vault backup: 2026-10-15 14:01:13

This commit is contained in:
disinfo.zone 2026-10-15 14:01:14 -04:00
parent 70fb85249f
commit ef6dbe44ac
No known key found for this signature in database
67 changed files with 3030 additions and 862 deletions

View file

@ -7,14 +7,28 @@ tags:
- Lawyer
- INSLAW
summary: "Olmstead questioned Peter Videnieks during the trial about his knowledge of the Wackenhut Corporation-Cabazon Indian Reservation joint venture, his relationship with Earl Brian, and his involvement with Hadron Company."
updated: 2026-10-15
relations:
- type: represented
with: "[[Michael Riconosciuto]]"
start: 1991
end: 1992
role: "trial counsel in the Tacoma drug case"
fn: 3
---
[[Thomas Olmstead]] was the attorney for [[Michael Riconosciuto]]. He represented Riconosciuto during his trial in Tacoma, Washington, where Riconosciuto's defense rested on his ability to prove he worked for the [[United States|U.S. government]] in intelligence and undercover operations.[^1]
Olmstead questioned [[Peter Videnieks]] during the trial about his knowledge of the [[Wackenhut Corporation]]-[[Cabazon Indian Reservation]] joint venture, his relationship with [[Earl Brian]], and his involvement with Hadron Company. He also pressed Videnieks on "Modification No. 12" of the [[PROMIS]] software and the bankruptcy court's ruling that the [[Department of Justice|DOJ]] had "stolen" [[PROMIS]] from [[INSLAW]] through Videnieks' handling of it.[^1]
Olmstead questioned [[Peter Videnieks]] during the trial about his knowledge of the [[Wackenhut Corporation]]-[[Cabazon Indian Reservation]] joint venture, his relationship with [[Earl Brian]], and his involvement with Hadron Company. He also pressed Videnieks on "Modification No. 12" of the [[PROMIS]] software and the bankruptcy court's ruling that the [[Department of Justice|DOJ]] had "stolen" PROMIS from [[INSLAW]] through Videnieks' handling of it.[^1]
[[Michael Riconosciuto]] communicated with [[Cheri Seymour]] and [[J.H.]] (an [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] agent) to convey information that Olmstead could use in his defense, including details about "[[The Company]]" and Riconosciuto's attempts to enter the [[Witness Protection Program]].[^1]
Michael Riconosciuto communicated with [[Cheri Seymour]] and [[J.H.]] (an [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] agent) to convey information that Olmstead could use in his defense, including details about "[[The Company]]" and Riconosciuto's attempts to enter the [[Witness Protection Program]].[^1]
### Trial and verdict, January 1992
A federal jury in Tacoma convicted Michael Riconosciuto on seven drug counts on January 17, 1992, and acquitted him on three others. Olmstead and his client branded four videotapes, which showed drugs being delivered to a government informer, as fake. The Associated Press reported at the opening of the trial that Olmstead told the jury Riconosciuto was the victim of a government plot, that the chemicals found near Tonasket were used to extract platinum from mining wastes, and that the defense would offer expert testimony that recordings can be altered.[^2] It reported at the verdict that Olmstead said he would decide whether to appeal after the sentencing set for March 20, 1992.[^3]
---
### Footnotes
[^1]: Seymour, Cheri. *The Last Circle: Danny Casolaro’s Investigation into the Octopus and the PROMIS Software Scandal*. First Edition. TrineDay, 2010.
[^1]: Seymour, Cheri. *The Last Circle: Danny Casolaro’s Investigation into the Octopus and the PROMIS Software Scandal*. First Edition. TrineDay, 2010.
[^2]: Associated Press, "Defendant Says Government Drug Charges Are Part Of Vendetta," January 2, 1992, Seattle Times archive. https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/19920102/1468169/defendant-says-government-drug-charges-are-part-of-vendetta
[^3]: Associated Press, "Jury Says Guilty," January 19, 1992, Seattle Times archive. https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/19920119/1471110/jury-says-guilty