vault backup: 2026-09-25 22:09:08

This commit is contained in:
disinfo.zone 2026-09-25 22:09:08 -04:00
parent b208eb6051
commit f3aadfd333
No known key found for this signature in database
104 changed files with 3959 additions and 180 deletions

View file

@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ Dershowitz was among the lawyers Epstein assembled after the [[Palm Beach Police
### In the Prosecutors' Record
The [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]]'s [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] described Dershowitz as "a self-described close friend of Epstein." Palm Beach State Attorney [[Barry Krischer]] told the office that Epstein's local counsel brought Dershowitz to see him and the assistant state attorney on the case, and that Dershowitz was "overly aggressive" and threatened, "We're going to destroy your witnesses; don't go to court because we're going to destroy those girls"; according to Krischer, Dershowitz so "tainted the waters" that Epstein also hired the local attorney [[Jack Goldberger]]. In the federal phase Dershowitz joined [[Gerald Lefcourt]] and Roy Black. He and Black met the line prosecutors on February 20, 2007 to present "witness issues," and on June 26, 2007 he led the defense presentation at a meeting at the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office with First Assistant [[Jeffrey Sloman]], Criminal Division chief [[Matthew Menchel]] and others, arguing that the state should handle the case because these were "traditionally state offenses."[^6]
The [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]]'s [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] described Dershowitz as "a self-described close friend of Epstein." Palm Beach State Attorney [[Barry Krischer]] told the office that Epstein's local counsel brought Dershowitz to see him and the assistant state attorney on the case, and that Dershowitz was "overly aggressive" and threatened, "We're going to destroy your witnesses; don't go to court because we're going to destroy those girls"; according to Krischer, Dershowitz so "tainted the waters" that Epstein also hired the local attorney [[Jack Goldberger]]. In the federal phase Dershowitz joined [[Gerald Lefcourt]] and Roy Black. He and Black met the line prosecutors on February 20, 2007 to present "witness issues," and on June 26, 2007 he led the defense presentation at a meeting at the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida|Miami U.S. Attorney's Office]] with First Assistant [[Jeffrey Sloman]], Criminal Division chief [[Matthew Menchel]] and others, arguing that the state should handle the case because these were "traditionally state offenses."[^6]
The federal prosecutors' 51-page chronology of the case lists a document from Lefcourt and Dershowitz to Menchel titled "Data that strongly supports the arguments made that no charge can or should be made under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)." In September 2007 the lawyer Nathan Z. Dershowitz represented Epstein's employee [[Harry Beller]] and a second Epstein employee when they were subpoenaed to the federal grand jury, and on September 12 he told the prosecutor that Epstein's assistant [[Lesley Groff]], also subpoenaed, would proceed by interview rather than testify. In late November 2007, after the agreement was signed, the chronology records an "Unscheduled meeting between Jay Lefkowitz, Alan Dershowitz and Jeff Sloman," a drop-in by Lefkowitz and Dershowitz. On December 7, 2007 the former federal judge [[Herbert J. Stern]] sent Dershowitz a 27-page letter, and the defense forwarded to the office the "independent ethics opinions" of Stern and the former Justice Department official [[Joe D. Whitley]] on the federal investigation.[^7]
In May 2008 the U.S. Attorney's Office's Professional Responsibility Officer asked the Department whether Alexander Acosta should recuse himself from the case because he was considering a visiting professorship at [[Harvard Law School]] in 2009, while Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor, was representing Epstein "as a private, paying client"; the Department found no basis for recusal. In March 2009, while Epstein was on work release, Sloman met Dershowitz in Miami for what Dershowitz called "a relaxed drink and conversation." Dershowitz then thanked him for his "assurance that the feds will not interfere with how the Palm Beach sheriff administers" Epstein's sentence "as long as he is treated like any similarly situated inmate"; Sloman replied that the office would not interfere but would object to alternative custody or home detention if asked. A week later Dershowitz thanked Sloman for his "willingness to call the sheriff and advise him that your office would take no position on how he handled Epstein's sentence," adding, "[L]et's put any call off for a while." In December 2009 Sloman told Dershowitz that the office opposed early termination of Epstein's community control and would object to transferring his supervision to the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]].[^8]
In May 2008 the U.S. Attorney's Office's Professional Responsibility Officer asked the Department whether Alexander Acosta should recuse himself from the case because he was considering a visiting professorship at [[Harvard Law School]] in 2009, while Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor, was representing Epstein "as a private, paying client"; the Department found no basis for recusal. In March 2009, while Epstein was on work release, Sloman met Dershowitz in Miami for what Dershowitz called "a relaxed drink and conversation." Dershowitz then thanked him for his "assurance that the feds will not interfere with how the [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]] sheriff administers" Epstein's sentence "as long as he is treated like any similarly situated inmate"; Sloman replied that the office would not interfere but would object to alternative custody or home detention if asked. A week later Dershowitz thanked Sloman for his "willingness to call the sheriff and advise him that your office would take no position on how he handled Epstein's sentence," adding, "[L]et's put any call off for a while." In December 2009 Sloman told Dershowitz that the office opposed early termination of Epstein's community control and would object to transferring his supervision to the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]].[^8]
### The Giuffre Allegation and the Edwards-Cassell Suit

View file

@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
---
category: "Business & Finance"
tags:
- Person
- AlanGreenberg
- BearStearns
- JPMorganChase
- JeffreyEpstein
- WallStreet
- DonaldTrump
alias:
- Alan "Ace" Greenberg
- Ace Greenberg
- Alan C. Greenberg
- Alan Courtney Greenberg
summary: "Bear Stearns chief executive from 1978 to 1993 and chairman to 2001 who brought Jeffrey Epstein into the firm and in 2010, at JPMorgan, sought a felony-policy exception to keep doing business with him."
born: 1927-09-03
died: 2014-07-25
location: "New York, New York"
relations:
- type: head_of
with: "[[Bear Stearns]]"
role: "chairman of the board"
start: 1985
end: 2001
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[JPMorgan Chase]]"
role: "vice chairman emeritus"
start: 2008
end: 2014-07-25
fn: 1
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Alan Courtney "Ace" Greenberg (September 3, 1927 to July 25, 2014) was an American investment banker who ran [[Bear Stearns]] as chief executive from 1978 to 1993 and was its chairman from the firm's 1985 public offering until 2001. [[Jeffrey Epstein]] came to Bear Stearns in 1976 from the [[Dalton School]] through Greenberg, rose under him and [[James Cayne]] to limited partner, and kept his accounts at the firm until its 2008 collapse into [[JPMorgan Chase]]. After that sale Greenberg became vice chairman emeritus of JPMorgan, and in August 2010, according to the [[Government of the United States Virgin Islands|Virgin Islands]], he asked the bank's general counsel, [[Stephen Cutler]], for an exception to its policy on felon clients so that he could continue doing business with Epstein. Greenberg died five years before these communications became public.[^1][^2][^3]
### Career
Greenberg was born in [[Wichita, Kansas]], the grandson of Russian Jewish immigrants, and grew up in [[Oklahoma City]]. He attended the [[University of Oklahoma]] on a football scholarship, transferred to the [[University of Missouri]], and joined Bear Stearns as a clerk in 1949 after it was the only firm of six to offer him a job. He took over the arbitrage desk, became a partner at 31, and succeeded Salim "Cy" Lewis as chief executive on Lewis's death in 1978, when the firm was a private partnership of about 1,000 employees and 46 million dollars in capital; by 1993, when he handed the post to Cayne, it had 6,300 employees and 1.8 billion dollars in shareholders' equity. He said he sought to hire people with "PSD" degrees, "poor, smart and a deep desire to become rich."[^1]
His discretion made him valuable to corporate raiders. His clients included [[Donald Trump]] and [[Henry Kravis]]'s [[KKR]], and he helped Trump accumulate 9.6 percent of Bally Entertainment in Trump's unsuccessful 1986 takeover attempt. "I put my children's accounts with him," Trump said in 2006. "That should tell you how much I trust him." In 2004 Greenberg appeared on Trump's television program *[[The Apprentice]]*. He was a member of the Society of American Magicians and performed at fundraising dinners for the [[Jerusalem Foundation]], required Bear Stearns executives to give 4 percent of their salaries to charity, and in 1998 gave one million dollars to help poor elderly men buy Viagra.[^1]
When JPMorgan agreed on March 16, 2008 to buy Bear Stearns for 2 dollars a share, later raised to 10, after a run on the firm, Greenberg stayed on as vice chairman emeritus of JPMorgan. In a 2010 book he blamed Cayne for the firm's collapse. He died of complications from cancer at [[Mount Sinai Hospital (Manhattan)|Mount Sinai Hospital]] in New York on July 25, 2014.[^1]
### Epstein at Bear Stearns
Epstein, then a teacher of physics and mathematics at Dalton, came to Bear Stearns after tutoring Greenberg's son there, and was friendly with a daughter of Greenberg's. Under Greenberg and Cayne he rose to limited partner, which *[[Fox Business]]*, citing former executives, reported he had reached by 1980.[^2][^4] He left in March 1981 after an internal inquiry that concerned a Regulation D violation. Cayne said, "Jeffrey Epstein left Bear Stearns of his own volition. It was never suggested that he leave by any member of management." Greenberg said he could not recall. Contemporaries told *[[Vanity Fair]]* of rumors that the executive committee asked for Epstein's resignation after his two supporters, Greenberg and Cayne, were outvoted, and a former executive told Fox Business in 2019 that Epstein "left at our invitation ... it was very serious stuff."[^2][^4]
Epstein's company [[Financial Trust Company]] held a large block of Bear Stearns stock until the firm failed. In a verified complaint of August 5, 2009 against Bear Stearns, filed in the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]], Financial Trust named Cayne, Greenberg, [[Warren Spector]], [[Samuel Molinaro]] and [[Alan Schwartz]] as the officers whose statements Epstein had relied on in holding the shares, which it sold in March 2008 for 34.99 and 3.41 dollars a share.[^5]
### The Felony Policy Exception
After the 2008 sale, Epstein's brokerage accounts passed to JPMorgan, where retaining a client with a felony conviction required the general counsel's approval. In June 2023 the Virgin Islands, suing JPMorgan over its Epstein relationship, quoted a bank email stating that Greenberg had gone to Cutler "for an exception to the felony policy" for Epstein; its statement of material facts placed the request in August 2010.[^3][^6] On January 19, 2011, while the bank's anti-money-laundering staff were pressing to end the relationship, a JPMorgan Securities employee wrote to Epstein's office: "Ace would love to speak to Jeffrey. Can you please call Ace at [number], or e-mail him a phone number where Jeffrey can be reached?" JPMorgan had withheld the email as outside the "negotiated scope of search" until the territory asked for it by name.[^3]
The bank's counsel at [[WilmerHale]] answered that "following Epstein's guilty plea in 2008, people from legacy Bear Stearns, including Mr. Greenberg, in connection with post-acquisition transition of accounts, may have attempted to speak with Stephen Cutler, then JPMC's General Counsel, about application of JPMC's corporate policy requiring approval of its General Counsel ... to retain a brokerage account for a client with a felony conviction," that the decision "was made by Mr. Cutler," and that there was "no evidence that Mr. Greenberg had anything to do with Epstein's accounts at the Private Bank." The territory asked the court to compel production of emails between Greenberg and Epstein and between Greenberg and [[Jamie Dimon]], [[Mary Erdoes]], [[Jes Staley]] or Cutler about Epstein. JPMorgan's internal 2019 review, Project Jeep, had opened with the note that "There is a highbridge angle and one dating back to Bear."[^3][^7] Greenberg had died in 2014 and made no statement on these matters.
### Footnotes
[^1]: "Alan 'Ace' Greenberg, who remade Bear Stearns, dies at 86." *Bloomberg News,* via *Portland Press Herald,* July 25, 2014. https://www.pressherald.com/2014/07/25/alan-ace-greenberg-who-remade-bear-stearns-dies-at-86/
[^2]: Vicky Ward, "The Talented Mr. Epstein," *Vanity Fair,* March 2003, as republished by the author. https://vickyward.com/article/the-talented-mr-epstein/
[^3]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02808715, Court Records (Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904), letter motion of Motley Rice to Judge Jed S. Rakoff seeking leave to reopen depositions, ECF No. 191, June 7, 2023 (filed June 20, 2023). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank%2C%20N.A.%2C%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02808715.pdf
[^4]: Charles Gasparino and Lydia Moynihan, "The woes of Jeffrey Epstein: How he maintained Wall Street connections while downplaying child sex accusations," *Fox Business,* August 10, 2019. https://www.foxbusiness.com/features/jeffrey-epstein-wall-street-connections-child-sex-trafficking
[^5]: Financial Trust Company, Inc. v. The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., Civil No. 2009/106 (D.V.I.), Verified Complaint dated August 5, 2009; reproduced as Exhibit 253, ECF No. 244-8 (filed July 25, 2023), in Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.). https://web.archive.org/web/20260117011822/https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/244-08.pdf
[^6]: Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts, ECF No. 221 (filed July 24, 2023), paras. 123-124, 149, 157-158. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.591653/gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.221.0.pdf
[^7]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02808625, Court Records (Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904), letter of John J. Butts, WilmerHale, opposing the motion to reopen depositions, ECF No. 187, June 9, 2023 (filed June 15, 2023). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank%2C%20N.A.%2C%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02808625.pdf

View file

@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ As U.S. Attorney he oversaw the 2006 prosecution of the [[Cali Drug Cartel]] lea
### The 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement
Federal investigators in the Southern District of Florida identified roughly 30, and ultimately more than 30, minors whom Epstein was alleged to have sexually abused, after the Palm Beach Police Department referred the case to the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] on concerns that the local prosecution would be too lenient. By May 2007 government lawyers had prepared an 82-page prosecution memorandum and a 53-page draft federal indictment charging Epstein with multiple federal sex offenses; the Justice Department later described the draft as a 60-count indictment. Acosta decided in 2007 to negotiate with Epstein's defense team rather than seek that indictment. At a July 31, 2007 meeting with Epstein's lawyers, his office offered to end the investigation if Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges, served at least two years, registered as a sex offender, and agreed to a damages mechanism for victims. Acosta did not sign the agreement but, according to the Justice Department's later review, "participated in its drafting and approved it, with knowledge of its terms."[^1][^6][^7]
Federal investigators in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida|Southern District of Florida]] identified roughly 30, and ultimately more than 30, minors whom Epstein was alleged to have sexually abused, after the [[Palm Beach Police Department]] referred the case to the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] on concerns that the local prosecution would be too lenient. By May 2007 government lawyers had prepared an 82-page prosecution memorandum and a 53-page draft federal indictment charging Epstein with multiple federal sex offenses; the Justice Department later described the draft as a 60-count indictment. Acosta decided in 2007 to negotiate with Epstein's defense team rather than seek that indictment. At a July 31, 2007 meeting with Epstein's lawyers, his office offered to end the investigation if Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges, served at least two years, registered as a sex offender, and agreed to a damages mechanism for victims. Acosta did not sign the agreement but, according to the Justice Department's later review, "participated in its drafting and approved it, with knowledge of its terms."[^1][^6][^7]
The non-prosecution agreement, negotiated through 2007 and executed in stages, required Epstein to plead guilty in Palm Beach County court, which he did in June 2008, to state charges including soliciting prostitution and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution. He was sentenced to 18 months, of which he served roughly 13, under conditions that allowed extensive work release. The Justice Department's review recorded that from October 2008 he spent "12 hours a day purportedly working at the '[[Florida Science Foundation]],' an entity Epstein had recently incorporated that was co-located at the West Palm Beach office of one of Epstein's attorneys"; later reporting on sheriff's records described him leaving the jail for up to 16 hours a day, seven days a week. The foundation paid the [[Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office]] 128,136 dollars during his incarceration. Epstein's defense team included high-profile lawyers such as [[Alan Dershowitz|Alan Dershowitz]], [[Kenneth Starr|Kenneth Starr]], and [[Roy Black|Roy Black]], who pressed the office for concessions.[^1][^6][^7][^8][^9][^10]
@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ The Office of Professional Responsibility recorded two recusal questions. In May
### Crime Victims' Rights Act Ruling
In the case styled Doe v. United States, No. 08-80736, brought by victims including [[Courtney Wild|Courtney Wild]] and [[Jane Doe 2|Jane Doe 2]] to enforce their rights, United States District Judge [[Kenneth Marra|Kenneth Marra]] ruled on February 21, 2019, that the government had violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by failing to confer with the victims before entering the non-prosecution agreement. The opinion recorded that "[w]hile the Government spent untold hours negotiating the terms and implications of the NPA with Epstein's attorneys, scant information was shared with victims," and that "[t]he Court is not ruling that the decision not to prosecute was improper." After the ruling the Justice Department recused Acosta's former office from the litigation and assigned the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia to defend it. Marra wrote that "particularly problematic was the government's decision to conceal the existence of the" agreement and to "mislead the victims to believe that federal prosecution was still a possibility," finding that prosecutors had counseled the victims to have "patience" after the deal had been signed.[^7][^14]
In the case styled [[Doe v. United States]], No. 08-80736, brought by victims including [[Courtney Wild|Courtney Wild]] and [[Jane Doe 2|Jane Doe 2]] to enforce their rights, United States District Judge [[Kenneth Marra|Kenneth Marra]] ruled on February 21, 2019, that the government had violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by failing to confer with the victims before entering the non-prosecution agreement. The opinion recorded that "[w]hile the Government spent untold hours negotiating the terms and implications of the NPA with Epstein's attorneys, scant information was shared with victims," and that "[t]he Court is not ruling that the decision not to prosecute was improper." After the ruling the Justice Department recused Acosta's former office from the litigation and assigned the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia to defend it. Marra wrote that "particularly problematic was the government's decision to conceal the existence of the" agreement and to "mislead the victims to believe that federal prosecution was still a possibility," finding that prosecutors had counseled the victims to have "patience" after the deal had been signed.[^7][^14]
In a later ruling on September 16, 2019, Marra declined to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement itself, noting that Epstein had died and that rescission would not restore the victims' position, and he held that the victims were not entitled to monetary damages from the government under the statute. He refused the victims' request to order Acosta to meet with them, writing: "The Court has no jurisdiction over Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. Attorney, who is now a private citizen." The decisions established the CVRA violation as a finding of fact while leaving the underlying agreement in place.[^19][^20]

View file

@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Critics dispute the seniority he claims. Israel has generally characterized him
### Arms Case and Acquittal
Ben-Menashe first drew wide public attention when he was arrested in the United States in November 1989 and charged under the Arms Export Control Act with attempting to broker the sale of three Israeli-owned Lockheed [[C-130 Hercules]] transport aircraft to Iran, a deal valued at about 36 million dollars, using false end-user certificates.[^4] The prosecution was brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, where the related rulings carried the caption United States v. Menashe.[^14] He spent nearly a year in custody before a jury acquitted him and a co-defendant on November 28, 1990, after his defense argued, and the jury accepted, that he had been acting under the authority of the Israeli government in a transaction tied to Israel's arms dealings with Iran.[^4]
Ben-Menashe first drew wide public attention when he was arrested in the United States in November 1989 and charged under the Arms Export Control Act with attempting to broker the sale of three Israeli-owned Lockheed [[C-130 Hercules]] transport aircraft to Iran, a deal valued at about 36 million dollars, using false end-user certificates.[^4] The prosecution was brought in the United States District Court for the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]], where the related rulings carried the caption United States v. Menashe.[^14] He spent nearly a year in custody before a jury acquitted him and a co-defendant on November 28, 1990, after his defense argued, and the jury accepted, that he had been acting under the authority of the Israeli government in a transaction tied to Israel's arms dealings with Iran.[^4]
Israel denied that he had been authorized to act for it in the transaction, repeating the position that he had been only a translator.[^4] The acquittal nonetheless rested on the jury's willingness to credit his Israeli-agent defense, and he afterward cited the verdict as vindication of his broader account, even though the bodies that later examined his substantive claims rejected them.[^2][^6] The acquittal gave him a platform from which he expanded a series of claims about secret United States and Israeli arms networks, set out in his 1992 book [[Profits of War]].[^5]

View file

@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Epstein donated 1,000 dollars to Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign and contri
Flight logs released in civil litigation and later in document tranches list Clinton on flights aboard Epstein's Boeing 727, registration N908JE. Reporting on the logs in 2016 noted Clinton appearing on at least 26 flight "legs," a figure that counts individual segments of multi-stop trips rather than distinct journeys, and noted that he traveled on at least some legs without his [[United States Secret Service|Secret Service]] detail. Maxwell, recorded in the logs by the initials "GM," appears on the trips, as do entries read as the initials of Epstein assistant [[Sarah Kellen]]. The logs record who boarded which aircraft and when; they do not, on their face, establish what occurred at any destination.[^2][^3]
[[FactCheck.org]], reviewing the manifests, counted six trips comprising the 26 flights between February 2002 and November 2003, the discrepancy between trip and leg counts arising from whether each take-off and landing is tallied separately. The documented segments included a February 2002 Miami-to-Westchester hop, a round trip from New York to London in March 2002, a May 2002 sequence through Japan, [[Hong Kong]], Singapore, and Brunei, a July 2002 stop tied to a wedding in Morocco, the September 2002 Africa tour, and a November 2003 routing through Brussels, Oslo, Hong Kong, and Beijing. President [[Donald Trump]] in 2025 claimed Clinton flew on the plane "27 or 28 times," a characterization FactCheck.org described as conflating the leg total with the number of trips; the same review found no flight log placing Clinton on an aircraft bound for the U.S. Virgin Islands.[^11]
[[FactCheck.org]], reviewing the manifests, counted six trips comprising the 26 flights between February 2002 and November 2003, the discrepancy between trip and leg counts arising from whether each take-off and landing is tallied separately. The documented segments included a February 2002 Miami-to-Westchester hop, a round trip from New York to London in March 2002, a May 2002 sequence through Japan, [[Hong Kong]], Singapore, and Brunei, a July 2002 stop tied to a wedding in Morocco, the September 2002 Africa tour, and a November 2003 routing through Brussels, Oslo, Hong Kong, and Beijing. President [[Donald Trump]] in 2025 claimed Clinton flew on the plane "27 or 28 times," a characterization FactCheck.org described as conflating the leg total with the number of trips; the same review found no flight log placing Clinton on an aircraft bound for the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]].[^11]
Maxwell, deposed in the Giuffre litigation, stated of the island that "just so we are clear, the allegations that Clinton had a meal on Jeffrey's island is 100 percent false." On one of the 2003 legs, from Oslo to the Russian city of Novosibirsk, the manifest listed Clinton, Epstein, the aide [[Doug Band]], and individuals identified by the initials "GM" and "SK." No court, prosecutor, or official investigation has produced a finding that Clinton witnessed or participated in any crime aboard the aircraft.[^12][^2]

View file

@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ tags:
summary: "Cornelius Blackshear was a U.S."
---
Cornelius Blackshear was a U.S. Trustee in the Southern District of New York who later became a U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge for the Southern District of New York. He became a key figure in the allegations surrounding the attempted conversion of [[INSLAW|Inslaw]]'s bankruptcy case and a subsequent alleged cover-up.
Cornelius Blackshear was a U.S. Trustee in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]] who later became a U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge for the Southern District of New York. He became a key figure in the allegations surrounding the attempted conversion of [[INSLAW|Inslaw]]'s bankruptcy case and a subsequent alleged cover-up.
Blackshear initially testified in a deposition on March 25, 1987, that [[William White]], the U.S. Trustee for the District of Columbia, had told him that [[Thomas Stanton]], Director of the Executive Office of U.S. Trustees (EOUST), had tried to pressure White to convert [[INSLAW]]'s Chapter 11 reorganization to a Chapter 7 liquidation and to have [[Harry Jones]] assigned to White to effect the conversion. Blackshear also stated that Stanton had never contacted him about detailing Jones, but he thought Stanton might have approached Jones directly. This testimony supported Inslaw's primary allegation of a plot to liquidate the company. However, after speaking with White, Blackshear realized he was mistaken and had confused Inslaw with the UPI case, about which White had told him the IRS had pressured him to join a motion to convert. Blackshear then prepared and signed an affidavit recanting his deposition testimony, stating that he had confused the cases. He also gave a second deposition repeating his new recollections. During the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation, Blackshear essentially repeated his recanting statements, maintaining that White had not told him Stanton pressured him to convert Inslaw, and that he had confused Inslaw with UPI. He did, however, disagree with White regarding a conversation about the possible assignment of Harry Jones to Washington, believing White had told him Stanton planned to bring Jones to Washington, while White maintained Blackshear told this to White. Blackshear also denied discussing with [[Anthony Pasciuto]] at a social gathering that he was sorry for his conduct or had given false testimony in his recantation to avoid hurting people.[^1]
Blackshear initially testified in a deposition on March 25, 1987, that [[William White]], the U.S. Trustee for the District of Columbia, had told him that [[Thomas Stanton]], Director of the Executive Office of U.S. Trustees (EOUST), had tried to pressure White to convert [[INSLAW]]'s Chapter 11 reorganization to a Chapter 7 liquidation and to have [[Harry Jones]] assigned to White to effect the conversion. Blackshear also stated that Stanton had never contacted him about detailing Jones, but he thought Stanton might have approached Jones directly. This testimony supported Inslaw's primary allegation of a plot to liquidate the company. However, after speaking with White, Blackshear realized he was mistaken and had confused Inslaw with the UPI case, about which White had told him the IRS had pressured him to join a motion to convert. Blackshear then prepared and signed an affidavit recanting his deposition testimony, stating that he had confused the cases. He also gave a second deposition repeating his new recollections. During the [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] (OPR) investigation, Blackshear essentially repeated his recanting statements, maintaining that White had not told him Stanton pressured him to convert Inslaw, and that he had confused Inslaw with UPI. He did, however, disagree with White regarding a conversation about the possible assignment of Harry Jones to Washington, believing White had told him Stanton planned to bring Jones to Washington, while White maintained Blackshear told this to White. Blackshear also denied discussing with [[Anthony Pasciuto]] at a social gathering that he was sorry for his conduct or had given false testimony in his recantation to avoid hurting people.[^1]
Bankruptcy Judge Bason, in his findings, chose to believe Blackshear's original testimony and found his recantation to be the result of an "honest mistake." However, several years later, in January 1991, Bason filed a complaint against Blackshear with the Judicial Council of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that he now believed Blackshear recanted not due to an honest mistake but because he made a conscious choice to testify falsely. The OPR, however, credited Blackshear's recantation, noting that he had no apparent motive to lie about the matter. The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) found Blackshear's recantation implausible, noting that he had stated on four occasions prior to his recantation that White told him about pressure from Stanton to convert the Inslaw case. The PSI also found no evidence to support Blackshear's explanation that he had confused Inslaw with the UPI case. The Special Counsel's investigation concluded that there was insufficient evidence to prove that Blackshear lied when he recanted his deposition testimony. The report acknowledged the confusion arising from Blackshear's various statements but attributed it to poor memory rather than intentional misstatements. The Special Counsel found no reason why Blackshear, a sitting bankruptcy judge, would commit perjury and jeopardize his career.[^1]

View file

@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Epstein died in the [[Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York]] on August 10,
### Removal
On the night of Friday, June 19, 2020, Barr issued a statement that Berman was "stepping down" and that Trump would nominate [[Jay Clayton]], chairman of the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]], to replace him, with [[Craig Carpenito]], the U.S. Attorney for [[New Jersey]], to serve in the interim. Berman answered that he had learned of his departure from a press release: "I have not resigned, and have no intention of resigning, my position, to which I was appointed by the Judges of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York." On June 20 Barr wrote to him: "Unfortunately, with your statement of last night, you have chosen public spectacle over public service... Because you have declared that you have no intention of resigning, I have asked the President to remove you as of today, and he has done so." Trump told reporters, "That's his department, not my department... I'm not involved"; a senior administration official told NBC News that Barr had asked Trump for permission to fire Berman and Trump had agreed.[^4][^5]
On the night of Friday, June 19, 2020, Barr issued a statement that Berman was "stepping down" and that Trump would nominate [[Jay Clayton]], chairman of the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]], to replace him, with [[Craig Carpenito]], the U.S. Attorney for [[New Jersey]], to serve in the interim. Berman answered that he had learned of his departure from a press release: "I have not resigned, and have no intention of resigning, my position, to which I was appointed by the Judges of the United States District Court for the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]]." On June 20 Barr wrote to him: "Unfortunately, with your statement of last night, you have chosen public spectacle over public service... Because you have declared that you have no intention of resigning, I have asked the President to remove you as of today, and he has done so." Trump told reporters, "That's his department, not my department... I'm not involved"; a senior administration official told NBC News that Barr had asked Trump for permission to fire Berman and Trump had agreed.[^4][^5]
Berman left that evening after Barr agreed that his deputy, [[Audrey Strauss]], would lead the office as acting U.S. Attorney, a condition Berman said safeguarded the district's "tradition of integrity and independence." On July 2, 2020, twelve days later, the office under Strauss announced the arrest of [[Ghislaine Maxwell]] on charges of conspiring with Epstein.[^4][^5][^8]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
---
category: "Crime & Abuse Networks"
tags:
- Person
- HarryBeller
- JeffreyEpstein
- Accountant
- JPMorganChase
- SuspiciousActivityReports
- SouthernTrust
- RonWyden
alias:
- Harry Beller
summary: "Jeffrey Epstein's in-house accountant, who held power of attorney over his JPMorgan accounts, made the cash withdrawals flagged in the bank's suspicious activity reports, and was never questioned by federal prosecutors."
location: "New York, New York"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
role: "in-house accountant with power of attorney over his JPMorgan accounts"
fn: 1
- type: represented
with: "[[Nathan Z. Dershowitz]]"
reverse: true
start: 2007-09
role: "counsel on a federal grand jury subpoena"
fn: 4
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Harry Beller is a New York accountant who worked for [[Jeffrey Epstein]] as his in-house accountant. He held power of attorney and signatory authority over Epstein's accounts at [[JPMorgan Chase]], executed wires for him, and made cash withdrawals that the bank flagged to the [[U.S. Department of the Treasury|Treasury]] in suspicious activity reports. He was subpoenaed to the federal grand jury in [[Florida]] in 2007, directed the 2012 wire that paid the application fee for Epstein's Virgin Islands tax-incentive company, and in 2025 and 2026 was named by the minority staff of the [[Senate Finance Committee]] under Senator [[Ron Wyden]] as a person whose role merited criminal investigation. Wyden's August 2026 report stated that federal prosecutors had never questioned him. He has not been charged with any crime.[^1][^2][^3]
### The Grand Jury Subpoena
In the federal investigation that ended with Epstein's [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement|non-prosecution agreement]], the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]] subpoenaed Beller to the grand jury in September 2007, in the same weeks as subpoenas to Epstein's assistant [[Lesley Groff]], the model agent [[Jean-Luc Brunel]] and [[Bear Stearns]]. The lawyer [[Nathan Z. Dershowitz]] represented Beller and a second Epstein employee on their subpoenas, and on September 12, 2007 told the prosecutor that Groff would "proceed by interview." The agreement was signed on September 24, 2007.[^4]
### JPMorgan Accounts and Cash
A forensic accountant retained by the Virgin Islands identified 134 JPMorgan accounts owned by Epstein or related people and entities, including accounts for Beller, [[Richard Kahn]], [[Darren Indyke]] and [[Ghislaine Maxwell]].[^2][^5] According to a November 19, 2025 memorandum by a Senate Finance Committee investigator to Wyden, based on JPMorgan records unsealed in the territory's suit against the bank, Beller "had power of attorney over Epstein's bank accounts at JPMC and withdrew massive amounts of cash at Epstein's direction," and suspicious activity reports filed by the bank "documented how Beller had signatory authority over Epstein's accounts and withdrew millions of dollars in cash on Epstein's behalf." A report JPMorgan filed with the Treasury on August 13, 2019, after Epstein's arrest, stated the bank's belief that "both Indyke and Beller controlled movement of Epstein's funds as signers of several Epstein accounts."[^1]
Internal bank correspondence recorded that Beller cashed 20 checks totaling about 800,000 dollars from January 2007 through 2008. In March 2012, when a risk executive raised 160,000 dollars in cash withdrawals that Epstein said paid for jet fuel, [[John Duffy]], chief executive of JPMorgan's U.S. private bank, answered that "this is a better pattern than I thought...I did ask him to withdraw this cash from his aviation account for these payments," and, according to the memorandum, suggested following up about the withdrawals with Beller, "who we know." In 2013 compliance executives found more than 920,000 dollars in cash withdrawals from his accounts between 2009 and 2013, "all conducted in NY by POA Harry Beller."[^1]
### The Southern Trust Application Fee
On September 21, 2012 Beller faxed JPMorgan a memorandum directing it to wire 5,000 dollars from Epstein's account through Pacific Coast Banker's Bank to Merchants Commercial Bank in [[St. Thomas]], "for further credit to Kellerhals Ferguson LLP," the firm of Epstein's territorial lawyer [[Erika Kellerhals]]; Epstein's statement for the month records the debit with the reference "Southern Trust Company Application Fee." Two months later Epstein and Kellerhals presented [[Southern Trust Company]] to the Virgin Islands [[Economic Development Commission]], which granted it a ten-year tax-incentive certificate from February 1, 2013. The territory later estimated that the certificate let Epstein avoid 80,576,236 dollars in taxes.[^6][^7]
### Congressional Inquiries
The memorandum recalled that in September 2025 Wyden had pointed out to Treasury Secretary [[Scott Bessent]] that Treasury records documented that Indyke and Beller "had signatory authority over Epstein's bank accounts and were responsible for executing hundreds of millions of dollars in suspicious transactions on Epstein's behalf." Wyden's Produce Epstein Treasury Records Act, S. 2746, introduced on September 9, 2025, would require the Treasury to produce suspicious activity reports relating to a list of people and entities that includes Beller, Kellerhals, Indyke, Kahn and Maxwell. The November 2025 staff memorandum concluded that "Epstein's accountant Harry Beller was an integral part of Epstein's financial operation and his potential links to sex trafficking crimes merits further investigation," and that "Beller and Darren Indyke's roles as financial intermediaries for Epstein, merit further investigation."[^1][^8]
Wyden's August 4, 2026 report, "Looking the Other Way," called for criminal investigations of Indyke, Kahn and Beller, stating that federal prosecutors had never questioned them. None of the three has been charged with a crime.[^3]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, Memorandum to Senator Ron Wyden, Ranking Member, "JPMorgan Chase & Co. underreported Epstein's suspicious transactions to the U.S. government and should be the subject of further investigation," November 19, 2025 (redacted), sections V and VII, pp. 12 to 17, citing JPM-SDNYLIT-W-00017206-207 (SAR number 127304700, filed August 13, 2019) and JPM-SDNY-LIT-00269719. https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/memorandum_to_senator_wyden_on_jpmc-epstein_redactedpdf.pdf
[^2]: Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), Expert Report of Jorge Amador, ECF No. 238-31 (filed July 25, 2023), report pp. 6, 16-17, 24, 46. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.591653/gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.238.31.pdf
[^3]: U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, Ranking Member Ron Wyden, "Looking the Other Way: How Wall Street Banks Enabled Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Trafficking," August 4, 2026, pp. 3-6, 50-61. https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/wyden_wall_street_epstein_report.pdf
[^4]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1 (U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida), pp. 11, 21. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf
[^5]: U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, Ranking Member Ron Wyden, "Looking the Other Way: How Wall Street Banks Enabled Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Trafficking," August 4, 2026, pp. 5-7, 15-43 (forensic accounting of 134 JPMorgan accounts). https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/wyden_wall_street_epstein_report.pdf
[^6]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA01580553, DataSet 10, memorandum from Harry Beller to JPMorgan wire desk, September 21, 2012 (JPM-SDNY-00059908); EFTA01483636, DataSet 10, JPMorgan statement for Jeffrey E. Epstein, September 1-28, 2012 (JPM-SDNY-00004812). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01580553.pdf ; https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01483636.pdf
[^7]: Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, No. ST-20-CV-14 (V.I. Super. Ct.), Second Amended Complaint, paragraphs 157 to 159 and 175, filed as Exhibit 1 to Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), ECF No. 1-1 (December 27, 2022). https://web.archive.org/web/20260117011558/https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/001-01.pdf
[^8]: S. 2746, 119th Congress, "Produce Epstein Treasury Records Act," introduced September 9, 2025, section 2(b)(2). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-119s2746is/html/BILLS-119s2746is.htm

View file

@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- JackGoldberger
- Lawyer
- CriminalDefense
- JeffreyEpstein
- PalmBeach
- WorkRelease
- FloridaScienceFoundation
alias:
- Jack Alan Goldberger
- Jack A. Goldberger
- Jack Goldberger
summary: "West Palm Beach criminal defense lawyer who handled Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 state plea, whose law office housed the Florida Science Foundation of Epstein's work release, and who defended Epstein in 2009 civil suits."
location: "West Palm Beach, Florida"
relations:
- type: founded
with: "[[Goldberger Weiss]]"
role: "founding partner"
fn: 1
- type: participant_in
with: "[[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]]"
role: "defense counsel for the state plea"
start: 2007-09-12
end: 2009-06
fn: 2
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Jack Alan Goldberger is a criminal defense lawyer in [[West Palm Beach, Florida|West Palm Beach]], founding partner of the firm now called [[Goldberger Weiss]], who represented [[Jeffrey Epstein]] before the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office from 2006 and at his June 30, 2008 guilty plea in state court under the [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]]. The application that won Epstein daytime release from the Palm Beach County Stockade listed his employer, the [[Florida Science Foundation]], at Goldberger's office address and with his firm's telephone number. The line federal prosecutor wrote in December 2008 that "since Day 1, Goldberger and [Krischer] . . . have been scheming to get Epstein out on work release."[^1][^2][^3]
### Practice
Goldberger received a B.A. from [[Syracuse University]] in 1974 and a J.D. from the [[University of Miami School of Law]] in 1978, and was admitted to the Florida Bar in 1978. He has been board-certified in criminal law by the Florida Bar since 1996. His firm's biography lists him as a past member of the board of the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, past president of the Palm Beach County Criminal Defense Association, a past member of the Palm Beach County Criminal Justice Commission and past chairman of its Courts Task Force, and past chairman of the Palm Beach County Bar Association's Criminal Court Advisory Committee, and states that his clients include "corporate executives in both the public and private sector, wall street executives, entertainment figures, and professional sports athletes and executives." The firm was earlier styled Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss.[^1][^4]
### The State Case
Epstein's first local lawyer was a former Palm Beach County assistant state attorney. According to State Attorney [[Barry Krischer]]'s account to the [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]]'s [[Office of Professional Responsibility]], that lawyer brought [[Alan Dershowitz]] to see Krischer, and Dershowitz so "tainted the waters" that Epstein also hired Goldberger, with whom Krischer had "a working relationship." The assistant state attorney handling the case was married to Goldberger's law partner; once Goldberger was retained she was removed and [[Lanna Belohlavek]] took over. "Goldberger, together with Gerald Lefcourt, a nationally known New York criminal defense attorney also representing Epstein, then directed their efforts at Belohlavek and Krischer to dissuade the office from prosecuting Epstein, largely by attacking the credibility of the victim witnesses."[^2]
On September 12, 2007 Goldberger, [[Jay Lefkowitz]] and [[Gerald Lefcourt]] met the federal prosecutors together with Krischer and Belohlavek, a meeting at which, the Office of Professional Responsibility found, "the USAO made additional concessions." On September 21 the line prosecutor, [[Ann Marie Villafana|A. Marie Villafaña]], summarized the State Attorney's negotiations with Goldberger, including his request that Epstein not have to register as a sex offender. On December 7, 2007 Goldberger filed a notice of hearing setting the plea for January 4, 2008; on January 2 he told Belohlavek that the hearing was postponed because the facts "did not fit the proposed state charge." In the spring of 2008, while Epstein's appeal was pending before the Deputy Attorney General, Krischer told the federal office that he and Goldberger had arrived at a resolution involving a 90-day jail term. Villafaña wrote to her supervisor: "Please tell me that you are joking. Maybe we should throw him [Epstein] a party and tell him we are sorry to have bothered him."[^2][^5]
### The Plea and the Stockade
In late June 2008 Villafaña objected that the draft state plea form provided for community control, and reported that Goldberger "'swore' that Epstein would be in custody 24-hours-a-day" but "let it slip that Epstein would not be at the jail, he would be at the stockade." Goldberger agreed to insert the word "imprisoned" after "6 months"; the signed form instead carried "jail sentence." Epstein appeared with Goldberger on June 30, 2008 and pleaded guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and to procuring a person under 18 for prostitution. When the judge asked whether the plea was tied to promises by other jurisdictions, Goldberger and Belohlavek disclosed the non-prosecution agreement at sidebar, and the court ordered it filed under seal. That afternoon Villafaña gave Goldberger the list of 31 victims to whom the agreement's civil-damages provision applied, and on July 10 she sent him a "Final Notification of Identified Victims" listing 32.[^2]
The day after the plea a sheriff's official told Villafaña that Epstein "would be eligible for work release and will be placed on work release," contrary to what Goldberger had "specifically told" her days earlier. She noted that the "Florida Science Foundation," where Epstein told the court he had worked "every day" for "a couple of years," did not exist until November 2007, and that the address he gave the court for it "was the office of Epstein's attorney Jack Goldberger." On December 3, 2008 she wrote to her supervisors: "It appears that, since Day 1, Goldberger and [Krischer] . . . have been scheming to get Epstein out on work release. For example, the indictment incorrectly charges Epstein for an offense that would have made him ineligible for work release if it had been charged correctly." On December 11 she wrote to the sheriff's Corrections Division that the telephone number on Epstein's work release application for the foundation was that of Goldberger's law firm. "The Sheriff's Office neither acknowledged nor responded." The foundation paid the [[Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office]] 128,136 dollars during Epstein's incarceration, and deputies' July 2009 overtime reports on the detail read "Provide security for Jeffrey Epstein."[^2][^3][^6]
On June 12, 2009 Villafaña wrote to Goldberger about a violation of the agreement, and on June 15 to Lefkowitz, [[Roy Black]] and Goldberger on the history of Epstein's performance; no indictment followed.[^5]
### Civil Suits
In the 2009 federal suit Jane Doe No. 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein, brought by [[Virginia Giuffre]] before Judge [[Kenneth Marra]] in the [[United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida|Southern District of Florida]], Epstein was represented by Robert D. Critton Jr. of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman and by Goldberger of Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss. The case ended in a settlement whose agreement and release was filed in 2021 in [[Giuffre v. Prince Andrew]].[^4]
Goldberger remained Epstein's co-counsel in Epstein v. Rothstein, the Palm Beach County suit Epstein filed in 2009 against [[Scott Rothstein]] and [[Bradley Edwards]], which became Edwards's counterclaim for malicious prosecution. On November 9, 2018 Epstein's counsel, Goldberger among them, moved for in camera inspection of 302 emails withheld on a 1,607-entry privilege log by Edwards and by [[Paul Cassell]], who with [[Jay Howell]] represented three victims as limited intervenors, arguing that most were "e-mails among attorneys and staff" and "with media sources." Epstein settled the counterclaim the next month with a written apology to Edwards.[^7][^8]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Goldberger Weiss, P.A., "Attorneys: Jack Goldberger." https://www.goldbergerweiss.com/attorneys/
[^2]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284, Prior DOJ Disclosures, Office of Professional Responsibility, report, "Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation," November 2020, pp. 8, 14-16, 64, 94, 101, 109-112, 114-116, 234-238. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Prior%20DOJ%20Disclosures/Memos.%20&%20Correspondence/EFTA02847284.pdf
[^3]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, privileged chronology of the federal investigation, pp. 23, 37 to 39. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf
[^4]: Settlement Agreement and General Release, Jane Doe No. 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein, No. 09-80656-CIV-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.), filed as Exhibit A, ECF No. 32-1, in Giuffre v. Prince Andrew, No. 1:21-cv-06702 (S.D.N.Y.); complaint at ECF No. 35-2. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.564713/gov.uscourts.nysd.564713.32.1.pdf
[^5]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, pp. 14, 19 to 20, 45 to 51. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf
[^6]: "Jeffrey Epstein paid Palm Beach Sheriff's Office $128,000 during incarceration for prostitution charges," *WPTV,* 2019. https://www.wptv.com/news/region-c-palm-beach-county/new-jeffrey-epstein-paid-palm-beach-sheriffs-office-128-000-during-incarceration-for-prostitution ; U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA01308629, DataSet 10, Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Extra Duty Permits System overtime report forms, Permit No. 7804, "Florida Science Foundation," July 1 to 14, 2009. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01308629.pdf
[^7]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02768436, Court Records (Epstein v. Rothstein, No. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. 2009)), Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for an In Camera Inspection of E-mails, e-filed November 9, 2018, pp. 1, 3, 17, 21. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein%2C%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/EFTA02768436.pdf
[^8]: "Millionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein apologizes in settling malicious prosecution suit," *CNN,* December 4, 2018. https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/04/politics/jeffrey-epstein-lawsuit-settled

View file

@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
---
category: "Intelligence & Government"
tags:
- Person
- JayClayton
- SEC
- SullivanAndCromwell
- ApolloGlobalManagement
- SDNY
- DirectorOfNationalIntelligence
- JeffreyEpstein
- EpsteinFiles
alias:
- Walter J. Clayton III
summary: "Sullivan & Cromwell partner whose clients included Deutsche Bank and Reid Hoffman, SEC chairman, Apollo chairman after Leon Black, SDNY U.S. Attorney assigned Epstein matters in 2025, then Director of National Intelligence."
location: "New York, New York"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Sullivan & Cromwell]]"
role: "partner"
end: 2017
fn: 1
- type: represented
with: "[[Deutsche Bank]]"
role: "client of Clayton at Sullivan & Cromwell, disclosed to the Office of Government Ethics"
end: 2017
fn: 2
- type: represented
with: "[[Reid Hoffman]]"
role: "client of Clayton at Sullivan & Cromwell, disclosed to the Office of Government Ethics"
end: 2017
fn: 2
- type: head_of
with: "[[Securities and Exchange Commission]]"
role: "chairman"
start: 2017-05-04
end: 2020-12
fn: 1
- type: head_of
with: "[[Apollo Global Management]]"
role: "non-executive chairman of the board, succeeding Leon Black"
start: 2021-03-22
fn: 7
- type: investigated
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
role: "assigned by the Attorney General to investigate Epstein's dealings with Clinton, Summers, Hoffman and JPMorgan Chase"
start: 2025-11-14
fn: 3
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Walter J. "Jay" Clayton III is an American lawyer who was a partner of [[Sullivan & Cromwell]], chairman of the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]] from 2017 to 2020, non-executive chairman of [[Apollo Global Management]] in succession to its founder [[Leon Black]], and from 2025 [[United States]] Attorney for the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]]. In November 2025 Attorney General [[Pam Bondi]] assigned him to investigate [[Jeffrey Epstein]]'s dealings with [[Bill Clinton]], [[Larry Summers]], [[Reid Hoffman]] and [[JPMorgan Chase]]; Hoffman and [[Deutsche Bank]] had been among the clients Clayton disclosed on his 2017 government ethics filing. He was sworn in as the ninth [[Director of National Intelligence]] on August 3, 2026.[^1][^2][^3][^4]
### Sullivan & Cromwell
Clayton was born at Fort Eustis in [[Newport News, Virginia|Newport News]], [[Virginia]], and grew up mostly in central and southeastern [[Pennsylvania]]. He holds an engineering degree from the [[University of Pennsylvania]], degrees in economics from the [[University of Cambridge]], where he was a Thouron Scholar, and a law degree from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. After clerking for Judge Marvin Katz of the [[U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania]], he joined Sullivan & Cromwell, became a partner, sat on its management committee and co-headed its corporate practice; from 2009 to 2017 he also taught at Penn Law.[^1]
On his nomination to the SEC, Clayton filed a financial disclosure with the [[Office of Government Ethics]] listing clients from which he had earned more than 5,000 dollars in a year. They included Deutsche Bank AG, [[Goldman Sachs|The Goldman Sachs Group]] and the Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund, [[Barclays]], UBS Securities, [[Brown Brothers Harriman]], [[Bessemer Trust]], [[SoftBank]], the [[Royal Bank of Canada]], [[Pershing Square Capital Management|Pershing Square]], [[Paul Tudor Jones]], [[Valeant Pharmaceuticals]], [[Volkswagen]], [[TeliaSonera]], Suning Commerce Group, [[The Weinstein Company]] and Reid Hoffman. Four individual and five corporate clients were withheld "because the disclosure of the representations are the subject of attorney-client privilege and other confidentiality obligations," two of them because they were "the subject of a pending non-public investigation." He reported 7.6 million dollars in income from the firm in the preceding year.[^2][^5]
### SEC and Apollo
Nominated by President [[Donald Trump]] on January 20, 2017, Clayton was sworn in as SEC chairman on May 4, 2017 and served until December 2020, sitting also on the President's Working Group on Financial Markets, the [[Financial Stability Oversight Council]] and the [[Financial Stability Board]].[^1] On the night of June 19, 2020, while still at the SEC, he was named by Attorney General [[William Barr]] as Trump's choice to replace [[Geoffrey Berman]] as U.S. Attorney in Manhattan; Berman refused to step down, saying, "I have not resigned, and have no intention of resigning, my position, to which I was appointed by the Judges of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York," and was removed the next day.[^6]
Apollo appointed Clayton its lead independent director from March 1, 2021. On March 22, 2021 it announced that he had been named non-executive chairman and that he and [[Marc Rowan]], as chief executive, succeeded Black, who stepped down citing "my wife Debra's and my health issues." Clayton said, "It is an honor to serve Apollo's investors as Chairman and further the founders' commitment to leading, shareholder-oriented governance."[^7]
### U.S. Attorney in Manhattan
Clayton was sworn in as interim U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in April 2025, on appointment by the Attorney General.[^8] On August 18, 2025, as his interim term was about to expire, the judges of the district appointed "Walter J. Clayton III" United States Attorney under 28 U.S.C. § 546(d), effective August 20, "to serve until a United States Attorney, nominated by the President and appointed with the advice and consent of the United States Senate, takes office."[^9]
On July 16, 2025 the office dismissed [[Maurene Comey]], a prosecutor on the Epstein and [[Ghislaine Maxwell]] cases, by an email citing "Article II of the United States Constitution." According to her lawsuit against the department, when she asked Clayton for an explanation he told her: "All I can say is it came from Washington. I can't tell you anything else."[^10]
On November 14, 2025, at Trump's public request, Bondi assigned Clayton to investigate Epstein's dealings with Clinton, Summers, Hoffman and JPMorgan Chase. Five days later Trump signed the [[Epstein Files Transparency Act]], which permits the withholding of records that would jeopardize "an active federal investigation."[^3] Letters on the department's review of files under the Act were filed over Clayton's name in [[United States v. Maxwell]] on January 15 and January 31, 2026 (ECF Nos. 839 and 847).[^11]
### Director of National Intelligence
Trump nominated Clayton for Director of National Intelligence to fill the post vacated in June 2026 by [[Tulsi Gabbard]].[^4] At his confirmation hearing before the [[Senate Select Committee on Intelligence]] on July 15, 2026, he said, "Senator, I'm not an election denier. Joe Biden was certified as the president of the United States," but declined when pressed by Senator [[Jon Ossoff]] to say that [[Joe Biden]] had won the 2020 election. The committee chairman, [[Tom Cotton]], cited his office's cases, "including the indictment of Venezuelan dictator [[Nicolás Maduro]]." Senator [[Ron Wyden]] cited the office's "recent role in issuing subpoenas for records of [[New York Times]] journalists." The Senate confirmed him 51 to 47 on July 28, 2026.[^4][^12] He was sworn in on August 3, 2026 to oversee the eighteen agencies of the [[United States Intelligence Community|intelligence community]], saying the community's work must be "never weaponized for political motives."[^4]
He was succeeded in Manhattan by Jamie McDonald, who had served as director of enforcement at the [[Commodity Futures Trading Commission]] from 2017 to 2020 and then as a partner of Sullivan & Cromwell.[^13]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, "Jay Clayton," SEC Historical Summary of Chairmen and Commissioners. https://www.sec.gov/about/sec-commissioners/sec-historical-summary-chairmen-commissioners/jay-clayton
[^2]: ProPublica, "Jay Clayton," *Trump Town,* from his OGE Form 278e financial disclosure (database updated October 2019). https://projects.propublica.org/trump-town/staffers/jay-clayton
[^3]: "Bondi taps acting U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton to probe Democrats' ties to Epstein," *The Washington Times,* November 14, 2025. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2025/nov/14/bondi-taps-acting-us-attorney-jay-clayton-probe-democrats-ties/ ; Epstein Files Transparency Act, Pub. L. No. 119-38, § 2(c)(1)(C), 139 Stat. 656. https://www.congress.gov/119/plaws/publ38/PLAW-119publ38.pdf
[^4]: "Jay Clayton sworn in as U.S. director of national intelligence." *Reuters,* via *CNBC,* August 3, 2026. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/03/jay-clayton-sworn-in-as-us-director-of-national-intelligence.html
[^5]: Egan, Matt. "Jay Clayton: Trump's SEC nominee to face questions over deep ties to Wall Street." *CNN Money,* March 22, 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/2017/http://money.cnn.com/2017/03/22/investing/jay-clayton-sec-hearing-wall-street-defender/index.html
[^6]: "Geoffrey Berman, U.S. Attorney Who Prosecuted Trump Allies, Says He Won't Quit." *NPR,* June 20, 2020. https://www.npr.org/2020/06/20/881148365/geoffrey-berman-u-s-attorney-who-prosecuted-trump-allies-says-he-wont-quit ; Kimball, Spencer. "Attorney General Barr tells top Manhattan prosecutor Berman he is fired amid power struggle." *CNBC,* June 20, 2020. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/20/attorney-general-barr-tells-manhattan-us-attorney-berman-he-is-fired-amid-power-struggle.html
[^7]: Apollo Global Management, "Marc Rowan Assumes Role of CEO of Apollo; Jay Clayton Named Non-Executive Chair of Board," press release, March 22, 2021. https://ir.apollo.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/105/marc-rowan-assumes-role-of-ceo-of-apollo
[^8]: "Jay Clayton Appointed US Attorney for SDNY." *Yonkers Times,* April 28, 2025. https://yonkerstimes.com/jay-clayton-appointed-us-attorney-for-sdny/
[^9]: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Office of the District Court Executive, Press Advisory, August 18, 2025. https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2025-08/Press%20Advisory.pdf
[^10]: Atkins, Chloe. "Former federal prosecutor Maurene Comey sues Trump administration over her firing." *NBC News,* September 2025. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/former-federal-prosecutor-maurene-comey-sues-trump-admin-firing-rcna231406 ; Breuninger, Kevin. "Trump DOJ sued by Epstein prosecutor Maurene Comey over 'illegal' firing." *CNBC,* September 15, 2025. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/15/trump-comey-epstein-fired.html
[^11]: United States v. Maxwell, No. 1:20-cr-00330 (S.D.N.Y.), letters re Epstein Files Transparency Act review, ECF No. 839 (Jan. 15, 2026) and ECF No. 847 (Jan. 31, 2026). https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17318376/united-states-v-maxwell/
[^12]: McLaughlin, Jenna. "Senate confirms Jay Clayton as director of national intelligence." *NPR,* July 29, 2026. https://www.npr.org/2026/07/29/nx-s1-5910749/senate-confirms-jay-clayton-as-director-of-national-intelligence
[^13]: U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, "Meet the U.S. Attorney," accessed September 25, 2026. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/meet-us-attorney

View file

@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ The operation recruited girls, some as young as 14, to give Epstein "massages" t
A March 2011 JPMorgan report quoted in later shareholder litigation stated that "MC2 Model Management and Jeffrey Epstein engaged in racketeering that involved luring in minor children for sexual play for money," that Brunel "often visited Epstein in jail," and that Epstein had paid MC2 one million dollars in 2005, "unknown if the money was given as a secret investment or payment for services as a procurer." A 2011 compliance summary recorded that "the banker said today we extended Epstein a loan in relation to this modeling agency," a JPMorgan letter of credit to MC2. Epstein's JPMorgan accounts paid nearly 1.5 million dollars to known recruiters, including MC2.[^21]
The Palm Beach Police Department opened an investigation in 2005 after a parent reported that her teenage daughter had been molested, and detectives identified dozens of victims and a network of recruiters. The most prominent victim-witnesses overall include [[Virginia Giuffre]] (recruited at age 16 or 17 while working at [[Mar-a-Lago]]), Maria Farmer and her sister [[Annie Farmer]], who was abused at the New Mexico ranch in 1996, [[Courtney Wild]], and [[Sarah Ransome]]. Their accounts, depositions, and civil suits, many unsealed from the [[Giuffre v. Maxwell]] record between 2019 and 2024, provided much of the public record of the operation.[^17][^22][^23]
The [[Palm Beach Police Department]] opened an investigation in 2005 after a parent reported that her teenage daughter had been molested, and detectives identified dozens of victims and a network of recruiters. The most prominent victim-witnesses overall include [[Virginia Giuffre]] (recruited at age 16 or 17 while working at [[Mar-a-Lago]]), Maria Farmer and her sister [[Annie Farmer]], who was abused at the New Mexico ranch in 1996, [[Courtney Wild]], and [[Sarah Ransome]]. Their accounts, depositions, and civil suits, many unsealed from the [[Giuffre v. Maxwell]] record between 2019 and 2024, provided much of the public record of the operation.[^17][^22][^23]
### The Flight Logs and the Black Book
@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ Lefkowitz and co-counsel [[Kenneth Starr]] were partners at [[Kirkland & Ellis]]
The prosecution team kept working on the federal case after the signing. On February 14, 2008 Villafana wrote to the FBI case agents that she had not yet sent the indictment and "was just asking for input on who to include and who to exclude." On May 16, 2008 Sloman wrote to her, "We got approved," explaining: "Alex called to tell me. He said the ltr needs to be tweaked which we'll do on Monday. I wouldn't call the FBI yet." In March 2011, JPMorgan's investment bank general counsel reported to the bank's general counsel, [[Stephen Cutler]], a former Director of Enforcement at the SEC, that Lefkowitz, who "represented Epstein in state plea/fed NPA process," believed "any pre-plea conduct is subsumed within plea/NPA"; Cutler later testified that the bank "would have seen the non-pros agreement" sometime before 2011.[^39][^40][^41]
A 51-page "Epstein Investigation Timeline," marked privileged and as containing grand jury material and stamped Exhibit A-1, records the negotiation from the prosecutors' side. Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter had written to Krischer in May 2006 urging him to proceed on the probable cause affidavits or to recuse himself. In September 2007 Acosta, [[Drew Oosterbaan]], Sloman, Villafana and John McMillan met Starr, Lefkowitz and [[Lilly Ann Sanchez]]; on September 20 an internal email reported that Lefkowitz wanted to remove the registration requirement, and on September 23 Acosta told Lefkowitz to deal directly with Lourie and Villafana. On November 29, 2007 a forwarded exchange between Sloman and [[Andrew Lourie]] recorded that the defense "originally agreed to plead to the state felony that they thought was unregisterable (but did not tell us knowing we thought it was), but then discovered they were wrong and tried to get out of it. They tried several times to knock down the jail time after agreeing to the time." According to the chronology, in a telephone call in early January 2008 Lefkowitz admitted to Acosta that he had never intended Epstein to plead guilty to an offense requiring sex offender registration. After the Criminal Division rejected Epstein's appeal in May 2008, Villafana asked to indict, and Sloman and Acosta advised that Epstein would be given the chance to perform. On June 9, 2009, with Epstein on work release, she sent a memorandum titled "Request to Provide Notification of Breach," an indictment package was signed again for presentation on June 16, and on June 12 she wrote to Jack Goldberger about a violation of the agreement. The chronology ends with the formal office-wide recusal of the Southern District of Florida in July and August 2011.[^42]
A 51-page "Epstein Investigation Timeline," marked privileged and as containing grand jury material and stamped Exhibit A-1, records the negotiation from the prosecutors' side. Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter had written to Krischer in May 2006 urging him to proceed on the probable cause affidavits or to recuse himself. In September 2007 Acosta, [[Drew Oosterbaan]], Sloman, Villafana and John McMillan met Starr, Lefkowitz and [[Lilly Ann Sanchez]]; on September 20 an internal email reported that Lefkowitz wanted to remove the registration requirement, and on September 23 Acosta told Lefkowitz to deal directly with Lourie and Villafana. On November 29, 2007 a forwarded exchange between Sloman and [[Andrew Lourie]] recorded that the defense "originally agreed to plead to the state felony that they thought was unregisterable (but did not tell us knowing we thought it was), but then discovered they were wrong and tried to get out of it. They tried several times to knock down the jail time after agreeing to the time." According to the chronology, in a telephone call in early January 2008 Lefkowitz admitted to Acosta that he had never intended Epstein to plead guilty to an offense requiring sex offender registration. After the Criminal Division rejected Epstein's appeal in May 2008, Villafana asked to indict, and Sloman and Acosta advised that Epstein would be given the chance to perform. On June 9, 2009, with Epstein on work release, she sent a memorandum titled "Request to Provide Notification of Breach," an indictment package was signed again for presentation on June 16, and on June 12 she wrote to Jack Goldberger about a violation of the agreement. The chronology ends with the formal office-wide recusal of the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida|Southern District of Florida]] in July and August 2011.[^42]
Epstein served his sentence in the custody of the [[Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office]] under Sheriff [[Ric Bradshaw]], who approved him for work release. From October 2008 he spent "12 hours a day purportedly working at the '[[Florida Science Foundation]],' an entity Epstein had recently incorporated that was co-located at the West Palm Beach office of one of Epstein's attorneys." The foundation paid the sheriff's office 128,136 dollars during his incarceration, money reported to have paid off-duty deputies assigned to him while he was there; later reporting on sheriff's records described him leaving the jail up to 16 hours a day, seven days a week. In August 2019, after a letter from Bradshaw, Governor [[Ron DeSantis]] ordered the [[Florida Department of Law Enforcement]] to investigate; its May 2021 reports found no evidence that Krischer or Belohlavek "committed any crimes, accepted any bribes or gifts, or did anything improper," and found that Epstein "received differential treatment" in sheriff's custody that was not criminal.[^33][^43][^44]
@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ Before the report was final, the Chief of the Public Corruption Unit of the U.S.
Menchel had left the office in August 2007, weeks before the signing, for [[Kobre & Kim]]; according to reporting on the full report, he had offered the 2007 plea terms to an Epstein lawyer he had formerly dated. Epstein estate records released by the House Oversight Committee in October 2025 show appointments, calls, and dinners between Menchel and Epstein in 2011, 2013, and 2017. Menchel has said he had no business relationship with Epstein "at any point, not before, during or after my tenure," and has denied skiing with him.[^33][^52]
When Ghislaine Maxwell invoked the co-conspirator clause, the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|Second Circuit]] held in 2024 that under United States v. Annabi it bound only the Southern District of Florida, noting that the circuits "have been split on this issue for decades" and that the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division had told the Office of Professional Responsibility she "played no role" in the agreement; the Supreme Court denied certiorari on October 6, 2025. None of the four named women has been charged by any district. Among the files released in 2026 is a May 6, 2020 email in which a Southern District of New York prosecutor listed the office's internal memoranda, including a co-conspirator memo delivered in the week after Epstein's death, an 86-page "co-conspirator update memo" and a 13-page "corporate prosecution memo" described as "never discussed." Groff's lawyer said she was never told she was considered a co-conspirator.[^13][^34][^53][^54]
When Ghislaine Maxwell invoked the co-conspirator clause, the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|Second Circuit]] held in 2024 that under United States v. Annabi it bound only the Southern District of Florida, noting that the circuits "have been split on this issue for decades" and that the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division had told the Office of Professional Responsibility she "played no role" in the agreement; the Supreme Court denied certiorari on October 6, 2025. None of the four named women has been charged by any district. Among the files released in 2026 is a May 6, 2020 email in which a [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]] prosecutor listed the office's internal memoranda, including a co-conspirator memo delivered in the week after Epstein's death, an 86-page "co-conspirator update memo" and a 13-page "corporate prosecution memo" described as "never discussed." Groff's lawyer said she was never told she was considered a co-conspirator.[^13][^34][^53][^54]
### The Science Network and the Eugenics Ambition
@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ The post-death litigation produced large settlements. In 2022 Epstein's estate a
According to JPMorgan's 2023 filings in the territory's suit against the bank, Epstein's local affairs were managed by [[Cecile de Jongh]], the office manager of Southern Trust and the wife of Governor [[John de Jongh]] (in office 2007 to 2015), who helped Epstein shape legislation affecting sex-offender monitoring and the Economic Development Commission benefits while Epstein-linked entities paid family expenses. On the day the commission's certificate for Southern Trust was dated, January 24, 2014, Cecile de Jongh asked Epstein to match 15,000 dollars for her husband's final State of the Territory reception and asked Richard Kahn to make out a check to the "Governor's Special Events Fund." The commission's general counsel from 2007 to 2014 was [[Stacey Plaskett]], later the territory's delegate to Congress, who acknowledged receiving about 30,000 dollars in campaign contributions from Epstein and his employees. Epstein's office also handled requests from the Mapp-Potter inaugural committee (10,000 dollars from Southern Trust, December 2014), a Mapp super PAC (75,000 dollars, September 2016), and the Bryan/Roach inaugural committee (25,000 dollars requested, December 2018; payment not shown).[^11][^104][^105]
The territory's later Attorney General, [[Denise George]], filed the 2020 suit against the estate and a 2022 suit against JPMorgan, and was removed by Governor Albert Bryan days after the bank suit was filed. According to FBI notes of an October 2, 2023 interview released in January 2026, George said Bryan asked her in 2019 to grant Epstein a waiver of the 21-day travel-notice rule, told her after Epstein's death "He's dead go for it," later pressed her to settle with the estate for 80 million dollars with the attorney [[Henry Smock]] as mediator, and said the estate "just wanted to clear people." Smock had assisted Epstein in the 1998 purchase of Little St. James and was counsel to the Economic Development Authority board; he later represented Bryan in a sealed 2023 divorce. Bryan's chief legal counsel, [[David Bornn]], a former employee of Epstein's attorney [[Erika Kellerhals]], called George to relay Kellerhals's question about what she was investigating. Bryan has said Epstein received no special privilege from his administration. The territory recovered about 180 million dollars after legal fees and, as of January 2026, had not filed the accounting of the money that a 2024 law requires.[^20][^106][^107]
The territory's later Attorney General, [[Denise George]], filed the 2020 suit against the estate and a 2022 suit against JPMorgan, and was removed by Governor Albert Bryan days after the bank suit was filed. According to FBI notes of an October 2, 2023 interview released in January 2026, George said Bryan asked her in 2019 to grant Epstein a waiver of the 21-day travel-notice rule, told her after Epstein's death "He's dead go for it," later pressed her to settle with the estate for 80 million dollars with the attorney [[Henry Smock]] as mediator, and said the estate "just wanted to clear people." Smock had assisted Epstein in the 1998 purchase of Little St. James and was counsel to the [[Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority|Economic Development Authority]] board; he later represented Bryan in a sealed 2023 divorce. Bryan's chief legal counsel, [[David Bornn]], a former employee of Epstein's attorney [[Erika Kellerhals]], called George to relay Kellerhals's question about what she was investigating. Bryan has said Epstein received no special privilege from his administration. The territory recovered about 180 million dollars after legal fees and, as of January 2026, had not filed the accounting of the money that a 2024 law requires.[^20][^106][^107]
### The 2019 Federal Charges

View file

@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
---
category: "Authors & Journalists"
tags:
- Person
- JulieKBrown
- MiamiHerald
- Journalism
- JeffreyEpstein
- NonProsecutionAgreement
- GiuffreVMaxwell
- Unsealing
alias:
- Julie Brown
summary: "Miami Herald investigative reporter whose 2018 series Perversion of Justice prompted a Justice Department misconduct review of Epstein's plea deal and who intervened to unseal the Giuffre v. Maxwell record."
location: "Miami, Florida"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Miami Herald]]"
role: "investigative reporter"
fn: 1
- type: investigated
with: "[[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]]"
role: "Perversion of Justice series"
start: 2018-11-28
fn: 1
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Julie K. Brown is an American investigative reporter for the *[[Miami Herald]]* whose series "Perversion of Justice," published on November 28, 2018, examined the 2007 [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement|non-prosecution agreement]] between [[Jeffrey Epstein]] and the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]] under [[Alexander Acosta]]. The series led a [[United States]] senator to ask the [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] of the [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]] to investigate, and the office opened a review in February 2019. Brown and the Herald were also the intervenors who asked the courts to unseal the record of [[Giuffre v. Maxwell]]; the [[Second Circuit]] ruled in their favor in Brown v. Maxwell on July 3, 2019, three days before Epstein's arrest in New York.[^1][^2]
### Perversion of Justice
The Office of Professional Responsibility summarized the series in its November 2020 report: "The Miami Herald reported that in 2007, Acosta entered into an 'extraordinary' deal with Epstein in the form of the NPA, which permitted Epstein to avoid federal prosecution and a potentially lengthy prison sentence by pleading guilty in state court to 'two prostitution charges.' According to the Miami Herald, the government also immunized from prosecution Epstein's co-conspirators and concealed from Epstein's victims the terms of the NPA. Through its reporting, which included interviews of eight victims and information from publicly available documents, the newspaper painted a portrait of federal and state prosecutors who had ignored serious criminal conduct by a wealthy man with powerful and politically connected friends by granting him a 'deal of a lifetime.'" The report also cited a follow-up by Brown and colleagues of December 6, 2018, "Lawmakers issue call for investigation of serial sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal."[^1]
On December 3, 2018, five days after the series ran, Senator [[Ben Sasse]], chairman of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on oversight, wrote to the Office of Professional Responsibility citing the Herald's report and asking it to "open an investigation into the instances identified in this reporting of possible misconduct by Department of Justice attorneys." The department's Office of Legislative Affairs told Sasse on February 6, 2019 that the investigation had been opened. Its November 2020 report found no professional misconduct by Acosta or four subordinates but concluded that the agreement "was a flawed mechanism for satisfying the federal interest" and that Acosta's decision "constitutes poor judgment."[^1][^3]
When the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York]] announced Epstein's indictment on July 8, 2019, U.S. Attorney [[Geoffrey Berman]] said the office had been "assisted by some excellent investigative journalism." Acosta, by then [[United States Secretary of Labor|Secretary of Labor]], resigned on July 12, 2019.[^1][^4]
### The Unsealing Litigation
Giuffre v. Maxwell, the defamation suit brought in 2015 by [[Virginia Giuffre]] against [[Ghislaine Maxwell]] before Judge [[Robert W. Sweet]], settled on May 24, 2017 with much of its record under seal. On April 6, 2018 the Miami Herald and Brown moved to intervene and unseal the entire docket; [[Alan Dershowitz]] and the writer [[Mike Cernovich]] had earlier sought parts of the record. Sweet denied the requests.[^2]
On March 11, 2019 a Second Circuit panel of Judges [[José A. Cabranes]], [[Rosemary S. Pooler]] and [[Christopher F. Droney]] issued an order to show cause, listing "Julie Brown, Miami Herald Company" among the intervenors, which stated: "Our precedent clearly establishes that 'documents submitted to a court for its consideration in a summary judgment motion are, as a matter of law, judicial documents to which a strong presumption of access attaches, under both the common law and the First Amendment.'" It ordered the parties to "show good cause why the Court should not unseal the summary judgment motion, including any materials filed in connection with this motion, and the District Court's summary judgment decision"; Pooler dissented in part. A printout of the order from [[Bloomberg Law]], time-stamped "3/11/19, 5:28 PM," is among Epstein's files released by the Justice Department.[^5]
The panel ruled on July 3, 2019, in Brown v. Maxwell, that the summary judgment materials must be unsealed and that the remaining sealed filings required individualized review by the district court.[^2] About 2,000 pages were unsealed on August 9, 2019, including a 2016 deposition in which Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege; Epstein was found dead in his cell at the [[Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York|Metropolitan Correctional Center]] the next morning.[^6] On July 23, 2025, on appeals brought by Giuffre's side and by the Herald, the Second Circuit vacated the district court's December 2019 and January 2020 unsealing orders and remanded for further individualized review.[^6]
### Wild v. Brown
On February 3, 2022 [[Courtney Wild]] and [[Haley Robson]] sued Brown for defamation in Miami-Dade County circuit court over her 2021 book *Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story*. The complaint alleged that the book falsely described Wild as having had intercourse with Epstein after he raped her, and that Brown had minimized Wild's role in exposing the agreement and in Epstein's arrest while crediting herself; Robson alleged that after she declined an interview Brown told her she was "making the biggest mistake of your life." Brown told the *Florida Bulldog* on the day of filing that she had not yet seen the suit and had called her lawyer.[^7]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, "Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation," Executive Summary, November 2020, pp. i-xi and n. 3. https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl
[^2]: Brown v. Maxwell; Dershowitz v. Giuffre, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019), Nos. 18-2868, 16-3945-cv(L) (July 3, 2019). https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4636340/brown-v-maxwell-dershowitz-v-giuffre/
[^3]: Brown, Julie K. "Perversion of Justice." *Miami Herald,* November 28, 2018. https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article220097825.html
[^4]: "Jeffrey Epstein operated a vast sex-trafficking network of underage girls who recruited other victims, prosecutors say." *CNN,* July 8, 2019. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/08/us/jeffrey-epstein-monday-court-appearance
[^5]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00802958, DataSet 9, Bloomberg Law printout of Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 18-2868 (2d Cir.), Order to Show Cause, March 11, 2019. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802958.pdf
[^6]: Giuffre v. Maxwell, 146 F.4th 165 (2d Cir. 2025) (per curiam), Nos. 24-182-cv(L), 24-203-cv(con) (July 23, 2025). https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-2nd-circuit/117500106.html
[^7]: Complaint, *Wild and Robson v. Brown* (Fla. 11th Jud. Cir., Miami-Dade County, filed Feb. 3, 2022), paragraphs 5-13 and prayer for relief. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/wild-brown-complaint.pdf ; "Two victims of Jeffrey Epstein sue reporter/author Julie Brown for defamation," *Florida Bulldog,* February 2022. https://www.floridabulldog.org/2022/02/two-victims-jeffrey-epstein-sue-reporter-author-julie-brown-defamation/

View file

@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- JeffreyEpstein
- Prosecutor
- PalmBeach
- GrandJury
- NonProsecutionAgreement
alias:
- Lanna Belohlavek
summary: "Palm Beach County assistant state attorney and Crimes Against Children Unit chief who presented the 2006 Epstein case to the grand jury that returned one solicitation count, later cleared by state investigators."
location: "West Palm Beach, Florida"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office]]"
role: "Assistant State Attorney; Chief, Crimes Against Children Unit"
fn: 1
- type: prosecuted
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
role: "lead state prosecutor"
start: 2006
fn: 2
- type: investigated
with: "[[Florida Department of Law Enforcement]]"
reverse: true
start: 2019-08
end: 2021-05
fn: 3
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Lanna Belohlavek is a Florida prosecutor who, as an Assistant State Attorney and chief of the Crimes Against Children Unit of the [[Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office]] under [[Barry Krischer]], handled the 2005 to 2006 state case against [[Jeffrey Epstein]]. She declined to file the felony charges sought by the [[Palm Beach Police Department]], offered Epstein a probationary plea that he rejected, and on July 19, 2006 presented the case to a [[Palm Beach County]] grand jury that returned a single count of felony solicitation of prostitution. In September 2007 she sat with Krischer in the joint meeting with federal prosecutors and Epstein's lawyers that preceded the [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]]. The [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]]'s [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] interviewed her in its 2019 to 2020 review but had no jurisdiction over state officials, and the [[Florida Department of Law Enforcement]] reported in May 2021 that it had found no evidence that she or Krischer committed any crime or acted improperly.[^1][^2][^3]
### The State Case
The police brought the Epstein case to the State Attorney's Office in 2005 without having made an arrest, and it was assigned to the Crimes Against Children Unit. Belohlavek told OPR that she and an experienced Assistant State Attorney who first worked the case with her "were at a disagreement" with the police department "over what the state . . . could ethically charge." She did not believe the evidence would satisfy the elements of the two felonies the police wanted filed, unlawful sexual activity with a minor under Florida Statute 794.05(1) and lewd and lascivious molestation under 800.04(5), and "the police were not happy with that." Victims had given contradictory statements and the original complainant had recanted her allegation of sexual contact. In April 2006 the office offered Epstein a plea to third-degree felony aggravated assault with intent to commit a felony, with adjudication withheld and five years' probation with no unsupervised contact with minors, which he rejected. She told OPR that she never considered charging procurement of a minor for prostitution, the offense Epstein later pleaded to under the federal agreement, because "the police had not presented it," and that prostitution was a misdemeanor charge and "she did not handle misdemeanors."[^2]
Krischer told OPR that Epstein's local counsel brought [[Alan Dershowitz]] to see him and the Assistant State Attorney, and that Dershowitz threatened, "We're going to destroy your witnesses; don't go to court because we're going to destroy those girls." Epstein then hired [[Jack Goldberger]], with whom Krischer had "a working relationship." Because the husband of Belohlavek's colleague on the case was Goldberger's law partner, Belohlavek recused that prosecutor to remove "even the appearance of any kind of conflict" and took over the case herself. The lead police detective described the same episode to federal prosecutors in May 2006 as the defense having "orchestrated the removal of the Assistant State Attorney initially assigned to handle the matter, who was viewed as an aggressive prosecutor, by hiring a defense attorney whose relationship with the Assistant State Attorney created a conflict of interest for the prosecutor." Goldberger and the New York lawyer [[Gerald Lefcourt]] then directed their efforts at Belohlavek and Krischer, "largely by attacking the credibility of the victim witnesses."[^2][^4]
Belohlavek told OPR that her office took the allegations "seriously, because . . . it was an organized scheme to involve young girls by offering them money. And I wouldn't say that we ... thought they were prostitutes ... [but] I think there was solicitation," and that although Epstein's "behavior was reprehensible, . . . I'm limited by . . . the state statutes as to what I can charge."[^2]
### The Grand Jury
The grand jury heard the case on July 19, 2006 in a session of under four hours, taking testimony from two police officers, an investigator from the State Attorney's Office and two of the girls. Belohlavek presented the case. When the transcript was released on July 1, 2024 by Circuit Judge [[Luis Delgado]], it showed her asking one of the teenage witnesses, "You aware that you committed a crime?" The girl answered, "Now I am. I didn't know it was a crime when I was doing it." A grand juror separately asked the girl whether she had "any idea deep down inside of you that...what you're doing is wrong?" [[Spencer Kuvin]], who represented one of the girls who testified, said after reading the transcript: "It was just atrocious the way they handled it. . . . They basically tanked their own case," and "It just reaffirmed what we always knew was happening is that the state attorney was afraid to prosecute him." The grand jury returned one count of felony solicitation of prostitution under Florida Statute 796.07, and the police department took the case to the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]].[^5][^6][^7]
### Coordination with the Federal Office
Belohlavek and Krischer attended a joint meeting on September 13, 2007 with federal prosecutors [[Andrew Lourie]], [[Rolando Garcia]] and [[Ann Marie Villafana|A. Marie Villafaña]] and Epstein's lawyers [[Jay Lefkowitz]], Lefcourt and Goldberger, and from September 19 to 25, 2007 they exchanged emails with the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]] about a further meeting with Epstein's attorneys. The federal agreement signed on September 24 required Epstein to plead guilty in state court to her office's solicitation indictment and to a new information for procurement of minors for prostitution. On September 27 Villafaña wrote to Krischer and Belohlavek asking when and before which judge Epstein would plead, adding that "the agents and I would really like to be there, 'incognito.'"[^8][^9][^10]
On November 16, 2007 the FBI case agents met Belohlavek and asked whether her office would oppose a request that Epstein be granted work release. According to OPR, "Belohlavek was noncommittal," and when the agents asked her to include language in the state plea agreement barring work release, she answered that she would have to discuss it with the State Attorney. Krischer later told OPR that work release was "within the control of the Sheriff's Office, not my office." The state plea agreement did not address work release, and the [[Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office]] placed Epstein on work release in October 2008.[^11]
### Reviews
OPR interviewed Belohlavek and Krischer among more than 60 witnesses, but stated that "because OPR does not have jurisdiction over state officials, OPR did not investigate, or reach conclusions about, their conduct regarding the state investigation." In August 2019, after a letter from Sheriff [[Ric Bradshaw]], Governor [[Ron DeSantis]] directed the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to take over the investigation of the state's handling of the case. Its May 2021 summary found no evidence that Krischer or Belohlavek "committed any crimes, accepted any bribes or gifts, or did anything improper in their handling of the case."[^1][^3]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284, Prior DOJ Disclosures, report, Office of Professional Responsibility, "Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation," November 2020, Executive Summary pp. vi to vii, and p. 4 (EFTA02847291 to EFTA02847292, EFTA02847313). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Prior%20DOJ%20Disclosures/Memos.%20&%20Correspondence/EFTA02847284.pdf
[^2]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 14 to 15 and nn. 8 to 11 (EFTA02847323 to EFTA02847324).
[^3]: Sabrina Lolo, "FDLE clears PBSO, prosecutors in connection to Epstein's work release privileges," *CBS12,* May 10, 2021. https://cbs12.com/news/local/fdle-clears-pbso-prosecutors-in-connection-to-epsteins-work-release-privileges
[^4]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), p. 17 (EFTA02847326).
[^5]: James Hill, "Newly released grand jury documents in Epstein case reveal alleged victims accused of prostitution," *ABC News,* July 2, 2024. https://abcnews.com/US/newly-released-grand-jury-documents-epstein-case-reveal/story?id=111599027
[^6]: Holly Baltz and Hannah Phillips, "Jeffrey Epstein secret transcripts: Victim was asked, Do you know 'you committed a crime?'," *Palm Beach Post* via *Yahoo News,* July 3, 2024. https://www.yahoo.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-secret-documents-just-184451449.html
[^7]: "Judge releases Jeffrey Epstein grand jury investigation transcripts," *WUSF / Associated Press,* July 1, 2024. https://www.wusf.org/courts-law/2024-07-01/florida-judge-releases-transcripts-2006-grand-jury-investigation-jeffrey-epstein-sex-trafficking
[^8]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, privileged chronology of the federal investigation, May 2006 to August 2011, entry for September 13, 2007. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf
[^9]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00215188, DataSet 9, emails among Barry Krischer, Lanna Belohlavek and the U.S. Attorney's Office, "RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys," September 19 to 25, 2007. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00215188.pdf
[^10]: Opinion and Order, *Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States*, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla. Feb. 21, 2019), ECF No. 435 (Marra, J.), reported at 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, quoting ECF No. 407. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.435.0.pdf
[^11]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), p. 114 and n. 180 (EFTA02847423).

View file

@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ A separate federal lawsuit, Doe v. Black, No. 1:23-cv-06418 in the [[Southern Di
### The Virgin Islands Settlement
On January 20, 2023 Black signed a settlement agreement with the Government of the United States Virgin Islands, countersigned by Acting Attorney General [[Carol Thomas-Jacobs]], under which he paid 62.5 million dollars within sixty days to end the territory's claims against him arising from Epstein, without any admission of liability or any criminal charge. Governor [[Albert Bryan]] had removed Attorney General [[Denise George]] at the end of December 2022, days after she filed the territory's December 27, 2022 suit against JPMorgan, and appointed Thomas-Jacobs, already assigned as an attorney on the JPMorgan case, as acting attorney general effective January 1, 2023; Bryan's office gave no reason and said reports tying the removal to the suit were "not entirely accurate."[^25] The payment came shortly after the estate's own 105 million dollar settlement, while the territory's suit against JPMorgan Chase and victims' suits against JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank were pending.[^26][^27]
On January 20, 2023 Black signed a settlement agreement with the Government of the [[U.S. Virgin Islands|United States Virgin Islands]], countersigned by Acting Attorney General [[Carol Thomas-Jacobs]], under which he paid 62.5 million dollars within sixty days to end the territory's claims against him arising from Epstein, without any admission of liability or any criminal charge. Governor [[Albert Bryan]] had removed Attorney General [[Denise George]] at the end of December 2022, days after she filed the territory's December 27, 2022 suit against JPMorgan, and appointed Thomas-Jacobs, already assigned as an attorney on the JPMorgan case, as acting attorney general effective January 1, 2023; Bryan's office gave no reason and said reports tying the removal to the suit were "not entirely accurate."[^25] The payment came shortly after the estate's own 105 million dollar settlement, while the territory's suit against JPMorgan Chase and victims' suits against JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank were pending.[^26][^27]
The agreement's recitals state that "according to public reports, Black paid $158 million over approximately five years to Jeffrey Epstein's Virgin Islands company, Southern Trust," and, as a separate recital, "WHEREAS, Jeffrey Epstein used the money Black paid him to partially fund his operations in the Virgin Islands." Section III.2 provides that nothing in the agreement is an admission of liability, which Black expressly denies, and that its terms "shall not be cited by any person as evidence of wrongdoing by Black." Wyden later described the recital as an admission that Black's money funded sex trafficking. The territory directed 15 million dollars of the payment to a trust fund for counseling, mental-health and other services for Virgin Islands residents. The release covers "Leon Black, and all of his attorneys and other agents acting within the scope of their authority," and entities he owns or controls, and excludes "JP Morgan Chase or any other financial institution used by Black or Jeffrey Epstein or any current or former employees" of those institutions, and Epstein and his estate. Black agreed not to claim that his payment resolved any individual victim's claims.[^5][^9][^27]

View file

@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ The manifesto closed with a list of "patron saints of techno-optimism" that incl
Andreessen and Ben Horowitz announced their endorsement of [[Donald Trump]] on their podcast on July 16, 2024, framing the shift around what they called the "Little Tech" agenda and opposition to the Biden administration's cryptocurrency and AI policy. Andreessen named the administration's proposed tax on unrealized capital gains as "the final straw," and the two each gave 2.5 million dollars to the pro-Trump super PAC Right for America, while a16z contributed tens of millions of dollars to the crypto-industry PAC Fairshake.[^4][^8]
On Joe Rogan's podcast in late 2024 Andreessen claimed that more than thirty technology founders had been quietly cut off by their banks in what he called "Operation Choke Point 2.0," an assertion that Fortune and other outlets reported they could not substantiate. After the election he served as an unpaid adviser recruiting personnel for the Department of Government Efficiency run by [[Elon Musk]] and Vivek Ramaswamy, said he was spending much of his time at Mar-a-Lago, and his a16z partner Scott Kupor was named to lead the Office of Personnel Management, placing the firm alongside Thiel and [[David Sacks]] in the network that staffed the second Trump administration.[^9][^10]
On Joe Rogan's podcast in late 2024 Andreessen claimed that more than thirty technology founders had been quietly cut off by their banks in what he called "Operation Choke Point 2.0," an assertion that Fortune and other outlets reported they could not substantiate. After the election he served as an unpaid adviser recruiting personnel for the Department of Government Efficiency run by [[Elon Musk]] and Vivek Ramaswamy, said he was spending much of his time at [[Mar-a-Lago]], and his a16z partner Scott Kupor was named to lead the Office of Personnel Management, placing the firm alongside Thiel and [[David Sacks]] in the network that staffed the second Trump administration.[^9][^10]
### Footnotes

View file

@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ In the summer of 1996 Epstein invited Farmer to spend the summer as an "artist-i
NYPD complaint report No. 1996-0067241, dated August 29, 1996, records that Epstein "did call her and stated he was going to burn victim's painting" and that he "has keys to victim's apartment." The precinct told her it could address only the threat and referred her to the FBI. Farmer alleges that she then called at least two FBI offices and reported the assault, her fear that one of her minor sisters had been abused, the stolen photographs, Epstein's recording equipment, and the binder in his safe, and that the FBI hung up on her mid-sentence and did not follow up. That year Epstein had also met her younger sister [[Annie Farmer]], then sixteen, and flown her to his [[New Mexico]] ranch, where Annie later testified that Maxwell and Epstein abused her.[^1][^4]
In 2006, FBI agents working the Palm Beach case arrived unannounced at Farmer's home in [[North Carolina]], acknowledged her 1996 report, and told her they needed her for the Florida investigation, promising they would "get him" this time. FBI field notes of that meeting record her earlier report to the NYPD Sixth Precinct. Farmer repeated her 1996 account. In September 2007 the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]] had signed the non-prosecution agreement, which immunized Epstein's "potential co-conspirators."[^1][^5]
In 2006, FBI agents working the [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]] case arrived unannounced at Farmer's home in [[North Carolina]], acknowledged her 1996 report, and told her they needed her for the Florida investigation, promising they would "get him" this time. FBI field notes of that meeting record her earlier report to the NYPD Sixth Precinct. Farmer repeated her 1996 account. In September 2007 the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]] had signed the non-prosecution agreement, which immunized Epstein's "potential co-conspirators."[^1][^5]
### Farmer v. United States

View file

@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
---
category: "Crime & Abuse Networks"
tags:
- Person
- MarkEpstein
- JeffreyEpstein
- RealEstate
- LeslieWexner
- EpsteinDeath
- Autopsy
alias:
- Mark Epstein (brother of Jeffrey Epstein)
summary: "New York property owner and younger brother of Jeffrey Epstein, informant on his death certificate, who bought 301 East 66th Street from Leslie Wexner and hired Michael Baden to observe the autopsy."
location: "New York, New York"
relations:
- type: relative_of
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
role: "brother"
fn: 1
- type: head_of
with: "[[Ossa Properties]]"
role: "listed as president"
fn: 2
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Mark Epstein is a New York property owner and the younger brother of [[Jeffrey Epstein]]. He is named as the informant, with the relationship "Brother," on the [[New York City]] death certificate issued after Jeffrey Epstein died in federal custody on August 10, 2019. Through Ossa Properties, a company once affiliated with Jeffrey Epstein's [[J. Epstein & Co.]], he owns the building at [[301 East 66th Street]] on the [[Upper East Side]] of [[Manhattan]], which he bought from [[Leslie Wexner]] in the early 1990s and in which his brother kept apartments. He retained the forensic pathologist [[Michael Baden]] to observe the autopsy.[^1][^2][^3]
### 301 East 66th Street
Wexner, the retail executive whose fortune Jeffrey Epstein managed, sold the 16-story building at 301 East 66th Street to Mark Epstein in the early 1990s. Mark Epstein told *[[Crain's New York Business|Crain's]]* in July 2019 that he had bought it on a tip from his brother. The buyer was Ossa Properties, a former affiliate of J. Epstein & Co., of which Mark Epstein was once listed as president; its ownership changed from a partnership to a corporation by 2010. Records showed that the entity that owned Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan townhouse, [[9 East 71st Street]], used a unit in the 66th Street building as its mailing address.[^2]
Mark Epstein wrote to *[[The Wall Street Journal]]* in 2019: "Other than the obvious relationship of being brothers, the only other relationship between Jeffrey and I is as landlord/tenant." The *[[Miami Herald]]* had reported that Jeffrey Epstein housed some of his victims in individual apartments in the building, charging them 1,000 dollars a month through [[Jean-Luc Brunel]], owner of the modeling agency [[MC2 Model Management|MC2]].[^2] The interior-design firm SLK Designs of [[Sarah Kellen]], Jeffrey Epstein's former assistant, operated for a time from a Midtown Manhattan building owned by Mark Epstein.[^4]
When Jeffrey Epstein sought bail after his July 2019 arrest in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]], which was denied, Mark Epstein offered to put up a Florida condominium valued at 100,000 dollars. He had launched businesses ranging from a silk-screen T-shirt company to a modeling agency and is a donor to [[Cooper Union]], from which he graduated.[^2]
### The Death Certificate
On August 20, 2019, ten days after the death, [[Sigrid McCawley|Sigrid S. McCawley]] of [[Boies Schiller Flexner]] wrote to the [[Freedom of Information Act|FOIA]] Public Liaison of the [[Executive Office for United States Attorneys]] to renew eight requests, made on behalf of a client, for records on Jeffrey Epstein held by the U.S. Attorney's Offices for the District of [[New Mexico]], the Southern District of New York, the District of the Virgin Islands, the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida|Southern District of Florida]] and the Northern District of Georgia. "As Jeffrey Epstein is now deceased, any privacy concerns are extinguished," she wrote, offering to "obtain a formal death certificate to proceed." The file released by the [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]] in 2026 ends with the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene death transcript, certificate number 156-19-032838, which lists "Mark Epstein" as informant and his relationship to the decedent as "Brother."[^1]
### The Autopsy and Baden
Dr. [[Kristin Roman]] of the New York City [[Office of Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York|Office of Chief Medical Examiner]] performed the autopsy on August 11, 2019 with Baden, retained by Mark Epstein, present. Chief Medical Examiner [[Barbara Sampson]] ruled the death a suicide by hanging. On October 30, 2019 Baden said that the three fractures found in Epstein's neck, two of the thyroid cartilage and one of the hyoid bone, were "extremely unusual in suicidal hangings and could occur much more commonly in homicidal strangulation"; the medical examiner's office said it stood "firmly" behind its finding.[^3][^5] Baden repeated his findings on *[[60 Minutes]]* on January 5, 2020, in a broadcast that reported Mark Epstein as the family member who had hired him.[^3]
In 2025 Mark Epstein sought access to about 15 hours of unaired video interviews of his brother recorded by [[Steve Bannon]]; iMessage logs released in the [[Epstein Files|Epstein files]] record exchanges between Jeffrey Epstein and a contact named "Steve Bannon" in August 2018.[^6]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00032431, DataSet 8, letter of Sigrid S. McCawley, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, to FOIA Public Liaison, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, August 20, 2019, with City of New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene death transcript, Certificate No. 156-19-032838 (EFTA00032431 to EFTA00032437); duplicate EFTA02751207, Court Records, Doe v. Indyke, No. 1:19-cv-08673 (S.D.N.Y.). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00032431.pdf
[^2]: Kallergis, Katherine. "These are Jeffrey Epstein's real estate ties to his brother Mark." *The Real Deal,* August 12, 2019, summarizing *The Wall Street Journal* and *Crain's New York Business.* https://therealdeal.com/national/2019/08/12/these-are-jeffrey-epsteins-real-estate-ties-to-his-brother-mark/
[^3]: "Jeffrey Epstein's autopsy: A closer look." *CBS News, 60 Minutes,* January 5, 2020. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-autopsy-a-closer-look-60-minutes-2020-01-05/
[^4]: "Jeffrey Epstein's Alleged Accomplices: Where Are Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, Adriana Ross and Lesley Groff?," *The Daily Beast.* https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epsteins-alleged-accomplices-where-are-sarah-kellen-nadia-marcinkova-adriana-ross-and-lesley-groff/
[^5]: "NYC medical examiner rejects claim that Jeffrey Epstein's death was a homicide." *CNN,* October 30, 2019. https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/30/us/jeffrey-epstein-autopsy-fox ; "Jeffrey Epstein autopsy finds broken bones in his neck." *CNN,* August 15, 2019. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/08/15/us/jeffrey-epstein-autopsy-broken-neck
[^6]: "'Let me see the videotapes': Mark Epstein wants Steve Bannon's 15 hours of unseen footage of his brother," *NBC News,* 2025. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/mark-epstein-steve-bannon-15-hours-brother-jeffrey-epstein-rcna219630 ; U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA01615267, DataSet 10, iMessage log with the contact "Steve Bannon," August 23, 2018. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01615267.pdf

View file

@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Following the December 21, 1988, bombing of [[Pan Am Flight 103]] over [[Lockerb
### 2008 Conviction
In 2007, the US [[DEA|Drug Enforcement Administration]] conducted a sting operation in which undercover agents posed as representatives of the [[FARC|Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)]] seeking weapons to kill Americans in Colombia. Al-Kassar and a co-conspirator agreed to provide weapons including anti-aircraft missiles. He was arrested in Spain in June 2007 on a US warrant and extradited. Tried in the Southern District of New York before Judge Jed Rakoff, al-Kassar was convicted in November 2008 on charges of conspiracy to provide material support to a designated terrorist organization and conspiracy to kill Americans. He was sentenced to 30 years in prison. The conviction was the result of straightforward recorded evidence from the [[DEA]]'s sting, with al-Kassar's own statements providing the primary evidence against him.[^4]
In 2007, the US [[DEA|Drug Enforcement Administration]] conducted a sting operation in which undercover agents posed as representatives of the [[FARC|Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)]] seeking weapons to kill Americans in Colombia. Al-Kassar and a co-conspirator agreed to provide weapons including anti-aircraft missiles. He was arrested in Spain in June 2007 on a US warrant and extradited. Tried in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]] before [[Jed Rakoff|Judge Jed Rakoff]], al-Kassar was convicted in November 2008 on charges of conspiracy to provide material support to a designated terrorist organization and conspiracy to kill Americans. He was sentenced to 30 years in prison. The conviction was the result of straightforward recorded evidence from the [[DEA]]'s sting, with al-Kassar's own statements providing the primary evidence against him.[^4]
### Footnotes

View file

@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- PaulCassell
- Lawyer
- FederalJudge
- VictimsRights
- CrimeVictimsRightsAct
- JeffreyEpstein
- UniversityOfUtah
alias:
- Paul G. Cassell
- Paul George Cassell
- Judge Paul Cassell
- Paul Cassell
summary: "Utah law professor, former Reagan Justice Department official and former federal judge who, after leaving the bench in 2007, represented Epstein's victims in the Crime Victims' Rights Act case against the United States."
born: 1959
location: "Salt Lake City, Utah"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Department of Justice]]"
role: "Associate Deputy Attorney General"
start: 1986
end: 1988
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia]]"
role: "Assistant U.S. Attorney"
start: 1988
end: 1991
fn: 1
- type: appointed
with: "[[George W. Bush]]"
reverse: true
role: "U.S. District Judge, District of Utah"
start: 2002-05-15
end: 2007-11-05
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[University of Utah College of Law]]"
role: "professor of law"
start: 1992
fn: 1
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Paul G. Cassell (born 1959, in [[Orange, California]]) is an American law professor at the [[University of Utah College of Law]], a former Associate Deputy Attorney General in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan]] [[Department of Justice]], and a former judge of the [[United States District Court for the District of Utah]], appointed by [[George W. Bush]], who resigned from the bench in November 2007. He then became co-counsel with [[Bradley Edwards]] for victims of [[Jeffrey Epstein]] in [[Doe v. United States]], the [[Crime Victims' Rights Act]] case over the [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]], and in related civil litigation, and was sued for defamation by [[Alan Dershowitz]] after a December 2014 filing in that case.[^1][^2][^3]
### Career
Cassell graduated from [[Stanford University]] in 1979 and from [[Stanford Law School]] in 1984. He clerked for Judge [[Antonin Scalia]] on the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit|D.C. Circuit]] from 1984 to 1985 and for Chief Justice [[Warren E. Burger]] from 1985 to 1986. He was an Associate Deputy Attorney General from 1986 to 1988 and an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the [[Eastern District of Virginia]] from 1988 to 1991, and taught at the University of Utah from 1992 to 2002. Bush nominated him to the federal bench on June 19, 2001, without Senate action, and again on September 4, 2001, to the seat vacated by David Sam; he was confirmed on May 13, 2002 and commissioned on May 15, 2002. His service ended by resignation on November 5, 2007, and he returned to the Utah faculty.[^1]
### Doe v. United States
On July 7, 2008 Edwards filed the emergency petition of the victim then known as Jane Doe 1, later identified as [[Courtney Wild]], to enforce her rights under 18 U.S.C. 3771, before Judge [[Kenneth Marra]] in [[West Palm Beach, Florida|West Palm Beach]]. On July 28, 2008, three weeks after the filing and less than nine months after leaving the bench, Cassell moved for a limited appearance for the petitioners, which Marra granted the next day; the Jacksonville lawyer [[Jay Howell]] followed on August 8. Edwards litigated the case without fee for more than ten years. Marra held in 2011 that the Act's rights attach before formal charges and in 2013 that it authorizes rescission of a prosecutorial agreement reached in violation of the conferral right. On February 21, 2019 he granted partial summary judgment, finding that "[p]articularly problematic was the Government's decision to conceal the existence of the NPA and mislead the victims to believe that federal prosecution was still a possibility," and on September 16, 2019, after Epstein's death, he denied every remedy the petitioners sought. On April 15, 2021 the en banc [[United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit|Eleventh Circuit]] held seven to four that the Act gave Wild no freestanding pre-charge action, and on February 22, 2022 the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] denied certiorari.[^2][^4][^5]
### The Jane Doe 3 Filing and the Dershowitz Litigation
In December 2014 Edwards and Cassell moved in the Crime Victims' Rights Act case to add a client identified as Jane Doe 3, later publicly identified as [[Virginia Giuffre]], alleging that Epstein had trafficked her as a minor to Dershowitz, among others. Dershowitz said he had never met her, called the accusation fabricated, and said the two lawyers should be disbarred. In April 2015 Marra struck the allegations as "immaterial and impertinent" to the case without ruling on their truth. Edwards and Cassell sued Dershowitz for defamation, and he countersued.[^3][^6]
The suits settled on April 8, 2016. In a joint statement issued through the mediator, "Edwards and Cassell acknowledge that it was a mistake to have filed sexual misconduct accusations against Dershowitz," and Dershowitz withdrew his accusations that they had acted unethically. The statement said the dispute concerned the lawyers' due diligence and "not whether the acts of alleged misconduct in fact occurred," and that the withdrawal was not an acknowledgment that Giuffre's allegations were mistaken; Giuffre, not a party, stood by them at the time. Dershowitz required that the financial terms remain confidential. Giuffre withdrew her allegation against Dershowitz in a separate 2022 settlement, saying she "may have made a mistake."[^3][^6]
### Epstein v. Rothstein
In the [[Palm Beach County]] suit Epstein brought in 2009 against [[Scott Rothstein]] and Edwards, which became Edwards's counterclaim for malicious prosecution, Cassell and Howell appeared as limited intervenor co-counsel for three of Epstein's victims. On November 9, 2018 Epstein, through counsel including [[Jack Goldberger]], moved for in camera inspection of 302 emails that the other side had withheld on a 1,607-entry, 159-page privilege log. The motion argued that only 19 entries were communications with a client, that "the majority of the documents are e-mails among attorneys and staff" and "with media sources," and that Cassell and his co-counsel had "very significant personal and professional reas[ons]" for not wanting the emails "to see the light of the courtroom," quoting the line that sunlight "is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman." Epstein settled the counterclaim in December 2018 with a written apology to Edwards.[^7][^8]
On May 2, 2023 Judge [[Jed Rakoff]] admitted Cassell pro hac vice in Jane Doe 1's class suit against [[JPMorgan Chase]] in the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]], consolidated for pretrial purposes with [[Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank]]; JPMorgan settled the class claims in June 2023 for 290 million dollars.[^9][^10]
On February 25, 2018 Epstein had written to [[Kathryn Ruemmler]], the former [[White House]] Counsel, about an "email trail" involving Rothstein's lawyer and prosecutors: "now the issue is how to use, it, CVRA? marie? Bar. USA[?]. . . . Judge marra, cvra.? press? move f[o]r sanctions? strategy time." Ruemmler replied the next morning: "How did you discover it? Let's discuss in the a.m."[^11]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Federal Judicial Center, "Cassell, Paul G.," Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges. https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/cassell-paul-g
[^2]: Opinion and Order, *Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States*, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla. Feb. 21, 2019), ECF No. 435 (Marra, J.), reported at 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, at 17-21, 26-33, citing *Does v. United States*, 817 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (S.D. Fla. 2011), and *Doe v. United States*, 950 F. Supp. 2d 1262 (S.D. Fla. 2013). https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.435.0.pdf ; docket, ECF Nos. 16, 18, 20, 21: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4502088/doe-v-united-states/
[^3]: "Lawyers Call Sexual Misconduct Case Against Dershowitz 'A Mistake,'" *The Harvard Crimson,* April 11, 2016. https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/4/11/lawyers-drop-dershowitz-case/ ; "Settlement Reached In Litigation Between Alan Dershowitz, Paul Cassell, And Bradley Edwards," *Above the Law,* April 2016. https://abovethelaw.com/2016/04/settlement-reached-in-litigation-between-alan-dershowitz-paul-cassell-and-bradley-edwards/
[^4]: Opinion and Order, *Doe v. United States*, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla. Sept. 16, 2019), ECF No. 478 (Marra, J.). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-flsd-9_08-cv-80736/pdf/USCOURTS-flsd-9_08-cv-80736-2.pdf
[^5]: *In re Wild*, No. 19-13843, 994 F.3d 1244 (11th Cir. Apr. 15, 2021) (en banc). https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201913843.enb.pdf ; Supreme Court of the United States, docket No. 21-351, order of February 22, 2022 denying certiorari. https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-351.html
[^6]: "Virginia Giuffre drops allegations against Alan Dershowitz, saying she 'may have made a mistake,'" *CNN,* November 8, 2022. https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/08/us/alan-dershowitz-virginia-giuffre-allegations-dropped
[^7]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02768436, Court Records (Epstein v. Rothstein, No. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. 2009)), Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for an In Camera Inspection of E-mails, e-filed November 9, 2018, pp. 1, 3, 17, 21, with privilege log. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Epstein%20v.%20Rothstein%2C%20No.%2050-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202009)/EFTA02768436.pdf
[^8]: "Millionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein apologizes in settling malicious prosecution suit," *CNN,* December 4, 2018. https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/04/politics/jeffrey-epstein-lawsuit-settled
[^9]: Docket, Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), ECF No. 131 (May 2, 2023), order granting motion of Paul G. Cassell to appear pro hac vice in No. 1:22-cv-10019-JSR, CourtListener docket 66683865. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66683865/government-of-the-united-states-virgin-islands-v-jpmorgan-chase-bank-na/
[^10]: "JPMorgan Chase and Epstein survivor Jane Doe 1 reach $290 million settlement," *NPR,* June 12, 2023. https://www.npr.org/2023/06/12/1181675580/epstein-jane-doe-1-290-million-settlement-jpmorgan-chase
[^11]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02522534, DataSet 11, email chain, Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler, "Re: this email trail was discovered today," February 25 to 26, 2018. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02522534.pdf

View file

@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- PaulEngelmayer
- FederalJudge
- SouthernDistrictOfNewYork
- GhislaineMaxwell
- EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct
- GrandJury
- TreasuryDepartment
alias:
- Paul A. Engelmayer
- Paul Adam Engelmayer
- Judge Engelmayer
- Paul Engelmayer
summary: "Manhattan federal judge and former Thurgood Marshall clerk and Major Crimes chief who inherited Ghislaine Maxwell's closed criminal case and ruled on its grand jury record under the Epstein Files Transparency Act."
born: 1961
location: "New York, New York"
relations:
- type: appointed
with: "[[Barack Obama]]"
reverse: true
role: "U.S. District Judge, Southern District of New York"
start: 2011-07-27
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York]]"
role: "Assistant U.S. Attorney; chief, Major Crimes Unit"
start: 1989
end: 1999
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Office of the Solicitor General]]"
role: "Assistant to the Solicitor General"
start: 1994
end: 1996
fn: 1
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Paul A. Engelmayer (born 1961, in [[New York City]]) is a judge of the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]], appointed by [[Barack Obama]] in 2011, who earlier clerked for Justice [[Thurgood Marshall]], served in the [[Office of the Solicitor General]] and headed the Major Crimes Unit of the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office]]. He took over [[United States v. Maxwell]], the criminal case of [[Ghislaine Maxwell]], after Judge [[Alison Nathan]] was elevated to the [[Second Circuit]], and in 2025 and 2026 ruled on the unsealing of its grand jury record, first refusing the request of Deputy Attorney General [[Todd Blanche]] and then granting it under the [[Epstein Files Transparency Act]]. In February 2025, sitting in emergency Part I, he barred political appointees and special government employees from Treasury payment systems.[^1][^2][^3]
### Career
Engelmayer graduated from [[Harvard College]] in 1983 and [[Harvard Law School]] in 1987, after working as a reporter for the [[Wall Street Journal]] in New York in 1983 and 1984. He clerked for Judge [[Patricia Wald|Patricia M. Wald]] of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit|D.C. Circuit]] from 1987 to 1988 and for Justice Marshall from 1988 to 1989. He was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York from 1989 to 1994 and 1996 to 1999, as deputy chief appellate attorney in 1994 and chief of the Major Crimes Unit from 1996 to 1999, and Assistant to the Solicitor General from 1994 to 1996. He was in private practice in New York from 2000 to 2011. Obama nominated him on February 2, 2011 to the seat vacated by [[Gerard E. Lynch]]; he was confirmed on July 26 and commissioned on July 27, 2011.[^1]
### Leon Black's Racketeering Suit
In 2022 Engelmayer dismissed with prejudice a racketeering suit by the financier [[Leon Black]], who had left [[Apollo Global Management]] after the disclosure of his payments to [[Jeffrey Epstein]], against his Apollo co-founder Josh Harris, [[Guzel Ganieva]] and others, calling the claims "glaringly deficient in fundamental respects."[^4]
### The Maxwell Grand Jury Record
On July 18, 2025 Blanche, formerly [[Donald Trump]]'s personal criminal defense lawyer, entered an appearance for the [[United States]] in Maxwell's closed case and moved to unseal the grand jury transcripts (ECF Nos. 784, 785); he questioned Maxwell under limited immunity on July 24 and 25. On August 11, 2025 Engelmayer denied the motion (ECF No. 809, 794 F. Supp. 3d 215), holding that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) barred disclosure and that "[t]he Government's invocation of special circumstances . . . fails at the threshold." Judge [[Richard M. Berman]] relied on the ruling nine days later in denying the government's parallel motion in [[United States v. Epstein]].[^2][^5]
After the Epstein Files Transparency Act became law on November 19, 2025, the government renewed the motion (ECF No. 810). Engelmayer ordered victim submissions through a dedicated [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]] mailbox, docketed three redacted victim letters, and on December 9, 2025 granted the motion and modified the 2020 protective order, subject to the Act's protection of victims' identities (ECF No. 820). Berman granted the matching motion in the Epstein docket the next day.[^2][^5]
On January 13, 2026 Representatives [[Thomas Massie]] and [[Ro Khanna]], the Act's sponsors, asked Engelmayer to appoint "a special master or independent monitor" over the Justice Department's compliance, reporting that as of January 5 it had "publicly released only 12,285 documents" of "more than 2 million documents potentially responsive to the Act," and that "DOJ cannot be trusted with making mandatory disclosures under the Act." Victim letters, including one from [[Haley Robson]] transmitted by the government, were cited in support. He denied the motion on January 21, 2026 (ECF No. 844): "This federal criminal case does not give the Court jurisdiction over, or authority to supervise, DOJ's compliance with the EFTA, a civil records-disclosure statute." Amici, he held, may not raise issues no party has pursued; his December ruling had removed the protective order as an obstacle, but "[i]t was the EFTA that" required release. He described the case as "effectively closed," with Maxwell's pro se motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 "the only outstanding item." Status letters on the Department's review followed over the name of U.S. Attorney [[Jay Clayton]].[^6]
### The Treasury Order
On the evening of February 8, 2025, "sitting in its Part I capacity," Engelmayer received the application of the attorneys general of 19 states, led by New York, for a temporary restraining order against a Treasury policy that expanded access to the payment systems of the [[Bureau of the Fiscal Service]] to political appointees and "special government employees." Finding that the states faced irreparable harm from "the risk that the new policy presents of the disclosure of sensitive and confidential information and the heightened risk that the systems in question will be more vulnerable than before to hacking," and that their statutory claims presented "as particularly strong," he restrained the defendants from granting access to Treasury payment records and systems except to civil servants who had passed background checks and security clearances, and ordered anyone else given access since January 20 "to immediately destroy any and all copies of material downloaded from the Treasury Department's records and systems, if any." The case was assigned the same evening to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas.[^3]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Federal Judicial Center, "Engelmayer, Paul Adam," Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges. https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/engelmayer-paul-adam
[^2]: United States v. Maxwell, No. 1:20-cr-00330 (S.D.N.Y.), ECF Nos. 784, 785 (July 18, 2025); Opinion and Order, ECF No. 809 (Aug. 11, 2025), reported at 794 F. Supp. 3d 215, 225-29; ECF Nos. 810, 811, 818; Opinion and Order, ECF No. 820 (Dec. 9, 2025), 2025 WL 3522378. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17318376/united-states-v-maxwell/
[^3]: Order, State of New York et al. v. Trump et al., No. 25 Civ. 1144 (JAV) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2025), ECF No. 6 (Engelmayer, J., sitting in Part I). https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2025-02/25cv1144%20Order%20on%20TRO%202%208%2025_0.pdf
[^4]: "Leon Black's Lawsuit Against Josh Harris, Guzel Ganieva Dismissed by Judge," *Bloomberg,* June 30, 2022. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-30/leon-black-suit-against-josh-harris-guzel-ganieva-thrown-out
[^5]: United States v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490 (S.D.N.Y.), Decision and Order, ECF No. 77 (Aug. 20, 2025), quoting United States v. Maxwell, 2025 WL 2301281, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 11, 2025); Decision and Order, ECF No. 92 (Dec. 10, 2025), CourtListener docket 15887848. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15887848/united-states-v-epstein/
[^6]: United States v. Maxwell, No. 20 Cr. 330 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2026), Opinion and Order, ECF No. 844, denying motion of Reps. Massie and Khanna (ECF Nos. 837, 838). https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2026-01/Maxwell%2020cr330%20-%20Opinion%20%26%20Order%201.21.26.pdf ; United States v. Maxwell, No. 1:20-cr-00330 (S.D.N.Y.), ECF Nos. 839, 843, 847. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17318376/united-states-v-maxwell/

View file

@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- RichardMBerman
- FederalJudge
- SouthernDistrictOfNewYork
- JeffreyEpstein
- Halkbank
- EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct
alias:
- Richard Berman
- Judge Richard M. Berman
- Judge Berman
- Richard M. Berman
summary: "Manhattan federal judge, a former Javits aide and Warner Cable general counsel, who ordered Jeffrey Epstein detained in 2019, let victims speak before dismissing his indictment, and later unsealed its grand jury record."
born: 1943
location: "New York, New York"
relations:
- type: appointed
with: "[[Bill Clinton]]"
reverse: true
role: "U.S. District Judge, Southern District of New York"
start: 1998-10-22
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Jacob Javits]]"
role: "executive assistant to the senator"
start: 1974
end: 1977
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Warner Cable]]"
role: "general counsel and executive vice president"
start: 1978
end: 1986
fn: 1
- type: participant_in
with: "[[United States v. Epstein]]"
role: "presiding judge"
start: 2019-07-02
fn: 2
- type: participant_in
with: "[[United States v. Halkbank]]"
role: "presiding judge"
start: 2019
fn: 9
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Richard M. Berman (born 1943, in [[New York City]]) is a senior judge of the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]], appointed by [[Bill Clinton]] in 1998. He presided over [[United States v. Epstein]], the 2019 sex-trafficking indictment of [[Jeffrey Epstein]], ordering Epstein detained on July 18, 2019 and, after Epstein's death in federal custody, holding a public hearing on August 27, 2019 at which victims spoke before he dismissed the indictment. In 2025 he first refused and then, after the [[Epstein Files Transparency Act]], granted the government's motions to unseal the case's grand jury record. He also presided over the Iran-sanctions prosecution of the Turkish state-owned bank [[Halkbank]]. He is not related to [[Geoffrey Berman]], the U.S. Attorney whose office brought the Epstein case.[^1][^2][^3]
### Career
Berman graduated from [[Cornell University]] in 1964 and the [[New York University School of Law]] in 1967, and in 1996, while in private practice, earned a master's degree in social work from the [[Fordham University]] Graduate School of Social Services. He practiced in New York from 1970 to 1974, was executive assistant to Senator [[Jacob Javits]] of New York from 1974 to 1977, executive director of the New York State Alliance to Save Energy from 1977 to 1978, and general counsel and executive vice president of [[Warner Cable]] from 1978 to 1986. After further private practice he sat as a judge of the Queens County Family Court from 1995 to 1998. Clinton nominated him on May 21, 1998 to the seat vacated by [[Kevin Thomas Duffy]]; he was confirmed on October 21 and commissioned on October 22, 1998, and took senior status on September 11, 2011.[^1]
In 2001 Berman warned [[Steven Hoffenberg]], the former chief executive of [[Towers Financial Corporation]], that "he may not assert baseless claims or abuse the judicial process through the instigation of frivolous or duplicative suits"; a 2018 draft memorandum by Epstein's lawyers at [[Troutman Sanders]] quoted the warning under the heading "Multiple SDNY Judges Warned the Person Driving This Action Against Such Frivolous Lawsuits."[^4]
### United States v. Epstein
A grand jury in the Southern District returned a sealed two-count indictment on July 2, 2019, unsealed on July 8 after Epstein's arrest at [[Teterboro Airport]]. On July 16 Assistant U.S. Attorney Alison Moe filed a supplement to the government's detention memorandum disclosing that in late 2018, days after the [[Miami Herald]] began its series on the case, Epstein had wired 100,000 dollars and 250,000 dollars to two individuals named as potential co-conspirators in the 2007 [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]], identified only as Individual-1 and Individual-2. On July 18, 2019 Berman granted the government's motion for remand and denied release (ECF No. 32), finding Epstein a danger to the community and a flight risk.[^2][^5]
Epstein was found dead in the [[Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York|Metropolitan Correctional Center]] on August 10, 2019, and on August 19 the U.S. Attorney asked the court to approve an order of nolle prosequi. Berman convened a public hearing on August 27. Appearing were Assistant U.S. Attorneys [[Maurene Comey]] and Alison Moe, defense counsel Reid Weingarten and [[Martin Weinberg]], an [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] special agent and an NYPD detective. Berman said that "Mr. Epstein's death obviously means that a trial in which he is a defendant cannot take place," and answered a [[New York Law Journal]] opinion article by two professors arguing against such a hearing: "I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal[.] . . . [P]ublic hearings promote transparency and they provide the court with insights and information which the court may not otherwise be aware of." He described Rule 48(a) as "clearly directed toward an independent judicial assessment of the public interest in dismissing the indictment," and said it was "required that the court consider the views of the victims in the case at the hearing." He observed that "one of the authors of that article is himself counsel in one of the Epstein-related cases" and that he was surprised this was not disclosed. More than a dozen victims spoke, some through their lawyers. On August 29, 2019 Berman signed the order of nolle prosequi (ECF No. 52). On August 30 Professor Bruce A. Green of [[Fordham University School of Law]] wrote to Berman to "clarify the record" after reading a partial transcript, and Berman thanked him on September 4.[^2][^6]
In June 2023 an expert report for the [[Government of the United States Virgin Islands]] in its suit against [[JPMorgan Chase]] cited the transcript of the August 27 hearing among its sources.[^7]
### Criticism of the Justice Department
On May 6, 2020 staff of the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York]] circulated among themselves a news report of "Judge Berman commenting, in the middle of a random fraud sentencing, on his objections to DOJ policies and investigations post-Epstein," linking a New York Daily News story on Berman, Attorney General [[William Barr]] and the [[Federal Bureau of Prisons|Bureau of Prisons]]; an earlier message in the chain forwarded a New York Law Journal article on [[Prince Andrew]]'s non-cooperation with prosecutors "for awareness given that this is an ongoing issue."[^8]
### The Grand Jury Record
On July 18, 2025 Deputy Attorney General [[Todd Blanche]] entered an appearance in the closed Epstein case and moved to unseal its grand jury transcripts (ECF Nos. 60, 61), the same day he filed the matching motion in [[United States v. Maxwell]]. After reviewing the 70 pages of transcripts of June 18 and July 2, 2019, the exhibits (a PowerPoint presentation and four pages of call logs), letters from victims and their lawyers and a letter from the executors of Epstein's estate, Berman denied the motion on August 20, 2025 (ECF No. 77). He held that Rule 6(e) governed, that "there is clear precedent and sound purpose for grand jury sealing," and that the government "fails to demonstrate any 'special circumstance[]' which might justify unsealing," quoting Judge [[Paul Engelmayer]]'s ruling of August 11 in the Maxwell case and the Second Circuit's statement that grand jury secrecy is a tradition "older than our Nation itself." On September 16, 2025 he denied an application by NBC News to unseal the names of Individual-1 and Individual-2 (ECF No. 82).[^2][^3]
After the Epstein Files Transparency Act became law, the government renewed its motion on November 24, 2025, and on December 10, one day after Engelmayer's parallel ruling, Berman granted it (ECF No. 92): "The recently enacted 'Epstein Files Transparency Act,' Pub. L. No. 119-38, 139 Stat. 656 (2025) . . . compels the US [[Department of Justice]] . . . to make public by December 19, 2025 certain evidentiary files. The Court hereby grants the Government's motion in accordance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act and with the un[e]qivocal right of Epstein victims to have their identity and privacy protected." From January 15 to February 5, 2026 U.S. Attorney [[Jay Clayton]] sent him a series of letters on the Department's review and compliance. On January 23 Berman answered a letter from [[Haley Robson]], transmitted by the government, that there was "no relevant case on my docket at this time." On February 1 the victims' lawyer [[Brittany Henderson]] sent Berman and Engelmayer an emergency request for judicial intervention under the Act; Berman set a conference, which he cancelled on February 3 after the parties resolved the privacy issues.[^3]
### Halkbank
In 2019 the [[United States]] indicted Türkiye Halk Bankası, a bank majority-owned through the Turkish Wealth Fund by the Republic of [[Turkey]], for a multi-year conspiracy to evade sanctions on [[Iran]]; the indictment alleged that the bank, "with the assistance of high-ranking Turkish government officials, laundered billions of dollars of Iranian oil and gas proceeds through the global financial system." The prosecution proceeded before Berman in the case captioned United States v. Zarrab. On October 1, 2020 he denied Halkbank's motion to dismiss, reasoning that the [[Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act]] "does not appear to grant immunity in criminal proceedings." The Second Circuit affirmed on October 22, 2021 (16 F.4th 336), and on April 19, 2023 the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] held that the Act does not apply to criminal cases but remanded on common-law immunity, Justice [[Neil Gorsuch]] writing in partial dissent that the decision "overcomplicates the law for no good reason." The Second Circuit ruled again on October 22, 2024 (120 F.4th 41).[^9]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Federal Judicial Center, "Berman, Richard M.," Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges. https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/berman-richard-m
[^2]: United States v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (S.D.N.Y.), ECF Nos. 2, 3, 32 (July 18, 2019), 52 (Aug. 29, 2019), 55, 56, 77 (Aug. 20, 2025), 82 (Sept. 16, 2025), CourtListener docket 15887848. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15887848/united-states-v-epstein/
[^3]: United States v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (S.D.N.Y.), ECF Nos. 60, 61, 75, 77, 85, 92 (Dec. 10, 2025), 94-105 (Jan. 15 to Feb. 5, 2026), CourtListener docket 15887848. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/15887848/united-states-v-epstein/
[^4]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00802452, DataSet 9, draft memorandum of law, Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss, Gerber v. The Financial Trust Company, No. 1:18-cv-07580-JPO (S.D.N.Y.), Troutman Sanders LLP, September 2018. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802452.pdf
[^5]: United States v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (S.D.N.Y.), ECF No. 23, Letter from AUSA Alison Moe to Judge Richard M. Berman (Supplement to Detention Memorandum), July 16, 2019, pp. 1-3. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.518649/gov.uscourts.nysd.518649.23.0_2.pdf ; U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Report 23-085, June 2023, pp. iii to iv. https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/23-085.pdf
[^6]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02733081, Court Records (CA Florida Holdings, LLC, Publisher of the Palm Beach Post v. Aronberg, No. 50-2019-CA-014681-XXXX-MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. 2019)), appendix item 11, transcript of hearing, United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2019), beginning at EFTA02733613. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/CA%20Florida%20Holdings%2C%20LLC%2C%20Publisher%20of%20the%20Palm%20Beach%20Post%20v.%20Aronberg%2C%20No.%2050-2019-CA-014681-XXXX-MB%20(Fla.%2015th%20Cir.%20Ct.%202019)/EFTA02733081.pdf
[^7]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02810827, Court Records (Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904), Expert Report of Jorge Amador, June 16, 2023, Document 238-31, n. 53. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank%2C%20N.A.%2C%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02810827.pdf
[^8]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00030338, DataSet 8, internal U.S. Attorney's Office email chain, "RE: The Prince and the Proffer | New York Law Journal," May 6, 2020. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00030338.pdf ; duplicate at EFTA00018735. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00018735.pdf
[^9]: Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States, No. 21-1450, 598 U.S. 264 (April 19, 2023), slip op. at 1-3, and Gorsuch, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1450_5468.pdf ; United States v. Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S., No. 20-3499, 16 F.4th 336 (2d Cir. Oct. 22, 2021), on appeal from the Decision and Order of Oct. 1, 2020 (Berman, J.). https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5291813/united-states-v-bankasi/ ; United States v. Zarrab (Turkiye Halk Bankasi), No. 20-3499, 120 F.4th 41 (2d Cir. Oct. 22, 2024). https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10152619/united-states-v-zarrab-turkiye-halk-bankasi/

View file

@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ The Future Fund launched in February 2022, run by [[Nick Beckstead]], [[Leopold
### The Collapse and Conviction
FTX collapsed in November 2022 when it could not meet customer withdrawals, revealing that roughly eight billion dollars in customer deposits had been diverted to Alameda Research. Bankman-Fried was arrested, extradited, and tried in the Southern District of New York, where a jury convicted him on November 2, 2023; he was sentenced in March 2024 to twenty-five years in prison. The fraud destroyed the effective-altruism movement's largest funding source and discredited its public standing, accelerating the distancing from the label by figures including Anthropic's [[Dario Amodei]] and contributing to the climate in which the Future of Humanity Institute was closed.[^1][^4]
FTX collapsed in November 2022 when it could not meet customer withdrawals, revealing that roughly eight billion dollars in customer deposits had been diverted to Alameda Research. Bankman-Fried was arrested, extradited, and tried in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]], where a jury convicted him on November 2, 2023; he was sentenced in March 2024 to twenty-five years in prison. The fraud destroyed the effective-altruism movement's largest funding source and discredited its public standing, accelerating the distancing from the label by figures including Anthropic's [[Dario Amodei]] and contributing to the climate in which the Future of Humanity Institute was closed.[^1][^4]
Judge Lewis Kaplan handed down the sentence on March 28, 2024 and ordered forfeiture of 11.02 billion dollars; prosecutors had sought 40 to 50 years against a statutory maximum of 110, while the defense had argued for about six and a half. Several of his closest associates pleaded guilty and testified against him, including Alameda chief [[Caroline Ellison]], FTX cofounder [[Gary Wang]], and engineering head [[Nishad Singh]]. The bankruptcy estate, led by restructuring executive [[John J. Ray III]], recovered enough through asset sales (including the Anthropic stake and a rebound in crypto prices) to plan repayment of creditors at full claim value plus interest, while pursuing clawbacks against grant recipients; the effective-altruism umbrella body [[Effective Ventures]] returned 26,786,503 dollars to the estate in 2024, the full sum it had received from FTX.[^7][^8]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- VincentFrazer
- VirginIslands
- AttorneyGeneral
- JeffreyEpstein
- SexOffenderRegistration
- GovernmentCapture
alias:
- Vincent F. Frazer
- Vincent Franklin Frazer
- Attorney General Vincent Frazer
summary: "Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands from 2006 to 2015 who in 2012 cut Jeffrey Epstein's required notice of travel from 21 days to 24 hours at the request of Epstein's lawyers."
location: "St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands"
relations:
- type: head_of
with: "[[Virgin Islands Department of Justice]]"
start: 2006
end: 2015
role: "Attorney General"
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Virgin Islands Port Authority]]"
role: "senior counsel"
fn: 7
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Vincent F. Frazer is a [[U.S. Virgin Islands]] lawyer who was Attorney General of the territory from 2006 to 2015, through both terms of Governor [[John de Jongh]]. As head of the [[Virgin Islands Department of Justice]], which kept the territorial sex-offender registry, he received a 2009 request from [[Jeffrey Epstein|Jeffrey Epstein's]] lawyers to take over supervision of Epstein's [[Florida]] sentence, and in July and August 2012, after meeting Epstein's lawyers, he waived the 21-day advance notice of travel required by a newly passed sex-offender law and allowed Epstein to give 24 hours' notice by email. The arrangement stood until March 2019. He was later senior counsel at the [[Virgin Islands Port Authority]], and was named in a federal trafficking suit that was dismissed in 2025.[^1][^2][^3]
### The 2009 Supervision Request
In 2009, before the start of the year of community control that followed his Florida jail sentence, Epstein's counsel wrote to "The Honorable Vincent F. Frazer, Attorney General of the United States Virgin Islands," asking for help in transferring Epstein's supervision from Florida to the Virgin Islands. The letter described Epstein as "a full-time resident of the Virgin Islands, who maintains his home at [[Little St. James]]," and stated that "his place of employment was, and still is, [[Financial Trust Company|Financial Trust Company, Inc.]], located at Red Hook Quarter in [[St. Thomas]]." It acknowledged that Epstein "is required, at least under Florida law, to register as a sex offender," but argued that "as his state charge was a non-violent offense, i.e., procuring a minor for prostitution, Virgin Islands law would govern as to Mr. Epstein's registration requirements." It named the interstate compact coordinators for Florida and the Virgin Islands and Epstein's Florida probation officer, and gave July 22, 2009 as the start of his supervision.[^2]
### The 2012 Travel Waivers
In 2012 the [[Legislature of the Virgin Islands]] passed Bill 29-0239, enacted as Act No. 7372, which amended chapter 86 of title 14 of the Virgin Islands Code to expand the monitoring of sex offenders and set a 21-day advance notice requirement for travel, with discretion for the Attorney General to reduce it. The Rules and Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the bill on June 21, 2012. On July 13, 2012, before the governor signed it, Frazer met the St. Thomas attorney [[Maria Tankenson Hodge]] and Epstein's lawyer [[Darren Indyke]] to discuss its implementation. Hodge wrote to Frazer on July 16 asking that Epstein be allowed to continue his practice of notifying the department by email or fax "immediately prior to Mr. Epstein's departure," giving only "the general geographic areas of his travel," and that his existing practice be "deemed compliance with the new law" until Frazer ruled.[^3]
On July 25, 2012 Frazer accepted the letter as a request "for the Attorney General to waive the 21 day prior notice requirement," and wrote: "Based upon your representation and that of Attorney Darren Indyke, we will grant the waiver of the (21) twenty one day notice requirement to the Department of Justice when Mr. Epstein is traveling out of the Territory." He set conditions, including 72 hours' notice and the addresses of temporary lodging, and added: "I do recognize that these conditions vary from the former conditions. However in light of the discretion given to the Attorney General by Act No.7372, we are forced to take a closer look at the waiver conditions."[^3]
Hodge replied on July 30 that the 72-hour rule and the address requirement were "unduly restrictive," and wrote that "both you and Senator Russell stated during the hearing on the Act before the Rules and Judiciary Committee on June 21, 2012, that the travel notification requirements of this Act were specifically not intended to be penal in nature." On August 14, 2012 Frazer wrote that "in light of the justification set out in your letter of July 30, 2012, I have decided to shorten the notice period": Epstein would "be allowed to notify the Department of Justice of his intention to travel out of the Territory twenty four (24) hours prior to his departure," could continue to notify the department when staying at one of his "stateside homes," and when staying with "an associate" needed to give only the city and state or country. Frazer required copies of Epstein's driver's licenses, identification cards and passports, and closed: "I trust that the foregoing conditions will be workable for your client, in light of his frequent trips out of the Territory on business."[^3]
### Revocation
Acting Attorney General [[Carol Thomas-Jacobs]] revoked the arrangement by letter of March 14, 2019, after Epstein was detained and refused entry in the [[Dominican Republic]] in February 2019, and required 21 days' notice in person for travel outside the United States. On April 30, 2019 the firm of Epstein's territorial counsel, [[Erika Kellerhals]], asked the incoming Attorney General, [[Denise George]], to reinstate "the proven travel notification procedures," attaching the Frazer correspondence. George answered on June 2, 2019: "While my predecessors have apparently had differing interpretations of Title 14, Section 1724(b)(4) of the Virgin Islands Code, it is my understanding that the 21-day in-person notification for international travel can only be waived upon a showing of 'reasonable and reliable proof satisfactory to the Department of Justice'... In this particular case, I have not been presented with any documentation of such proof, nor does the VIDOJ have any record of such documentation ever having been submitted to the VIDOJ." She asked for "the documentation that was originally submitted to Attorney General Frazer that validated such a waiver."[^3]
In an October 2, 2023 interview with the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]], released by the [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]] in January 2026, George said she "believed that Frazer was pressured by then Governor John De Jongh" to grant the waiver. De Jongh's wife, [[Cecile de Jongh]], was the office manager of Epstein's territorial companies throughout her husband's two terms. Frazer was deposed in the territory's suit against [[JPMorgan Chase]], and, like the other officials deposed, said he had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes.[^4][^5]
### Litigation and Later Career
On November 22, 2023 six women identified as Jane Does named Frazer, with the territorial government, the de Jonghs, Governor [[Kenneth Mapp]], [[Celestino White]], [[Carlton Dowe]] and [[Stacey Plaskett]], in a suit in the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]] alleging that the defendants made the territory a "safe haven" for Epstein's trafficking; the complaint alleged among other things that Epstein had been labeled a Tier 1 sex offender when he should have been Tier 2. On March 21, 2025 Judge [[Arun Subramanian]] dismissed the claims against Frazer and the other defendants except Plaskett for lack of personal jurisdiction in New York. The court's mailing receipt for its September 2025 dismissal order was addressed to "Attorney General Vincent Frazer" at a post office box on St. Thomas.[^1][^6]
In October 2022 the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands publicly reprimanded Frazer, then senior counsel at the Virgin Islands Port Authority, after a complaint that, while representing the seller of a business, he had unilaterally disbursed a disputed good-faith deposit held in escrow to his client and deducted his fees. He consented to the reprimand, the return of the funds to escrow and six additional hours of continuing legal education, on pain of a six-month suspension. The Port Authority's executive director, Carlton Dowe, was a co-defendant in the 2023 trafficking suit.[^1][^7][^8]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Doe 1 v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands, No. 1:23-cv-10301-AS (S.D.N.Y.), Opinion and Order, ECF No. 202 (March 21, 2025), pp. 1 to 2, 7 to 8, 16 to 17 (Frazer as Attorney General from 2006 to 2015). https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf
[^2]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00727487, DataSet 9, letter from counsel for Jeffrey Epstein to Attorney General Vincent F. Frazer requesting transfer of Epstein's supervision from Florida to the Virgin Islands, 2009 (duplicate EFTA00727485). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00727487.pdf
[^3]: Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), Exhibit 83, ECF No. 194-24 (filed June 20, 2023), pp. 2 to 7 (Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin letter to Denise George, April 30, 2019), 36 to 47 (Hodge letters of July 16 and July 30, 2012; Frazer letters of July 25 and August 14, 2012), 56 to 58 (George email of June 2, 2019). https://web.archive.org/web/20260117011719/https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/194-24.pdf
[^4]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Docs confirm Bryan pressed for special treatment of sex offender." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 2, 2026. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/docs-confirm-bryan-pressed-for-special-treatment-of-sex-offender/article_5e9483c9-38d2-406c-8bb0-e5757ce287f2.html (George's FBI interview; Frazer waiver; Cecile de Jongh's employment).
[^5]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Files reveal Epstein's efforts to influence V.I. officials; emails with Mapp." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 2, 2026. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/files-reveal-epstein-s-efforts-to-influence-v-i-officials-emails-with-mapp/article_2dd4fe69-4daf-4dc2-b3b8-37a929002bb6.html
[^6]: Doe 1 v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands, No. 1:23-cv-10301-AS (S.D.N.Y.), docket, including Stipulation and Order of Dismissal, ECF No. 224 (September 23, 2025), and mailing receipt to "Attorney General Vincent Frazer," St. Thomas (September 24, 2025). https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68031620/doe-1-v-government-of-the-united-states-virgin-islands/
[^7]: "V.I. Supreme Court Reprimands Former Attorney General for Issuing Good Faith Deposit for Potential Sale of Business to Client While a Dispute Was Ongoing." *The Virgin Islands Consortium,* October 31, 2022. https://viconsortium.com/vi-government/virgin-islands-v-i-supreme-court-reprimands-former-attorney-general-for-issuing-good-faith-deposit-for-potential-sale-of-business-to-client-while-a-dispute-was-ongoing
[^8]: "Former Gov. Kenneth Mapp Visited Epstein's Island, Sought $50,000 for Final Election Push, DOJ Records Show." *The Virgin Islands Consortium,* January 31, 2026 (Port Authority Executive Director Carlton Dowe). https://viconsortium.com/vi-federal/virgin-islands-former-gov--kenneth-mapp-visited-epstein-s-island--sought--50-000-for--final-push---doj-records-show

View file

@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ In the summer of 2000 Giuffre took a job as a locker-room attendant at the Mar-a
### Recruitment and Trafficking Allegations
Giuffre said that Ghislaine Maxwell approached her while she was working at the Mar-a-Lago spa, reading a book on massage therapy, and recruited her ostensibly to train as a masseuse for Epstein, taking her that evening to Epstein's nearby Palm Beach house. She said she was then drawn into sexual abuse by Epstein and trafficked to other men over a period of years, traveling among Epstein's residences in New York, Palm Beach, [[New Mexico|New Mexico]], and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and abroad. She described Maxwell as central to Epstein's operation and said she was presented to Epstein's associates as available for sexual purposes.[^1][^2]
Giuffre said that Ghislaine Maxwell approached her while she was working at the Mar-a-Lago spa, reading a book on massage therapy, and recruited her ostensibly to train as a masseuse for Epstein, taking her that evening to Epstein's nearby [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]] house. She said she was then drawn into sexual abuse by Epstein and trafficked to other men over a period of years, traveling among Epstein's residences in New York, Palm Beach, [[New Mexico|New Mexico]], and the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]], and abroad. She described Maxwell as central to Epstein's operation and said she was presented to Epstein's associates as available for sexual purposes.[^1][^2]
Among the men Giuffre said Epstein directed her to was Prince Andrew, whom she said she was made to have sex with on three occasions beginning in London in March 2001 when she was 17, around the time she was photographed with him at Maxwell's Belgravia home. Andrew has denied the allegations and settled her civil suit without admitting liability. Giuffre also named other men in her filings and interviews, including the financier [[Jean-Luc Brunel|Jean-Luc Brunel]] and the attorney [[Alan Dershowitz|Alan Dershowitz]]; those named denied her accounts. Her allegations against individuals other than Epstein and Maxwell were not adjudicated as criminal findings.[^1][^2]
@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ Her memoir [[Nobody's Girl|Nobody's Girl]], co-written with the author [[Amy Wal
Giuffre died without a valid will. In June 2025 two of her sons applied to the Supreme Court of Western Australia to be appointed administrators of the estate, which includes property in Western Australia, what remained of the settlement with Andrew (reported at 12 million pounds), and revenue from her memoir. Their application was opposed by her former carer, Cheryl Myers, and her former Perth lawyer, Karrie Louden, who sought appointment themselves; her estranged husband Robert Giuffre had agreed to the sons' writ, and the court registrar noted that he should be joined as a party.[^18]
In late November 2025 the court appointed a Western Australian lawyer, Ian Torrington Blatchford, as interim administrator, at 400 Australian dollars an hour. The court's orders listed existing legal proceedings the administrator would conduct, among them the 2015 case against Maxwell and "an arbitration" involving Alan Dershowitz, three years after the 2022 settlement of their litigation. They also included a defamation suit for 10 million dollars filed in the Southern District of New York in October 2021 by [[Rina Oh]], who alleged that Giuffre had portrayed her "as an accomplice to Epstein rather than a victim"; an appeals court had ruled that Oh's claim survived Giuffre's death.[^18][^19]
In late November 2025 the court appointed a Western Australian lawyer, Ian Torrington Blatchford, as interim administrator, at 400 Australian dollars an hour. The court's orders listed existing legal proceedings the administrator would conduct, among them the 2015 case against Maxwell and "an arbitration" involving Alan Dershowitz, three years after the 2022 settlement of their litigation. They also included a defamation suit for 10 million dollars filed in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]] in October 2021 by [[Rina Oh]], who alleged that Giuffre had portrayed her "as an accomplice to Epstein rather than a victim"; an appeals court had ruled that Oh's claim survived Giuffre's death.[^18][^19]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- JeffreyEpstein
- NonProsecutionAgreement
- Prosecutor
- DepartmentOfJustice
- PublicIntegritySection
- RevolvingDoor
alias:
- Andrew Lourie
- Andrew C. Lourie
- Andy Lourie
summary: "Federal prosecutor who managed the West Palm Beach office during the Epstein investigation, twice acted as chief of the Public Integrity Section, and left for Criminal Division leadership while the non-prosecution agreement was negotiated."
location: "West Palm Beach, Florida"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey]]"
role: "Assistant U.S. Attorney"
start: 1991
end: 1994
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]]"
role: "Assistant U.S. Attorney; Deputy Chief, Criminal Division; Managing AUSA, West Palm Beach"
start: 1994
end: 2007-09
fn: 1
- type: head_of
with: "[[Public Integrity Section]]"
role: "Acting Chief, on detail"
start: 2001-09
end: 2002-09
fn: 1
- type: head_of
with: "[[Public Integrity Section]]"
role: "Acting Chief, on detail"
start: 2006-02
end: 2006-07
fn: 1
- type: reported_to
with: "[[Alice Fisher]]"
role: "Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General and Chief of Staff, Criminal Division"
start: 2007-09
end: 2008-02
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Kobre & Kim]]"
role: "partner"
fn: 12
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Tein Malone]]"
role: "of counsel"
fn: 4
- type: investigated
with: "[[Office of Professional Responsibility]]"
reverse: true
start: 2019-02-06
end: 2020-11
fn: 2
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Andrew C. Lourie is an American lawyer and former federal prosecutor who, as a deputy chief of the Criminal Division of the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]] and managing attorney of its [[West Palm Beach, Florida|West Palm Beach]] branch, supervised the 2006 to 2007 investigation of [[Jeffrey Epstein]] and took part in negotiating the [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]]. Twice detailed to Washington as acting chief of the [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]]'s [[Public Integrity Section]], he left the Miami office in September 2007, while the agreement was being negotiated, to become Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General and chief of staff to [[Alice Fisher]], head of the department's Criminal Division, and left the department in February 2008. He later practiced government enforcement defense at [[Kobre & Kim]] and [[Tein Malone]] in [[Miami]]. The [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] named him one of five subjects of its Epstein investigation and found no professional misconduct.[^1][^2]
### Career
According to his current firm biography, Lourie practiced at [[Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher]] in New York and then served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in [[New Jersey]], focusing on public corruption. He joined the Southern District of Florida office in 1994 after three years in New Jersey, and during a thirteen-year tenure there headed the Major Crimes unit and the West Palm Beach office. He served two details as acting chief of the Public Integrity Section, from September 2001 to September 2002 and from February to July 2006. Kobre & Kim's biography of him states that as chief of the section he supervised public corruption prosecutions including investigations of bribery in [[United States Congress|Congress]] and the executive branch arising from the prosecution of the lobbyist [[Jack Abramoff]], and that as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General he ran the day-to-day operations of the 438-lawyer Criminal Division.[^1][^3][^4]
### Supervising the Epstein Case
Lourie returned to West Palm Beach in July 2006 as the managing attorney over the line prosecutor [[Ann Marie Villafana|A. Marie Villafaña]], who had briefed [[Alexander Acosta]] and [[Jeffrey Sloman]] on the new case that month without first telling him. On July 24, 2006 Sloman emailed Lourie that Operation Leap Year was "a highly sensitive case involving some [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]] rich guy." When Villafaña kept sending updates directly to Miami, Lourie asked Sloman in August, "Do you and Alex [Acosta] want her updating you on the case?" Sloman answered, "At this point, I don't really care." The Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section chief, [[Drew Oosterbaan|Andrew Oosterbaan]], reviewed her prosecution memorandum favorably, but Lourie told OPR the case was "a bit of uncharted territory." After explaining to the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] squad supervisor on May 9, 2007 that charges would not be quickly approved, he reported to [[Matthew Menchel]] that the FBI was "not happy," adding: "I did not even tell them I think we should bring [Epstein] in, once we decide to charge him, and offer a pre-indictment deal, figuring a judge might never agree to such a deal post indictment. That would have sent them thru the roof."[^5][^6]
On May 10, 2007 he wrote to Villafaña: "I believe that Epstein's att[orneys] are scared of the victims they don't know. Epstein has no doubt told them that there were many. Thus I believe the f[ir]st indictment should contain only the victims they have nothing on at all. We can add in the other ones that have myspace [sic] pages and prior testimony in a [superseding indictment]. I think for the first strike we should make all their nightmare[]s come true." The next day he recommended to Acosta and Menchel: "My current thoughts are that we should charge him," proposing to "start with a complaint, arrest him, detain him . . . and then try to see if he wants a pre-indictment resolution." He told OPR that he "was not in favor of walking away, which is what the defense wanted," but "didn't think the odds were nearly as good as you want in a criminal case."[^6]
### The September 2007 Negotiations
Lourie was on the federal side of the September 13, 2007 joint meeting with [[Rolando Garcia]] and Villafaña, facing Epstein's lawyers [[Jay Lefkowitz]], [[Gerald Lefcourt]] and [[Jack Goldberger]], with State Attorney [[Barry Krischer]] and [[Lanna Belohlavek]] for the state. When Villafaña proposed that Epstein plead to a federal assault charge, Lourie told her it "sounds like a stretch and factually [is] sort of silly," and told Sloman and Acosta that he did not "like the assault charge" because it would not "go smooth with every judge"; Acosta answered, "If we need[,] let's find a different charge." Villafaña then relayed his advice to Lefkowitz: "Andy recommended that some of the timing issues be addressed only in the state agreement, so that it isn't obvious to the judge that we are trying to create federal jurisdiction for prison purposes." On September 23, the day before the agreement was signed, Acosta told Lefkowitz to deal directly with Lourie and Villafaña.[^7][^8][^9]
That month Lourie moved to Washington as Fisher's chief of staff. OPR found that the three supervisors under Acosta "left the USAO, were transitioning to other jobs, or were absent at critical junctures." From Washington, on November 29, 2007, he was party to an exchange that Sloman forwarded, recording that the defense "originally agreed to plead to the state felony that they thought was unregisterable (but did not tell us knowing we thought it was), but then discovered they were wrong and tried to get out of it."[^1][^2][^9]
### Ties to the Defense
One of Epstein's Miami lawyers, identified in OPR's report by the first name Guy, was a former career Assistant U.S. Attorney who had been U.S. Attorney for the district from 2000 to 2002 and then for two years Director of the [[Executive Office for United States Attorneys]]; he telephoned Villafaña with an overture on Epstein's behalf in early November 2006, a call Sloman joined. OPR found that "Villafaña and Lourie had worked for [him] and Lourie was close friends with one of [his] law partners," also a former Assistant U.S. Attorney representing Epstein. A December 2018 account of Epstein's early defense team listed "former U.S. Attorney [[Guy Lewis]]" among its members.[^10][^11]
Early in the investigation Lourie voluntarily asked the office's Professional Responsibility Officer whether the two friendships created "either a conflict of interest or an appearance of impropriety mandating recusal." The officer answered that they were not "covered" relationships under the conflict guidelines and deferred to Sloman or Menchel "to make the call," and Sloman authorized Lourie to continue supervising the case. OPR treated the inquiry as "an indication that he was alert to his ethical responsibilities." Lourie told OPR that his "preexisting associations with Epstein's attorneys" did not influence "anything."[^10]
### After the Justice Department
Lourie left the department in February 2008 for private practice and became a partner at Kobre & Kim, where his practice covered government enforcement defense in commodities manipulation, spoofing, insider trading and [[Foreign Corrupt Practices Act]] matters, and international judgment enforcement and asset recovery. In 2015 the firm quoted the Chambers guide that his "skills are extraordinary, and his judgment is first-rate." Menchel, his former Criminal Division chief on the Epstein matter, is a partner at the same firm. Lourie is now of counsel at the Miami firm Tein Malone, whose attorneys include [[Michael Tein]].[^1][^3][^4][^12]
### OPR and Villafaña
Questioned by OPR about Villafaña's September 2007 emails, which the district court had quoted in 2019 in [[Doe v. United States]], Lourie said he was "surprised to see how nice she was to them. And she winds up taking it on the chin for being so nice to them. When I know the whole time she was the one who wanted to go after him the most." OPR found no professional misconduct by Lourie or the other four subjects.[^2][^13]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284, Prior DOJ Disclosures, report, Office of Professional Responsibility, "Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation," November 2020, pp. 5 to 6 (EFTA02847314 to EFTA02847315). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Prior%20DOJ%20Disclosures/Memos.%20&%20Correspondence/EFTA02847284.pdf
[^2]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), Executive Summary, pp. vi, ix to x (EFTA02847291, EFTA02847294 to EFTA02847295).
[^3]: Kobre & Kim, "Andrew C. Lourie" (firm biography, Chinese-language edition). https://kobrekim.com/zh_cmn/people-cn/andrew-c-lourie-cn
[^4]: Tein Malone, "Andrew Lourie" (firm biography). https://www.teinmalone.com/andrewlourie
[^5]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 18, 21 and nn. 28, 30 (EFTA02847327, EFTA02847330).
[^6]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 28 to 29 and nn. 41 to 43 (EFTA02847337 to EFTA02847338).
[^7]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, privileged chronology of the federal investigation, May 2006 to August 2011, entries for September 13 and 23, 2007. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf
[^8]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 68 to 70 (EFTA02847377 to EFTA02847379).
[^9]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943 (see note 4), pp. 23 to 29.
[^10]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 22, 150 to 152 and n. 34 (EFTA02847331, EFTA02847459 to EFTA02847461).
[^11]: "Daily Dicta: Why Jeffrey Epstein's All-Star Defense Team May Be the Victim of Its Own Success," *ALM Media* via *Yahoo Finance,* December 5, 2018. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/daily-dicta-why-jeffrey-epstein-062720798.html
[^12]: Kobre & Kim, "Kobre & Kim Receives Top Rankings in the 2015 Edition of Chambers & Partners," May 19, 2015. https://kobrekim.com/news/accolades/kobre-and-kim-receives-top-rankings-in-the-2015-edition-of-chambers-and-partners
[^13]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), p. 165 (EFTA02847474).

View file

@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Hannam's case is not a documented instance of O9A insight roles in law enforceme
What Hannam's case does document is the structural fact that a member of a proscribed terrorist organisation successfully passed police vetting and served as a constable for two years. Whether the mechanism was insight-role doctrine, opportunistic careerism, or a combination is not established in the trial record.
The documented cases of O9A adherents who joined military or law enforcement institutions as a direct expression of insight role doctrine include [[Ethan Phelan Melzer]], the U.S. Army private in the [[173rd Airborne Brigade]] who was convicted in the Southern District of New York after transmitting classified unit deployment information to O9A members on [[Telegram]], conspiring to arrange a mass-casualty attack on his own soldiers. Melzer's prosecution memo stated explicitly that he "joined the Army in 2018 as part of what O9A referred to as an 'insight role.'" He was sentenced to 45 years in March 2023.[^20]
The documented cases of O9A adherents who joined military or law enforcement institutions as a direct expression of insight role doctrine include [[Ethan Phelan Melzer]], the U.S. Army private in the [[173rd Airborne Brigade]] who was convicted in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]] after transmitting classified unit deployment information to O9A members on [[Telegram]], conspiring to arrange a mass-casualty attack on his own soldiers. Melzer's prosecution memo stated explicitly that he "joined the Army in 2018 as part of what O9A referred to as an 'insight role.'" He was sentenced to 45 years in March 2023.[^20]
[[Nicholas Welker]], the [[Feuerkrieg Division]] leader convicted in the Eastern District of New York of conspiring to make interstate death threats, joined FKD explicitly as an O9A insight role, as documented in his prosecution records. He was sentenced to 44 months in April 2024.[^21]

View file

@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Cecile de Jongh (born Cecile Galiber) was the office manager of [[Jeffrey Epstei
De Jongh worked as the office manager of Epstein's Virgin Islands companies from 2007, the year her husband took office, through 2015, the year his term ended. JPMorgan's filings stated that she earned more than 200,000 dollars in compensation in 2007 alone for the role. The companies that employed her, Financial Trust Company and later Southern Trust Company, were the entities through which Epstein held his territorial tax benefits under the [[Economic Development Commission]] program and through which his Virgin Islands operations were funded.[^1][^2]
The same filings alleged that Epstein paid tuition for de Jongh's children, that she forwarded her children's tuition bills to him for payment, and that she requested he help fund her husband's re-election campaign. In her May 2023 deposition, taken at the Ritz-Carlton on St. Thomas over roughly five and a half hours, de Jongh described confronting Epstein after his 2006 Florida arrest, saying she looked him in the eye and asked what was going on, and was assured it was a one-time mistake that would not recur. The arrangement continued after Epstein registered as a sex offender following his 2008 Florida plea.[^2][^3]
The same filings alleged that Epstein paid tuition for de Jongh's children, that she forwarded her children's tuition bills to him for payment, and that she requested he help fund her husband's re-election campaign. In her May 2023 deposition, taken at the Ritz-Carlton on [[St. Thomas]] over roughly five and a half hours, de Jongh described confronting Epstein after his 2006 Florida arrest, saying she looked him in the eye and asked what was going on, and was assured it was a one-time mistake that would not recur. The arrangement continued after Epstein registered as a sex offender following his 2008 Florida plea.[^2][^3]
The employment overlapped entirely with her public role. While serving as First Lady from 2007 to 2015, she simultaneously drew her salary from Epstein's companies, an overlap that was reported contemporaneously and that became the foundation of the later allegations. No charges were brought against de Jongh, and she was not a defendant in the territory's case against the estate, whose November 2022 settlement resolved only the claims against the estate and the named co-defendants. The phrase "shield its participants from liability" in that litigation comes from the territory's 2020 objection to the estate's proposed victim compensation program, which required claimants to release claims against "any person or entity arising from or related to Mr. Epstein's conduct." Denise George later told the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] that Governor Albert Bryan, urging her to settle for 80 million dollars, said "that the Epstein estate just wanted to clear people."[^2][^4][^5][^6][^7]

View file

@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Darren K. Indyke is a New York lawyer who was [[Jeffrey Epstein]]'s longtime per
According to the Virgin Islands government's Second Amended Complaint, filed in November 2022, Indyke or Kahn, "frequently both," were officers or directors of the Butterfly Trust, of the companies holding Epstein's real property, and of Financial Strategy Group, Ltd.; Financial Trust, Inc.; FT Real Estate Inc.; [[Gratitude America]], Inc.; Hyperion Air, Inc.; the J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc.; Jeepers, Inc.; Mort, Inc.; Nautilus, Inc.; and Zorro Development Corporation, and had "signatory authority over virtually all of the accounts held by the Epstein Enterprise entities." The territory alleged that the two men "organized, controlled, and directed almost every aspect of the Epstein Enterprise," that with Epstein they "held and managed at least 140 different bank accounts for Epstein and Epstein-owned entities, many of which existed only to transfer payments to other entities and accounts," and that "in many instances, Kahn and/or Indyke structured these transactions in order to evade the bank's reporting requirements."[^2]
Indyke sat with Epstein and Kahn on the board of [[Southern Trust Company]], the St. Thomas company that obtained a Virgin Islands tax-incentive certificate on the representation that it ran a "biomedical and financial informatics" business. He was signatory on its primary bank account, into which funds were wired "primarily from a single source," and authorized a majority of the wire transfers out of it to Epstein's other entities and personal accounts. The territory estimated that the certificate let Epstein avoid 80,576,236 dollars in taxes. When Epstein formed [[Cypress Inc.|Cypress, Inc.]], [[Maple Inc.|Maple, Inc.]] and [[Laurel Inc.|Laurel, Inc.]] as Virgin Islands corporations in November 2011 and moved title to the [[Zorro Ranch]], the [[9 East 71st Street]] townhouse and his [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]] house into them, Indyke became vice president, secretary and director of each. The territory alleged that these transfers "were made for the sole purpose of sheltering these assets from collection."[^2]
Indyke sat with Epstein and Kahn on the board of [[Southern Trust Company]], the [[St. Thomas]] company that obtained a Virgin Islands tax-incentive certificate on the representation that it ran a "biomedical and financial informatics" business. He was signatory on its primary bank account, into which funds were wired "primarily from a single source," and authorized a majority of the wire transfers out of it to Epstein's other entities and personal accounts. The territory estimated that the certificate let Epstein avoid 80,576,236 dollars in taxes. When Epstein formed [[Cypress Inc.|Cypress, Inc.]], [[Maple Inc.|Maple, Inc.]] and [[Laurel Inc.|Laurel, Inc.]] as Virgin Islands corporations in November 2011 and moved title to the [[Zorro Ranch]], the [[9 East 71st Street]] townhouse and his [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]] house into them, Indyke became vice president, secretary and director of each. The territory alleged that these transfers "were made for the sole purpose of sheltering these assets from collection."[^2]
Indyke was listed as president of the J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, a tax-exempt private foundation, as of October 23, 2007. Between September 2015 and June 2019 he signed foundation checks for more than 400,000 dollars payable to young female models and actresses, including more than 380,000 dollars in monthly payments of 8,333 dollars to a former Russian model; in November 2017 he signed a foundation check to a New York immigration lawyer whose memo line referenced that model's surname. Earlier in 2017 he signed a foundation check for 160,000 dollars to resolve an environmental fine Epstein had incurred for construction on [[Great St. James]], which the estate later repaid to the foundation after questions were raised about it. The territory called the payments "inconsistent with the charitable purpose of the Foundation."[^2]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
---
category: "Crime & Abuse Networks"
tags:
- Person
- ErikaKellerhals
- JeffreyEpstein
- VirginIslands
- TaxIncentives
- SouthernTrust
- ButterflyTrust
- Lawyer
alias:
- Ericka Kellerhals
- Erica Kellerhals
- Erika A. Kellerhals
- Attorney Kellerhals
summary: "St. Thomas tax lawyer who represented Jeffrey Epstein before the Virgin Islands tax-incentive board and justice department, served as a trustee of his Butterfly Trust, and received his foundation's mail."
location: "St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands"
relations:
- type: founded
with: "[[Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin]]"
start: 2011
role: "co-founder of Kellerhals Ferguson LLP"
fn: 1
- type: represented
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
start: 2012
end: 2019
role: "territorial counsel before the Economic Development Commission, Planning and Natural Resources, and the Department of Justice"
fn: 4
- type: represented
with: "[[Southern Trust Company]]"
start: 2012-11-15
role: "counsel at the Economic Development Commission hearing"
fn: 4
- type: director_of
with: "[[Butterfly Trust]]"
role: "trustee"
fn: 8
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Stacey Plaskett]]"
reverse: true
fn: 2
- type: partner_of
with: "[[David Bornn]]"
start: 2017-01
role: "law partners at Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin"
fn: 6
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Erika A. Kellerhals is a tax and business lawyer on [[St. Thomas]], [[U.S. Virgin Islands]], and a founder of Kellerhals Ferguson LLP, later styled [[Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin|Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC]]. She represented [[Jeffrey Epstein]] in the territory from at least 2012 until his death: she appeared with him at the November 2012 [[Economic Development Commission]] hearing that led to the tax-incentive certificate of [[Southern Trust Company]], received the wire for its application fee, drafted a 2017 suit against the territory over his construction on [[Great St. James]], sought to restore his 24-hour travel notice in 2019, and filed the petition to probate his estate. She was a trustee of his Butterfly Trust and the care-of addressee of his foundation, [[Gratitude America]]. The future congressional delegate [[Stacey Plaskett]] and the future chief legal counsel to Governor [[Albert Bryan]], [[David Bornn]], both worked with her firm.[^1][^2][^3][^4]
### Career
Kellerhals holds an LL.M. in taxation from [[New York University]]. She practiced at a boutique New York firm giving tax advice to individuals and closely held corporations, relocated to the Virgin Islands in 2003, and worked at the Law Offices of Marjorie Rawls Roberts, P.C. before opening her own practice in 2008 and forming Kellerhals Ferguson, LLP in 2011 with a former co-worker. Her firm biography describes a practice "rooted in her years of practice in the Virgin Islands and in depth knowledge of the U.S. Virgin Islands incentive programs," advising clients "on obtaining economic development incentives from the U.S. Virgin Islands Economic Development Commission and the University of the Virgin Islands Research & Technology Park," and representing taxpayers before the [[Internal Revenue Service]] and the Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue. By 2019 the firm, Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC, was at 9053 Estate Thomas, Suite 101, in the Royal Palms Professional Building on St. Thomas.[^1][^5]
Plaskett, who was general counsel of the Economic Development Commission from 2007 to 2014, had worked for Kellerhals. In August 2014 the firm congratulated "our colleague and friend Stacey Plaskett" on her Democratic primary victory for delegate to Congress. On January 4, 2017 the firm announced that "David A. Bornn, Esq. has become a Partner of the Firm," operating a branch from the Bornn Building on Norre Gade in [[Charlotte Amalie]]; Bornn later became Bryan's chief legal counsel. The journalist [[Lee Fang]] published in 2025 a territorial campaign-finance record showing a check from Kellerhals to Bryan's 2018 campaign.[^2][^6][^7]
### Southern Trust and the Tax-Incentive Board
On September 21, 2012 Epstein's bookkeeper [[Harry Beller]] faxed [[JPMorgan Chase]] a memorandum directing a wire of 5,000 dollars from Epstein's account through Pacific Coast Banker's Bank to Merchants Commercial Bank in St. Thomas, "for further credit to Kellerhals Ferguson LLP," and Epstein's September 2012 statement records the debit with the reference "Southern Trust Company Application Fee." At a public hearing of the Economic Development Commission on November 15, 2012, "Epstein and his attorney Ericka Kellerhals described the company as providing 'cutting edge consulting services' in 'biomedical and financial informatics,'" according to the territory's later complaint; no one asked about his 2008 conviction or his registration as a sex offender. The commission granted Southern Trust a ten-year package from February 1, 2013 with a 90 percent income-tax exemption, and the territory later estimated that the certificate let Epstein avoid 80,576,236 dollars in taxes.[^3][^4]
### Trusts and the Foundation
A [[Deutsche Bank]] know-your-customer page headed "The 2013 Butterfly Trust," produced to a federal grand jury in the [[Southern District of New York]], lists Kellerhals as a current trustee with the note "(Deutsche Bank already has on file)," and names among the trust's "Current Potential Beneficiaries" Epstein's assistant [[Lesley Groff]], his pilot [[Larry Visoski|Lawrence Paul Visoski Jr.]] and his lawyer [[Darren Indyke]]. The Internal Revenue Service record of Gratitude America Ltd, recognized as a private foundation in September 2012, gives its address as 9053 Estate Thomas, Suite 101, St. Thomas, "in care of Erika Kellerhals." It reported revenue and assets of one dollar for 2012 through 2014 and gross contributions of 10,003,000 dollars for 2015.[^5][^8]
In September 2025 Senator [[Ron Wyden]] introduced the Produce Epstein Treasury Records Act, S. 2746, which would require the Treasury to produce suspicious activity reports relating to Epstein and a list of individuals and entities that includes "Erika Kellerhals," alongside Indyke, [[Richard Kahn]], Beller, Southern Trust Company, the Butterfly Trust and Gratitude America Ltd.[^9]
### Great St. James
Epstein bought Great St. James in January 2016, and the [[Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources|Department of Planning and Natural Resources]] issued a cease-and-desist order over unpermitted construction there on October 28, 2016. After text exchanges in which Governor [[Kenneth Mapp]] told Epstein he was "a bit disappointed" at an "end run around the VI code," Kellerhals drafted a lawsuit in March 2017 alleging "unauthorized entry" by the government. The dispute was settled with the original 280,000 dollar fine reduced to 160,000 dollars.[^10][^11]
### The 2019 Travel Notice
On March 14, 2019 acting Attorney General [[Carol Thomas-Jacobs]] revoked the arrangement, granted by Attorney General [[Vincent Frazer]] in 2012, under which Epstein gave 24 hours' notice of travel by email, and required 21 days' notice in person for travel abroad. On April 30, 2019 Kellerhals's firm wrote to the Attorney General nominee, [[Denise George]], "We represent Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, who is registered on the U.S. Virgin Islands Sexual Offender Registry," asking the department to "reinstate the proven travel notification procedures that have been in effect since Mr. Epstein's initial registration." It blamed Epstein's February 2019 detention in the [[Dominican Republic]] "solely" on the department's failure to notify that country, and stated that the department "has been aware of Mr. Epstein's location every single day of his life without exception for the past ten (10) years." On May 1 Kellerhals apologized "profusely for incorrectly addressing my prior correspondence" and sent a corrected letter.[^12]
George asked on June 2, 2019 whether Kellerhals was "still representing Mr. Epstein in this matter" or whether to write to the attorney [[Clive Rivers]]; Kellerhals asked that correspondence go to both. George then wrote that the department had no record that "reasonable and reliable proof" of frequent travel had ever been submitted to Frazer, and asked for it. On June 17 Kellerhals asked what information would satisfy that standard, and on June 20 Rivers wrote that "Erika and I would like to meet with you." In July 2019 Kellerhals asked George for a meeting about the waiver; Epstein was arrested on July 6.[^2][^12]
### After Epstein's Death
After Epstein died in August 2019, Kellerhals filed a petition to probate his estate in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. When George investigated the estate, she found that its employees "had nondisclosure agreements and were informed if questioned by law enforcement to say nothing and alert Kellerhals," according to the notes of her October 2, 2023 interview with the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]]. After the territory's outside counsel, [[Motley Rice]], began interviewing employees, George received a call from Bornn, then Bryan's chief legal counsel, relaying that Kellerhals wanted to know what George was investigating; George told him it was "none of Kellerhals's business."[^2]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC, "Erika Kellerhals," attorney biography, captured August 10, 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190810121434/https://www.kellfer.com/attorneys/erika-kellerhals/
[^2]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Docs confirm Bryan pressed for special treatment of sex offender." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 2, 2026. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/docs-confirm-bryan-pressed-for-special-treatment-of-sex-offender/article_5e9483c9-38d2-406c-8bb0-e5757ce287f2.html (Plaskett's employment with Kellerhals; Bornn; probate petition; George's FBI interview; July 2019 meeting request).
[^3]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA01580553, DataSet 10, memorandum from Harry Beller to JPMorgan wire desk, September 21, 2012 (JPM-SDNY-00059908); EFTA01483636, DataSet 10, JPMorgan statement for Jeffrey E. Epstein, September 1-28, 2012 (JPM-SDNY-00004812). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01580553.pdf ; https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01483636.pdf
[^4]: Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, No. ST-20-CV-14 (V.I. Super. Ct.), Second Amended Complaint, paragraphs 157 to 159 and 175, filed as Exhibit 1 to Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), ECF No. 1-1 (December 27, 2022). https://web.archive.org/web/20260117011558/https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/001-01.pdf
[^5]: Internal Revenue Service, Form 990-PF data for Gratitude America Ltd, EIN 66-0789697, tax years 2012 to 2022, and IRS Business Master File record (ruling date September 2012; in care of Erika Kellerhals, 9053 Estate Thomas Suite 101, St. Thomas), as indexed by ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/660789697
[^6]: Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC, "Attorney Stacey Plaskett Wins Democratic Primary for VI Delegate to Congress," August 11, 2014, captured May 14, 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190514002952/https://www.kellfer.com/blog/2014/08/11/attorney-stacey-plaskett-wins-democratic-primary-vi-delegate-congress/ ; Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC, "Welcome David Bornn," January 4, 2017, captured August 20, 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190820054157/https://www.kellfer.com/blog/2017/01/04/welcome-david-bornn/
[^7]: Fang, Lee. "Jeffrey Epstein Exploited the U.S. Virgin Islands for a Reason." *Lee Fang* (Substack), May 26, 2025. https://www.leefang.com/p/jeffrey-epstein-exploited-the-us (image of a Kellerhals check to Bryan's 2018 campaign).
[^8]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA01364303, DataSet 10, Deutsche Bank know-your-customer page "The 2013 Butterfly Trust" (DB-SDNY-0054829); EFTA01372887, DataSet 10, Deutsche Bank "KYC Print," July 15, 2019 (DB-SDNY-0066790). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01364303.pdf ; https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01372887.pdf
[^9]: S. 2746, 119th Congress, "Produce Epstein Treasury Records Act," introduced September 9, 2025, section 2(b)(2). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-119s2746is/html/BILLS-119s2746is.htm
[^10]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Files reveal Epstein's efforts to influence V.I. officials; emails with Mapp." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 2, 2026. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/files-reveal-epstein-s-efforts-to-influence-v-i-officials-emails-with-mapp/article_2dd4fe69-4daf-4dc2-b3b8-37a929002bb6.html (spelling the name "Erica Kellerhals").
[^11]: "DPNR Orders Cease and Desist for Unauthorized Development on Great St. James." *St. Thomas Source,* November 1, 2016. https://stthomassource.com/content/2016/11/01/dpnr-orders-cease-and-desist-for-unauthorized-development-on-great-st-james/
[^12]: Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), Exhibit 83, ECF No. 194-24 (filed June 20, 2023), pp. 2 to 7 (Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin letter to Denise George, April 30, 2019), 56 to 60 (emails of May 1 to June 20, 2019). https://web.archive.org/web/20260117011719/https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/194-24.pdf

View file

@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ In March 1963 - immediately after the period of his closest contact with Oswald
During the HSCA investigation period of 1976-1979, de Mohrenschildt was in deteriorating psychological condition. He had been briefly committed to a Dallas psychiatric facility in 1976. In fall 1976, while fragile, he wrote an unpublished memoir titled "I Am a Patsy! I Am a Patsy!" - its title a reference to what he claimed were Oswald's final public words before being shot by [[Jack Ruby]]. The 28-chapter manuscript covered his friendship with the Oswalds and the assassination's effects on his life, maintaining throughout that Oswald was innocent of killing Kennedy. The HSCA received a copy from his widow Jeanne on April 1, 1977 - three days after de Mohrenschildt's death - and published it as HSCA Volume XII.
On March 29, 1977, de Mohrenschildt was found dead of a shotgun wound to the head at his daughter Alexandra's home in Manalapan, [[Florida]]. The Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office ruled the death a suicide. De Mohrenschildt was 65 years old.
On March 29, 1977, de Mohrenschildt was found dead of a shotgun wound to the head at his daughter Alexandra's home in Manalapan, [[Florida]]. The [[Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office]] ruled the death a suicide. De Mohrenschildt was 65 years old.
Two events had occurred on the same day: HSCA investigator [[Gaeton Fonzi]] visited the house that morning and left his business card when de Mohrenschildt was not home; journalist [[Edward Jay Epstein]] concluded an extensive interview with de Mohrenschildt at The Breakers Hotel in Palm Beach for a Reader's Digest-commissioned article on the Kennedy assassination. De Mohrenschildt reportedly found Fonzi's business card in his shirt pocket upon returning home. He died approximately three hours after the Epstein interview ended. The suicide ruling was not challenged through any formal proceeding.[^1]
Two events had occurred on the same day: HSCA investigator [[Gaeton Fonzi]] visited the house that morning and left his business card when de Mohrenschildt was not home; journalist [[Edward Jay Epstein]] concluded an extensive interview with de Mohrenschildt at The Breakers Hotel in [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]] for a Reader's Digest-commissioned article on the Kennedy assassination. De Mohrenschildt reportedly found Fonzi's business card in his shirt pocket upon returning home. He died approximately three hours after the Epstein interview ended. The suicide ruling was not challenged through any formal proceeding.[^1]
### Footnotes

View file

@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- GeraldLefcourt
- Lawyer
- CriminalDefense
- JeffreyEpstein
- NonProsecutionAgreement
- NACDL
alias:
- Gerald B. Lefcourt
- Gerry Lefcourt
- Gerald Lefcourt
summary: "New York criminal defense lawyer and former NACDL president who represented Jeffrey Epstein from 2006 and signed the September 2007 non-prosecution agreement and its October addendum for the defense."
location: "New York, New York"
relations:
- type: head_of
with: "[[National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers]]"
role: "president"
start: 1997
end: 1998
fn: 1
- type: member_of
with: "[[New York State Commission on Judicial Nomination]]"
role: "designee of the Speaker of the New York State Assembly"
fn: 1
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Gerald B. Lefcourt is a New York criminal defense lawyer, a past president of the [[National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers]] and for more than twenty years the [[New York State Assembly]] Speaker's designee to the state Commission on Judicial Nomination, who represented [[Jeffrey Epstein]] in the [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]] state investigation and the federal investigation that ended in the [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]]. He opened the defense's contact with the federal prosecutor in August 2006, co-signed the July 2007 letter that put the [[Steven Pinker]] opinion before the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]], and was one of the two defense lawyers who signed the agreement on September 24, 2007.[^1][^2][^3]
### Practice and Bar Positions
Lefcourt holds a B.A. in political science from [[New York University]], a J.D. from [[Brooklyn Law School]] and an LL.M. in taxation from the [[New York University School of Law]]. His clients have included the [[Yippie]] founder [[Abbie Hoffman]] and leaders of the [[Black Panther Party]], the [[Drexel Burnham Lambert]] securities trader Bruce Newberg, the real estate owner [[Harry Helmsley]], the actor [[Russell Crowe]], the New York Assembly Speaker [[Mel Miller]], the Brooklyn Democratic leader [[Vito Lopez]], the [[Murder Inc. Records]] head [[Irv Gotti]], and the campaign treasurer of the New York mayoral candidate [[John Liu]].[^1]
He was president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in 1997 and 1998 and later of its Foundation for Criminal Justice, has co-chaired its annual White Collar Crime Conference since 2004, and founded both the [[New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers]] and the New York Criminal Bar Association. He served for more than twenty years as the Assembly Speaker's designee to the statewide [[New York State Commission on Judicial Nomination|Commission on Judicial Nomination]], which recommends to the Governor the candidates for the [[New York Court of Appeals]], and he sits on the Magistrate Selection Committee of the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]].[^1]
### The State Investigation
Lefcourt began representing Epstein during the state investigation, which the Justice Department's [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] later reviewed. After Epstein hired the West Palm Beach lawyer [[Jack Goldberger]], whose law partner was married to the assistant state attorney on the case, that prosecutor was removed and [[Lanna Belohlavek]] took over; "Goldberger, together with Gerald Lefcourt, a nationally known New York criminal defense attorney also representing Epstein, then directed their efforts at Belohlavek and [State Attorney Barry] Krischer to dissuade the office from prosecuting Epstein, largely by attacking the credibility of the victim witnesses." A 2006 letter from Lefcourt to the State Attorney's Office showed that "the defense team had thoroughly researched the details and ramifications of Florida's sexual offender registration requirement"; the office "did not find evidence indicating similar research and consideration by the USAO." The plea eventually entered rested on conduct involving a victim who was at least 16, which, because the age of consent in [[New Mexico]] was 16, exempted Epstein from registration there.[^2]
### The Federal Investigation
Lefcourt made the first defense contact with the line prosecutor, [[Ann Marie Villafana|A. Marie Villafaña]], in August 2006. On November 15, 2006 [[Lilly Ann Sanchez]], a former Deputy Chief of the office's Major Crimes Section, wrote to Villafaña that she and Lefcourt represented Epstein and asked that all contact be directed to them. When Villafaña insisted on documents before any meeting, Sanchez telephoned the West Palm Beach manager, [[Andrew Lourie]], a former colleague, who granted one. At the February 1, 2007 meeting Sanchez and Lefcourt presented a 25-page letter arguing that there was no federal jurisdiction, that the [[Petite policy]] barred a second prosecution, and that the state's two principal victims had "damaging histories of lies, illegal drug use, and crime."[^2]
The federal investigation's subpoenas of May 31, 2007 to [[Financial Trust Company]], the J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, J. Epstein & Company and "Epstein Interests" listed Lefcourt as the correspondent. On May 22, 2007 he wrote to Lourie to "confirm" that the defense would be heard before any charging decision; Villafaña wrote to First Assistant [[Jeffrey Sloman]] and Criminal Division chief [[Matthew Menchel]]: "I just want to again voice my disagreement with promising to have a meeting or having a meeting with Lefcourt or any other of Epstein's attorneys. . . . This is a case where the defendant is facing the possibility of dozens of years of prison time."[^2][^4]
On June 25, 2007 Lefcourt sent a 19-page letter arguing that voluntary sexual activity with "young adults, 16 or 17 years of age" was "strictly a state concern" and that 18 U.S.C. 2422(b) was aimed at "internet trolling." [[Alan Dershowitz]] led the defense presentation at the Miami office the next day. On July 6, 2007 Lefcourt and Dershowitz wrote on Lefcourt's letterhead to Sloman, Menchel, Lourie and Villafaña that the Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker had found their narrow reading of the statute "the sole rational reading," annexing Pinker's opinion. The office's investigative chronology lists a further submission from Lefcourt and Dershowitz to Menchel titled "Data that strongly supports the arguments made that no charge can or should be made under 18 U.S.C. 2422(b)."[^2][^5][^6]
### The Agreement
After the office presented its term sheet at a July 31, 2007 meeting with Lefcourt, Sanchez and [[Roy Black]], Epstein added [[Kenneth Starr]] and [[Jay Lefkowitz]] of [[Kirkland & Ellis]]. Shortly after Acosta's September 7 meeting with Starr and Lefkowitz, which Lefcourt did not attend, he spoke with both [[Alexander Acosta]] and Lourie and proposed that Epstein serve 15 months in jail followed by 15 months of home confinement; Villafaña called it "a reasonable counteroffer in light of our starting position of 24 months," but "a really low sentence." On September 11 she sent Lefcourt a revised draft with Acosta's edits, and on September 12 he, Lefkowitz and Goldberger met the federal prosecutors together with Krischer and Belohlavek.[^2][^6]
The agreement was signed on September 24, 2007 by Epstein and, for the defense, by Lefcourt and Sanchez. A December 11, 2007 letter from the office to Lefkowitz, written by the line prosecutor over Acosta's name, stated: "The agreement itself was signed by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Sanchez, and Mr. Lefcourt, whose experience speaks for itself." Lefcourt and Sanchez also signed the addendum of October 29, 2007, which governed the selection of an attorney representative for victims' civil claims. Lefcourt attended the December 14, 2007 meeting with Acosta in Miami with Starr, Dershowitz and [[Martin Weinberg]], and a January 7, 2008 meeting at which the defense presented "federal jurisdiction issues, legal issues, and [a] request for de novo review."[^2][^3]
### Footnotes
[^1]: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, "Gerald Lefcourt, NACDL Past Presidents, Past President, 1997-98." https://www.nacdl.org/People/GeraldLefcourt ; Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C., attorney biography. https://www.lefcourtlaw.com/attorney/gerald-b-lefcourt/index.html
[^2]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284, Prior DOJ Disclosures, Office of Professional Responsibility, report, "Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation," November 2020, pp. 8, 15, 22-24, 31-35, 54, 59, 63-64, 85, 93, 99, 156, 174. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Prior%20DOJ%20Disclosures/Memos.%20&%20Correspondence/EFTA02847284.pdf
[^3]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00013538, DataSet 8, letter, U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to Jay P. Lefkowitz, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, "Re: Jeffrey Epstein," December 11, 2007, p. 3, signed over the block "R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney, By:" and written in the first person by the line Assistant U.S. Attorney. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013538.pdf
[^4]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, privileged chronology of the federal investigation, pp. 1, 4 to 7, 9, 11. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf
[^5]: Letter from Gerald B. Lefcourt and Alan M. Dershowitz to Jeffrey Sloman, Matthew Menchel, Andrew Lourie and A. Marie Villafaña, July 6, 2007, filed as Exhibit 46, *Doe v. United States*, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla.), ECF No. 361-46 (entered February 10, 2016). https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.361.46.pdf
[^6]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, pp. 9, 12 to 14, 19 to 20. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf

View file

@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ After Robert Maxwell drowned in November 1991 and his empire was found to have l
### Arrest, Indictment, and the Non-Prosecution Agreement Defense
A grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned a sealed indictment against Maxwell on June 29, 2020. It was unsealed on July 2, 2020, the day agents of the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] arrested her at a property in [[New Hampshire]]. The original six counts charged her with facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minor victims "from around 1994 to 1997." A first superseding indictment, filed July 10, 2020, added two counts of perjury arising from her 2016 deposition testimony in [[Giuffre v. Maxwell]]. A second superseding indictment, filed March 29, 2021, added a sex trafficking conspiracy count and a count of sex trafficking of a minor, extended the charged conduct into the early 2000s, and renumbered the perjury counts as Counts Seven and Eight. On July 30, 2020, Judge [[Alison Nathan|Alison J. Nathan]] entered the protective order (ECF No. 36) that governed discovery in the case and that the government moved to modify five years later.[^5][^6]
A grand jury in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]] returned a sealed indictment against Maxwell on June 29, 2020. It was unsealed on July 2, 2020, the day agents of the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] arrested her at a property in [[New Hampshire]]. The original six counts charged her with facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minor victims "from around 1994 to 1997." A first superseding indictment, filed July 10, 2020, added two counts of perjury arising from her 2016 deposition testimony in [[Giuffre v. Maxwell]]. A second superseding indictment, filed March 29, 2021, added a sex trafficking conspiracy count and a count of sex trafficking of a minor, extended the charged conduct into the early 2000s, and renumbered the perjury counts as Counts Seven and Eight. On July 30, 2020, Judge [[Alison Nathan|Alison J. Nathan]] entered the protective order (ECF No. 36) that governed discovery in the case and that the government moved to modify five years later.[^5][^6]
Maxwell's lead pretrial motion, filed over the signatures of Mark S. Cohen of [[Cohen & Gresser]], Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and [[Laura Menninger|Laura A. Menninger]] of [[Haddon, Morgan and Foreman]], and Bobbi C. Sternheim, sought dismissal of the superseding indictment for breach of Epstein's September 2007 [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement|non-prosecution agreement]] with the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]]. In consideration of Epstein's state guilty pleas, that agreement provided that "the [[United States]] also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to [[Sarah Kellen]], [[Adriana Ross]], [[Lesley Groff]], or [[Nadia Marcinkova]]." Maxwell argued that she was a third-party beneficiary of the clause. Nathan denied the motion with the other pretrial motions in an opinion and order of April 16, 2021 (ECF No. 207).[^6][^7]
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ An FBI Guardian complaint form dated April 23, 2021 and filed under the Epstein
### Collateral Attack
On December 17, 2025, Maxwell filed a pro se motion to vacate her sentence under 28 U.S.C. section 2255 (ECF No. 830), opened as the companion civil matters Maxwell v. United States, Nos. 1:25-cv-10464 and 1:25-cv-10468. Engelmayer's January 2026 opinion described the criminal case as "effectively closed," with the section 2255 motion "the only outstanding item." The government's letters of February 12 and April 21, 2026 (ECF Nos. 852, 856) concerned the briefing schedule for its response, and the docket remained active in July 2026 (ECF No. 866).[^23][^27]
On December 17, 2025, Maxwell filed a pro se motion to vacate her sentence under 28 U.S.C. section 2255 (ECF No. 830), opened as the companion civil matters [[United States v. Maxwell|Maxwell v. United States]], Nos. 1:25-cv-10464 and 1:25-cv-10468. Engelmayer's January 2026 opinion described the criminal case as "effectively closed," with the section 2255 motion "the only outstanding item." The government's letters of February 12 and April 21, 2026 (ECF Nos. 852, 856) concerned the briefing schedule for its response, and the docket remained active in July 2026 (ECF No. 866).[^23][^27]

View file

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ tags:
summary: "Harry Jones was an Assistant U.S."
---
Harry Jones was an Assistant U.S. Trustee in the Southern District of New York. He became involved in the [[PROMIS Software Scandal]] allegations concerning the attempted conversion of [[INSLAW|Inslaw]]'s bankruptcy case.
Harry Jones was an Assistant U.S. Trustee in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]]. He became involved in the [[PROMIS Software Scandal]] allegations concerning the attempted conversion of [[INSLAW|Inslaw]]'s bankruptcy case.
[[Anthony Pasciuto]] alleged that [[Thomas Stanton]], Director of the Executive Office of U.S. Trustees (EOUST), tried to detail Jones to [[William White]]'s office in Washington D.C. to work on converting the Inslaw case from Chapter 11 reorganization to Chapter 7 liquidation. [[Cornelius Blackshear]] initially testified that White had told him of Stanton's pressure to have Jones assigned to the case. Bankruptcy Judge Bason, in his findings, concluded that Stanton sought to have Jones detailed to accomplish the conversion when White resisted Stanton's pressure. The Special Counsel's investigation found that Stanton did consider transferring Jones to assist in the Inslaw matter, but denied that Jones was to be assigned to effect a conversion. Stanton testified he wanted Jones to set up the creditors' committee and conduct the first meeting of creditors due to the matter's likely publicity, and that Blackshear had told him his office was too busy to spare Jones. Jones himself testified that he was never requested by anyone, including Stanton, to go to Washington to work on the [[INSLAW]] case. The Special Counsel's investigation found no evidence to the contrary and concluded that the inference that Jones was to be used to file a baseless motion to convert was unreasonable, given Jones's reputation for integrity and expertise in bankruptcy matters.[^1]

View file

@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ In October 2025 Lutnick told the [[New York Post]] that he and his wife, Allison
### The Correspondence After 2005
The released emails show Lutnick and Epstein arranging calls and planning drinks in 2011.[^1] On April 4, 2011, Epstein's assistant [[Lesley Groff]] told him, "Howard Lutnick returned your call." On April 27 she wrote that Lutnick "will come see you at 5pm on Sunday May 1st," and Epstein's calendar for May 1, 2011 reads "5:00 Drinks w/Howard Lutnick."[^4] On November 20, 2012, Groff wrote to Lutnick: "Jeffrey Epstein understands you will be down in St. Thomas some over the holidays," passing on Epstein's telephone numbers and naming as contacts the staff of his St. Thomas office, "FTC," the [[Financial Trust Company]]. Calendar alerts of December 20 and 21, 2012 read "can Howard Lutnick do lunch Sat or Sun on JE's island?" and "can Howard Lutnick do lunch on Sat. 22nd or Sun. 23rd?"[^5] In December 2012 Lutnick, his wife, and their four children planned a visit to Little St. James, and Lutnick was invited to lunch there on December 24, 2012; afterward Epstein's assistant wrote to Lutnick on Epstein's behalf, "it was nice seeing you."[^1]
The released emails show Lutnick and Epstein arranging calls and planning drinks in 2011.[^1] On April 4, 2011, Epstein's assistant [[Lesley Groff]] told him, "Howard Lutnick returned your call." On April 27 she wrote that Lutnick "will come see you at 5pm on Sunday May 1st," and Epstein's calendar for May 1, 2011 reads "5:00 Drinks w/Howard Lutnick."[^4] On November 20, 2012, Groff wrote to Lutnick: "Jeffrey Epstein understands you will be down in [[St. Thomas]] some over the holidays," passing on Epstein's telephone numbers and naming as contacts the staff of his St. Thomas office, "FTC," the [[Financial Trust Company]]. Calendar alerts of December 20 and 21, 2012 read "can Howard Lutnick do lunch Sat or Sun on JE's island?" and "can Howard Lutnick do lunch on Sat. 22nd or Sun. 23rd?"[^5] In December 2012 Lutnick, his wife, and their four children planned a visit to Little St. James, and Lutnick was invited to lunch there on December 24, 2012; afterward Epstein's assistant wrote to Lutnick on Epstein's behalf, "it was nice seeing you."[^1]
On December 28, 2012, four days after the lunch, Lutnick and Epstein each signed, on behalf of limited liability companies, a contract to acquire stakes in Adfin, an advertising-technology company since shut down. Epstein signed for [[Southern Trust Company]], Inc., the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]] entity through which he conducted much of his business; Lutnick signed for an LLC named CVAFH I. Their signatures appear on neighboring pages, and the document lists nine shareholders.[^1] A person close to Lutnick told CBS News that "Cantor was a small minority investor in Adfin" and that Lutnick "would not have any knowledge of who the other investors were."[^1] Adfin correspondence continued into 2014, when the shareholder David Mitchell wrote to Epstein about further fundraising involving Cantor Ventures.[^1]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- JayLefkowitz
- Lawyer
- KirklandAndEllis
- JeffreyEpstein
- NonProsecutionAgreement
- GeorgeWBushAdministration
- NorthKorea
alias:
- Jay P. Lefkowitz
- Jay Lefkowitz
- Lefkowitz
summary: "Kirkland & Ellis litigation partner and veteran of both Bush White Houses who led Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution negotiations while serving as special envoy for human rights in North Korea."
location: "New York, New York"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Kirkland & Ellis]]"
role: "partner"
end: 2026-03
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Domestic Policy Council]]"
role: "deputy executive secretary, then director of cabinet affairs"
start: 1991
end: 1993
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Office of Management and Budget]]"
role: "general counsel"
start: 2001-03
end: 2002-01
fn: 1
- type: appointed
with: "[[George W. Bush]]"
reverse: true
role: "Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy"
start: 2002-01-31
end: 2003
fn: 1
- type: appointed
with: "[[George W. Bush]]"
reverse: true
role: "Special Envoy for Human Rights in North Korea"
start: 2005-08-19
end: 2009-01
fn: 2
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Jay P. Lefkowitz is an American lawyer, a litigation partner at [[Kirkland & Ellis]] and a former official in the administrations of [[George H.W. Bush]] and [[George W. Bush]], who was the principal defense negotiator of the September 2007 [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]] between [[Jeffrey Epstein]] and the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]]. From August 2005 to January 2009 he was also the part-time Special Envoy for Human Rights in [[North Korea]], appointed by the second Bush. He retired from Kirkland in March 2026, saying that he would not have taken the Epstein matter "knowing what we all know now."[^1][^2][^3]
### Government Career
Lefkowitz took both his undergraduate degree in history and his law degree at [[Columbia University]]. From 1991 to 1993 he served in the [[White House]] under George H.W. Bush as deputy executive secretary of the [[Domestic Policy Council]] and then as director of cabinet affairs, and in 1990 he was a public member of the United States delegation to the [[United Nations Commission on Human Rights|United Nations Human Rights Commission]] in [[Geneva]]. Before joining the second Bush administration he was a partner in the Washington office of Kirkland & Ellis. He became general counsel of the [[Office of Management and Budget]] in March 2001, and on January 31, 2002 the White House announced his appointment as Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, to "advise the President on a wide range of domestic policy issues and advise the domestic policy council."[^1]
On August 19, 2005 President Bush appointed him Special Envoy for Human Rights in North Korea under the [[North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004]]. The [[State Department]]'s 2006 biography described him in that post as "also a senior partner at Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, where he serves clients in trial and appellate litigation," and noted his 2004 membership of the United States delegation to the [[Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe]] conference on anti-Semitism in [[Berlin]]. He filed his final report as envoy in January 2009. A 2013 Kirkland profile dated his government service as 2001 to 2003 in the White House and at the Office of Management and Budget and 2005 to 2009 as envoy, and described his 2011 Supreme Court victory for generic drug manufacturers in [[Pliva v. Mensing]].[^1][^2]
### Entry into the Epstein Defense
Epstein's defense had been conducted since 2006 by [[Roy Black]], [[Alan Dershowitz]], [[Gerald Lefcourt]], [[Lilly Ann Sanchez]] and others. In early August 2007, immediately after the federal office presented a term sheet requiring a state guilty plea, jail time, sex offender registration and civil damages, Epstein added Lefkowitz and [[Kenneth Starr]], then of counsel to Kirkland & Ellis while dean of the [[Pepperdine University School of Law]]. U.S. Attorney [[Alexander Acosta]] had been an associate at Kirkland a decade earlier and had worked on at least one matter with each of them. On the evening of August 6, 2007, First Assistant U.S. Attorney [[Jeffrey Sloman]] emailed Acosta: "Just saw Menchel. I didn't know Kirkland made a call into you. You were right. Unbelievable." Acosta answered that the Kirkland lawyers "are likely to go to DC. We should strategize a bit. We are not changing positions, and that should be made clear."[^4]
Lefkowitz and Starr met Acosta, Sloman, the line prosecutor [[Ann Marie Villafana|A. Marie Villafaña]] and [[Drew Oosterbaan]], chief of the [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]]'s [[Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section]], on September 7, 2007, Acosta's first meeting with the defense. On September 12 Lefkowitz, Lefcourt and [[Jack Goldberger]] met federal prosecutors with State Attorney [[Barry Krischer]] and Assistant State Attorney [[Lanna Belohlavek]], a session at which, the Justice Department's [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] later found, "the USAO made additional concessions." On September 19 Villafaña forwarded to her supervisors a defense redline that restored provisions she had already rejected, writing: "This is NOT good faith negotiations."[^4][^5]
The final terms were settled in email between Lefkowitz and Villafaña. On September 13 she wrote that she had been "spending some quality time with Title 18 looking for misdemeanors," and he answered that he was "[a]lready thinking about the same statutes." On September 20 an internal email reported that he wanted the registration requirement removed; on September 23 he wrote that the defense had agreed to plead to Florida Statute 796.03 on a "mistaken assumption," and Acosta told him to deal directly with [[Andrew Lourie]] and Villafaña. On September 24, as the agreement was executed, Lefkowitz wrote: "Please do whatever you can to keep this from becoming public." It was signed for the defense by Epstein, Sanchez and Lefcourt.[^5][^6][^7]
### After the Signing
On October 10, 2007 Lefkowitz wrote to Acosta that "[n]either federal agents nor anyone from your Office should contact the identified individuals." Acosta met him for breakfast on October 12, and Lefkowitz's follow-up letter thanked him "for the commitment you made to me during our October 12 meeting in which you . . . assured me that your Office would not . . . contact any of the identified individuals, potential witnesses, or potential civil claimants." The Office of Professional Responsibility found no evidence that the breakfast "led to the NPA, which had been signed weeks earlier, or to any other significant decision that benefited Epstein." When Sloman moved in late November 2007 to notify victims under the [[Justice for All Act of 2004]], Lefkowitz objected on November 29 that victims should not be invited to the state sentencing or "encouraged to contact law enforcement officials."[^6][^8]
On December 11, 2007 Starr transmitted to Acosta two submissions written by Lefkowitz, one of them a 20-page attack on the "improper involvement" of federal authorities that accused Villafaña of "unprecedented federal overreaching" and of forcing a registrable plea. The same day the office answered Lefkowitz in a five-page letter issued over Acosta's name and written by the line prosecutor, who described herself as "a simple line AUSA" who had "handled the primary negotiations for the Office." It stated that she had continued to deal with him professionally "even after I learned that you had been proceeding in bad faith for several weeks," thinking she had wrongly treated solicitation of minors as registrable "and that you would 'fool' our Office into letting Mr. Epstein plead to a non-registrable offense," that "neither you nor your client ever intended to abide by the terms of the agreement that he signed," and that "you repeatedly went over my head, involving Messrs [redacted] and Acosta in the negotiations at various times." The letter stated that he and his co-counsel had contacted a federal judge in an attempt to "lobby" him over the choice of the victims' attorney representative, a selection the agreement reserved to the office.[^4][^9]
Starr and Lefkowitz sent Acosta a 110-page letter on December 17, 2007. On January 3, 2008 Acosta recorded a telephone statement from Lefkowitz: "I may have made a mistake 6 months ago. [Belohlavek] told us solicitation [is] not registrable. It turns out that the actual offense charged is." Through the spring Lefkowitz pressed the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, telling Oosterbaan its role should be "review only," and he and Starr then sought review by the [[Criminal Division]] and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. On June 23, 2008 Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General John Roth wrote to both men that intervention was not warranted and that "[e]ven if we were to substitute our judgment for that of the U.S. Attorney, we believe that federal prosecution of this case is appropriate." Epstein pleaded guilty in state court a week later.[^4][^7]
In late 2008, while considering employment at Kirkland & Ellis, Acosta stopped receiving email on the Epstein matter and obtained formal Department approval of his recusal because he had "begun to discuss possible employment" with the firm. On June 15, 2009, with Epstein on work release, Villafaña wrote to Lefkowitz, Black and Goldberger on the history of Epstein's performance under the agreement. In March 2011 the victims in [[Doe v. United States]], the [[Crime Victims' Rights Act]] case, moved to use the plea correspondence as evidence and to unseal it; on April 7, 2011 Lefkowitz, Black and [[Martin Weinberg]] moved to intervene in their own names, and Lefkowitz was admitted pro hac vice on April 18. Epstein moved for limited intervention on September 2, 2011.[^4][^7][^10]
### Later Contacts
In March 2011 the general counsel of [[JPMorgan Chase|JPMorgan]]'s investment bank reported to the bank's general counsel, [[Stephen Cutler]], a conversation with Lefkowitz, who "represented Epstein in state plea/fed NPA process" and believed that "any pre-plea conduct is subsumed within plea/NPA." The exchange was entered in 2023 in the [[Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank|Virgin Islands' suit against JPMorgan]].[^11]
The Office of Professional Responsibility's November 2020 report found that Epstein had hired Starr and Lefkowitz "when Epstein was seeking Acosta's personal involvement in the case," attorneys "with whom Acosta was acquainted from his previous employment with that firm," and concluded that the evidence did not establish that Acosta extended any improper benefit because of those relationships. Villafaña told the office that "the ability of Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz to convince Alex Acosta that I didn't know what I was talking [about] also, all came into play."[^4]
On his retirement from Kirkland in March 2026 after three decades at the firm, Lefkowitz said: "Although I believe everyone is entitled to representation no matter how heinous their crimes, knowing what we all know now, I would not have taken on the Epstein matter." A Kirkland spokesperson said: "To say the least, we deeply regret the firm's 2007 representation of Jeffrey Epstein."[^3]
### Footnotes
[^1]: The White House (George W. Bush archives), "Personnel Announcement," January 31, 2002. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020131-10.html ; Kirkland & Ellis LLP, "Q&A With Kirkland's Jay Lefkowitz" (Law360), February 27, 2013. https://www.kirkland.com/news/in-the-news/2013/02/qa-with-kirklands-jay-lefkowitz
[^2]: U.S. Department of State, "Jay Lefkowitz, Special Envoy, Human Rights in North Korea," biography, released May 25, 2006 (term of appointment from August 19, 2005). https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/66929.htm ; "Final Report of Jay Lefkowitz, U.S. Special Envoy for Human Rights in North Korea," January 2009. https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/senk/115268.htm
[^3]: "Jeffrey Epstein's Disgraced Lawyer Jay Lefkowitz Who Secured Sweetheart Deal Leaves Firm," *The Daily Beast,* March 2026, quoting Lefkowitz's retirement statement and a Kirkland & Ellis spokesperson. https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epsteins-disgraced-lawyer-jay-lefkowitz-who-secured-sweetheart-deal-leaves-firm/
[^4]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284, Prior DOJ Disclosures, Office of Professional Responsibility, report, "Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation," November 2020, pp. 9, 59, 62-64, 76, 97-99, 101, 105, 109-110, 150-152. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Prior%20DOJ%20Disclosures/Memos.%20&%20Correspondence/EFTA02847284.pdf
[^5]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, privileged chronology of the federal investigation, pp. 12 to 14, 19 to 20, 24 to 29. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf
[^6]: Opinion and Order, *Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States*, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla. Feb. 21, 2019), ECF No. 435 (Marra, J.), reported at 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, quoting ECF No. 407 at paragraphs 33, 37, 52, 61, 63, 82. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.435.0.pdf
[^7]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, pp. 34 to 38, 45 to 51. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf ; U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (note 4), p. 85 (signatories of the agreement).
[^8]: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, Executive Summary of the November 2020 report, pp. i-xi. https://www.justice.gov/opr/page/file/1336471/dl
[^9]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00013538, DataSet 8, letter, U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to Jay P. Lefkowitz, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, "Re: Jeffrey Epstein," December 11, 2007, EFTA00013538 to EFTA00013542, signed over the block "R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney, By:" with Acosta copied, and written in the first person by the line Assistant U.S. Attorney. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013538.pdf
[^10]: Docket, *Doe v. United States*, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla.), ECF Nos. 48, 51, 56, 68, 70, 93 (March to September 2011), CourtListener. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4502088/doe-v-united-states/
[^11]: Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), Plaintiff's Statement of Material Facts, ECF No. 221 (filed July 24, 2023), paras. 123-124, 374. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.591653/gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.221.0.pdf

View file

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ John F. Kennedy was the 35th President of the [[United States]], serving from 19
Kennedy's presidency was marked by a struggle with [[Israel]] over its nuclear ambitions, particularly concerning the [[Dimona]] reactor. He established himself as firmly opposed to the Israeli bomb, and his administration insisted on American inspection teams being permitted full and unfettered access to [[Dimona]]. This stance was met with resistance from [[David Ben-Gurion]] and [[Shimon Peres]], who sought to protect the secret.[^1]
Kennedy continued to pressure [[David Ben-Gurion]] throughout 1962 about international inspection, receiving bland and irritating assurances that [[Israel]] had no intention of becoming an atomic power. He angrily told his friend [[Charles L. Bartlett]] that the Israelis "lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability." In what amounted to a direct move against Ben-Gurion's leadership, Kennedy invited Foreign Minister [[Golda Meir]], one of Ben-Gurion's leading critics, to his Palm Beach, Florida, home for a private talk in late December 1962. During this meeting, Kennedy made an extraordinary private commitment to [[Israel]]'s defense, stating that in case of an invasion, the [[United States]] would come to [[Israel]]'s support.[^2]
Kennedy continued to pressure [[David Ben-Gurion]] throughout 1962 about international inspection, receiving bland and irritating assurances that [[Israel]] had no intention of becoming an atomic power. He angrily told his friend [[Charles L. Bartlett]] that the Israelis "lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability." In what amounted to a direct move against Ben-Gurion's leadership, Kennedy invited Foreign Minister [[Golda Meir]], one of Ben-Gurion's leading critics, to his [[Palm Beach, Florida]], home for a private talk in late December 1962. During this meeting, Kennedy made an extraordinary private commitment to [[Israel]]'s defense, stating that in case of an invasion, the [[United States]] would come to [[Israel]]'s support.[^2]
Despite his tough stance, Kennedy's political needs, particularly the significant Jewish vote that contributed to his narrow victory in 1960, complicated his approach to Israeli issues. He appointed [[Myer Feldman]] as his presidential point man for Jewish and Israeli affairs, a position that created bureaucratic chaos due to Feldman's strong pro-Israel bias.[^1]

View file

@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Epstein's donations to the Media Lab were directed through intermediaries and th
### The Resignation and the Aftermath
Ito resigned from the MIT Media Lab on September 7, 2019, one day after the *New Yorker* reporting. MIT initiated an independent investigation conducted by the law firm [[Goodwin Procter|Goodwin Procter]], which produced a report documenting the extent of the Media Lab's Epstein relationship and the institutional failures that permitted it. The Goodwin Procter investigation found that Epstein made ten donations to MIT totaling 850,000 dollars between 2002 and 2017, nine of them, 750,000 dollars, after his 2008 conviction and 525,000 dollars of those to the Media Lab; that the post-conviction gifts were driven by Ito or by Professor Seth Lloyd; that three members of MIT's senior team approved them in 2013 knowing of Epstein's record; and that President L. Rafael Reif "was not contemporaneously aware of Epstein's donations."[^4]
Ito resigned from the MIT Media Lab on September 7, 2019, one day after the *New Yorker* reporting. MIT initiated an independent investigation conducted by the law firm [[Goodwin Procter|Goodwin Procter]], which produced a report documenting the extent of the Media Lab's Epstein relationship and the institutional failures that permitted it. The Goodwin Procter investigation found that Epstein made ten donations to MIT totaling 850,000 dollars between 2002 and 2017, nine of them, 750,000 dollars, after his 2008 conviction and 525,000 dollars of those to the Media Lab; that the post-conviction gifts were driven by Ito or by [[Seth Lloyd|Professor Seth Lloyd]]; that three members of MIT's senior team approved them in 2013 knowing of Epstein's record; and that President L. Rafael Reif "was not contemporaneously aware of Epstein's donations."[^4]
Ito also resigned from positions at the [[John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation|MacArthur Foundation]], the [[John S. and James L. Knight Foundation|Knight Foundation]], the [[Knight-Hennessy Scholars|Knight-Hennessy Scholars]] program, and the [[New York Times Company|New York Times Company]] board. The MIT Media Lab subsequently reformed its donor-acceptance policies to prohibit anonymous donations and to require enhanced due diligence on donors with criminal records.[^1][^4]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
---
category: "Political Figure"
tags:
- Person
- KennethMapp
- VirginIslands
- Governor
- JeffreyEpstein
- CampaignFinance
- GovernmentCapture
- GreatStJames
alias:
- Ken Mapp
- Kenneth E. Mapp
- Governor Kenneth Mapp
- Gov. Kenneth Mapp
- Kenn Mapp
summary: "Governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands from 2015 to 2019, who asked Jeffrey Epstein to lend the territory 275 million dollars and to fund his political action committee."
born: 1955-11-02
location: "U.S. Virgin Islands"
relations:
- type: member_of
with: "[[Legislature of the Virgin Islands]]"
role: "senator, three terms"
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Industrial Development Commission]]"
role: "assistant director"
fn: 1
- type: head_of
with: "[[Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority]]"
start: 2002
role: "director"
fn: 1
- type: funded
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
reverse: true
start: 2014-12
role: "10,000 dollars from Southern Trust Company to the Mapp-Potter inaugural committee"
fn: 9
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Kenneth E. Mapp (born November 2, 1955, in [[New York]]) is a [[U.S. Virgin Islands]] politician who was governor of the territory from January 5, 2015 to January 7, 2019, between [[John de Jongh]] and [[Albert Bryan]]. He governed while [[Jeffrey Epstein]], a registered sex offender in the territory, bought and built on [[Great St. James]], and [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]] releases in 2026 showed years of direct correspondence between the two, including a 2016 request that Epstein lend the territorial government 275 million dollars and a 2018 request for 50,000 dollars for his political action committee. Deposed in 2023 in the territory's suit against [[JPMorgan Chase]], Mapp, like the other officials deposed, said he had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes. A federal trafficking suit naming him was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction in 2025.[^1][^2][^3][^4]
### Career
Mapp began as a police officer in New York and in the Virgin Islands. He was elected to three terms as a senator in the [[Legislature of the Virgin Islands]], and served as assistant director of the [[Industrial Development Commission]], the body that preceded the [[Economic Development Commission]] as the territory's tax-incentive board and that granted Epstein's [[Financial Trust Company]] its first certificate in 1999, and as director of the Consumer Services Administration. He was lieutenant governor from 1995 to 1999, under Governor [[Roy Schneider]]. In 2002 he was appointed director of the [[Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority]], the territory's borrowing agency.[^1][^5] He holds a master's degree in public administration from the [[Harvard Kennedy School|John F. Kennedy School of Government]] at [[Harvard University]] and completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School. The [[National Governors Association]] lists him as an independent.[^1]
De Jongh defeated Mapp in the 2010 gubernatorial election, and Mapp won the governorship in 2014. In August 2015 his administration's acting Attorney General, [[Claude Walker]], had de Jongh arrested on embezzlement charges over roughly 490,000 dollars in public highway funds spent on security at de Jongh's private house; de Jongh's lawyers called the case "a politically-driven, poorly conceived vendetta initiated by the current governor," and the charges were dismissed with prejudice in January 2016 after de Jongh paid 380,000 dollars. Bryan defeated Mapp in a November 2018 runoff.[^3][^6][^7][^8]
### Arrangements Through Cecile de Jongh
Epstein's contacts with Mapp were first arranged by [[Cecile de Jongh]], the wife of Governor de Jongh and the office manager of Epstein's territorial companies. On October 16, 2014 she wrote to Epstein that "Kenn Mapp and Celestino White would like to see you," referring to the former senator and police chief [[Celestino White]], who had signed a contractor's and confidentiality agreement with Epstein in August 2013 for 10,000 dollars. After the election she wrote, "Mapp won in a landslide. Congrats," and White offered to obtain tickets for Epstein to the inaugural events. In December 2014 she asked Epstein "to confirm that you want to donate $10,000 to the Mapp-Potter inaugural committee and that it should come from Southern Trust," a payment the consultant [[Carlyn Irwin]], retained by JPMorgan Chase, later reported as made through [[Southern Trust Company]].[^3][^9][^10]
In March 2015 Cecile de Jongh prepared Epstein for a meeting with White and Mapp: "I understand that Mapp has about $60K in campaign debt to retire and it would be illegal for him to discuss anything having to do at GH," meaning Government House. "I don't think he will or at least I hope not but I just wanted you to know." She added: "When you get to Government House, there is a sign in book for visitors at the entrance. I have asked Celestino to arrange to have you not sign in and he said that he would take care of it." The same month she informed Epstein that Mapp was interested in repurposing the former [[HOVENSA]] refinery on [[St. Croix]], writing that the [[Department of Defense]] was "sending a team to St. Croix within the month to make a full assessment of the HOVENSA facility for use as a replacement for the prison at Guantanamo, or other military use in light of the proposed closing of GTMO."[^3]
### Money and Advice
In his May 2023 deposition in the territory's suit against JPMorgan Chase, Mapp testified that he had lunch on Epstein's island between 2015 and 2019, likely in 2016, to seek his advice on the territory's effort to raise more than 200 million dollars in municipal bonds amid uncertainty over [[Puerto Rico|Puerto Rico's]] debt crisis and the federal PROMESA legislation, and that he sought similar advice from other financial contacts. Released emails schedule lunches and brunches at Epstein's properties and at Government House, one of them for "Gov Mapp for brunch."[^2]
In July 2016 Mapp emailed Epstein: "Good afternoon; question. Would you be open to/interested in lending the GVI $275M at 4.75-5.25%, pledged revenues as security over a 20 year term?" Epstein answered, "I may be back in territory next week. Let's discuss. How taxed? Sinking funds? Other collateral, ? Land, ? Use of funds?" After further texts Mapp wrote: "Coffee, maybe subject to your EDC certificate. If we did a pvt placement bond, a greater portion would be triple tax exempt." A month later Epstein's assistant sent him a reminder to "Buy coffee set for Gov. Mapp." On September 1, 2016 Epstein told Cecile de Jongh to "prepare a check for mapps super pac. For 75k." The day before his 2017 State of the Territory address Mapp sought Epstein's advice on the speech, and Epstein replied that he had "made some general edits to give you a flavor . not to be your speechwriter :)." Released texts also show Mapp fundraising from Epstein for the Queen Louise Home for Children on St. Croix, thanking him for donations, reporting a public presentation totaling 140,500 dollars, and later acknowledging an additional 20,000 dollar contribution.[^2][^3][^9]
In October 2018, facing a runoff, Mapp asked Epstein "to help me with one last push to stay ahead" and wrote, "Can u donate 50k to the PAC? I need to bring more expertise on messaging." He told Epstein he had hired "a political mercenary." It is not shown in the released material whether Epstein paid. After Bryan's victory Epstein wrote, "Let's talk about what you do next. Shame," and Mapp thanked him "for your tremendous help and support" and "our work on a number of issues." In his deposition Mapp said he believed Epstein had donated to his inaugural committee and had no reason to dispute records showing 10,000 dollars, though he had not known the amount at the time.[^2][^3]
### Great St. James and the Planning Department
Epstein bought Great St. James in January 2016 and pressed Mapp and the Commissioner of Planning and Natural Resources, [[Dawn Henry]], over permit delays and fines for unpermitted construction. In October 2016 three inspectors of the [[Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources|Department of Planning and Natural Resources]], among them the Coastal Zone Management director [[Jean-Pierre Oriol]], visited the island, and the department issued a cease-and-desist order on October 28, 2016. In the text exchange that followed, Epstein told Mapp that the election of [[Donald Trump]] "means many opportunities" and that he was "Seeing trump (sic) people today," that he had "left you out of the dpnr issues as you requested," and that he would "prefer not to go to court to enforce reasonableness."[^3][^11]
On November 14, 2016 Mapp wrote that he was "a bit disappointed" to learn that Epstein had poured concrete for a helipad and made other unpermitted changes after "you solicited my help to move DPNR along," and accused him of attempting "an end run around the VI code." Epstein answered that "there is another side to the story" and "I will not disappoint you." Mapp replied, "I do want to work with you. Being open and honest on both sides will make this very productive," and later that he would "convene a meeting with all concerned to bring this matter to finality. I certainly can't regulate the territory's environmental issues by text." He added: "Frankly, I can't do this over and over and over again. I really wanna work on some more pressing issues during my tenure. The economy, health care, public safety finding a strategy to work with the new president. I'm sure you understand." Epstein wrote back, "Me too," and that "with regard Donald" they would "talk face to face," and on November 16, 2016 asked whether Mapp wanted to discuss "trump (sic) priorities? I think he would like your guantamo (sic) proposal."[^3]
Pressed again for a meeting date, Mapp wrote: "What is wrong with you? I told you I would do that and in your mind you expect that to happen in 24 hours? Maybe my efforts to assist and resolve this matter is for naught. Or maybe my duties only require me to attend to your issues. I cannot understand your impatience or unreasonable expectations. WOW!" Epstein replied that it was "not urgent at all," and the correspondence continued. In March 2017 Epstein's attorney [[Erika Kellerhals]] drafted a lawsuit against the government alleging "unauthorized entry," and the dispute was settled with the original 280,000 dollar fine reduced to 160,000 dollars. The Coastal Zone Management program issued a stop-work order on the island on December 21, 2018, in the final weeks of Mapp's term.[^3][^12]
### Litigation
On November 22, 2023 six women identified as Jane Does sued the [[Government of the United States Virgin Islands]], John and Cecile de Jongh, Mapp, the former Attorney General [[Vincent Frazer]], White, the former senator [[Carlton Dowe]], and Delegate [[Stacey Plaskett]] in the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]], alleging under the [[Trafficking Victims Protection Act]] and New York law that the defendants made the territory a "safe haven" for Epstein. The second amended complaint alleged, among other things, that defendants had labeled Epstein a Tier 1 sex offender when he should have been Tier 2, modified sex-trafficking laws, and received rewards including "a $50 million loan, payment of financial obligations, campaign donations, and monthly retainer fees." On March 21, 2025 Judge [[Arun Subramanian]] dismissed all claims against Mapp and every other defendant except Plaskett, holding that receiving money from Epstein's New York bank accounts and communicating with him about it did not amount to transacting business in New York. The claims against Plaskett were dismissed with prejudice by stipulation on September 23, 2025, and final judgment was entered on May 5, 2026.[^4][^13]
Mapp was among the officials deposed in the territory's suit against JPMorgan Chase, with Bryan, John and Cecile de Jongh, Frazer, [[Carol Thomas-Jacobs]] and Plaskett, who each said they had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes.[^3]
### Footnotes
[^1]: National Governors Association, "Gov. Kenneth Mapp," former Virgin Islands governors (terms January 5, 2015 to January 7, 2019; born November 2, 1955, New York; career). https://www.nga.org/governor/kenneth-mapp/
[^2]: "Former Gov. Kenneth Mapp Visited Epstein's Island, Sought $50,000 for Final Election Push, DOJ Records Show." *The Virgin Islands Consortium,* January 31, 2026. https://viconsortium.com/vi-federal/virgin-islands-former-gov--kenneth-mapp-visited-epstein-s-island--sought--50-000-for--final-push---doj-records-show
[^3]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Files reveal Epstein's efforts to influence V.I. officials; emails with Mapp." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 2, 2026. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/files-reveal-epstein-s-efforts-to-influence-v-i-officials-emails-with-mapp/article_2dd4fe69-4daf-4dc2-b3b8-37a929002bb6.html
[^4]: Doe 1 v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands, No. 1:23-cv-10301-AS (S.D.N.Y.), Opinion and Order, ECF No. 202 (March 21, 2025), pp. 1 to 2, 7 to 8, 16 to 17. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf
[^5]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Epstein estate could be ordered to repay more than $144 million in tax breaks." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 13, 2020. http://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/epstein-estate-could-be-ordered-to-repay-more-than-144-million-in-tax-breaks/article_b84d9710-14af-5e69-a890-bcf8265cf8f9.html (1999 Financial Trust certificate issued by the Industrial Development Commission, predecessor of the Economic Development Authority).
[^6]: "Governor John P. de Jongh Arrested By DOJ Officials." *The Virgin Islands Consortium,* August 18, 2015. https://viconsortium.com/vi-world/governor-john-p-de-jongh-arrested-being-processed-at-district-court (archived at https://wp.viconsortium.com/?p=27084).
[^7]: "De Jongh Attorneys Slam Mapp And Walker; Call Case Against Former Governor Sham, Disgrace And Poltically-Driven." *The Virgin Islands Consortium,* November 4, 2015. https://viconsortium.com/vi-government/de-jongh-attorneys-slam-mapp-administration-says-case-against-former-governor-is-sham-disgrace-and-poltically-driven (archived at https://wp.viconsortium.com/?p=30871).
[^8]: "DOJ Drops Charges Against Former Governor De Jongh After $380,000 Settlement." *The Virgin Islands Consortium,* January 22, 2016. https://viconsortium.com/vi-vic_news/doj-drops-charges-against-former-governor-de-jongh-with-prejudice-after-380000-settlement (archived at https://wp.viconsortium.com/?p=33926).
[^9]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Court filings show V.I. First Lady's loyalty to Epstein." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* June 21, 2023. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/court-filings-show-v-i-first-ladys-loyalty-to-epstein/article_c2dca0a7-a243-5365-88c0-389c576ad022.html (Mapp and White meeting, Mapp-Potter inaugural committee and Mapp super PAC requests).
[^10]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Docs confirm Bryan pressed for special treatment of sex offender." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 2, 2026. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/docs-confirm-bryan-pressed-for-special-treatment-of-sex-offender/article_5e9483c9-38d2-406c-8bb0-e5757ce287f2.html (Carlyn Irwin report: 10,000 dollar donation to the Mapp-Potter inaugural committee).
[^11]: "DPNR Orders Cease and Desist for Unauthorized Development on Great St. James." *St. Thomas Source,* November 1, 2016. https://stthomassource.com/content/2016/11/01/dpnr-orders-cease-and-desist-for-unauthorized-development-on-great-st-james/
[^12]: "DPNR planning visit to Epstein's island." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* 2019. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/dpnr-planning-visit-to-epstein-s-island/ (December 21, 2018 stop-work order).
[^13]: Doe 1 v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands, No. 1:23-cv-10301-AS (S.D.N.Y.), docket, including Stipulation and Order of Dismissal, ECF No. 224 (September 23, 2025), and Judgment, ECF No. 229 (May 5, 2026). https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68031620/doe-1-v-government-of-the-united-states-virgin-islands/

View file

@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ In a 2011 ruling Marra held that rights under the Act attach before the governme
On February 21, 2019 he granted partial summary judgment for the petitioners. He wrote that "[p]articularly problematic was the Government's decision to conceal the existence of the NPA and mislead the victims to believe that federal prosecution was still a possibility," that "[w]hile the Government spent untold hours negotiating the terms and implications of the NPA with Epstein's attorneys, scant information was shared with victims," and that "[t]he Court is not ruling that the decision not to prosecute was improper." He rejected the government's argument that a 2015 amendment had excluded non-prosecution agreements from victims' rights, reasoning that "[o]nce a NPA is entered into without notice, the matter is closed and the victims have no opportunity to be heard regarding any aspect of the case."[^3]
After Epstein's death, Marra closed the case on September 16, 2019, denying the victims' requests to rescind the agreement, to compel a meeting with former U.S. Attorney [[Alexander Acosta]], to obtain grand jury and internal documents, and to impose sanctions or damages. He wrote that "[t]he Court has no jurisdiction over Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. Attorney, who is now a private citizen," and that "despite Petitioners having demonstrated the Government violated their rights under the CVRA, in the end they are not receiving much, if any, of the relief they sought." He said the rulings "likely played some role, however small it may have been, in the initiation of criminal charges against Mr. Epstein in the Southern District of New York." He also ordered unsealed the remedies briefing that had been filed under seal in December 2011.[^7]
After Epstein's death, Marra closed the case on September 16, 2019, denying the victims' requests to rescind the agreement, to compel a meeting with former U.S. Attorney [[Alexander Acosta]], to obtain grand jury and internal documents, and to impose sanctions or damages. He wrote that "[t]he Court has no jurisdiction over Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. Attorney, who is now a private citizen," and that "despite Petitioners having demonstrated the Government violated their rights under the CVRA, in the end they are not receiving much, if any, of the relief they sought." He said the rulings "likely played some role, however small it may have been, in the initiation of criminal charges against Mr. Epstein in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]]." He also ordered unsealed the remedies briefing that had been filed under seal in December 2011.[^7]
### The Chiquita Litigation

View file

@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ Krauss rose to prominence in the 1990s through popular books and lectures on phy
In March 2006 Krauss convened "[[Confronting Gravity]]," a conference of about twenty physicists in [[Saint Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands|St. Thomas]] funded by Epstein's foundation. Krauss had pitched it as "a small and rather exclusive workshop" with all expenses paid, naming as invitees [[Stephen Hawking]], the 2004 Nobel laureates [[David Gross]] and [[Frank Wilczek]], the 1999 laureate [[Gerard 't Hooft]] and [[Kip Thorne]]. "To get good people, you've got to have a hook," Krauss said in 2026. The announcement promised time to "relax on the beach, and take a trip to the nearby private island retreat of the science philanthropist Jeffrey Epstein." Epstein told the *St. Thomas Source* that "there is no agenda except fun and physics, and that's fun with a capital 'F.'" The physicists stayed at the Ritz-Carlton, and the program ended with a submarine dive for Hawking and a boat trip to a barbecue on [[Little St. James]], where a guide told them, "Don't go wandering off into the island."[^1]
[[Alan Guth]] of MIT recalled that "we probably never saw him without three or four young women." [[Jim Peebles]] recalled five to ten young women at a coffee break: "I can only tell you they were younger than the youngest women in our meeting. . . . Were they 15 or 30? I have no idea." Krauss told NPR the young women were Hawking's nurses. Palm Beach police were then completing their investigation of Epstein, who was indicted four months later. In a 2017 text Epstein wrote that when Hawking "came to my island. and said his dream was to go diving . . . i [duct-taped] his head to a high back chair and loaded him in a private sub, great fun," and he later listed the conference among his top five professional achievements. In 2012 someone whose name is redacted told Epstein they were "rehas[h]ing an article . . . on the gravity conference," and a press release on the six-year-old event followed the next month.[^1]
[[Alan Guth]] of MIT recalled that "we probably never saw him without three or four young women." [[Jim Peebles]] recalled five to ten young women at a coffee break: "I can only tell you they were younger than the youngest women in our meeting. . . . Were they 15 or 30? I have no idea." Krauss told NPR the young women were Hawking's nurses. [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]] police were then completing their investigation of Epstein, who was indicted four months later. In a 2017 text Epstein wrote that when Hawking "came to my island. and said his dream was to go diving . . . i [duct-taped] his head to a high back chair and loaded him in a private sub, great fun," and he later listed the conference among his top five professional achievements. In 2012 someone whose name is redacted told Epstein they were "rehas[h]ing an article . . . on the gravity conference," and a press release on the six-year-old event followed the next month.[^1]
't Hooft told *[[BuzzFeed News]]* he had had no contact with Epstein since 2006; Wilczek said, "I did not receive financial support from Mr. Epstein. I did attend conferences and events which he financed in part." Epstein foundation websites nonetheless listed Wilczek as a funding recipient, and MIT's investigators found no such donation.[^6][^7]

View file

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ relations:
fn: 1
---
Marvin Lee Minsky (August 9, 1927 to January 24, 2016) was an American cognitive and computer scientist at the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] who co-founded the [[MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory]] and was a central figure in the founding of [[artificial intelligence]] as a field. He received funding from [[Jeffrey Epstein]] and organized a 2002 conference financed by Epstein in the U.S. Virgin Islands; in 2019 an unsealed deposition by [[Virginia Giuffre]] named Minsky, an allegation his widow [[Gloria Rudisch]] disputed.[^1][^2]
Marvin Lee Minsky (August 9, 1927 to January 24, 2016) was an American cognitive and computer scientist at the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] who co-founded the [[MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory]] and was a central figure in the founding of [[artificial intelligence]] as a field. He received funding from [[Jeffrey Epstein]] and organized a 2002 conference financed by Epstein in the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]]; in 2019 an unsealed deposition by [[Virginia Giuffre]] named Minsky, an allegation his widow [[Gloria Rudisch]] disputed.[^1][^2]
### MIT and the Founding of Artificial Intelligence
@ -45,13 +45,13 @@ Epstein donated $100,000 to Minsky in 2002, several years before Epstein's 2008
After Minsky's death in 2016, Negroponte and Ito discussed whether Epstein could attend an on-campus memorial; Negroponte said Epstein would be welcome, but Ito instructed Epstein to stay away from the memorial and an associated reception. A Media Lab staff member later circulated memorial photographs with a note asking that they be posted only "as long as Jeffrey Epstein does not appear in any of the photos."[^2][^5]
In April 2002 Minsky organized a three-day artificial-intelligence meeting, the St. Thomas Common Sense Symposium, held April 14 to 16, 2002, on St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands and funded by Epstein. The proceedings were published by Minsky, [[Push Singh]], and [[Aaron Sloman]] as "The St. Thomas Common Sense Symposium: Designing Architectures for Human-Level Intelligence" in *AI Magazine* in 2004. Around twenty scientists attended, most of them men, including [[Roger Schank]], [[Doug Lenat]], [[Ken Forbus]], [[Henry Lieberman]], [[Vernor Vinge]], and [[Linda Stone]]. Schank later recalled that Epstein "walks into the conference with two girls on his arm" and sat "in the back, on a couch, hugging and kissing these girls." Epstein separately funded "Confronting Gravity," a March 2006 physics conference at the Ritz-Carlton in St. Thomas convened by [[Lawrence Krauss]], which drew physicists including [[Stephen Hawking]] and ended with a barbecue on Epstein's island, [[Little St. James]].[^6][^7][^8]
In April 2002 Minsky organized a three-day artificial-intelligence meeting, the St. Thomas Common Sense Symposium, held April 14 to 16, 2002, on St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands and funded by Epstein. The proceedings were published by Minsky, [[Push Singh]], and [[Aaron Sloman]] as "The St. Thomas Common Sense Symposium: Designing Architectures for Human-Level Intelligence" in *AI Magazine* in 2004. Around twenty scientists attended, most of them men, including [[Roger Schank]], [[Doug Lenat]], [[Ken Forbus]], [[Henry Lieberman]], [[Vernor Vinge]], and [[Linda Stone]]. Schank later recalled that Epstein "walks into the conference with two girls on his arm" and sat "in the back, on a couch, hugging and kissing these girls." Epstein separately funded "Confronting Gravity," a March 2006 physics conference at the Ritz-Carlton in [[St. Thomas]] convened by [[Lawrence Krauss]], which drew physicists including [[Stephen Hawking]] and ended with a barbecue on Epstein's island, [[Little St. James]].[^6][^7][^8]
### Giuffre Allegation and the Dispute
In a deposition given on May 3, 2016 in her defamation suit against [[Ghislaine Maxwell]], and unsealed in stages from August 2019, Virginia Giuffre testified that she was directed to have sex with Minsky when he visited Epstein's compound in the U.S. Virgin Islands, when she was seventeen and Minsky was in his seventies. Giuffre's claim named Minsky among several prominent men she said she was instructed to have sexual contact with. Minsky, who had died in January 2016, never had an opportunity to respond.[^1][^9]
The transcript pages filed in December 2022 record Maxwell's counsel, [[Laura Menninger]], summarizing Giuffre's testimony and asking, with Giuffre's lawyer [[Bradley Edwards]] objecting to the form: "another prince, the large hotel chain owner and Marvin Minsky, is there anyone else that Ghislaine Maxwell directed you to go have sex with?" Giuffre answered: "I am definitely sure there is. But can I remember everybody's name? No." Under further questioning she said she had kept notes of the men's names, begun around 2011 or 2012 and not at her lawyers' instruction, and had burned them "in a bonfire when I lived at Titusville." A separate witness testified in the same litigation that Minsky and Giuffre were both passengers on a March 2001 flight from Teterboro to Santa Fe and Palm Beach with Epstein, Maxwell, the chef [[Adam Perry Lang]] and the shipping heir [[Henry Jarecki]], when Giuffre was seventeen and Minsky seventy-three.[^10][^11]
The transcript pages filed in December 2022 record Maxwell's counsel, [[Laura Menninger]], summarizing Giuffre's testimony and asking, with Giuffre's lawyer [[Bradley Edwards]] objecting to the form: "another prince, the large hotel chain owner and Marvin Minsky, is there anyone else that Ghislaine Maxwell directed you to go have sex with?" Giuffre answered: "I am definitely sure there is. But can I remember everybody's name? No." Under further questioning she said she had kept notes of the men's names, begun around 2011 or 2012 and not at her lawyers' instruction, and had burned them "in a bonfire when I lived at Titusville." A separate witness testified in the same litigation that Minsky and Giuffre were both passengers on a March 2001 flight from Teterboro to Santa Fe and [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]] with Epstein, Maxwell, the chef [[Adam Perry Lang]] and the shipping heir [[Henry Jarecki]], when Giuffre was seventeen and Minsky seventy-three.[^10][^11]
Minsky's widow, the pediatrician Gloria Rudisch, disputed the allegation, telling the *[[New York Post]]* that she and her husband "were always together" when visiting Epstein. Minsky was never charged. The accusation of sexual contact rests on Giuffre's testimony; the flight testimony places the two on the same aircraft. In a 2015 deposition [[Alan Dershowitz]] said the young women around Epstein "were seen by [[Larry Summers]], they were seen by [George] Church, they were seen by Marvin Minsky," and that "there was no hint or suggestion of anything sexual or improper."[^11][^12]
@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ The 2019 MIT review and records reported in 2025 and 2026 indicated that Minsky
### The 2011 Conference and the Websites
The 2002 gift was the only Epstein donation MIT recorded for Minsky, and it was the one Epstein gift MIT did not reclassify as anonymous in 2013. Epstein's support continued outside MIT's books. Justice Department files show that he funded a second Minsky conference in 2011, addressing "future disasters that may arise in the face of growing populations, new technologies and new social network systems"; a 2012 Epstein foundation press release placed it on Epstein's island in December 2011. From at least August 2014 the website jeffreyepstein.net stated that "Jeffrey Epstein AI sponsors many leading scientists at the forefront of AI research, including Marvin Minsky and Seth Lloyd at MIT," and another page claimed support for "Marvin Minsky and MIT's AI and Media Labs." In a 2017 text message Epstein wrote: "I funded the father of AI marvin minsky for 20 years. I know the subject well."[^8][^11][^13]
The 2002 gift was the only Epstein donation MIT recorded for Minsky, and it was the one Epstein gift MIT did not reclassify as anonymous in 2013. Epstein's support continued outside MIT's books. Justice Department files show that he funded a second Minsky conference in 2011, addressing "future disasters that may arise in the face of growing populations, new technologies and new social network systems"; a 2012 Epstein foundation press release placed it on Epstein's island in December 2011. From at least August 2014 the website jeffreyepstein.net stated that "Jeffrey Epstein AI sponsors many leading scientists at the forefront of AI research, including Marvin Minsky and [[Seth Lloyd]] at MIT," and another page claimed support for "Marvin Minsky and MIT's AI and Media Labs." In a 2017 text message Epstein wrote: "I funded the father of AI marvin minsky for 20 years. I know the subject well."[^8][^11][^13]
When Epstein asked in February 2016 whether he could attend Minsky's memorial, Joi Ito offered two options: "get in a private room at the Lab where he can 'hold court' and people . . . could see him out of the public eye," or "let him participate since we have a good story around it. BTW, will press be at the event?" Nicholas Negroponte answered, "Of course he can come and would be welcome .... I would make absolutely no fuss over his coming and welcome home [sic] 100%." After discussion with Minsky's family, Epstein was kept in Ito's office during the March 17, 2016 event.[^13]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- JeffreyEpstein
- NonProsecutionAgreement
- Prosecutor
- DepartmentOfJustice
- RevolvingDoor
- KobreAndKim
alias:
- Matthew Menchel
- Matthew I. Menchel
- Matt Menchel
summary: "Criminal Division chief in the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office who conveyed the 2007 two-year state plea offer to Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers, left for Kobre & Kim weeks later, and later dined with Epstein."
location: "Miami, Florida"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Manhattan District Attorney]]"
role: "Assistant District Attorney"
end: 1998
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]]"
role: "Assistant U.S. Attorney; Chief, Major Crimes Section; Chief, Criminal Division"
start: 1998
end: 2007-08
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Kobre & Kim]]"
role: "partner"
start: 2007-08
fn: 3
- type: investigated
with: "[[Office of Professional Responsibility]]"
reverse: true
start: 2019-02-06
end: 2020-11
fn: 8
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Matthew I. Menchel is an American trial lawyer who was chief of the Criminal Division of the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]] from October 2006 to August 2007, the months in which the office declined to approve an indictment of [[Jeffrey Epstein]] and offered him instead a two-year state plea, the offer that became the [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]]. Menchel communicated the offer to Epstein's lawyers and left the office in August 2007 for the firm [[Kobre & Kim]], before the agreement's terms were negotiated. The [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]]'s [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] later found that he had dated, in 2003, a former deputy who by 2007 was one of Epstein's defense lawyers, that his supervisors did not know it, and that it "would have been prudent" for him to tell them. Epstein's records released in 2025 showed appointments, telephone calls and dinners between the two men in 2011, 2013 and 2017; Menchel denied any business relationship with Epstein.[^1][^2][^3]
### Manhattan and Miami
Menchel served eleven years as an Assistant District Attorney in the [[Manhattan District Attorney|New York County District Attorney's Office]] in [[Manhattan]], where according to his firm biography he was director of legal training. He joined the Miami office in 1998, became chief of its Major Crimes Section after several years as a line prosecutor, and was named chief of the Criminal Division by [[Alexander Acosta]] in September 2006, taking office that October alongside the new First Assistant, [[Jeffrey Sloman]].[^1][^3][^4]
### The Charging Decision
The line prosecutor, [[Ann Marie Villafana|A. Marie Villafaña]], submitted her prosecution memorandum on May 1, 2007. On May 14 she asked Menchel and [[Andrew Lourie]] whether she could file charges the next day, as Epstein flew from the [[U.S. Virgin Islands|Virgin Islands]] to [[New Jersey]]. Menchel answered: "[y]ou will not have approval to go forward tomorrow," explaining that Acosta "has your [prosecution] memo" and "wants to take his time making sure he is comfortable before proceeding," and that he had "trouble understanding" her "rush" "given how long this case has been pending." In his OPR interview Menchel described her as "out over her skis a little bit" and "ahead of Acosta in terms of his analysis of the case," and said, "This [was] not a case [we were] going to review in two weeks and make a decision on." In a July 5, 2007 email he rebuked her for having "led the agents to believe that [filing charges in] this matter was a foregone conclusion." Villafaña's immediate supervisor told OPR that it appeared "Miami didn't want the case prosecuted." OPR recorded that Menchel and Villafaña gave contradictory accounts of several events.[^5]
### The Two-Year Offer
The office's first plea overture came before June 26, 2007, when Menchel spoke with Epstein's lawyer [[Lilly Ann Sanchez]] about resolving the federal case with a state plea requiring jail time and sex-offender registration; according to an email, "[i]t was a non-starter" for the defense. Menchel told Villafaña in early July that he had raised the state resolution with Acosta's "full knowledge." At a July 26, 2007 meeting, according to Villafaña, Menchel announced that "Alex has decided to offer a two year state deal," and on July 31 the office delivered the terms to the defense. Menchel told OPR that he did not recall how the office arrived at two years. OPR itself was "unable to determine the reasoning underlying the decision to offer two years as the term of incarceration, as opposed to any other term of years," and concluded that Acosta knew of and approved it.[^6][^7]
Shortly after the offer was extended in early August 2007, Menchel left the office for private practice. OPR noted in its findings that the three supervisory subjects other than Acosta "left the USAO, were transitioning to other jobs, or were absent at critical junctures" during the negotiations that followed.[^1][^8]
### The Relationship with Defense Counsel
OPR found that "Epstein's wealth enabled him to hire multiple attorneys who had preexisting personal connections to some of the government attorneys involved in his case," and that Epstein "retained Lilly Ann [Sanchez], a former AUSA who had been Menchel's deputy and with whom he had socialized." Menchel told OPR that he and the former colleague had had a social relationship in the office that included, in 2003, "a handful of dates over a period of two to three weeks. We decided that . . . this was probably best not to pursue, and we mutually agreed to not do that." He said they had remained "close" and "hung out," that this was known in the office, and that by 2007 their contact was "most likely" at office events and at his wedding; his Outlook records showed at least one scheduled lunch with her in early 2006, after she left the office. "[T]hat was three and a half years [prior] for a very brief period of time," he said, "and I don't think I gave it a moment's thought."[^6]
Acosta, Sloman and Lourie each told OPR that in 2007 they did not know Menchel had dated her. The office's Professional Responsibility Officer told OPR that he would have expected Menchel to raise it with Acosta, and that "[g]iven the sensitivity of the [Epstein] matter, [my advice] would probably have been to tell him to step back and let somebody else take it over." OPR did not conclude that the relationship influenced the investigation, but assessed that "it would have been prudent for Menchel to have informed his supervisors so they could make an independent assessment as to whether his continued involvement in the Epstein investigation might create the appearance of a loss of impartiality." Menchel told OPR that the relationship did "[n]ot at all" affect his handling of the case, that prior ties gave defense lawyers credibility but did not "move the needle in any major way," and that he and his colleagues viewed Epstein's attempt to exert influence through his choice of counsel as "ham-fisted" and "clumsy."[^6][^9]
In a December 2018 email, Villafaña wrote that Sloman had once told her Sanchez "asked Mr. Menchel to 'do her a solid' and convince Mr. Acosta to offer two years." Sloman did not recall the remark, Villafaña could not recall its exact words, and OPR concluded "that there is no evidence to support the statement in Villafaña's 2018 email that Menchel had extended a two-year plea deal as a favor to one of Epstein's attorneys."[^6]
### Kobre & Kim
Menchel joined the litigation firm Kobre & Kim in August 2007. He became a partner in its government enforcement defense practice, a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, and head of the firm's trial advocacy program. The firm credits him with the "landmark acquittal" of the [[UBS]] banker [[Raoul Weil]] and with a defense verdict "against the CFTC on all causes of action" for the trading firm DRW. In 2015 the Chambers guide quoted clients describing him as "strategic, smart, attentive to detail and [having] outstanding common sense." Lourie, the West Palm Beach manager on the Epstein case, joined Kobre & Kim after leaving the Justice Department, and the firm's 2015 announcement quoted the guide as saying that his "skills are extraordinary, and his judgment is first-rate."[^3][^10]
### Contacts with Epstein
Documents from Epstein's estate released by the [[House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform|House Oversight Committee]] in October 2025 showed that Menchel had appointments, phone calls and dinners with Epstein in 2011, 2013 and 2017, beginning four years after he left the office. At Acosta's September 19, 2025 transcribed interview, members of the committee asked about a photograph said to show Epstein skiing with Menchel, possibly in the early 2000s, but did not produce it. Menchel had earlier denied having business relationships with Epstein "at any point, not before, during or after my tenure at the U.S. attorney's office," referred the [[Miami Herald]] to that denial, and after publication denied ever skiing with Epstein; he did not deny meeting him after leaving the office.[^2]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284, Prior DOJ Disclosures, report, Office of Professional Responsibility, "Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation," November 2020, pp. 5 to 7 (EFTA02847314 to EFTA02847316). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Prior%20DOJ%20Disclosures/Memos.%20&%20Correspondence/EFTA02847284.pdf
[^2]: Debra Cassens Weiss, "Jeffrey Epstein had dinners with top criminal prosecutor following favorable deal, documents show," *ABA Journal,* October 20, 2025, summarizing Miami Herald reporting on the House Oversight Committee's release of Epstein estate documents. https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/jeffrey-epstein-had-dinners-with-top-criminal-prosecutor-in-years-following-favorable-deal-documents-show
[^3]: Kobre & Kim, "Matthew I. Menchel" (firm biography). https://kobrekim.com/people/matthew-i-menchel ; Debra Cassens Weiss (see note 7).
[^4]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), p. 18 n. 21 (EFTA02847327).
[^5]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 29 to 30 and nn. 44 to 45 (EFTA02847338 to EFTA02847339).
[^6]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 150 to 155 and nn. 226 to 228 (EFTA02847459 to EFTA02847464).
[^7]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, privileged chronology of the federal investigation, May 2006 to August 2011, entry recording the meeting "where Criminal Chief Menchel announces that USA Acosta will offer a two-year state plea." https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf
[^8]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), Executive Summary, pp. vi, x (EFTA02847291, EFTA02847295).
[^9]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 151 to 152 (EFTA02847460 to EFTA02847461).
[^10]: Kobre & Kim, "Kobre & Kim Receives Top Rankings in the 2015 Edition of Chambers & Partners," May 19, 2015. https://kobrekim.com/news/accolades/kobre-and-kim-receives-top-rankings-in-the-2015-edition-of-chambers-and-partners

View file

@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
---
category: "Business & Finance"
tags:
- Person
- NicoleJunkermann
- JeffreyEpstein
- Carbyne
- EhudBarak
- NJFCapital
- NHS
- VentureCapital
alias:
- nicole junkerman
- Nicole Junkerman
summary: "German investor and founder of NJF Holdings who co-invested with Jeffrey Epstein and Ehud Barak in Carbyne, sat on a UK health technology advisory board, and lost a Lancaster University post in 2026."
location: "London, United Kingdom"
relations:
- type: founded
with: "[[NJF Holdings]]"
role: "founder"
fn: 3
- type: member_of
with: "[[Healthtech Advisory Board]]"
role: "member"
start: 2018-11-19
fn: 3
- type: appointed
with: "[[Lancaster University]]"
reverse: true
role: "visiting professor in practice for technology, innovation and entrepreneurship"
start: 2025-09
end: 2026-02-10
fn: 4
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Nicole Junkermann is a German investor, founder of the investment company NJF Holdings and of NJF Capital, the renamed Montilla International Corporation, through which she invested alongside [[Jeffrey Epstein]] and the former Israeli prime minister [[Ehud Barak]] in the Israeli emergency-response company [[Carbyne]]. Epstein called her "my great friend" in 2010, and their correspondence continued until 2019, long after his 2008 Florida conviction. In November 2018 the [[United Kingdom|British]] government named her to a Healthtech Advisory Board reporting directly to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, [[Matt Hancock]]. [[Lancaster University]] terminated her visiting professorship on February 10, 2026, after the [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]]'s release of the [[Epstein Files|Epstein files]].[^1][^2][^3][^4]
### Carbyne
Junkermann's investment firm took part in Carbyne's Series A round. *[[Forbes]]* reported in February 2026 that Carbyne's website had listed her as a director until 2020; Carbyne's chief executive, [[Amir Elichai]], said that "she is not and was never a board member," attributed the listing to a mistake by the company's marketing team, and said she no longer held a stake.[^5]
Epstein's stake was held through an Israeli limited partnership, SUM (E.B.) Limited Partnership, whose general partner was Ergo (E.B. 2014) Ltd. On February 28, 2019 the partnership's lawyer, [[Tomer Toor]] of the [[Tel Aviv]] firm Furth, Wilensky, Mizrachi, Knaani, wrote to Epstein's lawyer [[Darren Indyke]], to NJF Capital's finance officer and to Junkermann that SUM held warrants to buy 61,251 additional Preferred A shares of Carbyne for 3.5 million dollars, which would raise its holding "from about 13% to about 26.33%, on a fully diluted basis." The limited partners' shares of the 3.6 million dollar call were set at 66.67 percent, or 2.4 million dollars, for Epstein's [[Southern Trust Company]] and 33.33 percent, or 1.2 million dollars, for Montilla International Corporation, renamed NJF Capital Corp in 2018, to be wired to Ergo at [[Bank Leumi]]. Toor confirmed on March 11, 2019 that the full amount had arrived.[^2][^6]
When the Israeli bank asked, under its anti-money-laundering rules, for the controlling person and citizenship of each limited partner, Indyke wrote to Epstein on March 12, 2019: "I thought we did not want your name associated with this Investment?" Barak had replied to the same request on March 11: "That's the Israeli banks paranoia after they paid the penalties they've paid to the US authorities for past mistakes. According to our experience it was never leaked out of the banks." On March 14 Epstein confirmed that Indyke could name him as the controlling person of Southern Trust.[^2][^6]
### The China Matter
On February 18, 2019, four and a half months before his arrest, Epstein wrote to Junkermann that he had "litle idea of carbyne results to date" and asked to be told "how much we are giving up. how much we would have made." Junkermann answered in a numbered list: "You are my friend and I do not have a lot of them so lets try to find a fair solution for all of us"; "You are right I see it differently, you are a billionaire I am not and I am a mother you are not.. so I have to care about her future and I do not have a choice... and as you know China is difficult if not we would not have this conversation"; "Carbyne invested 1.5 m (1m you and 0.5m me) net of fees is 3.9m your share, Ehud carry 1.5 m and my share 2m"; "China is valued from FSB 1.2 to 1.5b if I can get at least 250m out of there"; and "Can Ehud help? Lets speak." The message does not define "FSB."[^1]
### Earlier Correspondence
On June 15, 2010, replying to a note from a son of the arms dealer [[Douglas Leese]], Epstein wrote: "Definitely, my great friend, nicole junkerman is considering moving to Singapore. May I have her call you."[^7] According to *[[The Lancaster Tab]]*, which reviewed the released files, an email from Junkermann to Epstein in November 2013 read, "You make me smile, you are in my heart :)"; in January 2014 Epstein wrote to her, "Paris on the 29th, coming to interview for chief of staff. Hope to see you. Don't you know any girl in their 20s good family, trustworthy, multilingual?", and the newspaper found nothing to suggest that she acted on the request; and in 2017, the year of her marriage, she wrote, "I am so happy to see you, [her husband] says always when I speak about you I have a smile on my face." The *Lancashire Telegraph* reported that the files record gifts she bought Epstein, including a cashmere bathrobe and jewelry.[^8]
### Public Appointments
The Department of Health and Social Care announced on November 19, 2018 the first meeting of the Healthtech Advisory Board, created to advise Hancock on "his technology vision for health and social care" and to "report directly to the Secretary of State." It was chaired by [[Ben Goldacre]] of the [[University of Oxford]]; Junkermann, listed as "founder of NJF Holdings, an international finance and investment company," sat with the chief executive of [[UK Research and Innovation]], Sir [[Mark Walport]], the chair of the Human Tissue Authority, [[Nicola Blackwood]], the chair of the [[Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation]], Roger Taylor, and [[Daniel Korski]] of the venture firm PUBLIC.[^3]
Lancaster University appointed her in September 2025 as visiting professor in practice for technology, innovation and entrepreneurship. After the files were released the university said, "Nicole Junkermann is not an employee of Lancaster University and our connection with her is currently being reviewed," and on February 10, 2026 confirmed that her "post as a visiting professor has been terminated." A spokesperson for Junkermann said: "The scale Jeffrey Epstein's crimes is appalling. As a woman and a mother, Nicole was completely deceived and misled by him and deeply regrets their conversations regarding personal and professional matters. These conversations took place at a time in her life when she was vulnerable, and she was manipulated into trusting him." She has not been accused of any crime.[^4][^8]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02630791, DataSet 11, email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and Nicole Junkermann, February 18, 2019. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02630791.pdf
[^2]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02634615, DataSet 11, email chain "Carbyne warrants" among Tomer Toor, NJF Capital, Darren Indyke and Jeffrey Epstein, February 28 to March 14, 2019. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02634615.pdf
[^3]: Department of Health and Social Care. "Health technology expert panel meets for the first time." GOV.UK, November 19, 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/health-technology-expert-panel-meets-for-the-first-time
[^4]: "Lancaster University visiting professor named 3,475 in the Epstein files leaves position." *The Lancaster Tab,* February 11, 2026. https://thetab.com/2026/02/11/lancaster-university-visiting-professor-who-was-named-3475-in-epstein-files-leaves-position
[^5]: Brewster, Thomas. "Epstein Could Have Made $100 Million On A Secret Police Tech Investment With Ehud Barak." *Forbes,* February 10, 2026. https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2026/02/10/epstein-police-surveillance-investments-with-ehud-barak/
[^6]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02632339, DataSet 11, email from Ehud Barak to Jeffrey Epstein, "Re: Carbyne warrants," March 11, 2019, with forwarded correspondence of Tomer Toor, Darren Indyke, and NJF Capital, February 28 to March 11, 2019. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02632339.pdf
[^7]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02412487, DataSet 11, email exchange, "My boy," June 15-16, 2010. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02412487.pdf
[^8]: "Lancaster University visiting professor mentioned 3,475 times in the Epstein files." *The Lancaster Tab,* February 9, 2026. https://thetab.com/2026/02/09/lancaster-university-visiting-professor-mentioned-3475-times-in-the-epstein-files

View file

@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Starmer named him ambassador in Washington at the start of Trump's second term,
### JPMorgan's "Project Jeep" Review
After Epstein's July 2019 arrest, JPMorgan's compliance staff reviewed his correspondence with the bank's executives under the code name "Project Jeep." Its October 2019 summary, quoted by the [[United States Virgin Islands]] in its 2023 suit against the bank, stated: "Jeffrey Epstein appears to maintain a particularly close relationship with Prince Andrew the [Duke] of York and Lord Peter Mandelson, a senior member of the British Government. He also appears to have a close relationship with [[Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem|Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem]] who is a senior [[United Arab Emirates|UAE]] official involved in ownership of the Dubai Ports." The Virgin Islands told Judge [[Jed Rakoff]] that the summary confirmed "more than four pages of Epstein referrals to JPMorgan," including [[Andrew Farkas]], [[Boris Nikolic]], [[Bill Gates]], and Mandelson; JPMorgan's chief executive, [[Jamie Dimon]], had said at deposition: "We did not need introductions to anybody."[^3]
After Epstein's July 2019 arrest, JPMorgan's compliance staff reviewed his correspondence with the bank's executives under the code name "Project Jeep." Its October 2019 summary, quoted by the [[United States Virgin Islands]] in its 2023 suit against the bank, stated: "Jeffrey Epstein appears to maintain a particularly close relationship with Prince Andrew the [Duke] of York and Lord Peter Mandelson, a senior member of the British Government. He also appears to have a close relationship with [[Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem|Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem]] who is a senior [[United Arab Emirates|UAE]] official involved in ownership of the [[DP World|Dubai Ports]]." The Virgin Islands told Judge [[Jed Rakoff]] that the summary confirmed "more than four pages of Epstein referrals to JPMorgan," including [[Andrew Farkas]], [[Boris Nikolic]], [[Bill Gates]], and Mandelson; JPMorgan's chief executive, [[Jamie Dimon]], had said at deposition: "We did not need introductions to anybody."[^3]
### Dismissal as Ambassador

View file

@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Morgenthau's investigation also targeted [[Kamal Adham]], who eventually pleaded
Morgenthau, at seventy years old during the BCCI investigation, was described as a lean figure with silver hair and a patrician manner.[^11] He was soft-spoken and considered one of the most important men in New York.[^12] His family had been part of the political establishment since 1886, with his great-grandfather immigrating from Bavaria and his father serving as [[Franklin D. Roosevelt|Franklin Roosevelt]]'s secretary of the Treasury.[^13]
Morgenthau's reputation as a crusader was built during his time as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, a position he held after being appointed by [[John F. Kennedy|Kennedy]] in 1960.[^14] He was known for his independence and his willingness to pursue cases against powerful figures.[^15]
Morgenthau's reputation as a crusader was built during his time as U.S. attorney for the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]], a position he held after being appointed by [[John F. Kennedy|Kennedy]] in 1960.[^14] He was known for his independence and his willingness to pursue cases against powerful figures.[^15]
### The Senate Account

View file

@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
---
category: "Scientists & Researchers"
tags:
- Person
- SethLloyd
- MIT
- QuantumComputing
- JeffreyEpstein
- ScienceFunding
- GoodwinProcter
- EdgeFoundation
alias:
- Professor Seth Lloyd
- seth lloyd
summary: "MIT mechanical engineering professor and quantum computing theorist who took a personal gift and post-conviction donations from Jeffrey Epstein and was disciplined by MIT in 2020 for not disclosing Epstein's conviction."
location: "Cambridge, Massachusetts"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]]"
role: "professor of mechanical engineering"
fn: 2
- type: funded
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
reverse: true
role: "60,000 dollar personal gift, unreported to MIT"
start: 2005
end: 2006
fn: 1
- type: funded
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
reverse: true
role: "two 50,000 dollar donations to MIT for Lloyd's research"
start: 2012
fn: 2
- type: investigated
with: "[[Goodwin Procter]]"
reverse: true
role: "fact-finding for MIT on Epstein's donations"
end: 2020-01-10
fn: 1
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Seth Lloyd is a professor of mechanical engineering at the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] and a theorist of quantum computing. He met [[Jeffrey Epstein]] in 2004 at a dinner organized by the literary agent [[John Brockman]], received a 60,000 dollar personal gift from him in 2005 or 2006, and after Epstein's 2008 conviction brought 225,000 dollars of Epstein's money into MIT for his research. The report MIT commissioned from [[Goodwin Procter]] concluded in January 2020 that he had "purposefully failed to inform MIT" that Epstein, a convicted sex offender, was the source of the 2012 donations; MIT placed him on paid administrative leave the day the report was released and imposed five years of restrictions in December 2020.[^1][^2][^3][^4]
### Epstein's Science Circle
Lloyd told *[[The New York Times]]* that he met Epstein in 2004 at a dinner Brockman organized; Brockman's gatherings and his [[Edge Foundation]] were the setting in which several scientists first encountered Epstein.[^4] On April 27, 2009, while Epstein was still serving the sentence that followed his 2008 Florida guilty plea in the custody of the [[Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office]], he wrote an email saying that a woman named in it "can meet have dinner lunch a weekend with any of the following," listing "seth lloyd mit quantum computing," [[Murray Gell-Mann]] of the [[Santa Fe Institute]], [[Brian Greene]] of [[Columbia University]], [[Leonard Susskind]], [[Lawrence Krauss]] of the Origins Institute in [[Phoenix, Arizona|Phoenix]] and [[Lee Smolin]] of the [[Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics|Perimeter Institute]], and adding, "she can see the large hadron collider in switzerland. private tour." The copy produced by [[JPMorgan Chase]] and filed in the [[Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank|Virgin Islands suit against the bank]] shows it addressed to the JPMorgan email account of [[Jes Staley]].[^5] Lloyd visited Epstein at his office during his work release.[^1]
Photographs from a 2012 lunch at [[Martin Nowak]]'s [[Program for Evolutionary Dynamics]] at [[Harvard University]], posted on an Epstein foundation website, showed Epstein with Lloyd, [[Leon Black]], [[George Church]], [[Eric Lander]], [[David Gergen]], [[Howard Gardner]], [[Ted Kaptchuk]] and [[Henry Rosovsky]].[^6] From at least August 2014 the website jeffreyepstein.net stated that "Jeffrey Epstein AI sponsors many leading scientists at the forefront of AI research, including Marvin Minsky and Seth Lloyd at MIT," referring to [[Marvin Minsky]].[^7]
### The Donations
The Goodwin Procter investigation, based on 73 interviews and more than 610,000 emails and documents, found that Epstein made ten donations to MIT totaling 850,000 dollars between 2002 and 2017. After the first, 100,000 dollars for Minsky's research in 2002, the nine post-conviction gifts went to the [[MIT Media Lab]] (525,000 dollars) or to Lloyd (225,000 dollars): two donations of 50,000 dollars in 2012 and one of 125,000 dollars in 2017. The report found that Epstein's post-conviction visits and gifts were driven by the Media Lab's director, [[Joi Ito]], or by Lloyd, and that the 2012 gifts served Epstein as "a trial balloon" to test MIT's willingness to take his money.[^1][^2]
On June 7, 2012, Lloyd told MIT staff to expect a donation without naming the donor, giving only the name of Epstein's assistant [[Lesley Groff]] as the person "taking care of the donation from the donor's end." The investigators wrote that "the only reasonable inference is that Professor Lloyd did this to obscure the fact that Epstein was the donor," and that "Professor Lloyd knew that donations from Epstein would be controversial and that MIT might reject them. We conclude that, in concert with Epstein, he purposefully decided not to alert the Institute to Epstein's criminal record." A presidential acknowledgment letter bearing [[L. Rafael Reif]]'s signature, dated August 16, 2012, thanked Epstein for the gift.[^1][^2] Lloyd acknowledged that the earlier 60,000 dollar gift had been deposited in a personal bank account and not reported to MIT.[^2]
### Lloyd's Account
In a post of January 16, 2020 Lloyd wrote that "The accusation that I accepted money from Epstein is true," but that "The accusation that I hid Epstein's identity from MIT ... is completely false." He said that in 2012 he had put "the donor's agent" in touch with his departmental administrator and that MIT officers "considered the donation with full knowledge that Epstein was the donor," quoting an email: "Jeffrey Epstein intends to make a gift in the amount of $100,000 in two tranches of $50,000 for the discretionary research for the support of Seth Lloyd." He wrote that on June 1, 2017 MIT's Office of the Recording Secretary had noted that Epstein's past gifts were "recorded anonymously." Of the 2005 or 2006 money he wrote that Epstein had suggested he "set up a 501c3 corporation as a vehicle for the grant" and in the end gave it as a gift, "on which I paid gift tax."[^8]
### Discipline
President Reif placed Lloyd, a tenured professor, on paid administrative leave on January 10, 2020.[^2] The physics department head, [[Peter Fisher]], suspended Lloyd's secondary appointment in physics, writing on February 4 that he "will no longer be able to supervise new graduate students, attend Departmental events or serve on Departmental committees."[^9]
Provost [[Martin A. Schmidt]] announced on December 18, 2020 the result of a two-stage faculty review. A panel of five senior faculty chaired by the dean of science, [[Nergis Mavalvala]], and including [[Daron Acemoglu]], found by majority that in accepting the 2012 donations Lloyd had violated MIT's conflict of interest policy "by failing to inform MIT that Epstein was a convicted sex offender," and thereby its policy on faculty misconduct. The full panel found that he had not violated MIT policy in accepting the 2005 or 2006 gift or the 2017 donation, did not find "that Professor Lloyd tried to circumvent the MIT vetting process nor that he sought to conceal the name of the donor," but concluded that he "failed to reveal crucial information about Epstein's background to anyone at MIT." For five years MIT limited his compensation, "his ability to engage in solicitation of donors and foundations, and his involvement in first-year undergraduate advising," and required training on professional conduct before he resumed certain activities, including teaching. Schmidt wrote: "These steps cannot undo the harm done. Professor Lloyd's failure to share what he knew about Epstein's conviction when he accepted his 2012 donations was unacceptable."[^3]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Goodwin Procter LLP. *Report Concerning Jeffrey Epstein's Interactions with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.* January 10, 2020, pp. 3-5, 10, 20-21 and nn. 5, 22-24. https://facultygovernance.mit.edu/sites/default/files/20200121GoodwinProcterReport.pdf
[^2]: "MIT releases results of fact-finding on engagements with Jeffrey Epstein." *MIT News,* January 10, 2020. https://news.mit.edu/2020/mit-releases-results-fact-finding-report-jeffrey-epstein-0110
[^3]: Schmidt, Martin A., Provost. "Decision on Professor Seth Lloyd." Massachusetts Institute of Technology, December 18, 2020. https://orgchart.mit.edu/letters/decision-professor-seth-lloyd
[^4]: Aldhous, Peter. "Jeffrey Epstein's Links To Scientists Are Even More Extensive Than We Thought," *BuzzFeed News,* August 27, 2019. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/jeffrey-epstein-science-donations-apologies-statements
[^5]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA01256065, DataSet 9, email from Jeffrey Epstein, April 27, 2009 (JPMorgan production, SDNY_GM_00077146); EFTA02816457, Court Records, Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904 (S.D.N.Y.), Exhibit 270, ECF No. 285-97 (filed August 15, 2023). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01256065.pdf ; https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank%2C%20N.A.%2C%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02816457.pdf
[^6]: Aldhous, Peter. "Jeffrey Epstein's Links To Scientists Are Even More Extensive Than We Thought," *BuzzFeed News,* August 27, 2019, on the 2012 photographs from an archived Epstein foundation website. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/jeffrey-epstein-science-donations-apologies-statements
[^7]: Goodwin Procter LLP. *Report Concerning Jeffrey Epstein's Interactions with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.* January 10, 2020, pp. 27-28, on the jeffreyepstein.net website claims. https://facultygovernance.mit.edu/sites/default/files/20200121GoodwinProcterReport.pdf
[^8]: Lloyd, Seth. "What I told MIT about Epstein's donations." *Medium,* January 16, 2020 (archived January 21, 2020). https://web.archive.org/web/20200121034304/https://medium.com/@sqlloyd/what-i-told-mit-about-epsteins-donations-feec0beb26a
[^9]: "Physics department suspends Seth Lloyd's secondary appointment." *The Tech,* February 13, 2020. https://thetech.com/2020/02/13/seth-lloyd-secondary-appointment-suspended

View file

@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Towers Financial Corporation operated as a debt-collection business that bought
To finance attempted corporate takeovers, Hoffenberg directed Towers to acquire, through a controlling interest in [[United Diversified Corporation]], two Illinois insurance companies, United Fire Insurance Co. and Associated Life Insurance Co., in 1987, and prosecutors later found their reserves were looted in the broader fraud.[^1][^2] The Illinois Department of Insurance, then directed by [[James Schacht]], placed the insurers into liquidation and brought a 1991 civil suit that named Jeffrey Epstein in connection with checks drawn on the companies' accounts.[^1]
The scheme operated between roughly 1988 and 1993; Hoffenberg later described it to CBS News as "a billion dollars in raising money. And it was criminal."[^1] The SEC charged Towers, Hoffenberg, [[Mitchell Brater]] and [[Arthur J. Ferro]] in February 1993 (93 Civ. 0744 (WK), S.D.N.Y.), later obtaining a consent judgment against Hoffenberg, and the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in March 1993.[^3][^5] He was indicted in the Northern District of Illinois on April 19, 1994 and in the Southern District of New York on April 20, 1994, and on April 20, 1995 he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud, mail fraud, conspiracy to obstruct justice and tax evasion (94 Cr. 213 (RWS), 95 Cr. 321 (RWS)). Judge [[Robert W. Sweet]] issued his sentencing opinion on March 4, 1997 and entered judgment on March 7, 1997: 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, a one million dollar fine and restitution of 475,157,340 dollars, the total of noteholder and bondholder claims the Bankruptcy Court had validated in April 1996.[^2][^7] The prosecution was led by Daniel Nardello, who went into private practice soon afterward.[^1] He served about 18 years and was released from federal custody on October 11, 2013.[^3][^7]
The scheme operated between roughly 1988 and 1993; Hoffenberg later described it to CBS News as "a billion dollars in raising money. And it was criminal."[^1] The SEC charged Towers, Hoffenberg, [[Mitchell Brater]] and [[Arthur J. Ferro]] in February 1993 (93 Civ. 0744 (WK), S.D.N.Y.), later obtaining a consent judgment against Hoffenberg, and the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in March 1993.[^3][^5] He was indicted in the Northern District of Illinois on April 19, 1994 and in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]] on April 20, 1994, and on April 20, 1995 he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud, mail fraud, conspiracy to obstruct justice and tax evasion (94 Cr. 213 (RWS), 95 Cr. 321 (RWS)). Judge [[Robert W. Sweet]] issued his sentencing opinion on March 4, 1997 and entered judgment on March 7, 1997: 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, a one million dollar fine and restitution of 475,157,340 dollars, the total of noteholder and bondholder claims the Bankruptcy Court had validated in April 1996.[^2][^7] The prosecution was led by Daniel Nardello, who went into private practice soon afterward.[^1] He served about 18 years and was released from federal custody on October 11, 2013.[^3][^7]
Hoffenberg swore in 2018 that "during the course of my criminal trial, Prosecutors offered me a reduced sentence in exchange for information about Epstein's role. However, I did not disclose any details about Epstein's involvement." His lawyer [[Gary Baise]] said Sweet asked him, "Why did he not give up Epstein?", and told the [[The Philadelphia Inquirer|Philadelphia Inquirer]], "The judge asked me the same question. I couldn't answer that." Epstein's lawyers wrote in 2016 that at a December 2013 conference in the criminal case "Judge Sweet stated he was unaware of Epstein." Hoffenberg told CBS News in 2019: "I didn't take that opportunity and I was wrong," saying he had not wanted to fight Epstein because of his powerful relationships and political connections.[^1][^2][^8][^9]

View file

@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Epstein himself had received an agreed eighteen-month state sentence under the 2
### The Directory at the Maxwell Trial
A copy of the same contact book was admitted as Government Exhibit 52 at the 2021 trial of [[Ghislaine Maxwell]] in the Southern District of New York, over defense objections, after its authentication by another former Palm Beach house manager, [[Juan Alessi]], on December 8, 2021.[^4]
A copy of the same contact book was admitted as Government Exhibit 52 at the 2021 trial of [[Ghislaine Maxwell]] in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]], over defense objections, after its authentication by another former Palm Beach house manager, [[Juan Alessi]], on December 8, 2021.[^4]
### Footnotes

View file

@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ summary: "Anthony Pasciuto was the Deputy Director of the Executive Office of U.
Anthony Pasciuto was the Deputy Director of the Executive Office of U.S. Trustees (EOUST) within the [[Department of Justice|DOJ]]. He became a central figure in [[INSLAW|Inslaw]]'s allegations of a plot to convert its bankruptcy to a liquidation and a subsequent cover-up.
Inslaw's primary allegation stemmed from a private conversation [[Bill Hamilton]] and [[Nancy Hamilton]] had with Pasciuto in March 1987. According to Nancy Hamilton's later testimony, Pasciuto told them that the Director of EOUST, [[Thomas Stanton]], had pressured the U.S. Trustee assigned to the [[INSLAW]] case, [[William White]], to convert the case to Chapter 7. Pasciuto also allegedly told the Hamiltons that Stanton had tried to detail a talented attorney from the U.S. Trustee's Office in the Southern District of New York, [[Harry Jones]], to Washington D.C., to work on converting the Inslaw case. This allegation was initially supported by the deposition testimony of [[Cornelius Blackshear]], then a U.S. Bankruptcy Judge, who swore that White had told him Stanton wanted the Inslaw case converted and a particular attorney from Blackshear's office assigned to handle it.[^1]
Inslaw's primary allegation stemmed from a private conversation [[Bill Hamilton]] and [[Nancy Hamilton]] had with Pasciuto in March 1987. According to Nancy Hamilton's later testimony, Pasciuto told them that the Director of EOUST, [[Thomas Stanton]], had pressured the U.S. Trustee assigned to the [[INSLAW]] case, [[William White]], to convert the case to Chapter 7. Pasciuto also allegedly told the Hamiltons that Stanton had tried to detail a talented attorney from the U.S. Trustee's Office in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]], [[Harry Jones]], to Washington D.C., to work on converting the Inslaw case. This allegation was initially supported by the deposition testimony of [[Cornelius Blackshear]], then a U.S. Bankruptcy Judge, who swore that White had told him Stanton wanted the Inslaw case converted and a particular attorney from Blackshear's office assigned to handle it.[^1]
However, Pasciuto's testimony and statements were found to be highly unreliable by the Special Counsel's investigation. Pasciuto himself testified during the Independent Handling hearing that no one had ever told him Stanton pressured White to convert the case, and he had no personal knowledge of the subject. He admitted that if he did tell the Hamiltons of such pressure, it was because he was very upset and would have done anything, including exaggerating and making things up, to hurt Stanton, his boss, with whom he was having problems. Pasciuto later changed his story, claiming that his initial statements to the Hamiltons were true and that his trial testimony was influenced by pressure from the DOJ and the lack of corroboration from Blackshear and White.[^1]
The Special Counsel's investigation concluded that Pasciuto's statements were unreliable because he never claimed first-hand knowledge, he contradicted his own prior sworn testimony, and his later statements were often vague impressions without corroboration. The investigation also noted that Pasciuto's later claims were made after the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) recommended his termination for admitting he made false statements to the Hamiltons to harm Stanton. OPR concluded that Pasciuto's conduct, in providing false information to harm his superior, did not qualify him as a whistleblower, and his termination was appropriate. The Special Counsel found insufficient evidence to support the allegations that the DOJ planned or attempted to convert Inslaw's bankruptcy case or engaged in any cover-up.[^1]
The Special Counsel's investigation concluded that Pasciuto's statements were unreliable because he never claimed first-hand knowledge, he contradicted his own prior sworn testimony, and his later statements were often vague impressions without corroboration. The investigation also noted that Pasciuto's later claims were made after the [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] (OPR) recommended his termination for admitting he made false statements to the Hamiltons to harm Stanton. OPR concluded that Pasciuto's conduct, in providing false information to harm his superior, did not qualify him as a whistleblower, and his termination was appropriate. The Special Counsel found insufficient evidence to support the allegations that the DOJ planned or attempted to convert Inslaw's bankruptcy case or engaged in any cover-up.[^1]
### Footnotes

View file

@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Gilberto Rodríguez Orejuela and his brother [[Miguel Rodriguez Orejuela|Miguel]
Rodríguez Orejuela was arrested in [[Spain]] in November 1984 and extradited from Spain to [[Colombia]] in 1986; while he was in a Spanish prison he met the lawyer William Moran, who was visiting another client, [[Jorge Luis Ochoa]], and who represented the brothers in the [[United States]] from then on. He was indicted in the mid-1980s in the Eastern District of Louisiana, and the United States asked Colombia to extradite him; in 1990 the Colombian Supreme Court declared the extradition treaty with the United States unconstitutional. He was added to the Miami case *United States v. Austin* by a superseding indictment of September 28, 1994. As of 1997 he had never appeared before an American court.[^2] According to [[Cheri Seymour]], he and [[Jose Santacruz Londono|José Santacruz Londoño]] had been targets of the [[DEA]]'s Centac 21 task force, which obtained indictments in [[Los Angeles]] and New York in 1978 that went no further; the task force was disbanded, and some DEA agents suspected a [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]] connection. She also wrote that he led a delegation to a "cocaine summit conference" in [[Panama City]] in the early 1980s, that his name was later removed from DEA reports, and that he owned the Northside Bank of Miami.[^1]
He and Miguel were imprisoned in Colombia in 1995 and continued to run the cartel from prison through Miguel's son, William Rodríguez Abadía, who pleaded guilty in Miami on March 8, 2006. After Colombia lifted its ban on extraditing nationals in 1997, investigations in Miami and New York produced new charges covering conduct after that date; Gilberto was extradited in December 2004 and Miguel in March 2005. On September 26, 2006, before Judge Federico A. Moreno in the Southern District of Florida, each pleaded guilty to conspiring to import five kilograms or more of cocaine, admitting responsibility for more than 200,000 kilograms smuggled between about 1990 and July 2002, and each was sentenced to thirty years. They agreed to a forfeiture judgment of 2.1 billion dollars, and 28 relatives agreed to give up their interests in the family's businesses, including the Drogas La Rebaja pharmacy chain, in exchange for eligibility to be removed from the Treasury's list of Specially Designated Narcotics Traffickers; the government agreed not to prosecute six of them. The Miami case, prosecuted under U.S. Attorney [[Alexander Acosta|R. Alexander Acosta]], grew out of Operation Cornerstone, an investigation begun in August 1991 after the discovery of more than 12,000 kilograms of cocaine in a cargo of cement posts at the port of Miami.[^4] The New York money-laundering charge, transferred to Miami, brought a further 87 months, concurrent with the thirty-year term, on November 17, 2006.[^5]
He and Miguel were imprisoned in Colombia in 1995 and continued to run the cartel from prison through Miguel's son, William Rodríguez Abadía, who pleaded guilty in Miami on March 8, 2006. After Colombia lifted its ban on extraditing nationals in 1997, investigations in Miami and New York produced new charges covering conduct after that date; Gilberto was extradited in December 2004 and Miguel in March 2005. On September 26, 2006, before Judge Federico A. Moreno in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida|Southern District of Florida]], each pleaded guilty to conspiring to import five kilograms or more of cocaine, admitting responsibility for more than 200,000 kilograms smuggled between about 1990 and July 2002, and each was sentenced to thirty years. They agreed to a forfeiture judgment of 2.1 billion dollars, and 28 relatives agreed to give up their interests in the family's businesses, including the Drogas La Rebaja pharmacy chain, in exchange for eligibility to be removed from the Treasury's list of Specially Designated Narcotics Traffickers; the government agreed not to prosecute six of them. The Miami case, prosecuted under U.S. Attorney [[Alexander Acosta|R. Alexander Acosta]], grew out of Operation Cornerstone, an investigation begun in August 1991 after the discovery of more than 12,000 kilograms of cocaine in a cargo of cement posts at the port of Miami.[^4] The New York money-laundering charge, transferred to Miami, brought a further 87 months, concurrent with the thirty-year term, on November 17, 2006.[^5]
### The Lawyers

View file

@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- HenrySmock
- VirginIslands
- JeffreyEpstein
- EconomicDevelopmentCommission
- LittleStJames
- AlbertBryan
- TaxIncentives
alias:
- Henry Smock, Esq.
- Attorney Smock
summary: "St. Thomas lawyer and former territorial judge who helped Epstein buy Little St. James, counseled the board that granted his tax benefits, and was Governor Bryan's proposed mediator for the estate settlement."
location: "St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands"
relations:
- type: represented
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
role: "assisted the purchase of Little St. James"
start: 1998
fn: 1
- type: contractor_to
with: "[[Economic Development Commission]]"
role: "legal counsel at the Southern Trust Company public hearing"
start: 2012-11-15
fn: 2
- type: member_of
with: "[[University of the Virgin Islands]]"
role: "board of trustees"
fn: 3
- type: represented
with: "[[Albert Bryan]]"
role: "counsel in the governor's divorce; obtained an order sealing the records"
start: 2023
fn: 1
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Henry Smock is a lawyer in [[St. Thomas]], [[U.S. Virgin Islands]], and a former judge of the Territorial Court of the Virgin Islands. He assisted [[Jeffrey Epstein]] in the 1998 purchase of [[Little St. James]] and served for years as counsel to the board of the [[Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority]], which oversees the [[Economic Development Commission]] program that granted Epstein's companies their tax exemptions; in November 2012 he swore in Epstein at the public hearing on [[Southern Trust Company]]'s application. According to [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] notes of a 2023 interview with the former Attorney General [[Denise George]], Governor [[Albert Bryan]] told her to settle the territory's suit against Epstein's estate and to "select Henry Smock" as mediator. Smock later represented Bryan in his divorce.[^1][^2]
### Legal Career in the Territory
A biography of Smock, circulated in October 2011, states that he graduated from [[Rutgers University]], came to the Virgin Islands in 1970, received his law degree from the [[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]] and was admitted to the Virgin Islands bar in 1975, served as a judge of the Territorial Court from 1987 to 1993, was a partner of Smock & Moorehead, and was a former chairman of the territory's Law Revision Commission and a former president of the Virgin Islands Bar Association. He served on the board of trustees of the [[University of the Virgin Islands]].[^3]
### The Governor's Wife's List
On October 19, 2011 [[Cecile de Jongh]], wife of Governor [[John de Jongh]] and listed as office manager of Epstein's Virgin Islands companies,[^4] sent Epstein ("JEE") an email headed "RT Park Directors," profiling candidates for the board of the University of the Virgin Islands Research and Technology Park. She closed several entries with her own notes. Of the university's president, David Hall, she wrote, "DO NOT KNOW HIM THAT WELL AND HE IS NEW TO THE VI"; of the university board chairman, Alex Moorhead, a retired vice president for government affairs of the [[HOVENSA]] refinery, "I HAVE KNOWN HIM FOR YEARS - QUIET AND CONSERVATIVE"; and of the park's executive director, "DO NOT KNOW HIM THAT WELL." Three entries, including Smock's, ended with the word "FRIEND." The email closed: "John has two other appointments to make."[^3]
### Counsel to the Commission
The Economic Development Commission held a public hearing on Southern Trust Company's application on November 15, 2012, in the Port Authority conference room on St. Thomas, with Albert Bryan, then its chairman, presiding. The staff present were listed as including "HENRY SMOCK, ESQ., Legal Counsel." At the chair's request, the transcript records, "Erika Kellerhals, Esq. and Jeffrey Epstein were duly sworn in by Attorney Smock." [[Erika Kellerhals]] presented Epstein as "the President of Southern Trust," a company that would provide "consulting services to companies around the world" using "biomedical and financial informatics," and asked for a waiver of the employment requirement to five employees for five years. Epstein told the commission that "Places, frankly, like St. [Thomas] are the perfect place to sequence people because it's so isolated."[^2]
When commissioner Millin Maduro asked legal counsel how the governor's veto of pending legislation on minimum employment would affect the application, Smock answered, "So we'll be dealing with the old legislation." Bryan said, "But the law allows for us to waive the employment in any case," and Smock replied, "If we wish." When Maduro proposed noting the waiver on the record so the applicant would not need to return for a modification hearing, Smock said, "I believe it's already a part of the application."[^2] Southern Trust received a ten-year package of exemptions from February 2013.[^4]
After Epstein's arrest in July 2019, Smock was part of the authority's nine-step protocol for answering press inquiries about Epstein's tax benefits.[^1] In the Virgin Islands' suit against [[JPMorgan Chase]], the bank's supplemental initial disclosures of August and September 2023 listed Smock as a person with knowledge of "Economic development tax incentives received or requested by Jeffrey Epstein."[^5]
### The Mediator Proposal
The territory's suit against Epstein's estate was filed by Attorney General George in 2020. In an interview with the FBI on October 2, 2023, released by the [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]] on January 30, 2026, George said that Bryan's "original tone of 'Go for it' changed to 'End it quickly,'" and that he told her to settle with the estate for 80 million dollars "and to pursue mediation and select Henry Smock" as mediator, saying "that the Epstein estate just wanted to clear people." She said Bryan sent [[Carlton Dowe]], director of the [[Virgin Islands Port Authority]], to press her, and that Dowe told her it "would be political suicide to fire her at least before the election."[^1] The estate settled on November 30, 2022 for more than 105 million dollars, with a share of the proceeds of any sale of Little St. James.[^6] Bryan removed George at the end of December 2022, days after she filed the territory's suit against JPMorgan. Bryan has said Epstein received no special privilege from his administration.[^1][^7]
### The Divorce
Bryan filed for divorce in 2023 after 27 years of marriage. Smock represented him and obtained an order sealing the case records.[^1] Smock has not been accused of any wrongdoing, and no public statement by him on these matters has been found.
### Footnotes
[^1]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Docs confirm Bryan pressed for special treatment of sex offender." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 2, 2026. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/docs-confirm-bryan-pressed-for-special-treatment-of-sex-offender/article_5e9483c9-38d2-406c-8bb0-e5757ce287f2.html (reporting on FBI notes of an October 2, 2023 interview with Denise George, released January 30, 2026; Smock's role in the 1998 purchase, as EDA board counsel and in the press protocol; the Bryan divorce).
[^2]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02812344, Court Records, Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904 (S.D.N.Y.), Exhibit 290, ECF No. 245-15 (filed July 25, 2023): Government of the Virgin Islands, Economic Development Commission, Public Hearing transcript, November 15, 2012, pp. 1-2, 6-9, 30-32 (VI-JPM-000016206 to 16237). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank%2C%20N.A.%2C%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02812344.pdf
[^3]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00720076, DataSet 9, email from Cecile de Jongh to "JEE," "RT Park Directors," October 19, 2011 (duplicate EFTA02035483, DataSet 10). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00720076.pdf
[^4]: Suzanne Carlson, "Epstein estate could be ordered to repay more than $144 million in tax breaks," *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 13, 2020, reproduced as Exhibit 36, ECF No. 158-36 (filed May 23, 2023), in Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.). http://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/epstein-estate-could-be-ordered-to-repay-more-than-144-million-in-tax-breaks/article_b84d9710-14af-5e69-a890-bcf8265cf8f9.html
[^5]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02817422, Court Records, Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904 (S.D.N.Y.), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s Fifth Supplemental Initial Disclosures, Exhibit 70 (filed August 25, 2023); EFTA02818510, same, Exhibit 56, ECF No. 326-56 (filed September 8, 2023). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank%2C%20N.A.%2C%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02817422.pdf ; https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank%2C%20N.A.%2C%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02818510.pdf
[^6]: "U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General Settles Sex Trafficking Case Against Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and Co-Defendants for Over $105 Million." *Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Justice,* December 1, 2022. https://usvidoj.com/u-s-virgin-islands-attorney-general-settles-sex-trafficking-case-against-estate-of-jeffrey-epstein-and-co-defendants-for-over-105-million/
[^7]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Bryan unapologetic for texts with Epstein, doubles down on denial of wrongdoing." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* March 3, 2026. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/bryan-unapologetic-for-texts-with-epstein-doubles-down-on-denial-of-wrongdoing/article_8bab46a1-6075-4c7c-abec-6efb19622e62.html

View file

@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- JedRakoff
- FederalJudge
- SouthernDistrictOfNewYork
- JPMorganChase
- JeffreyEpstein
- SEC
- Citigroup
alias:
- Jed S. Rakoff
- Jed Saul Rakoff
- Judge Rakoff
- Judge Jed Rakoff
- Jed Rakoff
summary: "Former chief of securities fraud prosecutions in Manhattan, appointed a federal judge by Bill Clinton, who rejected the SEC's Citigroup settlement in 2011 and presided over the 2023 Epstein suits against JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank."
born: 1943
location: "Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (born)"
relations:
- type: appointed
with: "[[Bill Clinton]]"
reverse: true
role: "U.S. District Judge, Southern District of New York"
start: 1996-01-04
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York]]"
role: "Assistant U.S. Attorney; chief, business and securities fraud prosecutions"
start: 1973
end: 1980
fn: 1
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Jed S. Rakoff (born 1943, in [[Philadelphia]]) is a senior judge of the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]], nominated by [[Bill Clinton]] in 1995, who was earlier chief of business and securities fraud prosecutions in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office]]. In 2011 he refused to approve the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]]'s 285 million dollar settlement with [[Citigroup]], calling the penalty "pocket change." In 2022 and 2023 he presided over the three consolidated suits against [[JPMorgan Chase]] and [[Deutsche Bank]] arising from their banking for [[Jeffrey Epstein]], including [[Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank]], which JPMorgan settled in 2023 for 75 million dollars.[^1][^2][^3]
### Career
Rakoff graduated from [[Swarthmore College]] in 1964, received an M.Phil. from [[Balliol College]], [[University of Oxford|Oxford]], in 1966, and a J.D. from [[Harvard Law School]] in 1969. He clerked for Judge Abraham Freedman of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit|Third Circuit]] from 1969 to 1970, practiced in New York from 1970 to 1972, and was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York from 1973 to 1980, the last two years as chief of business and securities fraud prosecutions. He returned to private practice from 1980 to 1995. Clinton nominated him on October 11, 1995 to the seat vacated by David N. Edelstein; he was confirmed on December 29, 1995, commissioned on January 4, 1996, and took senior status on December 31, 2010.[^1]
In a case brought by a [[Drug Enforcement Administration]] sting in which agents posed as representatives of the [[FARC]], Rakoff presided over the trial of the Syrian arms dealer [[Monzer Al-Kassar]], who was convicted in November 2008 of conspiring to provide material support to a designated terrorist organization and to kill Americans, and sentenced on February 24, 2009 to 30 years.[^4]
### SEC v. Citigroup
On November 28, 2011 Rakoff rejected a proposed consent judgment under which Citigroup Global Markets would pay 285 million dollars to settle the SEC's October 19, 2011 suit accusing it of "a substantial securities fraud" in connection with mortgage-backed securities (827 F. Supp. 2d 328). He held that the proposed judgment was "neither fair, nor reasonable, nor adequate, nor in the public interest," wrote that the SEC's "long-standing policy" of letting defendants settle without admitting the allegations was "hallowed by history, but not by reason," wrote that the proposed penalty was "pocket change to any entity as large as Citigroup," and that an application of judicial power "that does not rest on facts is worse than mindless, it is inherently dangerous." He tied the case to the related SEC v. Stoker, "currently scheduled to commence trial on July 16, 2012." The SEC and Citigroup appealed, and a [[Second Circuit]] panel decided the appeals on June 4, 2014 (752 F.3d 285); Judge [[Raymond J. Lohier Jr.]], concurring, wrote that the majority had made clear that district courts assessing a proposed consent decree "should consider principally four factors."[^2][^5]
### The Epstein Bank Cases
On December 27, 2022 the [[Government of the United States Virgin Islands]] sued JPMorgan before Rakoff; on December 29 he consolidated the case "for all pretrial purposes" with the suits of a pseudonymous victim against Deutsche Bank (22-cv-10018) and JPMorgan (22-cv-10019), under one case management plan. He decided the motions to dismiss in all three cases in a single "bottom-line" order on March 20, 2023, explained on May 1; refused on April 10 to sever the bank's third-party claims against its former executive [[Jes Staley]]; admitted [[Paul Cassell]] pro hac vice for the victims on May 2; and on August 18, 2023 denied Staley's motion to dismiss "in its entirety."[^3]
In June 2023 the territory's counsel, [[Motley Rice]], wrote to Rakoff that JPMorgan's late-produced internal review, "Project Jeep," confirmed "more than four pages of Epstein referrals to JPMorgan," including [[Bill Gates]] and [[Peter Mandelson]], and asked to recall chief executive [[Jamie Dimon]]. In August 2023 Rakoff ordered production of records concerning newly identified women Epstein had paid, but denied the request "to compel production of all documents and information concerning 'Project Jeep' or other investigations by JPMorgan that occurred after Epstein's 2019 arrest."[^6]
JPMorgan settled the victims' class for 290 million dollars in June 2023, which Rakoff approved in November, and the territory for 75 million dollars in September 2023. Rakoff closed the territory's case on October 18, 2023. On November 22 he ordered JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank to pay the [[Epstein Victims' Compensation Program]] 563,365.51 dollars and 187,788.50 dollars respectively for the cost of complying with their subpoenas. On June 28, 2024 he denied a motion by six Jane Does to intervene in the closed case for access to sealed filings, and on motions by [[The New York Times]] and [[The Wall Street Journal]] he unsealed parts of the summary judgment record on July 30, 2024 and October 24, 2025.[^3][^7]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Federal Judicial Center, "Rakoff, Jed Saul," Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges. https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/rakoff-jed-saul
[^2]: Opinion and Order, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., No. 11 Civ. 7387 (JSR), 827 F. Supp. 2d 328 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 28, 2011) (Rakoff, J.). https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8710930/us-securities-exchange-commission-v-citigroup-global-markets-inc/
[^3]: Docket, Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), ECF Nos. 1, 5, 90, 117, 130, 131, 293, 348, 351, 366, 367, 381, CourtListener docket 66683865. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66683865/government-of-the-united-states-virgin-islands-v-jpmorgan-chase-bank-na/
[^4]: U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, "International Arms Trafficker Monzer Al Kassar and Associate Sentenced on Terrorism Charges," press release, February 24, 2009. https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/nys/pressreleases/February09/kassarsentencingpr.pdf ; United States v. Monzer al-Kassar and Luis Felipe Moreno Godoy, No. 07 Cr. 354 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.).
[^5]: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Nos. 11-5227-cv(L), 11-5375-cv(con), 11-5242-cv(xap), 752 F.3d 285 (2d Cir. June 4, 2014), Lohier, J., concurring. https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8441747/united-states-securities-exchange-commission-v-citigroup-global-markets/
[^6]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02808715, Court Records (Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904), letter motion of Motley Rice to Judge Jed S. Rakoff seeking leave to reopen depositions, ECF No. 191, June 7, 2023, pp. 3-5. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank%2C%20N.A.%2C%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02808715.pdf ; U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02814941, Court Records (same case), Order of Judge Jed S. Rakoff on Dkt. 212, August 2023. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank%2C%20N.A.%2C%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02814941.pdf
[^7]: "JPMorgan Chase and Epstein survivor Jane Doe 1 reach $290 million settlement," *NPR,* June 12, 2023. https://www.npr.org/2023/06/12/1181675580/epstein-jane-doe-1-290-million-settlement-jpmorgan-chase ; "JPMorgan's $290 million settlement with Epstein accusers wins approval by U.S. judge," *CNBC / Reuters,* November 9, 2023. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/09/jpmorgans-290-million-settlement-with-epstein-accusers-wins-approval-by-us-judge.html ; "JPMorgan Chase settles Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking suit by U.S. Virgin Islands for $75 million," *CNBC,* September 26, 2023. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/26/jpmorgan-to-settle-jeffrey-epstein-suit-by-virgin-islands.html

View file

@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- JeffreyEpstein
- NonProsecutionAgreement
- Prosecutor
- DepartmentOfJustice
- RevolvingDoor
alias:
- Jeffrey Sloman
- Jeffrey H. Sloman
- Jeff Sloman
summary: "First Assistant U.S. Attorney in Miami during the Epstein non-prosecution agreement, who negotiated its addendum, supervised the case after Acosta's recusal, then led the office before entering white-collar defense practice."
location: "Miami, Florida"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]]"
role: "Assistant U.S. Attorney; Chief, Criminal Division; First Assistant U.S. Attorney"
start: 1990
end: 2010-06
fn: 1
- type: head_of
with: "[[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]]"
role: "Acting, then Interim U.S. Attorney"
start: 2009-06
end: 2010-06
fn: 1
- type: investigated
with: "[[Office of Professional Responsibility]]"
reverse: true
start: 2019-02-06
end: 2020-11
fn: 2
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Stumphauzer Kolaya Nadler & Sloman]]"
role: "partner"
fn: 4
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Jeffrey H. Sloman is an American lawyer who spent twenty years as a federal prosecutor in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]], serving as First Assistant U.S. Attorney under [[Alexander Acosta]] from October 2006 while the office negotiated the [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]] with [[Jeffrey Epstein]]. He personally negotiated and signed the agreement's October 2007 addendum, became the senior official supervising the Epstein matter when Acosta was recused in late 2008 over employment talks with Epstein's law firm, and then led the office as Acting and Interim U.S. Attorney until June 2010. He later practiced white-collar defense in [[Miami]]. The [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]]'s [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] named him one of five subjects of its 2019 to 2020 investigation and found no professional misconduct.[^1][^2]
### Career in the Office
Sloman joined the office in 1990 as a line prosecutor. In 2001 he became deputy chief of the Narcotics and Violent Crimes Section of the [[Fort Lauderdale]] branch, in 2003 its managing Assistant U.S. Attorney, and in early 2004 chief of the office's Criminal Division, the post he held in July 2006 when the line prosecutor [[Ann Marie Villafana|A. Marie Villafaña]] briefed him and Acosta on the new Epstein case. Acosta announced his appointment as First Assistant in September 2006, and he took office in October with a suite beside Acosta's in the Miami executive offices, supervising the Civil, Criminal and Appellate Divisions. His firm biography credits him with nearly 50 criminal trials to verdict, including "the prosecution of the largest Ponzi scheme in Florida history" and "the first post-September 11, 2001 prosecution of two radical Islamic fundamentalists."[^1][^3][^4]
### The Investigation Opens, 2006
On July 24, 2006 Villafaña told Sloman that the [[Palm Beach County]] State Attorney's Office under [[Barry Krischer]] had charged and arrested Epstein, and the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] formally opened its case the same day. Sloman emailed Lourie that Operation Leap Year was "a highly sensitive case involving some [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]] rich guy." When Acosta asked whether it was "appropriate to approach [State Attorney Krischer] and give him a heads up re where we might go?", Sloman replied, "No for fear that it will be leaked straight to Epstein." He told OPR that he did not recall what he meant, but that it was likely "we didn't trust the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office" and that there might have been "some type of relationship between somebody in the [State Attorney's Office] and the defense team." When Lourie asked in August whether Sloman and Acosta wanted Villafaña "updating you on the case," Sloman answered, "At this point, I don't really care." In early November 2006 Sloman joined, at Villafaña's request, a telephone call in which a former U.S. Attorney for the district made an overture on Epstein's behalf.[^5]
### The Epstein Investigation, 2007
OPR found that Sloman "had relatively little involvement in the decisions and negotiations that led to the NPA and did not review it before it was signed." He told OPR that he had not done a "granular review" of Villafaña's proposed charges but believed [[Matthew Menchel]] and [[Andrew Lourie]] had, and had "obviously" concluded that "the facts and the law didn't suggest that the right thing to do was to automatically indict." When Villafaña asked him on May 15, 2007 whether "pestering Alex will not do any good," he answered "Yes," and when she asked on May 21 for "a sense of the direction where we are headed," he answered "Taken care of," a remark he could not explain to OPR.[^1][^6]
Epstein's defense team included lawyers with personal ties to the office's managers. Sloman told OPR that he knew Lourie was friends with a former U.S. Attorney for the district who represented Epstein and with that lawyer's law partner, but that his own attitude toward former colleagues on the other side "was that we would give them process, but we didn't pull any punches with them."[^7]
### The Addendum
The agreement signed on September 24, 2007 let the government select an attorney representative for the victims' damages claims, subject to the approval of Epstein's counsel. When [[Jay Lefkowitz]] objected in early October to the representative Villafaña had proposed, she was on sick leave, and Sloman and Acosta exchanged emails about an addendum. The "Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement" was signed by Sloman for the office on October 29 and 30, 2007. Acosta wrote in a December 2007 letter that he had "sua sponte proposed the Addendum to Mr. Lefkowitz at an October meeting in Palm Beach," the breakfast of October 12; OPR recorded that "Sloman and Lefkowitz had been working on language for the Addendum before Acosta's breakfast meeting with Lefkowitz." When Lefkowitz later wrote that Acosta had promised at the breakfast not to intervene with the State Attorney's Office, contact witnesses or claimants, or intervene on Epstein's sentence, Sloman drafted a reply: "[S]uch a promise equates to the imposition of a gag order. Our Office cannot and will not agree to this." OPR found no evidence that the reply was sent.[^1][^8][^9]
In late November 2007 Sloman moved to notify victims under the [[Justice for All Act of 2004]]. Lefkowitz objected that victims should not be invited to the state sentencing or "encouraged to contact law enforcement officials," and Acosta ordered the letters held. On November 29, 2007 Sloman forwarded an exchange with Lourie recording that the defense "originally agreed to plead to the state felony that they thought was unregisterable (but did not tell us knowing we thought it was), but then discovered they were wrong and tried to get out of it. They tried several times to knock down the jail time after agreeing to the time."[^10][^11]
### Supervising the Sentence
On May 16, 2008, after the Justice Department's Criminal Division rejected Epstein's appeal, Sloman wrote to Villafaña, "We got approved," adding, "Alex called to tell me. He said the ltr needs to be tweaked which we'll do on Monday. I wouldn't call the FBI yet." On November 26, 2008 the office told the Department that Acosta was recused from matters involving [[Kirkland & Ellis]] because he was discussing employment with the firm, and Sloman became the senior official responsible for final decisions on Epstein. [[Roy Black]], forwarding Villafaña's breach notice about Epstein's work release to Sloman, wrote that she "is very concerned about anything Epstein does" and that the defense would "abide by" Sloman's decision.[^12][^13]
In March 2009 Sloman met [[Alan Dershowitz]] in Miami for what Dershowitz called "a relaxed drink and conversation." Dershowitz then thanked him for his "assurance that the feds will not interfere with how the Palm Beach sheriff administers" Epstein's sentence. Sloman replied that the office "will not interfere with how the [[Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office|Palm Beach Sheriff's Office]] administers the sentence imposed by the Court," but that "if contacted for our position concerning alternative custody or in-home detention . . . [t]o be clear, if contacted we will object." A week later Dershowitz thanked him for his "willingness to call the sheriff and advise him that your office would take no position on how he handled Epstein's sentence," adding, "[L]et's put any call off for a while." On June 9, 2009 Villafaña sent Sloman a memorandum titled "Operation Leap Year: Request to Provide Notification of Breach"; no indictment followed. In September 2009 the office told Black it would treat a transfer of Epstein's supervision to the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]] as a violation of the agreement, and three months later Sloman told Dershowitz in person that the office opposed early termination of Epstein's community control.[^10][^13]
### U.S. Attorney
When Acosta left in June 2009 to become dean of the law school at [[Florida International University]], Sloman became Acting U.S. Attorney for the district, and in January 2010 the Attorney General appointed him Interim U.S. Attorney. He left for private practice in June 2010; his firm biography gives his tenure as U.S. Attorney as May 2009 to May 2010. The whole district office was formally recused from the Epstein matter in July and August 2011.[^1][^4][^10]
### Private Practice
Sloman is a partner at the Miami litigation firm [[Stumphauzer Kolaya Nadler & Sloman]], representing individuals and companies in white-collar defense and government enforcement matters. His biography records "a $5 million 'first-of-a-kind' verdict against Philip Morris USA, Inc." and a 1.3 million dollar verdict against [[Wackenhut Corporation|G4S Secure Solutions]], and a "Most Effective Lawyer" award from the Daily Business Review.[^4]
### The OPR Investigation
OPR interviewed Sloman under oath as one of five subjects. In December 2018 Villafaña had written that Sloman once told her that Epstein's lawyer [[Lilly Ann Sanchez]] "asked Mr. Menchel to 'do her a solid'" and convince Acosta to offer two years. Sloman did not recall saying so, said that if he had he could not have meant it seriously, and told OPR: "[I]t's not something that I would have believed. Him doing her a solid. I mean that's the furthest thing from my recollection or impression even after years later." OPR found no evidence that the two-year offer was a favor. Of Villafaña, Sloman told OPR that reports that she "was soft on Epstein . . . couldn't have been further from the truth," and that she "did her best to implement the decisions that were made and to hold Epstein accountable." OPR found no professional misconduct by any subject and faulted only Acosta, for "poor judgment."[^2][^7][^14]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284, Prior DOJ Disclosures, report, Office of Professional Responsibility, "Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation," November 2020, pp. 5 to 6, 89 to 90 and n. 139 (EFTA02847314 to EFTA02847315, EFTA02847398 to EFTA02847399). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Prior%20DOJ%20Disclosures/Memos.%20&%20Correspondence/EFTA02847284.pdf
[^2]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), Executive Summary, pp. vi, ix to x (EFTA02847291, EFTA02847294 to EFTA02847295).
[^3]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), p. 18 and n. 21 (EFTA02847327).
[^4]: Stumphauzer Kolaya Nadler & Sloman, PLLC, "Jeffrey H. Sloman" (firm biography). https://sknlaw.com/litigators/jeffrey-h-sloman/
[^5]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 21 to 22 and nn. 28 to 30 (EFTA02847330 to EFTA02847331).
[^6]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 29 to 30 and n. 46 (EFTA02847338 to EFTA02847339).
[^7]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 150 to 153 (EFTA02847459 to EFTA02847462).
[^8]: Opinion and Order, *Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States*, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla. Feb. 21, 2019), ECF No. 435 (Marra, J.), reported at 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, quoting ECF No. 407. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.435.0.pdf
[^9]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), p. 12, timeline of key events (EFTA02847321), and p. 90 nn. 139, 141 to 142 (EFTA02847399).
[^10]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, privileged chronology of the federal investigation, May 2006 to August 2011, pp. 23 to 29, 45 to 51. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf
[^11]: Opinion and Order, *Doe v. United States* (see note 5), quoting ECF No. 407 at paragraphs 79 to 90.
[^12]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00214486, DataSet 9, email chain, Jeff Sloman and Ann Marie Villafana, "Re: Did u hear?," May 16, 2008. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00214486.pdf
[^13]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 115 to 118 and nn. 183 to 184 (EFTA02847424 to EFTA02847427).
[^14]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 153 to 155, 165 (EFTA02847462 to EFTA02847464, EFTA02847474).

