vault backup: 2026-10-16 01:25:00

This commit is contained in:
disinfo.zone 2026-10-16 01:25:00 -04:00
parent 837c566626
commit 9173c41b79
No known key found for this signature in database
199 changed files with 10378 additions and 1741 deletions

View file

@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Brazil broke off relations with Cuba in July 1964 and joined the Johnson adminis
### Second Institutional Act
The Second Institutional Act, signed on October 27, 1965, came in response to the military government's poor showing in that year's gubernatorial elections, in which opposition candidates won two state contests. The act banned all existing political parties, provided for indirect election of the president, restricted the time Congress could consider legislation before it automatically became law, stipulated that persons accused of crimes against national security would be subject to military justice, and expanded the [[Supreme Court]] to secure favorable rulings, including the restoration of Hanna Mining's concessions.[^17]
The Second Institutional Act, signed on October 27, 1965, came in response to the military government's poor showing in that year's gubernatorial elections, in which opposition candidates won two state contests. The act banned all existing political parties, provided for indirect election of the president, restricted the time Congress could consider legislation before it automatically became law, stipulated that persons accused of crimes against national security would be subject to military justice, and expanded the [[Supremo Tribunal Federal|Supreme Court]] to secure favorable rulings, including the restoration of Hanna Mining's concessions.[^17]
Ambassador Gordon reported on the act in a cable to Washington dated November 3, 1965, describing his private conversation with Castelo Branco about it. According to Gordon's account, Castelo Branco explained that Congress and some Supreme Court justices had misunderstood his commitment to constitutional normality as willingness to reverse the revolution, and determined by mid-October that corrective action was necessary. Gordon expressed concern about "arbitrary powers assumed through the act" and the risks of sliding toward military dictatorship rather than maintaining the armed forces' traditional moderating role.[^18]