whether the investigation was "treading on anyone's toes," the CIA agent responded "Sort of." The CIA agent stated the agency had "had someone working on the case since it first broke." The report confirmed Isabelle Pettie's CIA employment and documented that travel by at least one Finders member to Moscow, North Korea, and Vietnam during 1969-1971 had been conducted with CIA awareness and facilitation. Large sections of the released version of the report remain redacted.[^3]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -130,9 +130,9 @@ In 1994, the U.S. Customs Service proposed to remove Martinez from his position
|
|||
|
||||
### Future Enterprises and the Computer Training Connection
|
||||
|
||||
[[Future Enterprises]] was a private company that provided computer training to CIA employees during the 1980s. In a 1993 public statement, CIA spokesman David Christian confirmed: "CIA sent some employees to a company called Future Enterprises, Inc. for computer training in the nineteen eighties." Christian denied any CIA ownership of or organizational relationship with the company, characterizing the Finders connection as involving one member who worked as a "part-time accountant."[^4]
|
||||
Future Enterprises was a private company that provided computer training to CIA employees during the 1980s. In a 1993 public statement, CIA spokesman David Christian confirmed: "CIA sent some employees to a company called Future Enterprises, Inc. for computer training in the nineteen eighties." Christian denied any CIA ownership of or organizational relationship with the company, characterizing the Finders connection as involving one member who worked as a "part-time accountant."[^4]
|
||||
|
||||
[[Robert Garder Terrell]], described in sources as a former IRS appeals officer and the warehouse's owner of record, was that member. Vice president Joseph Marinich confirmed in contemporaneous reporting that CIA employees had received training at the company during the 1980s.[^4] An MPD report dated February 19, 1987 cited a CIA agent confirming the agency was sending personnel to "a Finders Corp., Future Enterprises, for training in computer operations," using language that directly identified Future Enterprises as a Finders corporate entity.[^4]
|
||||
Robert Garder Terrell, described in sources as a former IRS appeals officer and the warehouse's owner of record, was that member. Vice president Joseph Marinich confirmed in contemporaneous reporting that CIA employees had received training at the company during the 1980s.[^4] An MPD report dated February 19, 1987 cited a CIA agent confirming the agency was sending personnel to "a Finders Corp., Future Enterprises, for training in computer operations," using language that directly identified Future Enterprises as a Finders corporate entity.[^4]
|
||||
|
||||
### The 1993 Congressional and DOJ Investigation
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ Lewis introduced a resolution requiring the U.S. Customs Service to reinstate it
|
|||
|
||||
The two men arrested in Tallahassee were found carrying an address book. According to FBI file notes cited in secondary sources, individuals named in that address book included one person appearing in an FBI Buffalo field office file concerning [[NAMBLA]] members suspected of murder connections, and two persons appearing in FBI Dallas field office file 145-0 relating to [[John David Norman]]'s [[Odyssey Foundation]] child prostitution investigation.[^1][^2]
|
||||
|
||||
[[John David Norman]] (October 13, 1927 - May 22, 2011) was convicted multiple times between 1960 and 1998 on child molestation and child pornography charges. He founded the [[Odyssey Foundation]] in Dallas in the mid-1960s as a front for procuring teenage boys for prostitution and distributing child pornography nationally. The address-book overlaps represent the primary documented connection between The Finders and Norman's network.[^9]
|
||||
John David Norman (October 13, 1927 - May 22, 2011) was convicted multiple times between 1960 and 1998 on child molestation and child pornography charges. He founded the Odyssey Foundation in Dallas in the mid-1960s as a front for procuring teenage boys for prostitution and distributing child pornography nationally. The address-book overlaps represent the primary documented connection between The Finders and Norman's network.[^9]
|
||||
|
||||
### Intelligence Program Context
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -188,13 +188,13 @@ When the FBI assembled its released file, the documents included diagrams by Ted
|
|||
|
||||
### Dissolution and Continued Activity
|
||||
|
||||
On March 11, 1987, [[Robert Garder Terrell]] announced that The Finders were "breaking up" after approximately seventeen years. He gave a follow-up statement to the [[Associated Press]] on March 23, 1987 confirming dissolution: "You won't hear from the Finders again until the year 2000."[^5][^2]
|
||||
On March 11, 1987, Robert Garder Terrell announced that The Finders were "breaking up" after approximately seventeen years. He gave a follow-up statement to the [[Associated Press]] on March 23, 1987 confirming dissolution: "You won't hear from the Finders again until the year 2000."[^5][^2]
|
||||
|
||||
On October 22, 1991, MPD Intelligence officers observed activity at the former Fourth Street NE warehouse, which the group did not sell until 1994. Officers documented "numerous well-dressed males, who operate rental cars and expensive luxury type models" entering the building at late-night and early-morning hours. Officers also observed adult males with a young male child entering the building. A van operator stopped by officers claimed to have "baby sat children for diplomats" and acknowledged the neighborhood was "not fit for babysitting activity." The MPD report, included in the FBI Vault release (pages 147-148 of the released materials), noted "possible child pornography." No follow-up federal investigation of this incident was documented in accessible records.[^3]
|
||||
|
||||
Marion Pettie died on October 24, 2003, in Culpeper, Virginia.[^5]
|
||||
|
||||
In 2018, [[Robert Garder Terrell]] gave his first public interview in over twenty-five years to journalist Derrick Broze of The Conscious Resistance Network, followed by another in 2021. Both were incorporated into Broze's documentary "Who Will Find What The Finders Hide?" released in March 2019.[^10] Terrell denied all criminal allegations throughout.
|
||||
In 2018, Robert Garder Terrell gave his first public interview in over twenty-five years to journalist Derrick Broze of The Conscious Resistance Network, followed by another in 2021. Both were incorporated into Broze's documentary "Who Will Find What The Finders Hide?" released in March 2019.[^10] Terrell denied all criminal allegations throughout.
|
||||
|
||||
### Footnotes
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Wackenhut was very active in [[El Salvador]] during the Contra war, providing em
|
|||
|
||||
### The Cabazon Joint Venture
|
||||
|
||||
A particularly controversial aspect of Wackenhut's operations was its joint venture with the [[Cabazon Indian Reservation|Cabazon Indian tribe]] in Indio, California. Formalized on April 1, 1981, this partnership aimed to leverage the sovereign nation status of the Indian reservation to bypass federal jurisdiction and congressional prohibitions on arms exports. The venture, known as "Cabazon Arms," sought to establish a production facility for high-tech armaments and explosives for export to third-world countries, including the [[Contras]] in Nicaragua and nations in the [[Middle East]]. The firm was using the Cabazon reservation's tax-exempt status and its freedom from federal oversight to gain a competitive advantage in soliciting federal weapons projects.[^1][^2]
|
||||
A particularly controversial aspect of Wackenhut's operations was its joint venture with the [[Cabazon Indian Reservation|Cabazon Indian tribe]] in Indio, California. Formalized on April 1, 1981, this partnership aimed to leverage the sovereign nation status of the Indian reservation to bypass federal jurisdiction and congressional prohibitions on arms exports. The venture, known as "[[Cabazon Arms]]," sought to establish a production facility for high-tech armaments and explosives for export to third-world countries, including the [[Contras]] in Nicaragua and nations in the [[Middle East]]. The firm was using the Cabazon reservation's tax-exempt status and its freedom from federal oversight to gain a competitive advantage in soliciting federal weapons projects.[^1][^2]
|
||||
|
||||
[[Dr. John Nichols]], the Cabazon tribal administrator and a former CIA agent who claimed experience going back to the Chilean destabilization program in the 1970s, secured a [[Department of Defense]] secret facility clearance for the reservation. He then proposed to Wackenhut the manufacture of various weapons systems, including 120mm combustible cartridge cases, 9mm machine pistols, laser-sighted assault weapons, sniper rifles, and portable rocket systems. The venture also explored the development of biological weapons. [[Michael Riconosciuto]] served as the Director of Research for this joint venture, and was involved in meetings with figures like [[Robert Frye]] (Wackenhut VP), [[John P. Nichols]], and [[Peter Zokosky]], and [[Dr. Harry Fair]] of the U.S. Army's Railgun Project at Picatinny Arsenal, where Riconosciuto's scientific expertise was noted.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ It was here that the "trap door" was built into the U.S. version of PROMIS, base
|
|||
|
||||
### Danny Casolaro Investigation
|
||||
|
||||
Investigative reporter [[Danny Casolaro]] was investigating the Wackenhut/Cabazon weapons projects as part of his "[[The Octopus]]" investigation when he was found dead in a West Virginia motel room in 1991. The probe into his death was ordered by associate attorney general [[Webster Hubbell|Webb Hubbell]], who had his own connections to weapons manufacturing for the Contras through [[Park On Meter]] in [[Arkansas]].[^2]
|
||||
Investigative reporter [[Danny Casolaro]] was investigating the Wackenhut/Cabazon weapons projects as part of his "[[The Octopus]]" investigation when he was found dead in a [[West Virginia]] motel room in 1991. The probe into his death was ordered by associate attorney general [[Webster Hubbell|Webb Hubbell]], who had his own connections to weapons manufacturing for the Contras through [[Park On Meter]] in [[Arkansas]].[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
### Other Allegations
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue