vault backup: 2026-09-22 19:33:49
This commit is contained in:
parent
bdd3b6bbfb
commit
c84d8b2dd5
72 changed files with 861 additions and 167 deletions
|
|
@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ McLellan publicly defended the Castelo Branco government's practice of interveni
|
|||
|
||||
### Senate Foreign Relations Committee Testimony
|
||||
|
||||
The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations held a hearing on the American Institute for Free Labor Development on August 1, 1969, during the 91st Congress, 1st Session (Senate Hearing CHRG-91shrg33948). The hearing examined AIFLD's allegedly ineffective programs to promote trade unionism in Latin America and scrutinized the relationship between AFL-CIO support for US [[Vietnam War]] policy and the USAID financing of AIFLD's operations. The hearing's primary witness was AFL-CIO president [[George Meany]]. The hearing took place against a backdrop of growing public criticism of AIFLD's role in the 1964 Brazilian coup and its broader function as a CIA-adjacent instrument in hemispheric labor politics.[^10]
|
||||
The [[Senate Foreign Relations Committee|Senate Committee on Foreign Relations]] held a hearing on the American Institute for Free Labor Development on August 1, 1969, during the 91st Congress, 1st Session (Senate Hearing CHRG-91shrg33948). The hearing examined AIFLD's allegedly ineffective programs to promote trade unionism in Latin America and scrutinized the relationship between AFL-CIO support for US [[Vietnam War]] policy and the USAID financing of AIFLD's operations. The hearing's primary witness was AFL-CIO president [[George Meany]]. The hearing took place against a backdrop of growing public criticism of AIFLD's role in the 1964 Brazilian coup and its broader function as a CIA-adjacent instrument in hemispheric labor politics.[^10]
|
||||
|
||||
### 1969 Rockefeller Mission
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Hamilton also described to investigators his belief that the main purpose of the
|
|||
|
||||
### Congressional Testimony and Final Legal Proceedings
|
||||
|
||||
Hamilton and INSLAW participated in all major investigations of the affair, including the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations inquiry (1989), the House Judiciary Committee investigation led by Representative Jack Brooks (1989-1992), and the Special Counsel investigation conducted by [[Nicholas J. Bua]] (1991-1993). In 1995, the U.S. Senate referred INSLAW's remaining claims to the Court of Federal Claims; the court ruled in 1997-1998 that all versions of PROMIS were in the public domain and that the government had always been free to use the software. INSLAW received no compensation.[^2]
|
||||
Hamilton and INSLAW participated in all major investigations of the affair, including the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations inquiry (1989), the [[House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary Committee]] investigation led by Representative Jack Brooks (1989-1992), and the Special Counsel investigation conducted by [[Nicholas J. Bua]] (1991-1993). In 1995, the U.S. Senate referred INSLAW's remaining claims to the Court of Federal Claims; the court ruled in 1997-1998 that all versions of PROMIS were in the public domain and that the government had always been free to use the software. INSLAW received no compensation.[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
Hamilton continued to assert that PROMIS was fraudulently stolen and distributed internationally. He maintained a public website documenting INSLAW's claims long after the formal legal proceedings concluded.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ location: "Topeka, Kansas"
|
|||
|
||||
### Government Career
|
||||
|
||||
Christopher Mellon served for nearly two decades in the federal government, holding high-level positions in both the executive and legislative branches. He was the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence during the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] and [[George W. Bush]] administrations, a role that gave him oversight of the entire Department of Defense intelligence apparatus and its most sensitive [[Special Access Programs]] (SAPs). Prior to this, he served for over a decade on the staff of the Senate Intelligence Committee, eventually becoming the Minority Staff Director for Senator [[William S. Cohen]]. His deep understanding of the inner workings of the intelligence community and the legislative process would later prove invaluable to the UAP disclosure effort.[^1]
|
||||
Christopher Mellon served for nearly two decades in the federal government, holding high-level positions in both the executive and legislative branches. He was the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence during the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] and [[George W. Bush]] administrations, a role that gave him oversight of the entire Department of Defense intelligence apparatus and its most sensitive [[Special Access Programs]] (SAPs). Prior to this, he served for over a decade on the staff of the [[Senate Select Committee on Intelligence|Senate Intelligence Committee]], eventually becoming the Minority Staff Director for Senator [[William S. Cohen]]. His deep understanding of the inner workings of the intelligence community and the legislative process would later prove invaluable to the UAP disclosure effort.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
### Involvement with AATIP and Luis Elizondo
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Mellon was profoundly disturbed by these revelations, viewing the government's f
|
|||
|
||||
### The Legislative Strategy for Disclosure
|
||||
|
||||
Following Elizondo's resignation, Mellon became the primary architect of a multi-pronged strategy to force the UAP issue into the open. Recognizing that direct confrontation with the Pentagon was futile, he devised a plan to leverage Congress and the media. He personally facilitated the transfer of three declassified UAP videos - later known as "FLIR" ([[Tic Tac]]), "[[GIMBAL]]," and "[[GoFast]]" - to the New York Times, which resulted in a landmark front-page story in December 2017 that officially broke the news of AATIP's existence.[^1]
|
||||
Following Elizondo's resignation, Mellon became the primary architect of a multi-pronged strategy to force the UAP issue into the open. Recognizing that direct confrontation with the Pentagon was futile, he devised a plan to leverage Congress and the media. He personally facilitated the transfer of three declassified UAP videos - later known as "FLIR" (Tic Tac), "[[GIMBAL]]," and "[[GoFast]]" - to the New York Times, which resulted in a landmark front-page story in December 2017 that officially broke the news of AATIP's existence.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
Mellon then focused on a legislative approach, using his deep knowledge of Capitol Hill to engage with key staffers on the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services Committees. He and Elizondo worked to educate lawmakers and arrange for them to be briefed directly by credible military eyewitnesses like Commander [[Dave Fravor]] and Lieutenant [[Alex Dietrich]]. Mellon's key strategic insight was to draft specific legislative language that would compel the [[Director of National Intelligence]] to produce an unclassified report on UAP. This language, which he championed through op-eds and private meetings, was eventually included in the committee report accompanying the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, signed into law in December 2020. This led to the landmark June 2021 "Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena."[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Edwin Meese III served as Counselor to President [[Ronald Reagan]] from 1981 to
|
|||
|
||||
### Role in the PROMIS Software Scandal
|
||||
|
||||
The House Judiciary Committee's September 1992 investigation (House Report 102-857) placed Meese at the center of its conspiracy theory. The committee found that Meese and Lowell Jensen had "consciously ignored INSLAW's proprietary rights" and that Attorney Generals Meese and [[Richard Thornburgh]] had "blocked or restricted congressional inquiries into the matter, ignored the findings of two courts and refused to ask for the appointment of an independent counsel."[^1]
|
||||
The [[House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary Committee]]'s September 1992 investigation (House Report 102-857) placed Meese at the center of its conspiracy theory. The committee found that Meese and Lowell Jensen had "consciously ignored INSLAW's proprietary rights" and that Attorney Generals Meese and [[Richard Thornburgh]] had "blocked or restricted congressional inquiries into the matter, ignored the findings of two courts and refused to ask for the appointment of an independent counsel."[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
Meese's connection to Earl Brian was the committee's primary circumstantial evidence of motive. Both men had served together in Reagan's Sacramento cabinet; in 1985, Meese's wife purchased stock in a Brian-controlled company.[^1] INSLAW alleged that Meese had arranged for the DOJ to steal PROMIS and funnel its distribution rights to Brian as a reward for Brian's alleged role in the [[October Surprise]] negotiations - a theory that, if true, would make the PROMIS theft a product of a political debt going back to 1980.[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Fred P. Hitz was the [[Central Intelligence Agency]] Inspector General who condu
|
|||
|
||||
### Congressional Testimony
|
||||
|
||||
Appearing before the House Intelligence Committee in March 1998, Hitz delivered some of the most damaging admissions in the agency's history. "Let me be frank about what we are finding," Hitz testified. "There are instances where CIA did not, in an expeditious or consistent fashion, cut off relationships with individuals supporting the Contra program who were alleged to have engaged in drug trafficking activity." When Congressman Norman Dicks asked whether any of these allegations involved trafficking in the [[United States]], Hitz answered: "Yes."[^1]
|
||||
Appearing before the [[House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence|House Intelligence Committee]] in March 1998, Hitz delivered some of the most damaging admissions in the agency's history. "Let me be frank about what we are finding," Hitz testified. "There are instances where CIA did not, in an expeditious or consistent fashion, cut off relationships with individuals supporting the Contra program who were alleged to have engaged in drug trafficking activity." When Congressman Norman Dicks asked whether any of these allegations involved trafficking in the [[United States]], Hitz answered: "Yes."[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
### The Secret 1982 Agreement
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ born: 1931-04-20
|
|||
died: 2026-02-03
|
||||
location: "Daytona Beach, Florida"
|
||||
---
|
||||
Lee Herbert Hamilton was born April 20, 1931, in Daytona Beach, Florida. He served as a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Indiana's 9th congressional district from 1965 to 1999, a tenure of 34 years. During that period he served on the House Intelligence Committee, including as chairman, and was a central figure in congressional oversight of intelligence affairs. After leaving Congress he became President and CEO of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and Director of the Center on Congress at Indiana University.[^1]
|
||||
Lee Herbert Hamilton was born April 20, 1931, in Daytona Beach, Florida. He served as a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Indiana's 9th congressional district from 1965 to 1999, a tenure of 34 years. During that period he served on the [[House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence|House Intelligence Committee]], including as chairman, and was a central figure in congressional oversight of intelligence affairs. After leaving Congress he became President and CEO of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and Director of the Center on Congress at Indiana University.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
### House October Surprise Task Force
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ The Meese recusal added further significance to Jensen's role: Meese reportedly
|
|||
|
||||
### House Judiciary Committee Findings
|
||||
|
||||
The House Judiciary Committee's September 1992 report (House Report 102-857), produced after a three-year investigation chaired by Representative [[Jack Brooks]], named Jensen as among those who "consciously ignored INSLAW's proprietary rights." The committee found it "incredible that the Department, having made this determination [that INSLAW's claim was legitimate], would continue to pursue its litigation."[^3] The report noted that INSLAW alleged Jensen had been induced by Brian's political influence - routed through Meese - to engineer disputes with INSLAW and drive the company into bankruptcy, with Brian positioned to acquire the company and its software assets through his vehicle [[Hadron]].[^3]
|
||||
The [[House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary Committee]]'s September 1992 report (House Report 102-857), produced after a three-year investigation chaired by Representative [[Jack Brooks]], named Jensen as among those who "consciously ignored INSLAW's proprietary rights." The committee found it "incredible that the Department, having made this determination [that INSLAW's claim was legitimate], would continue to pursue its litigation."[^3] The report noted that INSLAW alleged Jensen had been induced by Brian's political influence - routed through Meese - to engineer disputes with INSLAW and drive the company into bankruptcy, with Brian positioned to acquire the company and its software assets through his vehicle [[Hadron]].[^3]
|
||||
|
||||
### Bua Report Findings
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ summary: "Lavas also turned some of Michael Riconosciuto's disks over to the Jac
|
|||
---
|
||||
[[Raymond Lavas]] was a former associate of [[Ted Gunderson]] and, according to [[Michael Riconosciuto]], a former protégé of [[Robert Maheu]]. He is noted for expressing his professional opinion about the death of [[Alan Michael May]] in a letter. In this letter, Lavas suggested that certain chemical assassination methods could have been employed, which would cause toxins to evaporate from the body, making the death appear natural. He emphasized that unless a body is immediately refrigerated, such toxins quickly evaporate, leaving minimal traces that would be difficult for a forensic expert to detect without prior suspicion.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
Lavas also turned some of [[Michael Riconosciuto]]'s disks over to the Jack Brooks investigative committee (House Judiciary Committee on [[INSLAW]]). Riconosciuto claimed there was no data on these disks, as they contained a sub-set of VAX VMS routines modified to activate a one-time pad encryption scheme, requiring specific hardware and instructions to unravel.[^1]
|
||||
Lavas also turned some of Michael Riconosciuto's disks over to the Jack Brooks investigative committee ([[House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary Committee]] on [[INSLAW]]). Riconosciuto claimed there was no data on these disks, as they contained a sub-set of VAX VMS routines modified to activate a one-time pad encryption scheme, requiring specific hardware and instructions to unravel.[^1]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
### Footnotes
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -43,11 +43,11 @@ In 1999, Hanssen resumed contact with the [[SVR]] (successor to the KGB), provid
|
|||
|
||||
The formal charging documents against Hanssen - the criminal complaint affidavit, the indictment, and the plea agreement - do not mention [[PROMIS]] or [[INSLAW]]. The 2003 [[Department of Justice]] Inspector General special report (OIG Special Report 03-08, August 2003), a 674-page review of the FBI's performance in detecting and investigating Hanssen's activities, similarly makes no connection between Hanssen and PROMIS.[^3]
|
||||
|
||||
However, reporting in the Washington Times and other outlets in 2001, citing unnamed government sources, alleged that the FBI's [[Automated Case Support]] (ACS) system - the internal case management and intelligence tracking database that Hanssen exploited throughout his espionage to monitor the Bureau's search for a mole - was itself a derivative of [[INSLAW]]'s PROMIS software. Under this theory, Hanssen's unauthorized access to and repeated exploitation of the ACS system constituted, in effect, the delivery of a PROMIS-derived intelligence management tool to Soviet and Russian handlers.[^4]
|
||||
However, reporting in the Washington Times and other outlets in 2001, citing unnamed government sources, alleged that the FBI's [[Automated Case Support]] (ACS) system - the internal case management and intelligence tracking database that Hanssen exploited throughout his espionage to monitor the Bureau's search for a mole - was itself a derivative of INSLAW's PROMIS software. Under this theory, Hanssen's unauthorized access to and repeated exploitation of the ACS system constituted, in effect, the delivery of a PROMIS-derived intelligence management tool to Soviet and Russian handlers.[^4]
|
||||
|
||||
The allegation gained additional circulation in October 2001 when post-September 11 reporting emerged that PROMIS-derived software provided to the Soviet Union via Hanssen had reportedly made its way to [[Osama bin Laden]] and [[al-Qaeda]], enabling the network to monitor U.S. counterterrorism database activity and move funds between banks undetected. These claims were not confirmed by any official investigation.[^4]
|
||||
|
||||
The 1992 House Judiciary Committee report on the INSLAW affair established the broader context in which this allegation arose, finding that the [[Department of Justice]] had "taken, converted and stolen" INSLAW's Enhanced PROMIS and that the software was distributed without authorization across federal agencies and to foreign governments.[^4] The DOJ's own Special Counsel, [[Nicholas J. Bua]], found "no credible basis" for the INSLAW theft claims in his 1994 report, placing the two official investigations in direct conflict.[^5]
|
||||
The 1992 [[House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary Committee]] report on the INSLAW affair established the broader context in which this allegation arose, finding that the Department of Justice had "taken, converted and stolen" INSLAW's Enhanced PROMIS and that the software was distributed without authorization across federal agencies and to foreign governments.[^4] The DOJ's own Special Counsel, [[Nicholas J. Bua]], found "no credible basis" for the INSLAW theft claims in his 1994 report, placing the two official investigations in direct conflict.[^5]
|
||||
|
||||
The charging documents confirm that Hanssen used the ACS system to conduct unauthorized database searches for his own name and related counterintelligence identifiers, monitoring the FBI's internal mole hunt in real time.[^2]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue