disinfozone/The_Info_Web
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

vault backup: 2026-09-22 19:33:49

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
disinfo.zone 2026-09-22 19:33:49 -04:00
parent bdd3b6bbfb
commit c84d8b2dd5
No known key found for this signature in database
72 changed files with 861 additions and 167 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
10 - PEOPLE/(N-S)/William Bradford Reynolds.md
View file

@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ In 2005, attorney Donald Carr showed the letter to Reynolds. Reynolds authentica
### House Judiciary Committee and Bua Report
The House Judiciary Committee's September 1992 investigative report on the INSLAW affair - produced before INSLAW obtained the May 1985 letter - found "strong evidence" that the Department of Justice had "taken, converted and stolen" INSLAW's Enhanced PROMIS through "trickery, fraud and deceit" under the direction of high-level DOJ officials, and recommended appointment of a Special Counsel to investigate further.[^2] Special Counsel [[Nicholas J. Bua]], appointed in 1993, issued a March 1994 report finding "no credible basis" for the INSLAW theft claims, placing the executive and legislative branches in direct conflict on the underlying allegation.[^3]
The [[House Committee on the Judiciary|House Judiciary Committee]]'s September 1992 investigative report on the INSLAW affair - produced before INSLAW obtained the May 1985 letter - found "strong evidence" that the Department of Justice had "taken, converted and stolen" INSLAW's Enhanced PROMIS through "trickery, fraud and deceit" under the direction of high-level DOJ officials, and recommended appointment of a Special Counsel to investigate further.[^2] Special Counsel [[Nicholas J. Bua]], appointed in 1993, issued a March 1994 report finding "no credible basis" for the INSLAW theft claims, placing the executive and legislative branches in direct conflict on the underlying allegation.[^3]
Reynolds died September 14, 2019, without ever being subjected to formal questioning about the letter in a legal proceeding.