disinfozone/The_Info_Web
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

vault backup: 2026-09-22 19:33:49

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
disinfo.zone 2026-09-22 19:33:49 -04:00
parent bdd3b6bbfb
commit c84d8b2dd5
No known key found for this signature in database
72 changed files with 861 additions and 167 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
10 - PEOPLE/(H-M)/Edwin Meese.md
View file

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Edwin Meese III served as Counselor to President [[Ronald Reagan]] from 1981 to
### Role in the PROMIS Software Scandal
The House Judiciary Committee's September 1992 investigation (House Report 102-857) placed Meese at the center of its conspiracy theory. The committee found that Meese and Lowell Jensen had "consciously ignored INSLAW's proprietary rights" and that Attorney Generals Meese and [[Richard Thornburgh]] had "blocked or restricted congressional inquiries into the matter, ignored the findings of two courts and refused to ask for the appointment of an independent counsel."[^1]
The [[House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary Committee]]'s September 1992 investigation (House Report 102-857) placed Meese at the center of its conspiracy theory. The committee found that Meese and Lowell Jensen had "consciously ignored INSLAW's proprietary rights" and that Attorney Generals Meese and [[Richard Thornburgh]] had "blocked or restricted congressional inquiries into the matter, ignored the findings of two courts and refused to ask for the appointment of an independent counsel."[^1]
Meese's connection to Earl Brian was the committee's primary circumstantial evidence of motive. Both men had served together in Reagan's Sacramento cabinet; in 1985, Meese's wife purchased stock in a Brian-controlled company.[^1] INSLAW alleged that Meese had arranged for the DOJ to steal PROMIS and funnel its distribution rights to Brian as a reward for Brian's alleged role in the [[October Surprise]] negotiations - a theory that, if true, would make the PROMIS theft a product of a political debt going back to 1980.[^2]