View file

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ tags:
- LawEnforcement
summary: "Head of the Organized Crime Strike Force in Los Angeles who advised investigator Marvin Rudnick that he was under investigation for including MCA in his organized crime probe."
---
[[John Newcomer]] was the new head of the Organized Crime Strike Force in Los Angeles. He advised [[Marvin Rudnick]] that Rudnick was under investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility for including [[Music Corporation of America|MCA]] in his investigation of [[Sal Pisello]].[^1]
[[John Newcomer]] was the new head of the Organized Crime Strike Force in Los Angeles. He advised [[Marvin Rudnick]] that Rudnick was under investigation by the [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] for including [[Music Corporation of America|MCA]] in his investigation of [[Sal Pisello]].[^1]
[[William Hundley]], retained by [[Music Corporation of America|MCA]], discussed the Pisello case with Newcomer and inquired about [[Music Corporation of America|MCA]]'s status in the investigation. Newcomer responded to [[Music Corporation of America|MCA]] that the allegations against Rudnick were a cause of great concern and that steps were being taken to ensure only factually accurate statements appeared in pleadings and oral arguments. He concluded by stating that neither [[Music Corporation of America|MCA]] nor its executives or employees were targets of that case and its attendant investigation.[^1]

View file

@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Recarey was born in Queens, New York, and moved to Florida at 13. He graduated f
The department received the first complaint on March 15, 2005, from the family of a 14-year-old girl, who identified "Jeff" from a photo lineup. Recarey took over as lead detective in September 2005 under Chief [[Michael Reiter]]. Between March 2005 and February 2006 detectives took sworn taped statements from five victims and seventeen witnesses. Recarey's affidavit described [[Haley Robson]], then a teenager herself, bringing girls to [[358 El Brillo Way]] to give Epstein massages in exchange for money, and Epstein's assistant [[Sarah Kellen]] recording the girls' names and telephone numbers. The girls were paid 200 to 1,000 dollars per visit. According to Robson's statement, Epstein told her after her own first visit that "he would pay her if she brought over some girls" and that "the younger the better."[^1][^2]
To corroborate the accounts, detectives obtained trash from Epstein's residence through the supervisor of the Town of Palm Beach sanitation bureau, which corroborated the appointment scheduling; subpoenaed Kellen's cell phone records and matched her calls to victims and witnesses; and subpoenaed the arrival and departure records of Epstein's aircraft at [[Palm Beach International Airport]] from its operator. Calls to the girls clustered "in the days just prior to [Epstein's] arrival or during the time Epstein was in Palm Beach."[^2]
To corroborate the accounts, detectives obtained trash from Epstein's residence through the supervisor of the [[Palm Beach, Florida|Town of Palm Beach]] sanitation bureau, which corroborated the appointment scheduling; subpoenaed Kellen's cell phone records and matched her calls to victims and witnesses; and subpoenaed the arrival and departure records of Epstein's aircraft at [[Palm Beach International Airport]] from its operator. Calls to the girls clustered "in the days just prior to [Epstein's] arrival or during the time Epstein was in Palm Beach."[^2]
The affidavit concluded that there was "sufficient probable cause to charge Jeffrey Epstein with FOUR COUNTS of Unlawful Sexual Activity with a Minor, in violation of Florida State Statute 794.05(1), a second degree felony," as to four girls, and with lewd and lascivious molestation of a 14-year-old under Florida Statute 800.04(5), also a second-degree felony. A companion affidavit sworn the same day sought charges against Kellen as a principal.[^2]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- KennethStarr
- Lawyer
- SolicitorGeneral
- IndependentCounsel
- KirklandAndEllis
- JeffreyEpstein
- NonProsecutionAgreement
- BaylorUniversity
alias:
- Ken Starr
- Kenneth W. Starr
- Kenneth Winston Starr
- Kenneth Starr
summary: "Former Solicitor General and Whitewater independent counsel who, as Kirkland & Ellis of counsel, fought the victim notification terms of Epstein's 2007 agreement and was removed as Baylor president in 2016."
born: 1946-07-21
died: 2022-09-13
location: "Houston, Texas (died)"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Kirkland & Ellis]]"
role: "partner, later of counsel"
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Office of the Solicitor General]]"
role: "Solicitor General of the United States"
start: 1989
end: 1993
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Pepperdine University School of Law]]"
role: "dean"
start: 2004-04-06
fn: 1
- type: head_of
with: "[[Baylor University]]"
role: "president"
end: 2016-05-31
fn: 6
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Kenneth W. Starr (July 21, 1946 to September 13, 2022) was an American lawyer, a former judge of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit|D.C. Circuit]], Solicitor General of the [[United States]] from 1989 to 1993, and the [[Whitewater]] independent counsel. In 2007 and 2008, while dean of the [[Pepperdine University School of Law]] and of counsel to [[Kirkland & Ellis]], he represented [[Jeffrey Epstein]] in the negotiation and aftermath of the [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]], writing to U.S. Attorney [[Alexander Acosta]] that notice to Epstein's victims was "wholly inappropriate" and appealing the agreement to the Deputy Attorney General. On May 26, 2016 the regents of [[Baylor University]] removed him as president after an outside review of the university's response to sexual assault reports.[^1][^2][^3]
### Career
Starr clerked in the 1970s for Judge David W. Dyer of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit|Fifth Circuit]] and for Chief Justice [[Warren E. Burger]]. He served as counselor to Attorney General [[William French Smith]], as a judge of the D.C. Circuit, and as the 39th Solicitor General, from 1989 to 1993 under [[George H.W. Bush]], arguing twenty-five cases before the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]]. In private practice he was a partner at Kirkland & Ellis and at [[Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher]]. As independent counsel on the Whitewater matter he conducted the investigation of President [[Bill Clinton]]. On April 6, 2004 he was appointed dean of Pepperdine's law school.[^1]
### The Epstein Negotiation
Epstein added Starr and [[Jay Lefkowitz]] to his defense in early August 2007, immediately after the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]] presented a term sheet requiring a state guilty plea, incarceration, sex offender registration and civil damages. Starr was then dean of Pepperdine's law school and of counsel to Kirkland & Ellis. Acosta had been an associate at Kirkland a decade earlier and had worked on at least one matter each with Starr and Lefkowitz; a colleague told the Justice Department's [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] that he once entered Acosta's office as Acosta finished a telephone call and Acosta said, "[T]hat was Ken Starr." On August 6, 2007 First Assistant U.S. Attorney [[Jeffrey Sloman]] wrote to Acosta, "I didn't know Kirkland made a call into you. You were right. Unbelievable."[^2]
Starr presented the defense case at Acosta's first meeting with Epstein's lawyers on September 7, 2007, arguing that the matter belonged to the state. Two prosecutors recalled that he addressed himself directly to Acosta and remarked that they were "the only people in this room who have run the [gantlet] of confirmation by the Senate." Acosta did not recall the comment. The agreement was signed on September 24, 2007 by Epstein and his lawyers [[Gerald Lefcourt]] and [[Lilly Ann Sanchez]].[^2][^4]
On November 28, 2007 Starr asked by letter for a meeting with Assistant Attorney General [[Alice Fisher]] of the [[Criminal Division]], arguing that the office had improperly compelled Epstein to pay civil damages under 18 U.S.C. 2255 as part of a state resolution. Acosta wrote to Starr on November 30: "I am directing our prosecutors not to issue victim notification letters until this Friday at 5 p.m., to provide you with time to review these options with your client." In a seven-page letter to Starr of December 4 he wrote that the prosecutors had complained of defense tactics under which, "as soon as resolution is reached on one issue, defense counsel finds ways to challenge the resolution collaterally." On December 5 Starr and Lefkowitz answered that "it is wholly inappropriate for your Office to send this letter under any circumstances," and that it was "certainly inappropriate to issue this letter without affording us the right to review it." No notification letters went out that month.[^2][^5]
On December 7, 2007 Starr and Lefkowitz sent Acosta "independent ethics opinions" by the former U.S. Attorney [[Joe D. Whitley]] and a retired federal judge, and on December 11 Starr transmitted two submissions by Lefkowitz attacking the conduct of the investigation and the line prosecutor, [[Ann Marie Villafana|A. Marie Villafaña]]. Starr's covering letter complained that the government had given "oral notification of the victim notification letter" to the lawyer of a girl whose recorded interview showed she "did not in any manner view herself as a victim." He, [[Alan Dershowitz]], Lefcourt and [[Martin Weinberg]] met Acosta in Miami on December 14, 2007, and on December 17 Starr and Lefkowitz sent Acosta a 110-page letter that invoked the State Attorney's Office's view that Epstein should not have to register as a sex offender.[^2][^4]
### Appeals to Main Justice
In March 2008 Starr told Fisher that the defense would want an audience with her if the [[Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section]] supported prosecution; he, Lefkowitz and Weinberg met the section's chief, [[Drew Oosterbaan]], on March 12, 2008, a session a deputy chief described as a "listening session" in which the defense team said "some outrageous things." Starr then accused Sloman and Villafaña of "encouraging civil litigation" against Epstein. After the section concluded on May 15, 2008 that "federal prosecution in this case would not be improper or inappropriate," Starr and Whitley wrote on May 19 to Deputy Attorney General [[Mark Filip]] asking for review "of the federal involvement in a quintessentially state matter." Their second letter, of May 27, argued that Epstein "entered the public arena only by virtue of his close personal association with former President Bill Clinton" and that the office "never would have contemplated a prosecution in this case if Mr. Epstein were just another 'John.'" It was the first defense submission to mention Clinton.[^2]
Filip told the Office of Professional Responsibility that he had never heard of Epstein before Starr's letter, that the argument that there was no federal basis for prosecution was "ludicrous," and that the claim of political motivation "just seemed unserious." On June 23, 2008 Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General John Roth wrote to Starr and Lefkowitz that "[e]ven if we were to substitute our judgment for that of the U.S. Attorney, we believe that federal prosecution of this case is appropriate." Starr then wrote to Acosta that they had reached "the end of a long and arduous road": "While I am obviously very unhappy at what I believe is the government's treatment of my client, a man whom I have come to deeply admire, I recognize that we have filed and argued our 'appellate motions' and lost." Acosta later wrote that Dershowitz, Starr and Lefkowitz "all sought to make peace" with him after the plea, and called it "a proud moment."[^2]
### Baylor University
Starr became president of Baylor University in [[Waco, Texas|Waco]]. In the fall of 2015 the regents engaged the law firm [[Pepper Hamilton]] to review the university's institutional response under [[Title IX]]. On May 26, 2016 the board announced that "Ken Starr will no longer serve in the role of President of Baylor University effective May 31," that head football coach [[Art Briles]] had been suspended with intent to terminate and athletic director Ian McCaw sanctioned and placed on probation. It reported findings of "a fundamental failure by Baylor to implement Title IX," that "[a]ctions by University administrators directly discouraged some complainants from reporting or participating in student conduct processes and in one instance constituted retaliation against a complainant for reporting sexual assault," and "significant concerns about the tone and culture within Baylor's football program." The board chair, Richard Willis, said: "We were horrified by the extent of these acts of sexual violence on our campus."[^6]
Starr also left the chancellorship in 2016. He later joined [[Donald Trump]]'s defense team for the first impeachment trial in the Senate, and died in [[Houston]] on September 13, 2022 of complications related to surgery.[^3]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Solicitor General, "Solicitor General: Kenneth W. Starr," historical biography (updated September 18, 2023). https://www.justice.gov/osg/bio/kenneth-w-starr
[^2]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284, Prior DOJ Disclosures, Office of Professional Responsibility, report, "Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation," November 2020, pp. 9, 59, 62-63, 94-99, 105-110, 113, 213-215. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Prior%20DOJ%20Disclosures/Memos.%20&%20Correspondence/EFTA02847284.pdf
[^3]: "Ken Starr, former Baylor president and Clinton investigator, dies at 76," *The Texas Tribune,* September 13, 2022. https://www.texastribune.org/2022/09/13/ken-starr-dead-baylor-clinton/
[^4]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, privileged chronology of the federal investigation, pp. 12 to 14, 24 to 29. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf ; U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00013538, DataSet 8, letter, U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to Jay P. Lefkowitz, December 11, 2007, p. 3 ("The agreement itself was signed by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Sanchez, and Mr. Lefcourt"). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013538.pdf
[^5]: Opinion and Order, *Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States*, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla. Feb. 21, 2019), ECF No. 435 (Marra, J.), reported at 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, quoting ECF No. 407 at paragraphs 83, 85, 88. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.435.0.pdf
[^6]: Baylor University, "Baylor University Board of Regents Announces Leadership Changes and Extensive Corrective Actions Following Findings of External Investigation," May 26, 2016. https://news.web.baylor.edu/news/story/2016/baylor-university-board-regents-announces-leadership-changes-and-extensive

View file

@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- LillyAnnSanchez
- Lawyer
- FormerProsecutor
- JeffreyEpstein
- NonProsecutionAgreement
- SouthernDistrictOfFlorida
alias:
- Lilly Sanchez
- Lilly Ann Sanchez
- Lily Sanchez
summary: "Former Miami federal prosecutor who represented Jeffrey Epstein from 2006, co-signed his 2007 non-prosecution agreement, and had briefly dated the Criminal Division chief who made the office's first plea overture to her."
location: "Miami, Florida"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]]"
role: "Assistant U.S. Attorney; Deputy Chief, Major Crimes Section"
start: 2000
end: 2005-09
fn: 1
- type: represented
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
role: "defense counsel and signatory of the non-prosecution agreement"
start: 2006-11
end: 2008
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[The LS Law Firm]]"
role: "principal"
fn: 6
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Lilly Ann Sanchez is a Miami defense lawyer and former Assistant U.S. Attorney in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]], where she was a Deputy Chief of the Major Crimes Section until September 2005. From late 2006 she represented [[Jeffrey Epstein]] before her former office, and on September 24, 2007 she and [[Gerald Lefcourt]] signed the [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]] for the defense. The office's Criminal Division chief, [[Matthew Menchel]], who had been her supervisor, told the [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]]'s [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] that they had dated briefly in 2003; he had not disclosed it to his superiors, and the office found that it "would have been prudent" for him to do so.[^1][^2][^3]
### Entry into the Case
Sanchez served in the office from 2000 to September 2005 and was a Deputy Chief of the Major Crimes Section while Menchel was its chief. In November 2006, shortly after a former U.S. Attorney had made the defense's first overture, she telephoned First Assistant U.S. Attorney [[Jeffrey Sloman]] to say that she too represented Epstein; according to Sloman's contemporaneous email, she said the defense believed the matter had been "elevated" within the office and that Epstein "wanted to be as transparent and cooperative as possible." On November 15, 2006 she wrote to the line prosecutor, [[Ann Marie Villafana|A. Marie Villafaña]], that she and Lefcourt represented Epstein and that all contact should go through them. In January 2007, when Villafaña required the documents she had requested before any meeting, Sanchez "bypassed Villafaña and phoned [Andrew] Lourie, with whom she had worked when she was an AUSA, to press for a meeting," and [[Andrew Lourie]] agreed. At the February 1, 2007 meeting she and Lefcourt presented a 25-page letter attacking federal jurisdiction and the credibility of the state's two principal victims.[^1]
### The Two-Year Offer
The office's first plea overture was made by Menchel in a conversation with Sanchez before the June 26, 2007 defense presentation, about resolving the federal case with a state plea requiring jail time and sex offender registration; according to Menchel's own email it "was a non-starter" for the defense. When Villafaña protested in early July that it was "inappropriate for you to enter into plea negotiations without consulting with me or the investigative agencies," Menchel answered that her email was "totally inappropriate" and that "Lilly called me before, not after, the June 26th meeting. It was an informal discussion and not in the nature of an official plea offer but rather a feeling out by both sides as to what it might take to resolve the matter," made "with the US Attorney's full knowledge." On July 30 he wrote to Villafaña: "While Lilly has represented in the past that this would likely not happen, I never conveyed it in quite these terms before."[^1]
After the office presented its term sheet at a July 31, 2007 meeting with Sanchez, Lefcourt and [[Roy Black]], Sanchez wrote to Menchel on August 2 on behalf of the defense team: "We welcomed your recognition that a state prison sentence is neither appropriate for, nor acceptable to, Mr. Epstein, as the dangers of the state prison system pose risks that are clearly untenable." She proposed two years of home confinement with no mandatory incarceration, described the proposal as "significantly punitive," and added: "We must keep in mind that Jeffrey Epstein is a 54-year-old man who has never been arrested before. He has lived an otherwise exemplary life." The office's reply of August 3, addressed "Dear Lilly" and signed by Menchel under Acosta's name, stated that "[t]he Office has never agreed that a state prison sentence is not appropriate for Mr. Epstein," that "a plea to two federal misdemeanors was never extended or meant as an offer," and that the two-year term was "a non-negotiable minimum." It was Menchel's last day in the office before he joined a private firm; he told the Office of Professional Responsibility that the timing was a "total coincidence."[^1]
### Registration and the Signing
In September 2007 [[Alexander Acosta]], [[Drew Oosterbaan]], Sloman, Villafaña and another prosecutor met [[Kenneth Starr]], [[Jay Lefkowitz]] and Sanchez. On Saturday, September 22, two days before the deadline, Sanchez sent Lourie a series of emails objecting to the requirement that Epstein plead to a registrable offense. She wrote that she had "spoke[n] to [M]att," that "we only agreed to the solicitation with minors because we believed and [State Attorney Barry Krischer] and [Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek] confirmed it was NOT registrable," and that lifetime registration was a "life sentence" imposed "simply [because] the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] wants it, in return for all there [sic] efforts." She wrote that Epstein's lawyers had "consistently emphasized their goal of 18 months in a federal camp," sent Lefcourt's number "in case you want to speak to him directly," and closed: "[I]mposing a life sentence on him is not something anyone will eventually be proud of. Please reconsider and help me get a fair result." Lourie did not reply to the emails but called Acosta.[^1][^4]
The agreement was signed on September 24, 2007 by Epstein, Lefcourt and Sanchez, and the two lawyers signed its addendum on October 29, 2007. The office's December 11, 2007 letter to Lefkowitz, written by the line prosecutor, listed "you, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Lewis, and a host of other highly skilled and experienced practitioners" as her counterparts and stated: "The agreement itself was signed by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Sanchez, and Mr. Lefcourt, whose experience speaks for itself."[^1][^2]
### Victim Notification
After First Assistant Sloman moved in late November 2007 to notify victims, Sanchez wrote on December 7, 2007 asking the office to "hold off on sending any victim notification letters," and none were sent that month. On December 19, 2007 Acosta wrote to her that the office would provide notice of the federal resolution but would "defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regarding whether he wishes to provide victims with notices of the state proceedings."[^3]
### The Menchel Relationship
Menchel told the Office of Professional Responsibility that he and Sanchez had had a social relationship in the office that included, in 2003, "a handful of dates over a period of two to three weeks," after which "we mutually agreed to not do that," and that by the time he worked on the Epstein case he had married and his contact with her was limited to office events and his wedding. He said the relationship did "[n]ot at all" affect his handling of the case. Acosta, Sloman and Lourie each said they had not known of it in 2007. The office's Professional Responsibility Officer said that, "[g]iven the sensitivity of the [Epstein] matter, [my advice] would probably have been to tell him to step back and let somebody else take it over." The report concluded: "Although OPR does not conclude Menchel's prior relationship with [Sanchez] influenced the Epstein investigation, OPR assesses that it would have been prudent for Menchel to have informed his supervisors so they could make an independent assessment as to whether his continued involvement in the Epstein investigation might create the appearance of a loss of impartiality."[^1][^5]
Villafaña told the office that Sloman had once said of the two-year offer, "Well, I always figured that . . . Lilly asked Matt to do her a solid . . . and to get her a good deal so that she would be in Epstein's good graces." She could not later recall whether he had asserted it or merely "figured" it, and said she knew of no information "expressly [indicating] that there was any sort of exchange of . . . a favor in either direction." The office concluded that "there is no evidence supporting the suggestion that the plea was instigated by Menchel as a favor to defense counsel," noting that the defense had rejected the two-year proposal and pressed for home confinement. The office found that Epstein "retained Lilly Ann [Sanchez] a former AUSA who had been Menchel's deputy and with whom he had socialized," among attorneys chosen for their connections to the prosecutors, and that Menchel had called that tactic "ham-fisted" and "clumsy."[^1]
### Later Practice
Sanchez practices at The LS Law Firm in Miami. The Chambers guide ranks her in white-collar crime and government investigations in Florida and describes her as "a go-to for individuals facing allegations of fraud, money laundering and public corruption," drawing on "her expertise as a former federal prosecutor." No public statement by Sanchez on her role in the Epstein negotiations has been located.[^6]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284, Prior DOJ Disclosures, Office of Professional Responsibility, report, "Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation," November 2020, pp. 9, 22-24, 41-42, 51, 54-58, 62, 82, 85, 93, 150, 153-155. The published report redacts Sanchez's surname ("Lilly Ann [redacted]"); the identification rests on its description of her as a former Deputy Chief of the Major Crimes Section who represented Epstein with Lefcourt, the "Dear Lilly" letter of August 3, 2007, the office's December 11, 2007 letter naming "Ms. Sanchez" as a signatory (note 2), and the reporting in note 6. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Prior%20DOJ%20Disclosures/Memos.%20&%20Correspondence/EFTA02847284.pdf
[^2]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00013538, DataSet 8, letter, U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida to Jay P. Lefkowitz, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, "Re: Jeffrey Epstein," December 11, 2007, p. 3, signed over the block "R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney, By:" and written in the first person by the line Assistant U.S. Attorney. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013538.pdf
[^3]: Opinion and Order, *Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States*, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla. Feb. 21, 2019), ECF No. 435 (Marra, J.), reported at 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, quoting ECF No. 407 at paragraphs 79-90. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.435.0.pdf
[^4]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, privileged chronology of the federal investigation, pp. 12 to 14. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf
[^5]: "Epstein had dinners with a top Florida prosecutor on his case, docs show," Miami Herald and *Tampa Bay Times* (syndicated by Yahoo News), October 20, 2025, reporting the Office of Professional Responsibility's findings on Menchel's relationship with Sanchez. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/epstein-had-dinners-top-florida-130000826.html
[^6]: Chambers and Partners, "Lilly Ann Sanchez, The LS Law Firm," Chambers USA 2026, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations, Florida. https://chambers.com/lawyer/lilly-ann-sanchez-usa-5:502891

View file

@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- LorettaPreska
- FederalJudge
- SouthernDistrictOfNewYork
- GiuffreVMaxwell
- Unsealing
- JeffreyEpstein
- Stratfor
alias:
- Loretta A. Preska
- Judge Preska
- Judge Loretta Preska
- Loretta Preska
summary: "Manhattan federal judge appointed by George H.W. Bush, chief judge from 2009 to 2016, who inherited the sealed Giuffre v. Maxwell record in 2019 and managed its unsealing through 2026."
born: 1949
location: "Albany, New York (born)"
relations:
- type: appointed
with: "[[George H.W. Bush]]"
reverse: true
role: "U.S. District Judge, Southern District of New York"
start: 1992-08-12
fn: 1
- type: head_of
with: "[[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]]"
role: "chief judge"
start: 2009
end: 2016
fn: 1
- type: member_of
with: "[[Federal Judicial Center]]"
role: "board member"
start: 2008
end: 2012
fn: 1
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Loretta A. Preska (born 1949, in [[Albany, New York]]) is a senior judge of the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]], appointed by [[George H.W. Bush]] in 1992 and chief judge of the district from 2009 to 2016. She took over [[Giuffre v. Maxwell]], [[Virginia Giuffre]]'s defamation suit against [[Ghislaine Maxwell]], after the death of Judge [[Robert W. Sweet]] in 2019, and from then until 2026 ruled on the release of its sealed discovery, including Maxwell's 2016 deposition, the January 2024 release of names from the record, and in August 2026 the government's disclosure under the [[Epstein Files Transparency Act]] of material it had taken from Giuffre's lawyers by grand jury subpoena in 2019. In 2013, as chief judge, she declined to recuse herself from the prosecution of the hacker [[Jeremy Hammond]], whose leak of [[Stratfor]] data, the defense said, had exposed her husband's email address.[^1][^2][^3]
### Career
Preska graduated from the [[College of Saint Rose|College of St. Rose]] in 1970, received her J.D. from [[Fordham University School of Law]] in 1973 and an LL.M. from the [[New York University School of Law]] in 1978, and practiced in [[New York City]] from 1973 to 1992. Bush nominated her on March 31, 1992 to the seat vacated by Robert J. Ward; she was confirmed on August 11 and commissioned on August 12, 1992. On September 9, 2008 Bush nominated her to the [[Second Circuit]]; the Senate did not vote. She sat on the board of the [[Federal Judicial Center]] from 2008 to 2012, was chief judge from 2009 to 2016, and took senior status on March 1, 2017.[^1]
### The Hammond Recusal
Hammond was prosecuted in the Southern District for the online infiltration of Strategic Forecasting, or Stratfor, "a self-described 'global intelligence' outfit." His lawyers moved for Preska's recusal because her husband, Thomas Kavaler, a lawyer at [[Cahill Gordon & Reindel]], had, the defense said, his email address disclosed in the Stratfor data. At a hearing on February 21, 2013 she denied the motion. She said the standard was "the views of the well-informed observer, not thousands of blog pages with wrong information," called a news article offered by the defense "rank hearsay," said that recusal on an interest not "arising even to the level of remote, contingent, or speculative would be a misuse," and wrote that "accepting defendant's invitation for recusal in this case would actually undercut the very policy" the defense invoked, and that "[f]inding otherwise on a record as suspect as here would only encourage supporters of this defendant."[^3]
### Giuffre v. Maxwell
After Sweet's death on March 24, 2019 and the Second Circuit's July 3, 2019 ruling in Brown v. Maxwell that the summary judgment record be unsealed and the rest reviewed document by document, the case passed to Preska. On remand she held that "only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet," with the documents relevant to his decisions, were judicial documents carrying a presumption of public access, and she set an unsealing protocol on that basis in orders of December 2019 and January 2020.[^2][^4]
On July 23, 2020, three weeks after Maxwell's arrest, Preska ordered the unsealing of materials including Maxwell's April 2016 deposition. A month later Maxwell's lawyer Jeffrey S. Pagliuca told Judge [[Alison Nathan]] in the criminal case that the government had already obtained nearly 90,000 pages of the civil discovery by subpoena, and that "Ms. Maxwell is seeking in both the Second Circuit and before Judge Preska that the status quo be maintained until the issue can be litigated. If, for example, without the benefit of this information, the Second Circuit and/or Judge Preska order Ms. Maxwell's deposition unsealed, the cat will be out of the bag." A panel of Judges [[José A. Cabranes]], [[Rosemary S. Pooler]] and [[Reena Raggi]] affirmed Preska's order on October 19, 2020, calling Maxwell's arguments "meritless"; [[David Boies]] argued for Giuffre.[^5][^6]
Preska held further hearings on the protocol in 2021 and 2022, ruled on a request by TGP Communications on August 9, 2022, and on November 18, 2022 ordered a broad unsealing in an oral ruling that two non-parties designated "John Doe 107" and "Jane Doe 171" appealed. On December 18, 2023 she issued findings after a "particularized review" (ECF No. 1315), and the release began on January 3, 2024. The same day she struck five attachments that "contain personally identifiable information, the disclosure of which could threaten the safety and privacy of named individuals"; on January 15 she stated that a woman identified in the press as "Doe 102" was not Doe 102; and in February and April 2024 she ordered sealed rather than docketed material mailed to her chambers that the court called "salacious and defamatory." On January 17, 2024 Giuffre and the [[Miami Herald]] appealed her December 2019 memorandum and her December 2023 findings.[^4]
On July 23, 2025, three months after Giuffre's death, a panel of Judges Cabranes, Raggi and [[Myrna Pérez]] held that "a judicial document determination is properly made by evaluating the relevant materials at the time of their filing with the court," vacated "the district court's December 2019 and January 2020 Orders in their entirety," vacated in part the November 2022 ruling, including its treatment of Giuffre's Florida deposition as carrying only a "barely cognizable" presumption of access, and remanded "for individualized review of materials." The mandate issued on January 8, 2026.[^7]
On January 30, 2026 the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York]] moved for disclosure (ECF No. 1353). Maxwell's opposition attached the record of a grand jury subpoena and an April 9, 2019 order in In re Grand Jury Subpoena, No. 19-MC-149 (CM), under which prosecutors had obtained the civil discovery from Boies Schiller Flexner months before Epstein's arrest. On August 11, 2026 Preska granted the motion (ECF No. 1367), adding to the 2016 protective order a paragraph authorizing the government to produce "documents that it received from Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP, in response to a grand jury subpoena and pursuant to the April 9, 2019, order issued in In re Grand Jury Subpoena, No. 19MC149 (CM) (S.D.N.Y.), in accordance with the Government's obligations under the Epstein Files Transparency Act." On September 3, 2026 she substituted [[Ian Torrington Blatchford]], interim administrator of Giuffre's estate, as plaintiff, and the case continued as Blatchford v. Maxwell.[^8]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Federal Judicial Center, "Preska, Loretta A.," Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges. https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/preska-loretta
[^2]: Brown v. Maxwell; Dershowitz v. Giuffre, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019), Nos. 18-2868, 16-3945-cv(L) (July 3, 2019). https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4636340/brown-v-maxwell-dershowitz-v-giuffre/
[^3]: Adam Klasfeld, "Judge in Hacktivist Case Refuses to Step Aside," *Courthouse News Service,* February 22, 2013. https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-in-hacktivist-case-refuses-to-step-aside/
[^4]: Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 1:15-cv-07433 (S.D.N.Y.), ECF Nos. 1220, 1254, 1277, 1280, 1285-1343 (Dec. 2022 to Jan. 2024), 1315 (Dec. 18, 2023), 1320-1342 (Jan. 3-17, 2024), 1344-1348 (Feb.-April 2024), 1352 (Jan. 13, 2026). https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/ian-torrington-blatchford-as-interim-administrator-of-virginia-giuffres/
[^5]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00088205, DataSet 9, letter, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., to Hon. Alison J. Nathan, "Re: Reply in Support of Request to Modify Protective Order (Under Seal), United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)," August 24, 2020, p. 3. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088205.pdf
[^6]: Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413-cv, Summary Order, Doc. 140-1 (2d Cir. Oct. 19, 2020) (Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi, JJ.). https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Maxwell-ca2.pdf
[^7]: Giuffre v. Maxwell, 146 F.4th 165 (2d Cir. 2025) (per curiam), Nos. 24-182-cv(L), 24-203-cv(con) (July 23, 2025). https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-2nd-circuit/117500106.html
[^8]: Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 1:15-cv-07433 (S.D.N.Y.), Motion for Disclosure, ECF No. 1353 (Jan. 30, 2026); Maxwell Response, ECF No. 1360 (Feb. 20, 2026); Order, ECF No. 1367 (Aug. 11, 2026); Order amending caption, ECF No. 1370 (Sept. 3, 2026). https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/ian-torrington-blatchford-as-interim-administrator-of-virginia-giuffres/

View file

@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Franklin National Bank collapsed on October 8, 1974, in what was at the time the
### American Criminal Proceedings
Sindona was indicted in the United States on multiple counts related to the Franklin National failure. In March 1980, he was convicted in the Southern District of New York on 65 counts of fraud, perjury, and misappropriation of bank funds. He was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison.
Sindona was indicted in the United States on multiple counts related to the Franklin National failure. In March 1980, he was convicted in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]] on 65 counts of fraud, perjury, and misappropriation of bank funds. He was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison.
Before his American trial, Sindona faked his own kidnapping in August 1979, traveling to Sicily under an assumed identity and making contact with Mafia figures before returning to New York and claiming he had been abducted. The fiction was intended to generate sympathy and delay his trial; it failed when investigators documented his actual movements.[^2]

View file

@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- RobertWSweet
- FederalJudge
- SouthernDistrictOfNewYork
- StevenHoffenberg
- TowersFinancial
- GiuffreVMaxwell
- JeffreyEpstein
alias:
- Robert Sweet
- Robert Workman Sweet
- Judge Sweet
- Judge Robert W. Sweet
- Robert W. Sweet
summary: "Former New York deputy mayor and Carter-appointed Manhattan federal judge who sentenced Towers Financial's Steven Hoffenberg in 1997 and presided over the sealed Giuffre v. Maxwell record until his death in 2019."
born: 1922-10-15
died: 2019-03-24
location: "Ketchum, Idaho (died)"
relations:
- type: appointed
with: "[[Jimmy Carter]]"
reverse: true
role: "U.S. District Judge, Southern District of New York"
start: 1978-04-28
end: 2019-03-24
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York]]"
role: "Assistant U.S. Attorney"
start: 1953
end: 1955
fn: 1
- type: employed_by
with: "[[City of New York]]"
role: "deputy mayor under John V. Lindsay"
start: 1966
end: 1969
fn: 1
- type: participant_in
with: "[[United States v. Hoffenberg]]"
role: "sentencing judge"
start: 1995-04-20
end: 2013-12-05
fn: 2
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Robert Workman Sweet (October 15, 1922 to March 24, 2019) was a judge of the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York]] from 1978 until his death, appointed by [[Jimmy Carter]] after service as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the district and as deputy mayor of [[New York City]] under [[John Lindsay|John V. Lindsay]]. He sentenced [[Steven Hoffenberg]], chief executive of [[Towers Financial Corporation]], to twenty years in 1997, a case in which Hoffenberg later swore prosecutors had offered him a reduced sentence for information about [[Jeffrey Epstein]]. From 2015 he presided over [[Giuffre v. Maxwell]], signing the protective order under which its discovery was sealed and denying the requests of [[Alan Dershowitz]], the writer [[Mike Cernovich|Michael Cernovich]] and the [[Miami Herald]] to unseal it; the [[Second Circuit]] reversed him on July 3, 2019, three months after his death.[^1][^2][^3]
### Career
Sweet was born in [[Yonkers, New York|Yonkers]] and graduated from [[Yale University]] in 1944 and [[Yale Law School]] in 1948, after service as a lieutenant junior grade in the [[United States Navy]] from 1943 to 1946. He practiced in New York City from 1948 to 1953, 1955 to 1965 and 1970 to 1978, and was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]] from 1953 to 1955. He was counsel to the New York State Interdepartmental Task Force on Youth and Juvenile Delinquency in 1958, executive assistant to Mayor Lindsay in 1966 and deputy mayor from 1966 to 1969, then a consultant to the [[Association for a Better New York]] from 1970 to 1975 and a hearing officer for the New York Transit Authority from 1975 to 1977. Carter nominated him on February 17, 1978 to the seat vacated by Inzer B. Wyatt; he was confirmed on April 25 and commissioned on April 28, 1978, took senior status on March 1, 1991, and died in [[Ketchum, Idaho]] on March 24, 2019.[^1]
### Hoffenberg and Towers Financial
Hoffenberg was indicted in the Southern District of New York on April 20, 1994 for the Towers Financial Ponzi scheme, and on April 20, 1995 pleaded guilty before Sweet to conspiracy to commit securities fraud, mail fraud, conspiracy to obstruct justice and tax evasion (94 Cr. 213 (RWS), 95 Cr. 321 (RWS)). Sweet issued his sentencing opinion on March 4, 1997 and entered judgment on March 7: twenty years in prison, three years of supervised release, a one million dollar fine and restitution of 475,157,340 dollars, the figure the bankruptcy court had fixed as the valid claims of the noteholders and bondholders. Towers investors later alleged that Hoffenberg had hired Epstein "as a consultant back in 1987"; Epstein was never charged in the matter.[^2][^4][^5]
Hoffenberg swore in 2018 that "during the course of my criminal trial, Prosecutors offered me a reduced sentence in exchange for information about Epstein's role," and that he had refused. His lawyer [[Gary Baise]] said Sweet had asked him, "Why did he not give up Epstein?" Epstein's lawyers at [[Troutman Sanders]] wrote in 2016 that at a December 2013 conference in the criminal case "Judge Sweet stated he was unaware of Epstein." At that conference, on December 5, 2013, Hoffenberg's counsel told Sweet that "Mr. Epstein is a critical player here." A draft Troutman Sanders memorandum for Epstein and [[Financial Trust Company]], headed "Multiple SDNY Judges Warned the Person Driving This Action Against Such Frivolous Lawsuits," recounted that Sweet had found in 2003 that Hoffenberg "will be enjoined from filing any further litigation ... without prior approval."[^2][^3][^5]
### Giuffre v. Maxwell
[[Virginia Giuffre]] sued [[Ghislaine Maxwell]] for defamation before Sweet on September 21, 2015. He denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss in February 2016, and on March 17, 2016 signed the protective order (ECF No. 62) under which deposition transcripts and exhibits, including Maxwell's own deposition, were designated confidential and filed under seal. On March 22, 2017 he denied Maxwell's motion for summary judgment in a heavily redacted 76-page opinion; the parties settled on May 24, 2017 on undisclosed terms. Dershowitz, whom Giuffre had accused and who denied her account, moved to intervene on August 11, 2016; Cernovich moved on January 19, 2017 to unseal the summary judgment record; and the Herald and its reporter [[Julie K. Brown]] moved on April 6, 2018 to unseal the docket. Sweet denied the requests.[^6][^7]
On March 11, 2019 a Second Circuit panel of Judges [[José A. Cabranes]], [[Rosemary S. Pooler]] and Christopher F. Droney ordered the parties to show cause why the summary judgment motion and Sweet's decision should not be unsealed, citing its precedent that documents submitted on summary judgment are "judicial documents to which a strong presumption of access attaches, under both the common law and the First Amendment"; a copy printed from Bloomberg Law at 5:28 p.m. that day is among Epstein's own files. Sweet died thirteen days later. On July 3, 2019, three days before Epstein's arrest in New York, the court ruled in Brown v. Maxwell that the summary judgment materials must be unsealed and the remaining filings reviewed individually, and about 2,000 pages were released on August 9, 2019, the day before Epstein's death. The case passed to Judge [[Loretta Preska]].[^6][^8]
In August 2020, after the government had obtained by subpoena nearly 90,000 pages of the Giuffre v. Maxwell discovery for Maxwell's criminal prosecution, her lawyer Jeffrey S. Pagliuca invoked Sweet in a reply brief to Judge [[Alison Nathan]]: "Judge Sweet, the same judge who approved the civil protective order upon which Ms. Maxwell relied, held that the defendant's 'continuing need for the confidentiality stipulation's protection outweighs by far the government's need for the deposition transcript,'" citing United States v. Oshatz (1988).[^9]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Federal Judicial Center, "Sweet, Robert Workman," Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges. https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/sweet-robert-workman
[^2]: Marvin Gerber and Kalma Koenig v. The Financial Trust Company, XYZ Corp., ABC, Inc., and Jeffrey E. Epstein, No. 1:18-cv-07580-JPO (S.D.N.Y.), Complaint, ECF No. 7 (filed August 21, 2018), paragraphs 15 to 58 (citing United States v. Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS), 95 Cr. 321 (RWS), 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2394 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 1997)), with Exhibit B, Affidavit of Steven J. Hoffenberg sworn August 17, 2018, ECF No. 7-2. https://truthinadvertising.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Gerber-v-The-Financial-Trust-Co-complaint.pdf ; Transcript of conference, United States v. Steven Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.), December 5, 2013, filed as Exhibit L, ECF No. 16-12, in No. 1:18-cv-07580-JPO. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.499593/gov.uscourts.nysd.499593.16.12.pdf
[^3]: Brian Pascus, "Jeffrey Epstein worked at Towers Financial with Steven Hoffenberg, who committed Ponzi scheme crimes," *CBS News,* August 13, 2019. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-worked-at-towers-financial-with-stephen-hoffenberg-who-committed-ponzi-scheme-crimes/ ; Letter of Bennet J. Moskowitz, Troutman Sanders LLP, to Hon. Richard J. Sullivan, June 28, 2016, Hoffenberg v. Epstein, No. 1:16-cv-03989-RJS (S.D.N.Y.), filed as Exhibit G, ECF No. 16-7, in No. 1:18-cv-07580-JPO. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.499593/gov.uscourts.nysd.499593.16.7.pdf
[^4]: Associated Press, "Jeffrey Epstein's mentor, who once ran a Ponzi scheme, was found dead. He was 77," *NPR,* August 26, 2022. https://www.npr.org/2022/08/26/1119746511/jeffrey-epstein-mentor-steven-hoffenberg-dead
[^5]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00802452, DataSet 9, draft memorandum of law, Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss, Gerber v. The Financial Trust Company, No. 1:18-cv-07580-JPO (S.D.N.Y.), Troutman Sanders LLP, September 2018. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802452.pdf
[^6]: Brown v. Maxwell; Dershowitz v. Giuffre, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019), Nos. 18-2868, 16-3945-cv(L) (July 3, 2019). https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4636340/brown-v-maxwell-dershowitz-v-giuffre/
[^7]: Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 1:15-cv-07433 (S.D.N.Y.), Complaint, ECF No. 1 (Sept. 21, 2015); Opinion denying motion to dismiss, ECF No. 37 (Feb. 2016); Protective Order, ECF No. 62 (March 17, 2016). https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/ian-torrington-blatchford-as-interim-administrator-of-virginia-giuffres/
[^8]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00802958, DataSet 9, Bloomberg Law printout of Order to Show Cause, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 18-2868 (2d Cir. March 11, 2019) (Cabranes, Pooler, Droney, JJ.), printed March 11, 2019. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00802958.pdf
[^9]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00088205, DataSet 9, letter, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Hon. Alison J. Nathan, "Re: Reply in Support of Request to Modify Protective Order (Under Seal), United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)," August 24, 2020, pp. 2-3, quoting United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696, 703 (S.D.N.Y. 1988). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00088205.pdf

View file

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Thomas Stanton was the Director of the Executive Office of U.S. Trustees (EOUST)
According to [[Anthony Pasciuto]], then Deputy Director of EOUST, Stanton had pressured [[William White]], the U.S. Trustee assigned to the Inslaw case, to convert Inslaw's Chapter 11 reorganization to a Chapter 7 liquidation. Pasciuto also alleged that Stanton tried to detail [[Harry Jones]], an attorney from the U.S. Trustee's Office, to Washington D.C. to work on converting the Inslaw case. [[Cornelius Blackshear]], then a U.S. Bankruptcy Judge, initially testified that White had told him of Stanton's pressure. Bankruptcy Judge Bason, in his findings, concluded that Stanton struck a bargain with [[C. Madison Brewer]] to liquidate [[INSLAW]] to rid the DOJ of its contract problems, and that Stanton made this commitment to curry favor with the EOUSA and higher DOJ officials to secure support for making the temporary U.S. Trustee program permanent. Bason believed Stanton agreed to pressure White and, when White resisted, sought to detail Jones to accomplish the conversion. However, the Special Counsel's investigation found that Stanton and Brewer denied any such discussions, and that Stanton testified he only briefly considered transferring Jones to assist with the Inslaw matter due to its high-profile nature, not to effect a conversion.[^1]
The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigated allegations against Stanton and others, concluding that Bankruptcy Judge Bason's findings on the Independent Handling proceeding were "clearly erroneous" and that there was no evidence that DOJ employees had tried to pressure White to convert Inslaw's case. OPR also found no evidence that DOJ officials had lied to cover up a conversion effort. The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) also investigated the matter, finding "no proof that an effort to convert Inslaw's bankruptcy proceedings was conducted by individuals beyond those the Bankruptcy Court had found responsible." The PSI noted that Stanton urged special treatment for the Inslaw case because he saw it as a means of favorably impressing the DOJ and ensuring continued support for his office, which, while improper, did not equate to the conspiracy alleged by the Hamiltons. The Special Counsel's investigation concluded that there was insufficient evidence to establish that the DOJ and Stanton endeavored to have the Inslaw case converted or engaged in any cover-up. It noted that a scheme to convert Inslaw would have been self-defeating, as only the Bankruptcy Court could order conversion, and the facts of the Inslaw case would not have supported such a motion.[^1]
The [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] (OPR) investigated allegations against Stanton and others, concluding that Bankruptcy Judge Bason's findings on the Independent Handling proceeding were "clearly erroneous" and that there was no evidence that DOJ employees had tried to pressure White to convert Inslaw's case. OPR also found no evidence that DOJ officials had lied to cover up a conversion effort. The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) also investigated the matter, finding "no proof that an effort to convert Inslaw's bankruptcy proceedings was conducted by individuals beyond those the Bankruptcy Court had found responsible." The PSI noted that Stanton urged special treatment for the Inslaw case because he saw it as a means of favorably impressing the DOJ and ensuring continued support for his office, which, while improper, did not equate to the conspiracy alleged by the Hamiltons. The Special Counsel's investigation concluded that there was insufficient evidence to establish that the DOJ and Stanton endeavored to have the Inslaw case converted or engaged in any cover-up. It noted that a scheme to convert Inslaw would have been self-defeating, as only the Bankruptcy Court could order conversion, and the facts of the Inslaw case would not have supported such a motion.[^1]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice. *Report of Special Counsel Nicholas J. Bua to the Attorney General of the United States Regarding the Allegations of Inslaw, Inc.* March 1993.

View file

@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ At about 6:30 a.m. Thomas opened Epstein's cell and found him hanged. Noel said
### Prosecution
On November 19, 2019 a federal grand jury in the Southern District of New York indicted Noel and Thomas on one count each of conspiracy and multiple counts each of making false records, in a case announced by U.S. Attorney [[Geoffrey Berman]]; according to the indictment, Thomas told a supervisor after finding Epstein, "we messed up." Each was released on a 100,000 dollar bond and ordered to surrender their passports. On May 25, 2021 both entered deferred prosecution agreements admitting that they had falsely certified counts and rounds, and agreeing to cooperate with the [[Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General|Inspector General]], the FBI, and prosecutors and to perform 100 hours of community service; on December 13, 2021 the court entered a nolle prosequi order dismissing the charges. The U.S. Attorney's Office declined to prosecute other Special Housing Unit employees who had also falsified count slips and round sheets on August 9 and 10. Both officers were fired.[^2][^3][^7]
On November 19, 2019 a federal grand jury in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]] indicted Noel and Thomas on one count each of conspiracy and multiple counts each of making false records, in a case announced by U.S. Attorney [[Geoffrey Berman]]; according to the indictment, Thomas told a supervisor after finding Epstein, "we messed up." Each was released on a 100,000 dollar bond and ordered to surrender their passports. On May 25, 2021 both entered deferred prosecution agreements admitting that they had falsely certified counts and rounds, and agreeing to cooperate with the [[Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General|Inspector General]], the FBI, and prosecutors and to perform 100 hours of community service; on December 13, 2021 the court entered a nolle prosequi order dismissing the charges. The U.S. Attorney's Office declined to prosecute other Special Housing Unit employees who had also falsified count slips and round sheets on August 9 and 10. Both officers were fired.[^2][^3][^7]
### The Deposits and the 2026 Inquiry

View file

@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- JeffreyEpstein
- NonProsecutionAgreement
- Prosecutor
- DepartmentOfJustice
- PalmBeach
- CrimeVictimsRightsAct
alias:
- Ann Marie Villafana
- Ann Marie Villafaña
- A. Marie Villafaña
- A. Marie Villafana
- Marie Villafaña
- Marie Villafana
- Ann C. Villafaña
- Ann C. Villafana
- Villafaña
- Villafana
summary: "Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach who opened the 2006 federal Epstein investigation, drafted a 60-count indictment, negotiated and signed the 2007 non-prosecution agreement, and left the office in August 2019."
location: "West Palm Beach, Florida"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]]"
role: "Assistant U.S. Attorney"
start: 2001-09
end: 2019-08
fn: 1
- type: investigated
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
role: "line prosecutor, Operation Leap Year"
start: 2006-05-23
end: 2011
fn: 3
- type: investigated
with: "[[Office of Professional Responsibility]]"
reverse: true
start: 2019-02-06
end: 2020-11
fn: 2
- type: represented
with: "[[Jonathan Biran]]"
reverse: true
start: 2019
fn: 15
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
A. Marie Villafaña, styled Ann C. Villafaña in the [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]]'s own records, is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney in the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida]] who opened the office's 2006 investigation of [[Jeffrey Epstein]], wrote an 82-page prosecution memorandum and a draft federal indictment in 2007, and was then overruled by her supervisors in favor of the [[Epstein non-prosecution agreement]], which she negotiated with Epstein's lawyers and signed on the office's behalf on September 24, 2007. She monitored Epstein's compliance with the agreement through his Florida jail term and home detention, served as co-counsel defending the government in the victims' suit under the [[Crime Victims' Rights Act]] until the office was recused in February 2019, and left the office in August 2019 while the Justice Department's [[Office of Professional Responsibility]] was investigating her and four supervisors. That office found in November 2020 that none of the five had committed professional misconduct.[^1][^2]
### Career in Miami and West Palm Beach
Villafaña joined the office in September 2001 as a line prosecutor in the Major Crimes Section in [[Miami]] and transferred in January 2004 to the branch office in [[West Palm Beach, Florida|West Palm Beach]], where she handled the majority of the branch's child exploitation cases. In 2006 U.S. Attorney [[Alexander Acosta]] designated her the office's first coordinator for Project Safe Childhood, a Justice Department initiative launched that May against technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation. The office's own chart of the period places her under a West Palm Beach supervisor, then the branch's managing attorney [[Andrew Lourie]], then Criminal Division chief [[Matthew Menchel]], First Assistant U.S. Attorney [[Jeffrey Sloman]] and Acosta.[^1][^3]
### Opening Operation Leap Year
In May 2006 the lead detective of the [[Palm Beach Police Department]] met Villafaña and an [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] case agent with whom she worked child exploitation cases and summarized the state investigation. According to Villafaña, the detective said that "pressure had been brought to bear on . . . Krischer by Epstein's attorneys," that the defense had hired private investigators to trail him and Chief [[Michael Reiter]], and that the defense had engineered the removal of the first Assistant State Attorney on the case by hiring a lawyer whose relationship with her created a conflict. Neither Villafaña nor the agent had heard of Epstein before the meeting. She opened a federal case file on May 23, 2006 and named the investigation "Operation Leap Year," after the approximately 29 girls identified as victims in the state case. She told the Office of Professional Responsibility that the case implicated federal interests including the use of telephones and airports, the number of victims, the possibility of child pornography suggested by computer equipment removed from Epstein's house before the police search, and "the possibility that improper political pressure had affected the State Attorney Office's handling of the case."[^3]
Having learned that Epstein "took a scorched earth approach" to litigation, she arranged a meeting with Acosta and Sloman in Miami on July 14, 2006 without first telling Lourie, then her second-line supervisor. She told OPR it was the first time she had asked to brief "executive management" on opening a case, and that she regarded Sloman as a friend.[^3]
### The Charging Memo and the Supervisors
Villafaña submitted her prosecution memorandum on May 1, 2007. Lourie wrote to her on May 10 that "Epstein's att[orneys] are scared of the victims they don't know," proposing that the first indictment name only the victims "they have nothing on at all," and that "for the first strike we should make all their nightmare[]s come true." On May 14, when Epstein was flying from the [[U.S. Virgin Islands|Virgin Islands]] to [[New Jersey]], she asked Lourie and Menchel whether she could file charges the next day. Menchel answered that "[y]ou will not have approval to go forward tomorrow" and that he had "trouble understanding" her "rush" "given how long this case has been pending." She later told OPR that "child sex offenders don't stop until they're behind bars." In their OPR interviews Acosta called her "very hard charging" and her timeline "really, really fast," and Menchel described her as "out over her skis a little bit" and "ahead of Acosta in terms of his analysis of the case." On May 15 she asked Sloman whether "pestering Alex will not do any good," and he answered "Yes"; on May 21 she asked Sloman and Menchel for "a sense of the direction where we are headed," and Sloman answered "Taken care of." Her immediate supervisor told OPR that it appeared "Miami didn't want the case prosecuted."[^4]
The office's privileged investigation chronology records that on May 23, 2007 she drafted an email disagreeing "with promising to have a meeting with Lefcourt or any of Epstein's other attorneys," on the ground that an earlier meeting had "disclosed prosecution strategy," and stating that if one were held she "will ask to have the case reassigned." OPR recorded that she "vehemently opposed meeting with Epstein's attorneys and voiced her concerns to her supervisors, but was overruled by them." She told OPR that she believed Acosta "was influenced by the stature of Epstein's attorneys," and that "the ability of [[Alan Dershowitz]] and [[Kenneth Starr|Ken Starr]] and [[Jay Lefkowitz]] to convince Alex Acosta that I didn't know what I was talking [about] also, all came into play."[^5][^6]
### Negotiating the Agreement
Acosta decided in mid-2007 to resolve the case through a state plea, and Villafaña became the office's principal negotiator and drafter of the agreement, under supervisors who, in OPR's words, "left the USAO, were transitioning to other jobs, or were absent at critical junctures": Menchel left in August 2007, and Lourie moved to a Washington detail in September. The court in the later victims' suit quoted her September 2007 emails to Lefkowitz: an offer to file a federal charge in Miami rather than West Palm Beach "[o]n an 'avoid the press' note," advice relayed from Lourie that "some of the timing issues be addressed only in the state agreement, so that it isn't obvious to the judge that we are trying to create federal jurisdiction for prison purposes," a statement that she "would prefer not to highlight for the judge all of the other crimes and all of the other persons that we could charge," and an offer to meet "off campus." On September 17 she asked Lefkowitz to send material to her home email address.[^2][^7][^8]
Villafaña gave OPR her own account of each line. She said the "off campus" offer meant a "neutral" location with "all the necessary decision makers present or 'on call'" to finish negotiations that "had dragged on for some time"; that the Miami filing was meant to let victims attend a plea hearing "without their faces being splashed all over the newspaper"; that she used her home account because negotiations ran "at nights, on weekend[s]" when remote email access was limited, which OPR found her supervisors knew; and that the co-conspirator clause was understood to cover the four women named in it because "we considered Epstein to be the top of the food chain, and we wouldn't have been interested in prosecuting anyone else." OPR found that she did not consider that Epstein might be shielding other, unnamed people, and that no one, including the FBI case agents, raised that concern.[^8][^9]
The attorney Villafaña first recommended as the victims' representative under the agreement's damages mechanism was, according to OPR, "a friend of another AUSA whom Villafaña was then dating, but had no professional relationship with either Villafaña or the other AUSA." Epstein's lawyers objected to the choice, and while she was on sick leave Sloman negotiated the October 2007 addendum that changed the selection process.[^1][^10]
### Holding Epstein to the Terms
After the signing Villafaña kept preparing a federal case. On February 14, 2008 she wrote to the FBI case agents that she had not yet sent the indictment and "was just asking for input on who to include and who to exclude." On May 16, 2008, after the Criminal Division rejected Epstein's appeal, Sloman wrote to her, "We got approved," adding, "Alex called to tell me. He said the ltr needs to be tweaked which we'll do on Monday. I wouldn't call the FBI yet."[^11][^12]
The day after Epstein's June 30, 2008 state plea, she and her immediate supervisor met an official of the [[Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office]], who told them that Epstein "would be eligible for work release and will be placed on work release." She told the official that the [[Florida Science Foundation]], where Epstein had told the plea court he worked "every day," did not exist until November 2007 and that the address he gave for it was the office of his lawyer [[Jack Goldberger]]. When she learned in mid-November 2008 that Epstein was on work release, she emailed Acosta, Sloman and the Criminal Division chief: "Can I indict him now?" On November 24 she wrote to [[Roy Black]] that Epstein had breached the agreement by "failing to remain incarcerated twenty-four hours a day." On December 3 she wrote to Sloman and Criminal Division chief [[Robert Senior]] that "since Day 1, Goldberger and Krisher [sic] . . . have been scheming to get Epstein out on work release," and that Epstein was paying off-duty deputies "between $3000 and $4100 per week" for "protection." Her December 11 letter to the sheriff's Corrections Division, itemizing inaccuracies in his work release application, went unanswered.[^13]
In the summer of 2009, when the New York Post reported that Epstein had been released early for cooperating in a federal case against [[Bear Stearns]], Villafaña called the prosecutors in the [[Eastern District of New York]], who told her they "had never heard of Epstein." In 2011 she wrote to senior colleagues that "this is urban myth. The FBI and I looked into this and do not believe that any of it is true." OPR reported finding no evidence that Epstein was a cooperating witness or "intelligence asset," or that any of the five subjects believed so.[^13][^14]
### The Victims' Suit, the 2018 Email and OPR
From July 2008 Villafaña was co-counsel for the government in [[Doe v. United States]], the Crime Victims' Rights Act suit filed by two victims, and she maintained the office's case records throughout it. In December 2018, after the [[Miami Herald]] series by [[Julie K. Brown]], she wrote in an internal email that she had once asked Sloman where the two-year plea figure came from and that "[h]e said that Lily [sic] Ann (attorney for Epstein) asked Mr. Menchel to 'do her a solid' and convince Mr. Acosta to offer two years." Questioned by OPR, she could not recall whether Sloman had said "Lilly asked Matt to do her a solid, and he did it," or "I always figured Matt just wanted ... to do her a solid," and said she knew of nothing that "expressly [indicated] that there was any sort of exchange of . . . a favor in either direction." Sloman did not recall the remark and called the idea "the furthest thing from my recollection." OPR found no evidence supporting it.[^1][^6]
OPR noted that she alone among the five subjects had remained in the office with continuous access to the documentary record. It concluded that the September 2007 emails did "not themselves establish that Villafaña (or any other subject) acted to improperly benefit Epstein," and that "the evidence shows that Villafaña, in particular, cared deeply about Epstein's victims." Sloman told OPR that reports she "was soft on Epstein . . . couldn't have been further from the truth." Lourie said that on reading the 2019 opinion quoting her emails he was "surprised to see how nice she was to them. And she winds up taking it on the chin for being so nice to them. When I know the whole time she was the one who wanted to go after him the most."[^2][^9]
### Resignation
Villafaña submitted her resignation to the Justice Department in August 2019. Her attorney, [[Jonathan Biran]], said that she had long planned a transition to a career in health care and planned to join the [[Department of Health and Human Services]]. OPR's report records only that she left "to join another federal government agency." In testimony to the [[House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform|House Oversight Committee]] on September 19, 2025, Acosta did not recall reading her recommendation that Epstein be charged with sex trafficking in a 60-count indictment.[^1][^15][^16]
### Footnotes
[^1]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284, Prior DOJ Disclosures, report, Office of Professional Responsibility, "Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation," November 2020, pp. 5 to 7, 89 to 90 (EFTA02847314 to EFTA02847316, EFTA02847398 to EFTA02847399). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Prior%20DOJ%20Disclosures/Memos.%20&%20Correspondence/EFTA02847284.pdf
[^2]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), Executive Summary, pp. v to x and n. 8 (EFTA02847290 to EFTA02847295).
[^3]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 6, 16 to 18 and nn. 20 to 21 (EFTA02847315, EFTA02847325 to EFTA02847327).
[^4]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 28 to 30 and nn. 44 to 46 (EFTA02847337 to EFTA02847339).
[^5]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00224943, DataSet 9, "Epstein Investigation Timeline," Exhibit A-1, privileged chronology of the federal investigation, May 2006 to August 2011, entry for May 23, 2007. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00224943.pdf
[^6]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 150 to 155 (EFTA02847459 to EFTA02847464).
[^7]: Opinion and Order, *Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States*, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla. Feb. 21, 2019), ECF No. 435 (Marra, J.), reported at 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, quoting ECF No. 407. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867/gov.uscourts.flsd.317867.435.0.pdf
[^8]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 68 to 71 and nn. 112, 115 (EFTA02847377 to EFTA02847380).
[^9]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 163 to 165 (EFTA02847472 to EFTA02847474).
[^10]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), p. 90 n. 143 (EFTA02847399).
[^11]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00225102, DataSet 9, emails, Ann Marie Villafana to FBI agents, "RE: Epstein Indictment" and "RE: DOBs," February 14, 2008. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00225102.pdf
[^12]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00214486, DataSet 9, email chain, Jeff Sloman and Ann Marie Villafana, "Re: Did u hear?," May 16, 2008. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00214486.pdf
[^13]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), pp. 114 to 118 and nn. 181, 187 (EFTA02847423 to EFTA02847427).
[^14]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02847284 (see note 1), p. 169 and n. 244 (EFTA02847478).
[^15]: "Lead federal prosecutor from Jeffrey Epstein 2008 case resigns," *WFLX / WPTV Webteam,* August 9, 2019. https://www.wflx.com/2019/08/09/lead-federal-prosecutor-jeffrey-epstein-case-resigns/
[^16]: Debra Cassens Weiss, "Jeffrey Epstein had dinners with top criminal prosecutor following favorable deal, documents show," *ABA Journal,* October 20, 2025. https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/jeffrey-epstein-had-dinners-with-top-criminal-prosecutor-in-years-following-favorable-deal-documents-show

View file

@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
---
category: "Law Enforcement & Legal"
tags:
- Person
- CarolThomasJacobs
- VirginIslands
- AttorneyGeneral
- JeffreyEpstein
- SexOffenderRegistration
- LeonBlack
- Judiciary
alias:
- Carol Thomas Jacobs
- Carol Jacobs
- Carol Thomas-Jacobs, Esq.
- Judge Carol Thomas-Jacobs
summary: "Antigua-born Virgin Islands prosecutor who as acting attorney general revoked Jeffrey Epstein's 24-hour travel notice in 2019, signed the 62.5 million dollar Leon Black settlement in 2023, then became a Superior Court judge."
location: "St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Virgin Islands Department of Justice]]"
end: 2023-04
role: "Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division chief, Deputy Attorney General (2016), Chief Deputy Attorney General (2020)"
fn: 1
- type: head_of
with: "[[Virgin Islands Department of Justice]]"
start: 2023-01-01
end: 2023-04
role: "acting Attorney General"
fn: 1
- type: appointed
with: "[[Albert Bryan]]"
reverse: true
start: 2023-01-01
role: "acting Attorney General"
fn: 4
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Superior Court of the Virgin Islands]]"
start: 2023-10-03
role: "judge, St. Thomas and St. John district"
fn: 1
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Carol Thomas-Jacobs is a lawyer and judge of the Superior Court of the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]], born in Willikies, [[Antigua]], who spent more than twenty years in the [[Virgin Islands Department of Justice]]. As acting Attorney General she signed the March 14, 2019 letter that revoked the 24-hour travel-notice arrangement [[Jeffrey Epstein]] had held since 2012, and on January 20, 2023, as acting Attorney General again after Governor [[Albert Bryan]] removed [[Denise George]], she countersigned the settlement under which [[Leon Black]] paid the territory 62.5 million dollars without admitting liability. Bryan nominated her to the bench two months later.[^1][^2][^3]
### Career
Thomas-Jacobs is the youngest of nine children of a family from Willikies and a graduate of the Princess Margaret School and of the Advanced Level Department of the Antigua State College. In the Virgin Islands Department of Justice she served as an Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Division and then as head of that division, became Deputy Attorney General in 2016 and Chief Deputy Attorney General in 2020.[^1][^4]
Bryan fired Attorney General George on December 31, 2022, four days after she filed the territory's suit against [[JPMorgan Chase]], and named Thomas-Jacobs, who had worked on the estate case with George and was assigned to the JPMorgan case, acting Attorney General effective January 1, 2023. The governor's office described the vacancy in its March 2023 announcement as following "the resignation of Denise George in December 2022." Bryan nominated Thomas-Jacobs to the Superior Court that March, saying that "after more than two decades working on behalf of the Government of the Virgin Islands in the Department of Justice, Acting Attorney General Carol Thomas-Jacobs has demonstrated a solid and balanced understanding of the laws of the U.S. Virgin Islands." The 35th [[Legislature of the Virgin Islands]] confirmed her unanimously on April 14, 2023. She was succeeded at the department by [[Ariel Smith]], who had been Civil Division chief on the estate case.[^1][^4][^5][^6]
She was invested as a judge for the [[St. Thomas]] and St. John district on October 3, 2023 at the Alexander A. Farrelly Justice Center in [[Charlotte Amalie]], in a ceremony attended by Chief Justice [[Rhys Hodge]], Bryan, Lieutenant Governor [[Tregenza Roach]] and Senate President [[Novelle Francis]]. Presiding Judge [[Debra Smith-Watlington]] spoke of "the work that she did as a practising attorney, her dedication to her craft, her attention to detail, her professionalism, her work ethic, her intelligence and temperament, her courage and confidence." Superior Court judges serve six-year terms.[^1][^4]
### The 2019 Travel Notice
Epstein, a registered sex offender in the territory, had since August 2012 been allowed by Attorney General [[Vincent Frazer]] to give the department 24 hours' notice of travel by email instead of the 21 days otherwise required. On February 19, 2019 he flew to the [[Dominican Republic]], where he was detained for several hours and refused entry; his lawyers later blamed the department's failure to notify Dominican authorities. By letter of March 14, 2019, Thomas-Jacobs, as acting Attorney General, revoked the arrangement and required Epstein to appear in person at the department at least 21 days before any travel outside the [[United States]], allowed email notice only while he was already outside the territory, and required him to submit supporting information for any requested reduction, subject to the department's discretion. A signed copy in the Justice Department's Epstein releases, photographed against what appears to be the interior of an aircraft cabin, reads: "Mr. Epstein, please understand that the previous provisions for your travel notifications are [no longer] accepted by [USVIDOJ] and you must comply immediately with the conditions noted [herein]. We thank you for your cooperation and trust that you will adhere to these conditions. Sincerely, Carol Thomas-Jacobs, Esq., Acting Attorney General."[^2][^7][^8]
On April 30, 2019 the firm of Epstein's territorial counsel, [[Erika Kellerhals]], asked George, then Attorney General nominee, to reinstate the Frazer procedures, arguing that "Attorney Jacobs' requirement to appear in person" for travel within the United States "appears to exceed the requirements of Virgin Islands law." Thomas-Jacobs was copied on the correspondence that followed: on June 17, 2019 Kellerhals asked George what she would accept as "reasonable and reliable proof" of frequent travel, and on June 20 Epstein's lawyer [[Clive Rivers]] wrote to George, copying Kellerhals and Thomas-Jacobs, "Erika and I would like to meet with you." Epstein was arrested in [[New Jersey]] on July 6, 2019.[^2][^6][^9]
### The Leon Black Settlement
On January 20, 2023 Black signed a settlement agreement with the [[Government of the United States Virgin Islands]], countersigned by Thomas-Jacobs as acting Attorney General, under which he paid 62.5 million dollars within sixty days to end the territory's potential claims against him arising from his dealings with Epstein, without any admission of liability. Black had paid Epstein about 158 million dollars between 2012 and 2017 for tax and estate-planning advice, beginning under a 2013 service agreement with Epstein's [[Southern Trust Company]], which held tax benefits from the territory's [[Economic Development Commission]]. The agreement was signed weeks after the estate's own 105 million dollar settlement, while the territory's suit against JPMorgan Chase was pending.[^3][^10][^11]
Thomas-Jacobs was deposed in the JPMorgan case, with Bryan, John and [[Cecile de Jongh]], Frazer, Governor [[Kenneth Mapp]] and Delegate [[Stacey Plaskett]], each of whom said they had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes. She was not among the officials named in the 2023 federal trafficking suit against the territory and its former officeholders, which was dismissed in 2025.[^9][^12]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Singh, Sera-quinn. "Antiguan Judge appointed to US Superior Court." *Antigua Observer,* November 6, 2023. https://antiguaobserver.com/antiguan-judge-appointed-to-us-superior-court/
[^2]: Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), Exhibit 83, ECF No. 194-24 (filed June 20, 2023), pp. 2 to 7 (Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin letter to Denise George, April 30, 2019, with Appendix 1), 46 to 47 (Frazer letter of August 14, 2012), 56 to 58 (emails of June 2 to June 20, 2019). https://web.archive.org/web/20260117011719/https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/194-24.pdf
[^3]: Settlement Agreement and Release between the Government of the United States Virgin Islands and Leon Black, executed January 20, 2023, sections I, II.A.1-3, III.2, III.5 (as published by the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance). https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/usvi_black_settlement_agreement_-_executedpdf.pdf
[^4]: Government of the United States Virgin Islands, Office of the Governor, "Governor Bryan Nominates Acting Attorney General Carol Thomas-Jacobs For Superior Court Judgeship," March 2, 2023. https://www.vi.gov/governor-bryan-nominates-acting-attorney-general-carol-thomas-jacobs-for-superior-court-judgeship/
[^5]: "U.S. Virgin Islands fires attorney general in Jeffrey Epstein cases," *PBS NewsHour / Associated Press,* January 2023. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/u-s-virgin-islands-fires-attorney-general-in-jeffrey-epstein-cases ; "Attorney General Denise George Has Been Terminated," *The Virgin Islands Consortium,* December 31, 2022. https://viconsortium.com/vi-government/virgin-islands-attorneygeneral-denise-george-has-been-terminated-
[^6]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Docs confirm Bryan pressed for special treatment of sex offender." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 2, 2026. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/docs-confirm-bryan-pressed-for-special-treatment-of-sex-offender/article_5e9483c9-38d2-406c-8bb0-e5757ce287f2.html (attorney-general succession; Thomas-Jacobs's March 2019 rescission).
[^7]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA01598591, DataSet 10, letter of Carol Thomas-Jacobs, Acting Attorney General, to Jeffrey Epstein on travel-notification conditions (photographed copy; related copies EFTA00001884, EFTA01340980, EFTA01303327). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01598591.pdf
[^8]: Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, No. ST-20-CV-14 (V.I. Super. Ct.), Second Amended Complaint, paragraphs 132 to 134, filed as Exhibit 1 to Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), ECF No. 1-1 (December 27, 2022). https://web.archive.org/web/20260117011558/https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/001-01.pdf
[^9]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Files reveal Epstein's efforts to influence V.I. officials; emails with Mapp." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 2, 2026. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/files-reveal-epstein-s-efforts-to-influence-v-i-officials-emails-with-mapp/article_2dd4fe69-4daf-4dc2-b3b8-37a929002bb6.html
[^10]: "Billionaire Leon Black paid $62.5m to exit US Virgin Islands investigation over links to Jeffrey Epstein." *AOL / Agence France-Presse,* 2023. https://www.aol.com/billionaire-leon-black-paid-62-002414707.html
[^11]: "Apollo Announces Review of Significant Governance Enhancements as Part of Continued Evolution and Institutionalization of the Firm and Leadership Transition." *Apollo Global Management,* January 25, 2021. https://www.apollo.com/insights-news/pressreleases/2021/01/apollo-announces-review-of-significant-governance-enhancements-as-part-of-continued-evolution-and-institutionalization-of-the-firm-and-leadership-transition-211534651 (Dechert LLP review: about 158 million dollars paid by Black to Epstein, 2012 to 2017). ; Dechert LLP, Memorandum to the Apollo Conflicts Committee, "Investigation of Epstein/Black Relationship and Any Relationship Between Epstein and Apollo Global Management, Inc.," January 22, 2021, pp. 3 to 4, 16 to 17, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Apollo Global Management, Inc., Form 8-K (January 25, 2021). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411494/000119312521016405/d118102dex991.htm
[^12]: Doe 1 v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands, No. 1:23-cv-10301-AS (S.D.N.Y.), Opinion and Order, ECF No. 202 (March 21, 2025), p. 1 (defendants named). https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915/gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf

View file

@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
---
category: "Crime & Abuse Networks"
tags:
- Person
- LarryVisoski
- JeffreyEpstein
- LolitaExpress
- Aviation
- ShellCompany
- VirginIslands
- MaxwellTrial
alias:
- Lawrence Paul Visoski Jr.
- Lawrence Visoski
- Lawrence VISOSKI
summary: "Jeffrey Epstein's pilot from 1991 to 2019, named manager of the Virgin Islands companies holding his aircraft, first government witness at the 2021 Maxwell trial, and recipient of Epstein-paid tuition for his daughters."
location: "United States"
relations:
- type: employed_by
with: "[[Jeffrey Epstein]]"
role: "pilot"
start: 1991
end: 2019
fn: 3
- type: head_of
with: "[[Plan D LLC]]"
role: "sole manager"
start: 2012
end: 2019-07-31
fn: 5
- type: director_of
with: "[[Hyperion Air]]"
role: "manager of Hyperion Air LLC, with Epstein"
start: 2012-10-19
fn: 5
- type: participant_in
with: "[[United States v. Maxwell]]"
role: "government's first witness"
start: 2021-11-29
end: 2021-11-30
fn: 2
created: 2026-09-25
updated: 2026-09-25
---
Lawrence Paul Visoski Jr., known as Larry Visoski, is an American pilot who flew [[Jeffrey Epstein]]'s aircraft from 1991 to 2019, including the Boeing 727 known as the [[Lolita Express]]. Federal Aviation Administration files and a [[Government of the United States Virgin Islands|Virgin Islands]] complaint list him as manager or member of several of the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]] companies that held Epstein's jets and helicopters. He was the government's first witness at the 2021 trial of [[Ghislaine Maxwell]] in the [[U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]], where he testified that Epstein had paid for his two daughters' education and had given him land at [[Zorro Ranch]] in [[New Mexico]]. Bank records released by the [[Department of Justice|Justice Department]] in 2026 show checks from Epstein's [[JPMorgan Chase]] account totaling 106,654 dollars to [[Syracuse University]] for one of the daughters between 2009 and 2012.[^1][^2][^3]
### Aircraft Companies
In August and September 2021, while prosecutors prepared the Maxwell trial, a special agent of the [[Federal Aviation Administration]]'s Law Enforcement Assistance Program in [[Atlanta]] summarized for federal investigators the registration files of ten aircraft connected to Epstein. Of a [[Bell 430]] helicopter registered to [[Hyperion Air]], Inc. in 2012, renumbered N331JE and transferred in August 2013 to Hyperion Air LLC of [[St. Thomas]], the agent wrote that "the same players in the Inc and LLC are on the FAA registration paperwork, Darren INDYKE and Lawrence VISOSKI," a reference to Epstein's lawyer [[Darren Indyke]]. A 1988 Gulfstream G-IV was registered in May 2013 to JEGE, LLC of St. Thomas, a company formed in the Virgin Islands on October 19, 2012, whose members were Epstein and Visoski; Visoski changed its registration number to N212JE in 2013 and to N120JE in 2017.[^4]
A 2007 Gulfstream G550 was sold by [[Chevron]] USA on March 29, 2017 to Plan D LLC, a Virgin Islands company of which Epstein was a member and Visoski the manager, and took the number N212JE in January 2018. The agent wrote: "I don't see EPSTEIN's name on any of the FAA paperwork." Flight plans show the jet flying from [[Paris]] to [[Teterboro Airport|Teterboro]] on July 7, 2019 and from Teterboro to Brunswick, [[Georgia]], on July 11. On December 22, 2020, sixteen months after Epstein's death, Visoski, for Plan D, "sold" the aircraft to Six G Aviation LLC, which "sold" it the same day to N550GP LLC of Ontario, [[California]].[^4]
Visoski signed as director of aviation when Air Ghislaine Inc., the company that held a [[Bell 407]] helicopter registered N491GM, bought a Sikorsky S-76C-2 on December 30, 2008. Air Ghislaine changed its name to Shmitka Air Inc. on February 11, 2010 and to Freedom Air International Inc. on July 6, 2010. The Sikorsky, renumbered N722JE, was sold in 2011 to ASI Wings LLC of Hartford, [[Connecticut]], and bought back on June 13, 2019 by Hyperion Air LLC, with Visoski signing as manager, three weeks before Epstein's arrest; Hyperion sold it on May 13, 2021. The agent found no aircraft registered to Epstein or Maxwell personally.[^4]
The territory's 2020 suit against Epstein's estate, filed by Attorney General [[Denise George]], described Plan D, LLC, the owner of the Gulfstream N212JE, as listing Visoski as its sole manager until a July 31, 2019 annual report named Epstein as the principal. It described Hyperion Air, LLC, organized October 19, 2012 with Epstein and Visoski as managers, as the owner of a Bell helicopter (N331JE) and a Keystone helicopter (N722JE) that it alleged Epstein used "to transport young women and underage girls between St. Thomas and [[Little St. James]]." The complaint also named Freedom Air Petroleum LLC and JEGE LLC among the Virgin Islands companies in the enterprise.[^5]
### The Butterfly Trust
A [[Deutsche Bank]] know-your-customer page headed "The 2013 Butterfly Trust," produced to the federal grand jury in New York under the stamp "DB-SDNY," listed the trust's "Current Potential Beneficiaries." Among them were Epstein's assistant [[Lesley Groff]], his lawyer Darren Indyke and "Lawrence Paul Visoski Jr." The trustee was the St. Thomas lawyer [[Erika Kellerhals]].[^6]
### Errands for the Office
On May 16, 2014, Epstein's accountant [[Richard Kahn]] asked Visoski to "poke around tonight about Black Diamond Trading," a company he had heard was trying to buy the St. Thomas Jet Center. Visoski replied, "Here you go Rich ask and ye shall receive," supplied the tail number of the Black Diamond Learjet, and asked, "can you ask if you want me to introduce myself?" Kahn forwarded the information to Epstein, noting that "Larry has obtained some good info on them." Black Diamond Capital Management's founder, [[Stephen Deckoff]], bought Little St. James and [[Great St. James]] from Epstein's estate in May 2023 through his firm SD Investments.[^7]
On September 9, 2014, a charter booker emailed Kahn and Visoski that a JEGE LLC charter flight carrying the New Mexico attorney general and gubernatorial candidate [[Gary King]] and his running mate, [[Deb Haaland]], from Santa Fe was "on the ground at IAD."[^8] On July 25, 2016 the head of security at [[Bard College]] wrote that a helicopter landing for Epstein's visit to the campus would be coordinated with "Epstein's pilot, Larry Visoski, and the local fire company"; the college's president, [[Leon Botstein]], replied "Excellent."[^9]
### Tuition and Favors
Checks from Epstein's JPMorgan Chase account payable to Syracuse University between 2009 and 2012 totaled 106,654 dollars and covered several semesters for Visoski's elder daughter, who attended the university's [[S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications|Newhouse School]] from 2009 to 2013; a check of December 11, 2012 for 22,310 dollars carried her former name in the memo line. Visoski requested a 21,000 dollar personal loan for her fall 2010 tuition and a 22,000 dollar loan for spring 2011. In July 2012 he proposed applying a remaining commission balance toward both daughters' tuition and asked for another loan; Epstein replied "yes." Epstein also paid toward the tuition of a younger daughter at [[Millsaps College]] in [[Mississippi]].[^3]
On April 7, 2011, after his elder daughter was denied an interview for an [[NBC]] internship covering the 2012 London Olympics, Visoski wrote to Epstein: "My believe is the background check they did on me, to eliminate her from being giving this interview. Is there any person or friend of a friend that you may know at NBC or affiliate that may look into the possibility of opening this door for her?" He later forwarded her résumé and [[Harvard Business School]] application essays to Epstein, who reviewed them. From 2011 to 2013, and again in September 2017, she stayed at Epstein's Manhattan townhouse, [[9 East 71st Street]], in stays arranged by Groff. The daughter did not respond to requests for comment, and Visoski's lawyer had no immediate comment; the records do not indicate that Visoski or his family had any involvement in Epstein's crimes.[^3]
### Testimony at the Maxwell Trial
Visoski testified on November 29 and 30, 2021. He named passengers he had flown with Epstein, including [[Donald Trump]] ("There was more than once, I believe"), [[Bill Clinton]], [[Prince Andrew]], Senators [[John Glenn]] and [[George Mitchell]], the actors [[Kevin Spacey]] and [[Chris Tucker]], and the violinist [[Itzhak Perlman]]. He testified that he flew Epstein to [[Columbus, Ohio]] to see [[Leslie Wexner]], whom Epstein called his client, and that "Ms. Maxwell had nothing to do with the passenger manifests." Under cross-examination he said he "never saw any sexual activity" on the aircraft, and of the accuser known at trial as "Jane," "I didn't know her age. She didn't look young." He testified that Epstein kept the cockpit door closed during flights, and confirmed that Epstein had paid for both of his daughters' college education and given him acreage at Zorro Ranch.[^1][^2][^3]
Judge [[Alison Nathan]] relied at sentencing in part on the testimony of two of Epstein's pilots that [[Sarah Kellen]] had been Maxwell's assistant, one element of the four-level leadership enhancement that the [[Second Circuit]] upheld in September 2024.[^10]
### Footnotes
[^1]: Lauren del Valle and Eric Levenson, "Jeffrey Epstein's former pilot testifies Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew flew aboard Epstein's private plane," CNN, November 30, 2021 (syndicated). https://abc17news.com/news/national-world/cnn-national/2021/11/30/prosecution-links-ghislaine-maxwell-to-jeffrey-epstein-while-defense-says-she-is-being-blamed-for-his-actions/
[^2]: Tom Winter and Corky Siemaszko, "Jeffrey Epstein's longtime pilot testifies in trial of Ghislaine Maxwell," NBC News, November 30, 2021. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/jeffrey-epsteins-longtime-pilot-testifies-trial-ghislaine-maxwell-rcna7078
[^3]: "Jeffrey Epstein funded his pilot's daughter's SU tuition." *The Daily Orange,* February 5, 2026. https://dailyorange.com/2026/02/epstein-funded-pilots-daughters-su-tuition/
[^4]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA00021675 to EFTA00021680, DataSet 8, email chain, "RE: FAA Question," between a Special Agent of the Federal Aviation Administration, Law Enforcement Assistance Program, Atlanta, and federal investigators, August 24 to September 29, 2021. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00021675.pdf
[^5]: Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, No. ST-20-CV-14 (V.I. Super. Ct.), Second Amended Complaint, paragraphs 33 to 36, 137 to 139, filed as Exhibit 1 to Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904-JSR (S.D.N.Y.), ECF No. 1-1 (December 27, 2022). https://web.archive.org/web/20260117011558/https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/001-01.pdf
[^6]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA01364303, DataSet 10, Deutsche Bank know-your-customer page "The 2013 Butterfly Trust" (DB-SDNY-0054829); EFTA01372887, DataSet 10, Deutsche Bank "KYC Print," July 15, 2019 (DB-SDNY-0066790). https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01364303.pdf ; https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01372887.pdf
[^7]: Carlson, Suzanne. "Still no resort plans for Epstein's islands purchased by Deckoff." *Virgin Islands Daily News,* February 6, 2026. https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/still-no-resort-plans-for-epsteins-islands-purchased-by-deckoff/article_84d776de-8427-4080-a1b5-6cf81418e23d.html
[^8]: Paras, Julian, and Pat Davis. "Records show Gary King, Deb Haaland used Epstein-linked jet during 2014 campaign." *New Mexico Political Report,* February 17, 2026. https://nmpoliticalreport.com/2026/02/17/records-show-gary-king-deb-haaland-used-epstein-linked-jet-during-2014-campaign/
[^9]: U.S. Department of Justice, Epstein Library, EFTA02047292, DataSet 10, email chain "Re: Jeffrey Epstein visit to Bard," July 25, 2016. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA02047292.pdf
[^10]: United States v. Maxwell, No. 22-1426-cr (2d Cir. Sept. 17, 2024) (Cabranes, Wesley, Lohier, JJ.), reported at 118 F.4th 256. https://storage.courtlistener.com/pdf/2024/09/17/united_states_v._maxwell.pdf

View file

@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ Abigail Koppel, a 31-year-old lawyer, married Wexner in 1993, and the couple set
### Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein
Wexner and Jeffrey Epstein were introduced in the mid-1980s; later reporting placed the meeting around 1986 through insurance executive [[Robert Meister]], who had met Epstein on a flight to Palm Beach.[^13] Wexner wrote in 2019 that he met Epstein "through friends who vouched for and recommended him as a knowledgeable financial professional," and that "Mr. Epstein represented that he had various well-known and respected individuals both as his financial clients and in his inner circle."[^11] Epstein told people he met Wexner in 1986 in Palm Beach and won his confidence by advising him to stay out of the stock market before the 1987 crash; asked by Vanity Fair whether Wexner had known of his work for [[Steven Hoffenberg]] at [[Towers Financial Corporation]], Epstein said he had begun working for Wexner in 1989 and that "it was certainly not the same time." Before he was engaged, Epstein met several times with [[Harold Levin]], then head of Wexner Investments, who found his ideas about currencies incomprehensible; a former Limited vice-chairman, [[Robert Morosky]], said "everyone was mystified as to what his appeal was."[^12] Epstein became Wexner's financial adviser by 1987, and in July 1991 Wexner gave him a power of attorney that authorized Epstein to sign checks, borrow money, buy and sell property, and hire and fire on Wexner's behalf.[^1] A close Wexner adviser, Harold Levin, reportedly warned that he did not trust Epstein, telling Wexner he "smell[ed] a rat," and at least one board member commissioned a background investigation, but Wexner continued the relationship.[^13] According to the [[New York Times]] account, Epstein later engineered Levin's firing by accusing him of stealing from Wexner, an accusation that would subsequently be leveled at Epstein himself.[^15]
Wexner and Jeffrey Epstein were introduced in the mid-1980s; later reporting placed the meeting around 1986 through insurance executive [[Robert Meister]], who had met Epstein on a flight to [[Palm Beach, Florida|Palm Beach]].[^13] Wexner wrote in 2019 that he met Epstein "through friends who vouched for and recommended him as a knowledgeable financial professional," and that "Mr. Epstein represented that he had various well-known and respected individuals both as his financial clients and in his inner circle."[^11] Epstein told people he met Wexner in 1986 in Palm Beach and won his confidence by advising him to stay out of the stock market before the 1987 crash; asked by Vanity Fair whether Wexner had known of his work for [[Steven Hoffenberg]] at [[Towers Financial Corporation]], Epstein said he had begun working for Wexner in 1989 and that "it was certainly not the same time." Before he was engaged, Epstein met several times with [[Harold Levin]], then head of Wexner Investments, who found his ideas about currencies incomprehensible; a former Limited vice-chairman, [[Robert Morosky]], said "everyone was mystified as to what his appeal was."[^12] Epstein became Wexner's financial adviser by 1987, and in July 1991 Wexner gave him a power of attorney that authorized Epstein to sign checks, borrow money, buy and sell property, and hire and fire on Wexner's behalf.[^1] A close Wexner adviser, Harold Levin, reportedly warned that he did not trust Epstein, telling Wexner he "smell[ed] a rat," and at least one board member commissioned a background investigation, but Wexner continued the relationship.[^13] According to the [[New York Times]] account, Epstein later engineered Levin's firing by accusing him of stealing from Wexner, an accusation that would subsequently be leveled at Epstein himself.[^15]
A New York Times Magazine investigation published December 16, 2025 traced Epstein's accumulation of wealth back to his hiring at [[Bear Stearns]] and his early targeting of wealthy businessmen, and detailed how his control over Wexner's accounts gave him unregulated access to fund real estate purchases, including property near [[Mar-a-Lago]] in Palm Beach, the [[9 East 71st Street]] townhouse in Manhattan, and the New Albany mansion.[^13] Epstein also drafted the prenuptial agreement for Wexner's marriage to [[Abigail Wexner|Abigail Koppel]] and obtained tax breaks for Epstein's [[Little St. James]] island in the U.S. Virgin Islands.[^13] The Times wrote that the central unanswered question was what Wexner gained from the relationship, and Wexner declined to participate in the investigation.[^15]
A New York Times Magazine investigation published December 16, 2025 traced Epstein's accumulation of wealth back to his hiring at [[Bear Stearns]] and his early targeting of wealthy businessmen, and detailed how his control over Wexner's accounts gave him unregulated access to fund real estate purchases, including property near [[Mar-a-Lago]] in Palm Beach, the [[9 East 71st Street]] townhouse in Manhattan, and the New Albany mansion.[^13] Epstein also drafted the prenuptial agreement for Wexner's marriage to [[Abigail Wexner|Abigail Koppel]] and obtained tax breaks for Epstein's [[Little St. James]] island in the [[U.S. Virgin Islands]].[^13] The Times wrote that the central unanswered question was what Wexner gained from the relationship, and Wexner declined to participate in the investigation.[^15]
Wexner described the relationship to Vanity Fair for its March 2003 profile: "I think we both possess the skill of seeing patterns. But Jeffrey sees patterns in politics and financial markets, and I see patterns in lifestyle and fashion trends." He called Epstein "very smart with a combination of excellent judgment and unusually high standards. Also, he is always a most loyal friend," and said that "Jeffrey has the unusual quality of knowing when he is winning." Epstein said, "People have said it's like we have one brain between two of us: each has a side." A person who worked for Wexner and saw their contract said Epstein was involved in "everything, not just a little here, a little there. Everything!" and that "Wexner likes having a hatchet man... Whenever there is dirty work to be done he'd stick Jeffrey on it." Epstein inserted himself into the construction of Wexner's 315-foot yacht Limitless, which led to litigation between Wexner and the shipyard, and the lawyer Lars Forsberg said his firm had to sue for its fees. When the co-investors in [[Riddell Sports]] bought out Epstein's stake in 1995 and asked him to guarantee access to a few million dollars against later disputes, Wexner signed for him.[^12]

View file

@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ When Epstein left suicide watch, Tartaglione "was not chosen as the investigatio
### After Epstein's Death
On September 12, 2019 the [[New York Daily News]] published a two-page handwritten letter from Tartaglione: "As far as Jeff Epstein is concerned, I never touched the man. I despise anyone who hurts children but whatever was going to happen to him, I was not going to be a part of it," and "The prison told Epstein they were putting him in a cell with me because they knew I would neither hurt nor extort him. The staff here at MCC had hundreds of inmates to choose from yet I was their first choice." Barket said his client had not been questioned "by any law enforcement official since July 23." Staff of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York circulated the article internally the next day. The Bureau of Prisons later withheld several categories of its records on Tartaglione on the ground that they could "adversely affect the Tartaglione proceedings and influence potential juror's perceptions."[^6][^7]
On September 12, 2019 the [[New York Daily News]] published a two-page handwritten letter from Tartaglione: "As far as Jeff Epstein is concerned, I never touched the man. I despise anyone who hurts children but whatever was going to happen to him, I was not going to be a part of it," and "The prison told Epstein they were putting him in a cell with me because they knew I would neither hurt nor extort him. The staff here at MCC had hundreds of inmates to choose from yet I was their first choice." Barket said his client had not been questioned "by any law enforcement official since July 23." Staff of the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York]] circulated the article internally the next day. The Bureau of Prisons later withheld several categories of its records on Tartaglione on the ground that they could "adversely affect the Tartaglione proceedings and influence potential juror's perceptions."[^6][^7]
### The Note

View file

@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ The department's draft press releases described first a 316-count indictment of
### Later Career
After leaving the Senate race, Thornburgh was appointed UN Under-Secretary General for Administration and Management by President Bush in 1992, serving through 1993. He returned to private practice at K&L Gates in Pittsburgh. In 2002, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York appointed him examiner in the WorldCom bankruptcy; his report included findings on the conduct of Arthur Andersen and Citigroup. In 2004, he co-chaired the independent panel investigating CBS News's *60 Minutes Wednesday* report on President [[George W. Bush]]'s National Guard service.[^1]
After leaving the Senate race, Thornburgh was appointed UN Under-Secretary General for Administration and Management by President Bush in 1992, serving through 1993. He returned to private practice at K&L Gates in Pittsburgh. In 2002, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the [[U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York|Southern District of New York]] appointed him examiner in the WorldCom bankruptcy; his report included findings on the conduct of Arthur Andersen and Citigroup. In 2004, he co-chaired the independent panel investigating CBS News's *60 Minutes Wednesday* report on President [[George W. Bush]]'s National Guard service.[^1]
### Footnotes